Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:32:14.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 23 - Personality Is Culturally Constructed and Maintained: Helping Students Think Globally about Themselves and Others

from Personality, Disability, and Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2018

Kenneth D. Keith
Affiliation:
University of San Diego
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Culture across the Curriculum
A Psychology Teacher's Handbook
, pp. 481 - 499
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, R. T. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, R. T., & Rosemont, H. Jr. (1998). The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York, NY: Ballentine.Google Scholar
Dahlgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9, 2032013. doi:10.1037/1089–2680.9.3.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Fingarette, H. (1972). Confucius: The secular as sacred. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A life for our time. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70, 19. doi:10.1037/a0038597Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2011). Culture and theories of personality: Western, Confucian, and Buddhist perspectives. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (pp. 423444). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2013). Personality. In Keith, K. D., (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. III, pp. 995997). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2014). Personality as continuous stochastic process: What Western personality theory can learn from classical Confucianism. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(2), 111128. doi:10.1007/s12124–013–9250–2Google Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2015). Being or becoming: Toward an open-system, process-centric view of personality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 757771. doi:10.1007/s12124–015–9329-zGoogle Scholar
Giordano, P. J. (2017, February 6). Individual personality is best understood as process, not structure: A Confucian-inspired perspective. Culture & Psychology, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1354067X17692118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of personality (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 11111120. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.53.10.1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanhoe, P. J. (2000). Confucian moral self cultivation (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 6480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Tompson, S. (2010). Envisioning the future of cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 92101. doi:10.1111/j.1467–839X.2010.01304.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419449. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709–145357Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224253. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2008). Culture and psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robbins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159181.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201218.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112117. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01619.xGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). The relationship between the structure of inter-individual and intra-individual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In Staudinger, U. & Lindenberger, U. (Eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 339360). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Valsiner, J. (2008). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. In Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout-Yagodzynski, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. I, pp. 2338). Rome: Firera.Google Scholar
Nesselroade, J. R., & Ram, N. (2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1, 929. doi:10.1207/s15427617rhd0101&2_3Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291310. doi:10.1037//0033–295X.108.2.291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosemont, H. Jr., & Ames, R. T. (2009). The Chinese classic of family reverence: A philosophical translation of the Xiaojing. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373386. doi:10.1002/jclp.20237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, W. (1989). Centrality and commonality: An essay on Confucian religiousness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tu, W. (1994). Embodying the universe: A note on Confucian self-realization. In Ames, R. T., Dissanayake, W., & Kasulis, T. P. (Eds.), Self as person in Asian theory and practice (pp. 177186). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279292. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.77.2.279Google Scholar
Wallace, B. A., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 690701. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.61.7.690Google Scholar
Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disciplines and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 227239. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.61.3.227Google Scholar
Wang, F., Peng, K., Chechlacz, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2017). The neural basis of independence versus interdependence orientations: A voxel-based morphometric analysis of brain volume. Psychological Science, 28, 519529. doi:10.1177/0956797616689079Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2017). Five myths about the role of culture in psychological research. APS Observer, 30(1), 2024.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Ross, M. (2005). What we remember and what we tell: The effects of culture and self-priming on memory representations and narratives. Memory, 13, 594606. doi:10.1080/09658210444000223Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×