Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:35:24.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

Lise Bender Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Joanna Sofaer
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Marie Louise Stig Sørensen
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Creativity in the Bronze Age
Understanding Innovation in Pottery, Textile, and Metalwork Production
, pp. 301 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, G. 2007. Thinking Through Craft. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Adamson, G. 2010. The Craft Reader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Alfaro, C. 1984. Tejido y cesteria en la Península Ibérica. Historia de su técnica e industrias desde la Prehistoria hasta la romanización. Bibliotheca Prehistorica Hispana XXI. Madrid: Instituto Español de Prehistoria.Google Scholar
Alfaro, C. 2012. ‘Spain’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textile and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 334–48.Google Scholar
Almevik, G., Bergström, L. and Löfgren, E. (eds.) 2011. Hantverkslaboratorium. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Amin, A. and Roberts, J. 2008. ‘Knowing In Action: Beyond Communities of Practice’. Research Policy 37: 353–69.Google Scholar
Anawalt, P. R. 2007. Weltgeschichte der Bekleidung. Bern, Stuttgart, Vienna: Geschichte Traditionen Kulturen.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. 1994. Patent Nonsense: A Catalogue of Inventions that Failed to Change the World. London: M. Joseph.Google Scholar
Andersson, E. B. 2007. ‘Textile Tools and Production during the Viking Age’. In Gillis, C. and Nosch, M.-L. (eds.) Ancient Textiles: Production, Craft and Society. Proceedings from the First International Conference on Ancient Textiles, held at Lund, Sweden and Copenhagen, Denmark, on March 19–23, 2003. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 1725.Google Scholar
Andersson Strand, E. 2012. ‘The textile chaîne opératoire: using a multidisciplinary approach to textile archaeology with a focus on the ancient Near East’. Paléorient 38 (1–2): 2140.Google Scholar
Andersson Strand, E. and Cybulska, M. 2013. ‘Visualising Ancient Textiles – How to Make a Textile Visible on the Basis of an Interpretation of an Ur III Text’. In Nosch, M.-L., Koefoed, H. and Strand, E. Andersson (eds.) Textile Production and Consumption in the Ancient Near East. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 113–27.Google Scholar
Andresen, S. T. and Karg, S. 2011. ‘Retting pits for textile fibre plants at Danish prehistoric sites dated between 800 bc and ad 1050’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 517–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aner, E. and Kersten, K. 1973–2011. Die Funde der älteren Bronzezeit des nordischen Kreises in Dänemark, Schleswig-Holstein und Niedersachsen. Band I–XII, XVII–XX. Copenhagen and Neumünster: Verlag Nationalmuseum and Karl Wachholz Verlag.Google Scholar
Armbruster, B. 2010. ‘Lithic technology for Bronze Age metalworking’. In Eriksen, B. V. (ed.) Lithic technology in metal using societies. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications 67. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society, pp. 922.Google Scholar
Balen, J. 2005. Sarvaš – neolitičko I eneolitičko naselje. Zagreb: Arheološki muzej u Zagrebu.Google Scholar
Banck-Burgess, J. 1999. Hochdorf IV. Die Textilfunde aus dem späthallstattzeitlichen Fürstengrab von Eberdingen-Hochdorf (Kreis Ludwigburg) und weitere Grabtextilien aus Hallstatt- und latènezeitlichen Kulturgruppen. Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 70. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Barber, E. J. W. 1991. Prehistoric Textiles. The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelheim, M. 2009. ‘Elites and Metals in the Central European Early Bronze Age’. In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies – Studies in honour of Barbara S Ottaway. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Halbert, pp. 446.Google Scholar
Barth, F. E. 1986. Der urzeitliche Bergbau im Grüner Werk des Salzberges Hallstatt. Hallstatt: Verlag des Musealvereines Hallstatt.Google Scholar
Barth, F. E. 1988/89. ‘Zum Goldscheibenfund von Óbuda’. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 118/119: 155–62.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. and van Peer, P. 2009. ‘The Chaîne Opératoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology’. Current Anthropology 50(1): 103–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basler, D., Benac, A., Gabrovec, S., Garašanin, M., Tasič, N., Čović, B. and Vinski-Gasparini, K. (eds.) 1983. Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV. Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne I Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja.Google Scholar
Baudou, E. 1960. Die regionale und chronologische Einteilung der jüngeren Bronzezeit im Nordischen Kreis. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, M. 2012. ‘Italy: Bronze Age’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 203–14.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, M. and Mayr, A. 2009. I reperti tessili, le fusaiole e I pesi da telaio dalla palafitta di Molina di Ledro. Trento: Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Sopraintendenza per i beni library, archivisti e archeologici.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, M., Mayr, A., Moser, L. and Rast-Eicher, A. (eds.) 2003. Textiles: intrecci e tessuti dalla preistoria europea. Catalogo della mostra tenutasi a Riva del Garda dal 24 maggio al 19 ottobre 2003. Trento: Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Servizio beni culturali.Google Scholar
Bech, J.-H. and Mikkelsen, M. 1999. ‘Landscapes, settlement and subsistence in Bronze Age Thy, NW Denmark’. In Fabech, C. and Ringtved, J. (eds.) Settlement and landscape. Proceedings of a conference in Århus, Denmark May 4–7 1998. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society, Aarhus University Press, pp. 6977.Google Scholar
Becker, S. 2015. Birds on Bronzes: a study of religious branding in later prehistoric Europe. Unpublished PhD. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beckerman, S. 2013. ‘Ceramics from Mienakker (A Corded Ware Culture wetland settlement site in the Netherlands)’. In Kleijne, J. P., Brinkkemper, O., Lauwerier, R. C. G. M, Smit, B. I. and Theunissen, E. M. (eds.) A Matter of Life and Death at Mienakker (the Netherlands) Late Neolithic Behavioural Variability in a Dynamic Landscape. Amersfoort: Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands, pp. 3758.Google Scholar
