Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T21:15:40.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Ductile-to-brittle transition under compression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2010

Erland M. Schulson
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Paul Duval
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Our objective in this chapter is to consider the ductile-to-brittle transition within polycrystalline ice loaded under compression. We describe a physical model that accounts quantitatively for the effects (described below) of strain rate, temperature, grain size, confinement, salinity and damage and which accounts as well for the transition within a number of rocks and minerals. We express the transition in terms of a critical strain rate, although it could just as well be expressed in terms of other factors. However, strain rate seems to be the most useful, because it spans the widest range of environmental and microstructural conditions encountered in practice.

The critical strain rate marks the point where compressive strength (Chapters 11 and 12) and indentation pressure (Chapter 14) reach a maximum. It is thus a point of considerable importance in relation to ice loads on offshore structures. It is of interest as well in relation to the rheological behavior of the sea ice cover on the Arctic Ocean (Chapter 15) and to the deformation of icy material of the outer Solar System.

Competition between creep and fracture

Three explanations have been offered. An early view, particularly in relation to the transition during indentation failure in the field (Sanderson, 1988), was that the transitional strain rate marks the conditions under which the first cracks nucleate, somewhat analogous to the transition under tension.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T. L. (1995). Fracture Mechanics. Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, M. F. and Hallam, S. D. (1986). The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states. Acta Metall., 34, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. W. and Gerberich, W. W. (1979). The effect of crystal size and dispersed-solid inclusions on the activation energy for creep of ice. J. Glaciol., 24, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, P., Tabor, D., Walker, F. R. S. and Walker, J. F. C. (1971). The friction and creep of polycrystalline ice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 324, 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batto, R. A. and Schulson, E. M. (1993). On the ductile-to-brittle transition in ice under compression. Acta Metall. Mater., 41, 2219–2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, W. F. and Byerlee, J. D. (1967). Recent experimental studies of brittle fracture of rocks. In Failure and Breakage of Rock, ed. Fairhurst, C.. New York: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc.Google Scholar
Cannon, N. P., Schulson, E. M., Smith, T. R. and Frost, H. J. (1990). Wing cracks and brittle compressive fracture. Acta Metall. Mater., 38, 1955–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. M., Johnson, R. A. and Durell, G. D. (1998). Cyclic loading and creep response of aligned first-year sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 21,751–21,758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, S., Duval, P. and Baudelet, B. (1995). Compressive creep of polycrystalline ice containing a liquid phase. Scr. Metall. Mater., 33, 447–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, L. W. (1997). Statistical characteristics for the type and length of deformation-induced cracks in columnar-grain ice. J. Glaciol., 43, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, R. R., Kronenberg, A. K., Russel, J. E. and Handin, J. (1990). Mechanical anisotropy of gneiss: Failure criterion and textural sources of directional behavior. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowd, T. N. and Rummel, F. (1980). Effect of confining pressure on the fracture-behavior of a porous rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci., 17, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, B. R. and Christie, J. M. (1990). Brittle/ductile and plastic/cataclastic transitions in experimentally deformed and metamorphosed amphibolite. In The Brittle-Ductile Transition in Rocks, eds. Duba, A. G., Durham, W. B., Handin, J. W. and Wang, H. F.. Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union, 243.Google Scholar
Hawkes, I. and Mellor, M. (1972). Deformation and fracture of ice under uniaxial stress. J. Glaciol., 11, 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, H. C. (1960). Transition from brittle fracture to ductile flow in solnhofen limestone as a function of temperature, confining pressure and interstitial fluid pressure. In Rock Deformation, eds. Griggs, D. T. and Handin, J.. New York: Geological Society of America, 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horii, H. and Nemat-Nasser, S. (1986). Brittle failure in compression: Splitting, faulting and brittle-ductile transition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 319, 337–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, D. (2000). Contributions to brittle compressive failure of ice. Ph.D. thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College.
