Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:27:55.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Structuring the Conditions of Training to Achieve Elite Performance: Reflections on Elite Training Programs and Related Themes in Chapters 10–13

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access

Summary

There can be arguments as to what training revolution we are in the midst of currently (Chatham, Chapters 2 and 10; Hunt, Chapter 5), but what does not seem debatable is that our society now confronts social, technological, and cultural conditions that require a revolution in training. Personnel in industry, health, military, and the public sector have more to learn in less time. Increasingly sophisticated and rapidly changing electronic and other technologies impose additional training demands at the same time that they offer the potential to make training more effective and more portable. The chapters in this section focus on these problems from the perspective of the military, which has always tried to be at the cutting edge of research and knowledge of learning and mastery. The United States Army, for example, requested that the National Academy of Sciences commission a National Research Council Committee study on the techniques for the enhancement of human performance (Druckman & Bjork, 1991, 1994; Druckman & Swets, 1988).

From the perspective of the military, changes in technology, types of wars, and the social/cultural contexts of warfare require that training must continue after military personnel are deployed, including in combat zones. Such changes also require that an elite performer possess a high level of interpersonal and cultural skills and sensitivities, as well as a high level of traditional warfighter skills. To optimize training, given these changes and challenges, requires new perspectives and new technologies, as well as capitalizing on progress in the science of learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Development of Professional Expertise
Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments
, pp. 312 - 330
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. A., & Reynolds, B. (1954). Effect of shift in distribution of practice conditions following interpolated rest. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 32–36.CrossRef
Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1994a). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1994b). Institutional impediments to effective training. In Druckman, D. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance (pp. 295–306) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In Gopher, D. & Koriat, A. (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (2003). Interference and forgetting. In Byrne, J. H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 268–273). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A., & Allen, T. W. (1970). The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 567–572.CrossRef
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A., Kosslyn, S., & Shiffrin, R. (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Christina, R. W., & Bjork, R. A. (1991). Optimizing long-term retention and transfer. In Druckman, D. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance (pp. 23–56). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Cuddy, L. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1982). When forgetting helps memory: Analysis of repetition effects. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 451–467.CrossRef
Dansereau, D. F. (1987). Transfer from cooperative to individual studying. Journal of Reading, 30 (7), 614–619.
Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Memory: Vol. 10. Handbook of Perception and Cognition (pp. 317–344). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). (1991). In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Druckman, D., & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.).(1994). Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Druckman, D., & Swets, J. A. (Eds.). (1988). Enhancing human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.CrossRef
Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369–377.CrossRef
Glenberg, A. M. (1992). Distributed practice effects. In Squire, L. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of learning and memory. (pp. 138–142) New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1943). The principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L., Bjork, R. A., & Kelley, C. M. (1994). Illusions of comprehensions and competence. In Druckman, D. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance (pp. 57–80). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585–592.CrossRef
Krueger, W. C. F. (1929). The effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 71–78.CrossRef
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14 (1), 1–43.CrossRef
Reder, L. M., & Klatzky, R. L. (1994). Transfer: Training for performance. In Druckman, D. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance (pp. 25–56). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.CrossRef
Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352–359.
Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 907–912.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In Thomson, D. M. & Davies, G. M. (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–33). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342–353.CrossRef
Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, C. H. (1930). Introduction and removal of reward and maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 257–275.
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9 (2), 185–211.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×