Belanová-Štolcová, T. and Grömer, K. 2010. ‘Loom-weights, Spindles and Textiles – Textile Production in Central Europe from Bronze Age to the Iron Age’. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgard, M. (eds.) North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 920.Google Scholar
Benac, A. (ed.) 1983. Praistorija Jugoslovenskih Zemalja IV. Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja.Google Scholar
Benac, A. (ed.) 1987. Praistorija Jugoslovenskih Zemalja IV. Željezno Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 1984. ‘North European Textile Production and Trade in the 1st Millennium ad – A Research Project’. Journal of Danish Archaeology 3: 124–34.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 1986. Forhistoriske textiler i Skandinavien. Prehistoric Scandinavian Textiles. Nordiske Fortidsminder Ser. B, vol. 9. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 1992. North European Textiles until ad 1000. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 2005. ‘Hallstatt and La Tène Textiles from the Archives of Central Europe’. In Bichler, P., Grömer, K., Hofmann-de Keijzer, R., Kern, A. and Reschreiter, H. (eds.) Hallstatt Textiles. Technical Analysis, Scientific Investigation and experiment on Iron Age Textiles. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1351. Oxford: Archeopress, pp. 133–50.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 2012a. ‘The introduction of sails to Scandinavia: Raw materials, labour and land’. In Berge, R., Jasinski, M. and Sognnes, K. (eds.) N-TAG TEN. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic TAG conference at Stiklestad, Norway 2009. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2399. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 173–81.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 2012b. ‘Writing craftsmanship? Vocabularies and Notation Systems in the Transmission of Craft Knowledge’. In Wendrich, W. (ed.) Archaeology and Apprenticeship. Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 240–54.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 2013a. ‘Spinning Faith’. In Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. (eds.) Embodied Knowledge. Historical Perspectives on Belief and Technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 128–36.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 2013b. ‘The question of prehistoric silks in Europe’. Antiquity 87: 581–8.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. 2013c. ‘The textile remains from Tybrind Vig’. In Andersen, S. H. (ed.) Tybrind Vig. Submerged Mesolithic settlements in Denmark. Højbjerg: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, pp. 393412.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. and Rast-Eicher, A. 2015. ‘Searching for the earliest wools in Europe’. In Grömer, K. and Pritchard, F. (eds.) Aspects of the Design, Production and Use of Textiles and Clothing from the Bronze Age to the Early Modern Era. NESAT XII. Budapest: Archaeolingua Main Series 33, pp. 43–8.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L. and Rast-Eicher, A. 2016. ‘Innovations in Bronze Age Textiles’. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 91(1): 86102.Google Scholar
Bender Jørgensen, L., Grömer, K. and Marić Baković, M. forthcoming. ‘An Early Wool Textile from Pustopolje, Bosnia-Herzegovina’. Antiquity.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1933 [1978]. ‘On the Mimetic Faculty’ (trans. Edmund Jephcott). In Demetz, P. (ed.) Reflections: Essays Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. New York: Schocken, pp. 720–2.Google Scholar
Berciu, D. 1939. Arheologia preistorica a Olteniei. Craiova: Ramuri.Google Scholar
Berciu, D. and Consa, E. 1956. Sapaturile arheologice de la Balta Verde si Gogosu, 1949–1950. Extras din Materiale si cercetari arheologice, vol II. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
Berg, I. 2011. ‘Exploring the Chaîne Opératoire of Ceramics through X-Radiography’. In Scarcella, S. (ed.) Archaeological Ceramics: A Review of Current Research. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2193. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 5763.Google Scholar
Berger, D. 2012. Bronzezeitliche Färbetechniken an Metallobjekten nördlich der Alpen. Eine archäometallurgische Studie zur prähistorischen Anwendung von Tauschierung und Patinierung anhand von Artefakten und Experimenten. Forschungsberichte des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle. Band 2. Halle an der Saale: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt, Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte Halle.Google Scholar
Berger, D., Hunger, K., Bolliger-Schreyer, S., Grolimund, D., Hartmann, S., Hovind, J., Müller, F., Lehmann, E. H., Vontobel, P. and Wörle, M. 2013. ‘New Insights into Early Bronze Age Damascene Technique North of the Alps’. Antiquaries Journal 93: 2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, D., Schwab, R. and Wunderlich, C.-H. 2010. ‘Technologische Untersuchungen zu bronzezeitlichen Metallziertechniken nördlich der Alpen vor dem Hintergrund des Hortfundes von Nebra’. In Meller, H. and Bertemes, F. (eds.) Der Griff nach den Sternen. Wie Europas Eliten zu Macht und Reichtum kamen. Halle: Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle, pp. 751–78.Google Scholar
Bergerbrant, S. 2007. Bronze Age Identities: Costume, Conflict and Contact in Northern Europa 1600–1300 BC. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 43. Lindome: Bricoleur Press.Google Scholar
Bergerbrant, S., Bender Jørgensen, L. and Fossøy, S. H. 2013. ‘Appearance in Bronze Age Scandinavia as seen from the Nybøl burial’. European Journal of Archaeology 16(2): 247–67.Google Scholar
Bergfjord, C., Mannering, U., Frei, K. M., Gleba, M., Scharff, A. B., Skals, I., Heinemeier, J., Nosch, M.-L. and Holst, B. 2012. ‘Nettle as a distinct Bronze Age textile plant’. Scientific Reports 2: Article No. 664.Google Scholar
Birgerstam, P. 2000. Skapande handling –om idéernas födelse. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Bitard, P. and Basset, J. 2008. ‘Design as a tool for innovation’. INNO-GRIPS Mini Study 5.Google Scholar
Blandino, B. 1984. Coiled Pottery, Traditional and Contemporary Ways. Randor, PA: Chilton Book Company.Google Scholar
