Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:13:20.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Small cell deployments: system scenarios, performance, and analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Mark C. Reed
Affiliation:
NICTA, Australia
He Wang
Affiliation:
NICTA, Australia
Alagan Anpalagan
Affiliation:
Ryerson Polytechnic University, Toronto
Mehdi Bennis
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Finland
Rath Vannithamby
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Portland, Oregon
Get access

Summary

Mobile device data rates are increasing at effectively Moore's law [1] due to the fact that mobile devices are all integrated in silicon and thus are taking advantage of the reduction in geometry and increase in functionality and the number of transistors per die. The current cellular approach of using large outdoor base station towers to provide mobile broadband via wireless communications, however, does not scale efficiently to cope with the forecast 13-fold increase expected by 2017 [2]. Thus a need for a new approach is required. As we will discuss in this chapter, small cell deployments have the potential to provide a scalable solution to this demand where they are beginning to change the network topology into a so-called heterogeneous network (HetNet) containing a mix of different cell sizes and cell power levels, as shown in Figure 8.1. This will lead to a mix of macro cells, micro cells, pico cells, and femto cells. This deployment is not as uniform as outdoor macro cells with different cell sizes and a much more irregular deployment results.

As we will show in this chapter, small cell network (SCN) deployments provide, for the first time, a low-cost efficient scalable architecture to meet the expected demand. This technology was initially deployed in large scale when femto cells (residential small cells) were first deployed by a number of leading wireless operators (including Vodafone and AT&T). The solution was enabled by two key developments, namely:

  1. • low-cost chip-sets (a so-called “system-on-chip”), which included the entire signal processing and most of the radio software stack, and

  2. • high-speed internet access (greater than Mbps) was available, thus providing the so-called “backhaul” (the connectivity into the network) for these access points.

These developments mean that with volume the effective capital costs of small cells are negligible compared to the cost of deployment and operating costs.

Small cell deployments have a range of topologies and configurations that will depend on the location and the demand requirements. For example, downtown city areas will consist of a combination of small cells where they will exist:

  1. on outdoor light poles to serve “hotspot” traffic needs around cafes and other places where users congregate

  2. in city buildings to serve enterprise customers with high demands on throughput and reliability

  3. in apartments or residential homes to serve private users' needs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Cherry, S., “Edholm's law of bandwidth,” IEEE Spectrum, 41(7), 58–60, July 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] “Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2012–2017,” Cisco Systems, Inc. White Paper, Feb. 2013.
[3] Yavuz, M., Meshkati, F., Nanda, S., et al. “Interference management and performance analysis of UMTS/HSPA+ femtocells,” IEEE Commun. Mag., 47(9), 102–109, Sept. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Femto. Forum, “Interference management in UMTS femtocells,” Femto Forum White Paper, Dec. 2008.
[5] Baszczyszyn, B., Karray, M. K., and Keeler, H. P., “Using Poisson processes to model lattice cellular networks,” Proc. 32nd IEEE Int'l Conf. on Computer Communications (INFOCOM13), Turin, Italy, 2013, pp. 773–781.Google Scholar
[6] Saunders, S. R., Carlaw, S., Giustina, A., Bhat, R. R., Rao, V. S., and Siegberg, R., Femtocells: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Technology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Andrews, J. G., Claussen, H., Dohler, M., Rangan, S., and Reed, M. C., “Femtocells: Past, present, and future,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 30(3), 497–508, Apr. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Chandrasekhar, V., Andrews, J. G., and Gatherer, A., “Femtocell networks: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Mag., 46(9), 59–67, Sept. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Zhao, M., Ruan, M., Chan, R., et al., “Hardware realization of UMTS femtocell modem with uplink interference cancellation,” in Communications and Information Systems Conference (MilCIS), 2012 Military, 2012, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[10] Goldsmith, A., Wireless Communications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., and Ganti, R. K., “A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 59(11), 3122–3134, Nov. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S., and Mecke, J., Stochastic Geometry and its Applications, 2nd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1995.Google Scholar
[13] Ganti, R. K., Baccelli, F., and Andrews, J. G., “A new way of computing rate in cellular networks,” Proc. IEEE International Conf. on Commun. (ICC'11), Kyoto, Japan, June 2011, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[14] Chen, C. S., Nguyen, V. M., and Thomas, L., “On small cell network deployment: A comparative study of random and grid topologies,” Proc. IEEE 76th Vehic. Tech. Conf. (VTC'12-Fall), Québec City, Canada, Sept. 2012, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[15] Haenggi, M. and Ganti, R. K., Interference in Large Wireless Networks. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers Inc., 2009.Google Scholar
[16] Busson, A., “An overview of results on ad hoc network performances using spatial model,” Proc. IEEE Symp. on Computers and Commun. (ISCC'09), Sousse, Tunisia, July 2009, pp. 36–41.Google Scholar
[17] Madhusudhanan, P., Restrepo, J. G., Liu, Y., Brown, T. X., and Baker, K. R., “Multi-tier network performance analysis using a shotgun cellular system,” Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM'11), Houston, USA, Dec. 2011, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
[18] Jo, H.-S., Sang, Y. J., Xia, P., and Andrews, J. G., “Heterogeneous cellular networks with flexible cell association: A comprehensive downlink SINR analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 11(10), 2012, 3484–3495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Dhillon, H. S., Ganti, R. K., Baccelli, F., and Andrews, J. G., “Modeling and analysis of K-tier downlink heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 30(3), Apr. 2012, 550–560,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Wang, C. C., Quek, T. Q. S., and Kountouris, M., “Throughput optimization, spectrum allocation, and access control in two-tier femtocell networks,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 30(3), 561–574, Apr. 2012.Google Scholar
[21] Singh, S., Dhillon, H. S., and Andrews, J. G.. “Offloading in heterogeneous networks: modeling, analysis and design insights”. http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1977.
[22] Zhong, Y. and Zhang, W.. “Multi-channel hybrid access femtocells: A stochastic geometric analysis”. http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1257.
[23] Dhillon, H. S., Ganti, R. K., and Andrews, J. G., “A tractable framework for coverage and outage in heterogeneous cellular networks,” Proc. Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA 11), San Diego, USA, Feb. 2011, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
[24] Dhillon, H. S., Ganti, R. K., Baccelli, F., and Andrews, J. G., “Coverage and ergodic rate in K-tier downlink heterogeneous cellular networks,” Proc. 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton‘11), Monticello, USA, Sept. 2011, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
[25] Holma, H. and Toskala, A., LTE for UMTS: OFDMA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Andrews, J. G., “Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift,” IEEE Commun. Mag., 51(3), 136–144, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Landstrom, S., Furuskar, A., Johansson, K., Falconetti, L., and Kronestedt, F., “Heterogeneous networks: increasing cellular capacity,” Ericsson Review, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011.
[28] Alouini, M.-S. and Goldsmith, A. J., “Area spectral efficiency of cellular mobile radio systems,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 48(4), 1047–1066, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×