Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:52:25.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Conclusion

from PART III - HISTORICAL-COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2019

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

682. OUTLINE – The objective of this Chapter is to synthesize how the controller and processor and processor concepts developed over time. While tracing the origin and development of both concepts, special consideration will be given to how the concepts have been used to determine the allocation of responsibility and liability. Three questions in particular shall serve as a guide:

  • (a) Does the instrument formally define who is responsible for compliance?

  • (b) How does the instrument deal with situations of outsourcing? Is there a formal recognition of agents “acting on behalf of” the entity responsible for compliance?

  • (c) How are responsibility and liability allocated? Is every actor subject to its own independent obligations? Or is a contractual approach adopted?

  • DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONTROLLER CONCEPT

    THE MEANING OF “CONTROL”

    683. ETYMOLOGY – According to Sjöblom, the term “control” was brought into the English language in the late middle ages from the French “contre-rôle”, which meant “duplicate register”. The original meaning of “control” was thus “to take and keep a copy of a roll of accounts and to look for errors theirein” or “to check or verify, and hence to regulate”. By the 17th century, “control” also referred to the nature of the relationship between the verifier and the verified, signifying “mastery” over something or someone.

    684. CONTROL IN THE CONTEXT OF COMPUTING – During the 1940s, computers were seen (and often designated) as “control systems”. For example, computers were deployed for purposes of “gunfire control” or “inventory control”. During the late 1950s, the term “control” became increasingly associated with “management control” in the context of organisational theory. In this context, the concept of “control” has been associated with the generic management process. The generic management process comprises different elements, such as

  • “(1) setting objectives;

  • (2) deciding on preferred strategies for achieving those objectives, and then

  • (3) implementing those strategies while

  • (4) making sure that nothing, or as little as possible, goes wrong”.

  • Both meanings of “control” also found their application in the context of computing and, eventually, in the context of data protection law. As Sjöblom observes:

    “[C]ontrol suggests agency – that someone is using computer-based systems to control something and achieve a certain objective […] With its undertone of domination, control helps highlight issues of power relations inherent in computer use […].”

    Type
    Chapter

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    • Conclusion
    • Brendan Van Alsenoy
    • Book: Data Protection Law in the EU: Roles, Responsibilities and Liability
    • Online publication: 26 June 2019
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688459.022
    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    • Conclusion
    • Brendan Van Alsenoy
    • Book: Data Protection Law in the EU: Roles, Responsibilities and Liability
    • Online publication: 26 June 2019
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688459.022
    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    • Conclusion
    • Brendan Van Alsenoy
    • Book: Data Protection Law in the EU: Roles, Responsibilities and Liability
    • Online publication: 26 June 2019
    • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688459.022
    Available formats
    ×