Blandino, B. 2003. Coiled Pottery. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 1961. The Cretan Collection in Oxford. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. 1990. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (Vol. 1). London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Boden, M. 1998. ‘What is Creativity?’. In Mithen, S. (ed.) Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1543.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. 1996. On Creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boivin, N. 2009. ‘Grasping the Elusive and Unknowable: Material Culture in Ritual Practice’. Material Religion: Journal of Objects, Art and Belief 5: 266–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bóna, I. 1975. Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und Ihre Südöstlichen Beziehungen. Archaeologia Hungarica IL. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bonev, A. 1996. ‘On the question of the so called great chariot from the village of Dupljaja’. Arheologia 38(4): 43.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, L., Faivre, J.-P. and Turq, A. 2004. ‘Ramification des chaînes opératoires: une spécificité du Moustérien?’. Paleo 16: 3748.Google Scholar
Bouzek, J. 1985. The Aegean, Anatolia and Europe: cultural interrelations in the second millennium BC. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 29. Gothenburg and Prague: Paul Åströms & Academia (Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
Bouzek, J. 2000. ‘Versuch einer Rekonstruktion des Pantheons der Urnenfelderzeit’. In Gediga, B. and Piotrowska, D. (eds.) Kultura symboliczna kregu pól popielnicowych epoki brazu i wczesnej epoki zelaza w europie środkowej. Warszawa and Wroclaw: Prace Komisji Archeologieznej, pp. 345–54.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2005. The moon and the bonfire: an investigation of three stone circles in north-east Scotland. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2006. ‘Danish razors and Swedish rocks: Cosmology and the Bronze Age landscape’. Antiquity 80: 372–80.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2009. Image and Audience. Rethinking Prehistoric Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. and Edmonds, M. 1993. Interpreting the Axe Trade: Production and Exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., Jones, A., Myhre, L. N. and Sackett, H. 2002. Sailing through Stone. Carved Ships and the Rock Face at Revheim, Southwest Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review 35(2): 109–18.Google Scholar
Bray, P. and Pollard, A. M. 2012. ‘A new interpretative approach to the chemistry of copper-alloy objects: source, recycling and technology’. Antiquity 86 (333): 853–67.Google Scholar
Breniquet, C. 2008. Essai sur le tissage en Mésopotamie des premièrese communauté sédentaires au milieu du IIIe millénaire avant J.-C. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Broholm, H. C. 1945. Danmarks Bronzealder III. Samlede funds fra den yngre bronzealder. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag. Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Broholm, H. C. 1952. Danske Oldsager. Ældre Bronzealder. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel. Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Broholm, H. C. and Hald, M. 1940. Costumes of the Bronze Age in Denmark. Copenhagen: Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, A. 2011. ‘Technologies of Re-using and Recycling in the Aegean and Beyond’. In Brysbaert, A. (ed.) Tracing Prehistoric Social Networks through Technology: A Diachronic Perspective on the Aegean. London: Routledge, pp. 183203.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, A., Bocchi, L. and Tuosto, E. 2012. ‘Relating archaeological chaîne opératoire and process mining in computer science’. Archeologia e Calcolatori 23: 165–86.Google Scholar
Buchli, V. 2010. ‘Presencing the Im-Material’. In Bille, M., Hastrup, F. and Sørensen, T. F. (eds.) An Anthroplogy of Absence: Materializations of Transcendence and Loss. New York: Springer. pp. 285–03.Google Scholar
Buchvaldek, M. and Strahm, C. (eds.) 1992. Die kontinentaleuropäischen Gruppen der Kultur mit Schnurkeramik. Schnurkeramik-Symposium 1990. Praehistorica 19. Prague: Univerzita Karlova.Google Scholar
Buck, D.-W. 1996. ‘Symbolgut, Opferplätze und Deponierungsfunde der Lausitzer Gruppe’. In Almagro-Gorbea, M. et al. (eds.) Archäologische Forschungen zum Kultgeschehen in der jüngeren Bronzezeit und frühen Eisenzeit Alteuropas. Ergebnisse eines Kolloquiums in Regensburg 4. – 7. Oktober 1993. Regensburg: Universitätsverlag; Bonn: Kommission R. Habelt, pp. 271300.Google Scholar
Budd, P. and Ottaway, B. S. 1995. ‘Eneolithic arsenical copper: chance or choice’. In Jovanovic, B. (ed.) Ancient mining and metallurgy in Southeast Europe. Belgrade: Belgrade Archaeological Institute and the Bor Museum of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 95102.Google Scholar
Budd, P., Gale, N., Pollard, A. M., Thomas, R. G. and Williams, P. A. 1992. ‘The early development of metallurgy in the British Isles’. Antiquity 66 (252): 677–86.Google Scholar
Budden, S. 2007. Renewal and Reinvention: the Role of Learning Strategies in the Early to Late Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin. Unpublished PhD thesis. Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Budden, S. 2008. ‘Skill Amongst the Sherds: Understanding the role of skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary’. In Berg, I. (ed.) Breaking the Mould: challenging the past through pottery, Manchester 2006. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 117.Google Scholar
Budden, S. and Sofaer, J. 2009. ‘Non-discursive Knowledge and the Construction of Identity Potters, Potting and Performance at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19 (2): 203–20.Google Scholar
Burke, B. 2010. From Minos to Midas: Ancient Cloth Production in the Aegean and in Anatolia. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Butler, A. 1979. The Batsford Encyclopaedia of Embroidery Stitches. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2002. Ingots and insights: reflections on rings and ribs’. In Bartelheim, M, Pernicka, E and Krause, R (eds.) Die Anfänge der Metallurgie in der alten Welt. Rahden: Leidorf, pp. 229–44.Google Scholar
Butler, J. J. and Smith, I. 1956. ‘Razors, Urns and the British Middle Bronze Age’. University of London, Institute of Archaeology, Annual Report 12 (1956): 2052.Google Scholar
Calas, G., Galoisy, L. and Kiratisin, A. 2005. ‘The origin of the green color of variscite’. American Mineralogist 90 (5–6): 984–90.Google Scholar
Cannavò, V., Cardarelli, A., Levi, S. T., Lugli, S. and Vezzalini, G. 2012. Pottery Production in Bronze Age Settlements of the Modena Era (Northern Italy). Atti Convegno Aiar 2012, Vi Congresso Nazionale Di Archeometria, Modena. Bologna.Google Scholar
Cassau, A. 1935. ‘Ein Feuersteindolch mit Holzgriff und Lederscheide aus Wiepenkathen, Kreis Stade’. Mannus Zeitschrift für Deutsche Vorgeschichte Bd. 27: 199209.Google Scholar
Cattani, M. 1997. ‘Una fornace per ceramica delle terramare’. In Bernabò Brea, A. M., Cararelli, A. and Cremaschi, M. (eds.) Catalogo della mostra. Milan: Electa, pp. 507–11.Google Scholar
