Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:24:21.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Subjugating the Creative Mind: The Soviet Biological Weapons Program and the Role of the State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Maria N. Zaitseva
Affiliation:
Cornell University
David H. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Arthur J. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
Mark A. Runco
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) invariably carry negative connotations – death and destruction, human suffering, evil intentions, and so on. Yet the process of creativity involved in designing these weapons, which include nuclear, chemical, and biological ones, is, arguably, much more nuanced and less straightforward than simply the intention to cause harm and to commit murder. The motivations for creating WMDs may include a desire to protect one's homeland from external (and internal) enemies, to deter an attack, and consequently, to prevent mass casualties. On the other hand, the weapons' creation may be motivated by the urge to solve purely scientific problems and dilemmas, such as finding ways to battle the plague or creating vaccines for new strands of anthrax or tularemia, for example. It is possible, then, that malevolent and benevolent creativity coexist during the process of WMD creation, which raises the question of how people involved in this process perceive and internalize their actions.

This chapter will explore these questions through the prism of the Soviet biological weapons (BW) program since the end of World War II. Not only was this venture the most massive in scale (and, arguably, ambition) ever undertaken in human history, but it also necessitated a juxtaposition of two seemingly opposite endeavors: the search for and understanding of lifesaving vaccines and the creation of deadly viruses and bacteria capable of killing a great number of people and livestock.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alibek, K. (1999). Biohazard. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, S. & Vogel, K. (2009). Consideration of the social context shaping BW (non)proliferation. Paper presented at the 2009 International Studies Association Convention, New York, February 15–18.
Domaradskij, I. V. & Orent, W. (2003). Biowarrior: Inside the Soviet/Russian biological war machine. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Evangelista, M. (1999). Unarmed force: The transnational movement and the end of the cold war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koblentz, G. (2003–2004). Pathogens as weapons. International Security, 28, 84–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, S. & Voronova, I. (2004). Russian bioweapons: Still the best-kept secret?Nonproliferation Review, Fall, 1–14.Google Scholar
Rimmington, A. (2002). The Soviet Union's offensive program: The implications for contemporary arms control. In S. Wright (Ed.), Biological warfare and disarmament: New problem/new perspectives (pp. 103–148). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Steinbruner, J. (1997–1998). Biological weapons: A plague upon all houses. Foreign Policy, Winter, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, C. & Zaitseva, M. (2008). Germ proliferation: A quantitative analysis of the spread of biological weapons. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, CA, March 26–29.
Wheelis, M., Rózsa, L., & Dando, M. (Eds.). (2006). Deadly cultures: Biological weapons since 1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (Ed.). (1990). Preventing a biological arms race. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×