Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T20:38:00.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Recovery actions

Captive breeding of island foxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2010

Timothy J. Coonan
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Channel Islands National Park, California
Catherin A. Schwemm
Affiliation:
National Park Service, Flagstaff, Arizona
David K. Garcelon
Affiliation:
Institute for Wildlife Studies, California
Get access

Summary

Captive breeding and reintroduction, especially on Santa Rosa and San Miguel Islands, was the one recovery action that could not fail if island foxes were to be recovered. If the handful of remaining San Miguel and Santa Rosa animals did not produce young before they died, those subspecies would be lost. Island foxes had never been bred in captivity, so it was unknown how adaptable they would be to captive conditions. As it turned out there were significant challenges to captive breeding, primarily less than ideal reproductive success, injuries to females from aggressive males, and considerable perinatal mortality. Despite such difficulties, captivity protected the northern foxes from golden eagles until eagles could be removed, and productivity was high enough that foxes could be released beginning less than five years after the program began. Once foxes were released the wild populations grew quickly (Chapter 9), and captive breeding ended on Santa Catalina in 2005, on San Miguel and Santa Cruz in 2007, and on Santa Rosa in 2008.

Captive breeding efforts on the northern islands

Developing an island fox captive breeding program was a unique challenge for NPS, which had not previously managed such a program and had minimal fiscal resources with which to begin one. The recommendation from an outside group of experts (the Island Fox Conservation Working Group [IFCWG], Chapter 13) to initiate island fox captive breeding provided the agency with a justification for taking the drastic step of removing all of the remaining individuals from the wild, a very difficult decision to make in rare species conservation (Hendron 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Decline and Recovery of the Island Fox
A Case Study for Population Recovery
, pp. 81 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×