Cattin, F., Villa, I. M. and Besse, M. 2009. ‘Copper supply during the Final Neolithic at the Saint-Blaise/Bains des Dames site (Neuchâtel, Switzerland)’. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 3: 161–76.Google Scholar
Cermanović-Kuzmanović, A. 1961. ‘Nova nekropola Žutobrdske culture Pesak kod Korbova’. Starinar, Beograd XI, str. 24, sl. 7.Google Scholar
Chantréaux, G. 1941–42. ‘Le tissage sur metier de haute lisse a Ait-Hichem et dans le Haut Sebaou’. Revue Africaine 85: 78116, 212–29; 86: 261313.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1930. The Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1944. ‘Archaeological ages as technological stages’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 74: 724.Google Scholar
Chimero, F. 2012. The Shape of Design. New York.Google Scholar
Christiansen, C. 2004. ‘A reanalysis of fleece evolution studies’. In Maik, J. (ed.). Priceless Invention of Humanity – Textiles. Lodz: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk, pp. 1118.Google Scholar
Ciszuk, M. and Hammarlund, L. 2008. ‘Roman looms – a study of craftsmanship and technology’. In Alfaro, C. and Karali, L. (eds.) Vestidos, Textiles y Tintes. Estudios sobre la producción de bienes de consumos en la Antigüedad (PURPUREAE VESTES II). Valencia: Universitet de València, pp. 119–34.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, J. 1989. A natural history of domesticated animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comis, S. Y. 2003. ‘Prehistoric Garments from the Netherlands’. In Bender Jørgensen, L., Banck-Burgess, J. and Rast-Eicher, A. (eds.) Textilien aus Archäologie und Geschichte. Festschrift Klaus Tidow. Neumünster: Wachholz Verlag, pp. 193204.Google Scholar
Cook, J. G. 1968. Handbook of Textile Fibres. I. Natural Fibres. Watford: Merrow Publishing Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Cooke, W. D., El-Gamal, M. and Brennan, A. 1991. ‘The Hand-Spinning of Ultrafine Yarns, Part 2. The Spinning of Flax’. Bulletin du Centre International d’Étude des Textiles Anciens 69: 1723.Google Scholar
Cooney, G. 2002. ‘So many shades of rock: colour symbolism and Irish stone axeheads’. In Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. (eds.) Colouring the Past. Oxford: Berg, pp. 93107.Google Scholar
Cooney, G. 2012. Landscapes of Neolithic Ireland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coxon, S. 2010. Creative Choices: The Investigation of Creativity in Late Bronze Age Ceramic Production at Szazhalombatta, Hungary. Unpublished MA dissertation. Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Coxon, S. 2015. Creativity, Practice and Tradition. An Exploration of Belegiš Ceramics. Unpublished PhD thesis. Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Črešnar, M. 2010. ‘Poskus določitve kulturne skupine Kisapostag v vzhodni Sloveniji (Attempted definition of the Kisapostag culture of the Early Bronze Age in north-eastern Slovenia)’. Zbornik soboškega muzeja 15: 107–34.Google Scholar
Crocker-Jones, G. 1989. Traditional Spinning and Weaving in the Sultanate of Oman. Ruwi: Historical Association of Oman.Google Scholar
Crowfoot, G. M. 1931. Methods of Hand Spinning in Egypt and the Sudan. Bankfield Museum Notes, Second Series, No. 12. Halifax: Bankfield Museum.Google Scholar
Crown, P. 2007. ‘Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology’. American Antiquity 72 (4): 677–90.Google Scholar
Csányi, M. 1982–83. ‘A nagyrévi kultúra leletei a Közép-Tiszavidékről’. SzMMÉ 1902–83: 3365.Google Scholar
Csányi, M. 1992. ‘Bestattungen, Kult und Sakrale Symbole der Nagyrév-Kultur’. In Meier-Arendt, W. (ed.) Bronzezeit in Ungarn. Forschungen in Tell-Siedlungen an Donau und Theiss. Frankfurt an Main, pp. 83–7.Google Scholar
Csengeri, P. 2001. ‘Adatok a Bükki Kultúra Keraámiamûvességének Ismeretéhez: a Felsõvadász-Várdombi Település Leletanyaga’. A Miskolci Herman Ottó Múzeum Évkönyve 40: 72103.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity, Glow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Curtis, N., Popovic, L., Wilkin, N. and Wright, M. 2010. ‘The moon, the bonfire and the beaker? Analysing white inlay from beaker pottery in Aberdeenshire’. Past 65: 35.Google Scholar
Czyborra, I. 1997. ‘Eisenzeitliche Vogeldarstellungen im ägäisch-adriatischen Raum’. In Becker, C. (ed.) Xpóvoç. Beiträge zur prähistorischen Archäologie zwischen Nord- und Südosteuropa. Festschrift für Bernhard Hänsel (Internationale Archäologie. Studia onoraria). Espelkamp, pp. 619–26.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, J. 2004. Ältere Bronzezeit in Polen (Starsza epoka brązu w Polsce). Warsaw: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Davaras, C. 1976. Guide to Cretan Antiquities. Athens: Eptalofos S.A.Google Scholar
Davey, C. J. 2009. ‘The early history of lost-wax casting’. In Mei, J. and Rehren, T. H. (eds.) Metallurgy and Civilisation: Eurasia and Beyond. London: Archetype, pp. 147–54.Google Scholar
Davies, W. V. 1982. ‘Razors’. In Freed, R. E. (ed.) Egypt’s Golden Age: The Art of Living in the New Kingdom 1558–1085 bc. Boston, MA: Museum of Fine Arts, pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
De La Fuente, G. 2011. ‘Chaîne Opératoire, Technical Gestures and Pottery Production at Southern Andes during the Late Period (c. ad 900 – ad 1450) (Catamarca, Northwestern Argentina, Argentina)’. In Scarcella, S. (ed.) Archaeological Ceramics: A Review of Current Research. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2193. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 89102.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1966. ‘Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’. In Derrida (ed.), J. Writing and Difference, trans. A. Bass. London: Routledge, pp. 278–94.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1934 (reprinted 2005). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
Diemer, G. 1995. Der Bullenheimer Berg und seine Stellung im Siedlungsgefüge der Urnenfelderkultur Mainfrankens, Materialhefte zur bayerischen Vorgeschichte, Band 70. Kallmünz: Michael Lassleben.Google Scholar
Dimbleby, G. 1978. Plants and Archaeology. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, S. 1977–78. ‘Zur Frage der Genese und der Gliederung der Vučedoler Kultur in dem Zwischenstromlande Donau-Drau-Sawe’. Vjesnik Arheološkog muzeja u Zagrebu, 3. s., X–XI: 196.Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, S. 1979. Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja III. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka I Umjetnosti Bosne I Hercegovine. Centar za balkanolsoška ispitivanja, pp. 267341.Google Scholar
Dizdar, M., Ložnjak Dizdar, D. and Mihelić, S. 2011. Early Urnfield Culture in Northern Croatia – New Challenges. Osijek: Arkeološki muzej Osijek I Arkeološki muzej Zagreb.Google Scholar