Jordaan, I. J. (2001). Mechanics of ice-structure interaction. Eng. Fract. Mech., 68, 1923–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, F. E., Schulson, E. M. and Jones, D. (2000). Friction of ice on ice at low sliding velocities. Phil. Mag. A, 80, 1693–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S. H. (1980). Tectonic stresses in the lithosphere – constraints provided by the experimental deformation of rocks. J. Geophy. Res., 85, 6353–6363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, G. A., Lee, R. W., Nixon, W. A. and Schulson, E. M. (1988). The structure and tensile behavior of first year sea ice and laboratory grown saline ice. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, IV, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
Lange, M. A. and Ahrens, T. J. (1983). The dynamic tensile-strength of ice and ice-silicate mixtures. J. Geophys. Res., 88, 1197–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, N., Allemand, P., Duval, P., Geraud, Y. and Thomas, P. (2002). Experimental and theoretical deformation of ice-rock mixtures: Implications on rheology and ice content of Martian permafrost. Planet. Space Sci., 50, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meglis, I. L., Melanson, P. M. and Jordaan, I. J. (1999). Microstructural change in ice: II. Creep behavior under triaxial stress conditions. J. Glaciol., 45, 438–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyssonnier, J. and Duval, P. (1989). Creep behaviour of damaged ice under uniaxial compression: A preliminary study. POAC 89; Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions, Luleaa, Sweden, Luleaa University of Technology.Google Scholar
Mogi, K. (1966). Some precise measurements of fracture strength of rocks under uniform compressive stress. Rock Mech. Eng. Geol., 4, 41–55.Google Scholar
Nayar, H. S., Lenel, F. V. and Ansell, G. S. (1971). Creep of dispersions of ultrafine amorphous silica in ice. J. Appl. Phys., 42, 3786–3789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, S. and Schulson, E. M. (1998). The effect of temperature on the ductile-to-brittle transition in columnar ice. 14th International Symposium on Ice, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York; A. A. Balkema Publishers.Google Scholar
Renshaw, C. E. and Schulson, E. M. (2001). Universal behavior in compressive failure of brittle materials. Nature, 412, 897–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedel, H. and Rice, J. R. (1980). Tensile cracks in creeping solids. ASTM-STP, 7700, 112–130.Google Scholar
Sanderson, T. J. O. (1988). Ice Mechanics: Risks to Offshore Structures. London: Graham & Trotman.Google Scholar
Schulson, E. M. (1990). The brittle compressive fracture of ice. Acta Metall. Mater., 38, 1963–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulson, E. M. and Buck, S. E. (1995). The brittle-to-ductile transition and ductile failure envelopes of orthotropic ice under biaxial compression. Acta Metall. Mater., 43, 3661–3668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulson, E. M. and Cannon, N. P. (1984). The effect of grain size on the compressive strength of ice. IAHR Ice Symposium, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Schulson, E. M. and Nickolayev, O. Y. (1995). Failure of columnar saline ice under biaxial compression: Failure envelopes and the brittle-to-ductile transition. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 22,383–22,400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shock, R. N. and Heard, H. C. (1974). Static mechanical properties and shock loading response of granite. J. Geophy. Res., 79, 1662–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoji, H. and Langway, C. C. J. (1985). Comparison of mechanical test on the Dye-3, Greenland ice core and artificial laboratory ice. Ann. Glaciol., 6, 306–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, N. K. (1988). Crack-enhanced creep in polycrystalline material: strain-rate sensitive strength and deformation of ice. J. Mater. Sci., 23, 4415–4428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. R., Schulson, M. E. and Schulson, E. M. (1990). The fracture toughness of porous ice with and without particles. 9th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.
Song, M., Baker, I. and Cole, D. M. (2005). The effect of particles on dynamic recrystallization and fabric development of granular ice during creep. J. Glaciol., 51, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squyres, S. W. (1989). Urey Price Lecture: Water of Mars. Icarus, 79, 229–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullis, J. and Yund, R. A. (1977). Experimental deformation of dry westerly granite. J. Geophy. Res., 82, 5705–5718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. and Ji, S. (1999). Deformation of silicate garnets: Brittle-ductile transition and its geological implications. Can. Mineral., 37, 525–541.Google Scholar
Weertman, J. (1983). Creep deformation of ice. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 11, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, J. (1999). The ductile behaviour of damaged ice under compression. POAC, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×