Dobres, M. A. 2000. Technology and Social Agency. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dovell-Dennis, T. 2011. Deiseal and Withershins: Exploring the Celtic Sunwise Way. Unpublished MA thesis. Winston-Salem: Wake Forest University.Google Scholar
Drescher, H. 1962. ‘Neue Untersuchungen am Sonnenwagen von Trundholm und über die Gusstechnik bronzezeitlicher Tierfiguren’. Acta Archeologica 33: 3962.Google Scholar
Drescher, H. 1963. ‘Untersuchungen der Technik einiger bronzezeitlicher Rasiermesser und Pinzetten’. Die Kunde. Neue Folge 14, Hildesheim, pp. 125–42.Google Scholar
Duberow, E., Pernicka, E. and Krenn-Leeb, A. 2009. ‘Eastern Alps or Western Carpathians: Early Bronze Age Metal within the Wieselburg Culture’. In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies – Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Halbert, pp. 328–49.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, V. 1961. Necropola de incineraţie din epoca bronzului de la Cîrna. Biblioteca de Arheologie 4. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
Durman, A. 1988. ‘The Vučedol Culture’. In Durman, A. (ed.) Vučedol. Three Thousand Years bc. Exhibition Catalogue, Zagreb: Muzejsko-galerijski centar and Department of Archaeology of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb, pp. 4548.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 2002. Bronze Age Economics: The Beginnings of Political Economies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Earle, T. and Kristiansen, K. 2010. ‘Introduction: Theory and Practice in the Late Prehistory of Europe’. In Earle, T. and Kristiansen, K. (eds.) Organizing Bronze Age societies; the Mediterranean, Central Europe, and Scandinavia compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133.Google Scholar
Egg, M. and Goedecker-Ciolek, R. 2009. ‘Ausrüstung und Kleidung’. In Egg, M. and Spindler, K. (eds.) Kleidung und Ausrüstung der kupferzeitlichen Gletschermumie aus den Ötztaler Alpen. Mainz: Schnell and Steiner, pp. 57163.Google Scholar
Egg, M. and Spindler, K. 2009. Kleidung und Ausrüstung der kupferzeitlichen Gletschermumie aus den Ötztaler Alpen. Mainz: Schnell & Steiner.Google Scholar
Ehlers, S. 1998. Bronzezeitliche Textilien aus Schleswig-Holstein. Eine technische Analyse und Funktionsbestimmung. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kiel: Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.Google Scholar
Ellison, A. 1980. ‘The Bronze Age’. In Freke, D. (ed.) The Archaeology of Sussex Pottery. Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. 118, pp. 3141.Google Scholar
Emery, I. 1966. The Primary Structures of Fabrics. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Erez, M. and Nouri, R. 2010. ‘Creativity: the influence of cultural, social and work contexts’. Management and Organization Review 6 (3): 351–70.Google Scholar
Ernst, R. 1995. Begegnungen des urnenfelderzeitlichen Europa mit Ägypten: Eine Annährung. Hephaistos 13: 1956.Google Scholar
Escobar, T. 2007. The Curse of Nemur: In Search of the Art, Myth, and Ritual of the Ishir. Trans. A. M. C. Johnson. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Evans, A. 1906. The Prehistoric Tombs of Knossos. 1: The Cemetery of Zafer Papoura. 2: The Royal Tombs of Isopata. Archaeologia 59. London: B. Quaritch.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F. 2012. ‘Articulating Stone: The Material Practice of Petroglyphing’. In Back Danielsson, I.-M., Fahlander, F. and Sjöstrand, Y. (eds.) Encountering Imagery. Materialities, Perceptions, Relations. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 37. Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 97115.Google Scholar
Farke, H. 1993. ‘Textile Reste von Dietzhausen und Schwarza’. In Feustel, R. (ed.) Zur bronzezeitlichen Hügelgräberkultur in Südthüringen. Alt-Thüringen 27: 109–12.Google Scholar
Filipov, T. 1974. ‘Keramika i idolna plastika ot kasnobronzovia nekropol pri s. Orsoa, Mihailovgradski okrug’. Arheologia 16: 1223.Google Scholar
Flohr Sørensen, T. 2013. ‘Original Copies: Seriality, similarity and the simulacrum in the Early Bronze Age’. Danish Journal of Archaeology 1(1): 4561.Google Scholar
Fokkens, H. and Harding, A. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fossøy, S. H. 2012. Rom for variasjon. En studie i bronsealderens tekstilhåndverk. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Technology and Science.Google Scholar
Fossøy, S. H. and Bergerbrant, S. 2013. ‘Creativity and corded skirts from Bronze Age Scandinavia’. Textile. Journal of Cloth and Culture 11(1): 2037.Google Scholar
Frangipane, M., Andersson Strand, E., Laurito, R., Möller-Wiering, S., Nosch, , Rast-Eicher, M. -L., , A. and Wisti Lassen, A. 2009. ‘Arslantepe, Malatya (Turkey): Textiles, Tools and Imprints of Fabrics from the 4th to the 2nd Millennium bce’. Paléorient 35: 529.Google Scholar
Freed, R. E. 1982. ‘Toilette implement in the shape of a horse’. In Freed, R. E. (ed.) Egypt’s Golden Age: The Art of Living in the New Kingdom 1558–1085 bc. Boston, MA: Museum of Fine Arts, p. 195.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, M. and Kaul, F. 2007. ‘Sonne und Schiff. Die Schiffdarstellungen des Nordens inder Bronzezeit’. In von Carnap-Bornheim, C. and Radtke, C. (eds.) Es war einmal ein Schiff. Archäologische Expeditionen zum Meer. Hamburg: Marebuchverlag, pp. 77107.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 2001. ‘The Iron Cage of Creativity: An Exploration’. In Liep, J. (ed.) Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 4661.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W. L. and Heinemeier, J. 2009. ‘The Minoan eruption of Santorini radiocarbon dated to 1613+/- 13 bc – geological and stratigraphical considerations’. In Warburton, D. V. (ed.) Time’s Up! Dating the Minoan eruption of Santorini. Acts of the Minoan Eruption Chronology Workshop, Sandbjerg, November 2007. Monographs of the Danish Institute at Athens 10, 2009. Athens: Danish Institute at Athens, pp. 5663.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. and Coward, F. 2010, ‘Metaphor and materiality in earliest prehistory’. In Malafouris, L. and Renfrew, C. (eds.) The Cognitive Life of Things. Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research, pp. 4758.Google Scholar
Garašanin, D. 1951. ‘Prilog proučavanju Dupljajskih kolica. (Contribution to the study of the Dupljaja chariot)’. Starinar 2: 270.Google Scholar
Garašanin, D. 1973. Praistorija Srbije (Prehistory of Serbia). Belgrade: Srpska književna zadruga.Google Scholar
Garašanin, D. 1983a. ‘Period polja sa urnama Vojvodine’. In Basler, D., Benac, A., Gabrovec, S., Garašanin, M., Tasič, N., Čović, B. and Vinski-Gasparini, K. (eds.) Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV. Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne I Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja, pp. 668–84.Google Scholar
Garašanin, D. 1983b. ‘Vatinska Grupa’. In Basler, D., Benac, A., Gabrovec, S., Garašanin, M., Tasič, N., Čović, B. and Vinski-Gasparini, K. (eds.) Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV. Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka I Umjetnosti Bosne I Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja, pp. 504–19.Google Scholar
Gauntlett, D. 2007. Creative Explorations: New Approaches to Identities and Audiences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gauntlett, D. 2011. Making is Connecting. The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to You Tube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gediga, B. 1970. Motywy figuralne w sztuce ludności kultury łużyckiej. Wroclaw: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Gedl, M. 1996. ‘Symbolgut, Opferplätze und Deponierungsfunde in Süd und Ostpolen’. In Almagro-Gorbea, M. (ed.) Archäologische Forschungen zum Kultgeschehen in der jüngeren Bronzezeit und frühen Eisenzeit Alteuropas: Ergebnisse eines Kolloquiums in Regensburg, 4. – 7. Oktober 1993. Regensburg: Universitätsverlag Regensburg, pp. 349–60.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1992. ‘The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology’. In Coote, J. and Shelton, A. (eds.) Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 4066.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gelling, P. and Davidson, E. 1969. The Chariot of the Sun and other Rites and Symbols of theNorthern Bronze Age. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Gherdan, K., Biró, K. T., Szakmány, Gy., T. and Sólymos, M.. 2003. ‘Analysis of incrusted pottery from Vörs, southwest Hungary’. In Prudêncio, M. I., Dias, M. I. and Waerenborogh, J. C. (eds.) Understanding People Through Their Pottery. Proceedings of the 7th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics (EMAC’03), pp. 103–8.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 2002. Prehistoric Pottery in Britain and Ireland. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. 1977. ‘The Theory of Affordances’. In Shaw, R. and Bansford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, Knowing:Towards an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Girić, M. 1971. Mokrin. The Early Bronze Age Necropolis. Belgrade: Smithsonian Institution and Archaeological Society of Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
Gleba, M. 2008a. Textile Production in Pre-Roman Italy. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Gleba, M. 2008b. ‘Aratae vestes: Gold textiles in the ancient Mediterranean’. In Alfaro, C. and Karali, L. (eds.) Purpureae vestes II. Textiles and Dyes in Antiquity. Vestidos, textiles y Tintes. Symposium Athen 24.-26. Nov. 2005. València: Universitat de València, pp. 6178.Google Scholar
Gleba, M. 2012. ‘From textiles to sheep: investigating wool fibre development in pre-Roman Italy using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)’. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3643–61.Google Scholar
Gleba, M. and Krupa, T. 2012. ‘Ukraine’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 399427.Google Scholar
Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. 2012. ‘Introduction: Textile Preservation, Analysis and Technology’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Godal, J. B. 1994. Tre til tekking og kleding. Frå den eldre materialforståinga. Oslo: Landbruksforlaget.Google Scholar
Godal, J. B. 1996. Tre til Laft og Reis. Oslo: Landbruksforlaget.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, J. and Mazursky, D. 2002. Creativity in Product Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhahn, J. 1999. Sagaholm hällristningar och gravritual. Studia Archaeologica Universitatis Umensis 11. Umeå: Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. 2001. ‘Making sense: archaeology and aesthetics’. World Archaeology 32: 163–7.Google Scholar
Granger-Taylor, H. 1982. ‘Weaving clothes to shape in the Ancient World: The tunic and toga of the Arringatore’. Textile History 13(1): 225.Google Scholar
Gräslund, B. 1994. ‘Prehistoric Soul Beliefs in Northern Europe’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60: 1526.Google Scholar
Grasselt, T. 1999. ‘Die späthallstattzeitlichen Gräber von Henfstädt-Strick, Lkr. Hildburghausen’. Alt-Thüringen Bd 33: 3080.Google Scholar
Green, H. S. 1985. ‘The Caergwrle Bowl – not oak but shale’. Antiquity 59: 116–17.Google Scholar
Green, M. W. 1980. ‘Animal Husbandry at Uruk in the Archaic Period’. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 39: 136.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. 2000. ‘Children, material culture and weaving’. In Sofaer, J. (ed.) Children and Material Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 7286.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., Maynard, A. E. and Childs, C. P. 2003. ‘Historical change, cultural learning and cognitive representation Zinacantec Maya children’. Cognitive Development 18: 455–87.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2005. ‘Efficiency and Technique – Experiments with Original Spindle Whorls’. In Bichler, P., Grömer, K., Hoffman de Kejer, R., Kern, A. and Reschreiter, H. (eds.) Hallstatt Textiles. Technical Analysis, Investigation and Experiment on Iron Age Textiles. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1351. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 8190.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2006a. ‘Vom Spinnen und Weben, Flechten und Zwirnen. Hinweise zur neolithischen Textiltechnik an österreichischen Fundstellen. Festschrift für Elisabeth Ruttkay’. Archäologie Österreichs 17/2: 177–92.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2006b. ‘Textilien der Bronzezeit in Mitteleuropa’. Archaeologia Austriaca 90/2006: 3172.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2007. Bronzezeitliche Gewebefunde aus Hallstatt. Ihr Kontext in der Textilkunde Mitteleuropas und die Entwicklung der Textiltechnologie zur Eisenzeit. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Vienna: University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2010. Prähistorische Textilkunst in Mitteleuropa. Geschichte des Handwerkes und der Kleidung vor den Römern. Veröffentlichungen der Prähistorischen Abteilung des Naturhistorischen Museums 4. Vienna: Naturhistorisches Museum Wien.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. 2012. ‘Austria: Bronze and Iron Ages’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 2764.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. and Kern, D. 2010. ‘Technical data and experiments on corded ware’. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 3136–45.Google Scholar
Grömer, K. and Mödlinger, M. 2005. ‘Metallographische und textilkundliche Untersuchungen an einem urnenfelderzeitlichen Schwert aus Nordböhmen’. Archäologie Österreichs 16/2, 2005: 2731.Google Scholar
Grömer, K., Kern, A., Reschreiter, H. and Rösel-Mautendorfer, H. (eds.) 2013a. Textiles from Hallstatt. Weaving Culture in Bronze Age and Iron Age Salt Mines. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Grömer, K., Rösel-Mautendorfer, H. and Bender Jørgensen, L. 2013b. Visions of Dress. Recreating Bronze Age Clothing from the Danube Region. Textile, Journal of Cloth and Culture 11(3): 218–41.Google Scholar
Grömer, K., Rösel-Mutendorfer, H. and Reschreiter, H. 2014. ‘Out of the dark … New textile finds from Hallstatt’. In Bergerbrant, S. and Fossøy, S. H. (eds.) A stitch in time … Essays in Honour of Lise Bender Jørgensen. GOTARC Series A, No. 4., Gothenburg University, pp. 129–14.Google Scholar
Guba, S. and Szeverényi, V. 2007. Bronze Age bird representations from the Carpathian Basin. Budapest: Communications Archaeologicae Hungariae, pp. 75110.Google Scholar
Guildford, J. P. 1965. Intelligence: 1965 model. American Psychologist 21(1): 20.Google Scholar
Guštin, M. 2005. ‘Starejša bronasta doba v Prekmurju: horizont pramenaste (litzen) lončenine (Die Ältere Bronzezeit im Prekmurje: Horizont der Litzenkeramik)’. Zbornik soboškega muzeja 8: 8598.Google Scholar
Hägg, I. 1995. ‘Rezension of Bender Jørgensen North European textiles until ad 1000’. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 70: 136–44.Google Scholar
Hahn, H. P. 2012. ‘Words and things: reflections on people’s interaction with the material world’. In Maran, J., J. and Stockhammer, P. W. (eds.) Materiality and Social Practice. Transformative Capacities of Intercultural Encounters. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 412.Google Scholar
Hald, M. 1980. Ancient Danish Textiles from Bogs and Burials. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2011. ‘Archaeologies of the Senses’. In Insoll, T. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 208–25.Google Scholar
Hänsel, A. 2003. ‘Wie sich die Sonne zum Sonnengott wandelt. Die Bedeutung des Lichts für die Kulturen der Bronzezeit’. Fundiert: Das Wissenschaftsmagazin der FU Berlin 1: 2835.Google Scholar
Harding, A. 2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrad, L. 2004. ‘Gabbroic Clay Sources in Cornwall: A Petrographic Study of Prehistoric Pottery and Clay Samples’. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 23(3): 271–86.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 2010. ‘Smooth and Cool, or Warm and Soft: Investigating the Properties of Cloth in Prehistory’. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgaard, M. (eds.) NESAT X. North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 104–12.Google Scholar
Hastrup, K. 2007. ‘Performing the World: Agency, Anticipation and Creativity’. In Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.) Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 193206.Google Scholar
Heckett, E. W. 1998. ‘A Late Bronze Age Horsehair Ornament from Cromaghs, Armoy in Ireland’. In Bender Jørgensen, L. and Rinaldo, C. (eds.) Textiles in European Archaeology. Report from the 6th NESAT Symposium, 7th–11th May in Boraas. GOTARC Series A, Vol. 1. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, pp. 2938.Google Scholar
Heckett, E. W. 2012. ‘Scotland and Ireland’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 428–43.Google Scholar
Hedges, J. W. 1973. Textiles and Textile Production in Prehistoric Britain. Unpublished MA thesis. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2007. Philosophy of Mind (translated by W. Wallace and A. V. Miller with a revised commentary by Michael Inwood). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Hencken, H. 1968. Tarquinia, Villanovans and Early Etruscans I-II. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin 23. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Henshall, A. S. 1950. ‘Textiles and Weaving Appliances in Prehistoric Britain’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (New Series) 16: 130–62.Google Scholar
Herbig, C. and Maier, U. 2011. ‘Flax for oil or fibre? Morphometric analysis of flax seeds and new aspects of flax cultivation in Late Neolithic wetland settlements in southwest Germany’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 527–33.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2004. ‘Boundaries of Creation: The Work of Credibility in Science and Ceremony’. In Hirsch, E. and Strathern, M. (eds.) Transactions and Creations. Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 176–92.Google Scholar
Hirschler, I. 2009. ‘Vinkovačka Kultura’. In Čataj, L. (ed.) Josipovac Punitovački – Veliko polje I. Zaštitna arheološka istraživanja na trasi autoceste A5. Eneolitičko, brončanodobno I srednjovjekovno naselje. Zagreb: Hrvatski restauratorski zavod, pp. 141–71.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987. The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, I. M. 1954. ‘Studies in the Late Bronze Age in Ireland: 1. Stone and Clay Moulds, and Wooden Models for Bronze Implements’. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 17: 6280.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. 1964. The Warp-Weighted Loom. (Studia Norvegica 1). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. 1991. Fra fiber til tøy. Oslo: Landbruksforlaget.Google Scholar
Hofmann-de Keijzer, R., van Bommel, M. R., Joosten, I., Hartl, A., Gaibor, A. N. P., Heiss, A. G., Kralofsky, R., Erlach, R. and de Groot, S. 2013. ‘The colours and dyeing techniques of prehistoric textiles from the salt mines of Hallstatt’. In Grömer, K. et al. (eds.) Textiles from Hallstatt. Weaving Culture in Bronze Age and Iron Age Salt Mines. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 135–62.Google Scholar
Hogarth, D. G. 1900. ‘The Dictaean Cave’. Annual of the British School at Athens VI, 1899–1900: 94116.Google Scholar
Høgseth, H. B. 2012. ‘Knowledge Transfer: The Craftsmen’s Abstraction’. In Wendrich, W. (ed.) Archaeology and Apprenticeship. Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 6178.Google Scholar
Høgseth, H. B. 2013. ‘The Language of Craftsmanship’. In Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. (eds.) Embodied Knowledge. Historical Perspectives on Belief and Technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 95105.Google Scholar
Højrup, O. 1967. Landbokvinden. Rok og Kærne. Grovbrød og Vadmel. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Holden, J. L., Phakey, P. P. and Clement, J. G. 1995. ‘Scanning electron microscope observationsof heat-treated human bone’. Forensic Science International 74: 2945.Google Scholar
Höppner, B., Bartelheim, , Huijsmans, M., Krauss, M., Martinek, R., Pernicka, K.-P., , E. and Schwab, R. 2005. ‘Prehistoric Copper Production in the Inn Valley (Austria), and the Earliest Copper in Central Europe.’ Archaeometry 47: 293315.Google Scholar
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J. and Dekoninck, E. 2008. ‘Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature’. Design Studies 29(2): 160–80.Google Scholar
Hurcombe, L. 2000. ‘Time, Skill and Craft Specialisation as Gender Relations’. In Donald, M. and Hurcombe, L. (eds.) Gender and Material Culture in Archaeological Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 88109.Google Scholar
Hurcombe, L. 2007A sense of materials and sensory perception in concepts of materiality’. World Archaeology 39(4): 532–45.Google Scholar
Ilkić, M. 2006. ‘Terakote kasnog brončanog i starijeg željeznog razdoblja iz Sotina’. Prilozi Instituta arheologije u Zagrebu 23: 5366.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007a. ‘Materials Against Materiality’. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1): 116.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007b. ‘Modes of Creativity in life and Art. Introduction’. In Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.) Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 4554.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2007c. Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2010. Bringing things the life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Working Paper Series, pp. 115.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2013. Making. Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. and Hallam, E. 2007. ‘Creativity and Cultural Improvisation: An Introduction’. In Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.) Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Jacomet, S. 2013. ‘Zur Geschichte der Archäobotanik’. In Burga, C. A. (ed.) Oswald Heer 1809–1883, Paläobotaniker – Entomologe – Gründerpersönlichkeit. Zürich: Neue Zürcher Zeitung NZZ Libro, pp. 315–24.Google Scholar
Jeanes, E. L 2006. ‘Resisting Creativity, Creating the New’. A Deleuzian Perspective on Creativity’. Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2): 127–34.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 1998. Manden i kisten. Hvad bronzealderens gravhøje gemte. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 2000. Rav. Nordens guld. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1971. Die Rasiermesser in Mitteleuropa. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung VIII, Band 1. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1974a. ‘Eine Bronzeamphore des 8. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. von Gevelinghausen, Kr. Meschede (Sauerland)’. Germania 52: 1654.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1974b. ‘Ein reich verziertes Protovillanova-Rasiermesser – ein Beitrag zum urnenfelderzeitlichen Symbolgut’. In Müller-Karpe, H. (ed.) Beiträge zu italischen und griechischen Bronzefunden. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung 20, Band 1. Munich: Beck, pp. 81–8.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1980. Die Rasiermesser in Westeuropa (Westdeutschland, Niederlande, Belgien, Luxemburg, Frankreich, Großbritannien und Irland). Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung VIII, Band 3. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1997. ‘Die Vogel-Sonnen-Barke: Symbol der mitteleuropäischen Urnenfelderkultur’. In Von der Höhlenkunst zur Pyramide: Vorzeit und Altertum. Leipzig: Mannheim, pp. 258–62.Google Scholar
Jones, A. 2002. ‘A Biography of Colour: Colour, Material Histories and Personhood in the Early Bronze Age of Britain and Ireland’. In Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. (eds.) Colouring the Past. The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Berg, pp. 159–74.Google Scholar
Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. 2002. ‘Introduction: Wonderful Things – Colour Studies in Archaeology from Munsell to Materiality’. In Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. (eds.) Colouring the Past. The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Berg, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Jung, M. 2005. ‘Zur objektiv-hermeneutschen Interpretation des Symbolguts prähistorischer Kulturen am Fallbeispiel des “Entenvogels” der Urnenfelderzeit’. In Kienlin, T. (ed.) Die Dinge als Zeichen: Kulturelles Wissen und materielle Kultur. Bonn: Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 127, pp. 329–38.Google Scholar
Junk, M. 2003. Material Properties of Copper Alloys containing Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth. The Material of Early Bronze Age Ingot Torques. Unpublished thesis. Freiberg: Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg.Google Scholar
Kacsó, C. 2011. Repertoriul Arheologic Al Judetului Maramurseș. Baia Mare: Editura Europtip.Google Scholar
Kalicz-Schreiber, R. 1990. Symbolic Representation on Early Bronze Age Vessels. Indo-European Studies 18: 59107.Google Scholar
Kalicz-Schreiber, R. 1991. ‘Das spätbronzezeitliche Gräberfeld von Budapest (Ungarn)’. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 66 (2): 161–96.Google Scholar
Kalicz-Schreiber, R. edited by Szabó, G. and Váczi, G. 2010. Ein Gräberfeld Der Spätbronzezeit Von Budapest-Békásmegyer. Budapest: Institut für Archäologische Wissenschaft en der Eötvös Loránd Universität. L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Karavanić, S. 2007. ‘The Middle and Late Bronze Age in northern Croatia’. In Tiefengraber, G. (ed.) Studien zur Mittle- und Spätbronzezeit am Rande der Südostalpen. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, pp. 3749.Google Scholar
Karavanić, S. 2009. The Urnfield Culture in Continental Croatia. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2036. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Karg, S. 2011. ‘New research on the cultural history of the useful plant Linum usitatissimum L. (Flax), a resource for food and textiles for 8,000 years’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 507–8.Google Scholar
Karg, S. 2015. ‘Überlegungen zur Kultur- und Anbaugeschichte des Leins’. In Rast-Eicher, A. and Dietrich, A. (eds.) Neolitische und bronzezeitliche Gewebe und Geflechte. Die Funde aus den Seeufersiedlungenim Kanton Zürich. Zürich: Monographie der Kantonsarchäologie Zürich 46, pp. 2733.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 1998. Ships on Bronzes, A Study in Bronze Age Religion and Iconography. Publications from the National Museum 3 (1 and 2). Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2004a. Bronzealderens religion. Studier af den nordiske bronzealders ikonografi. Copenhagen: Nordiske Fortidsminder, Serie B, Bind 22.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2004b. ‘Social and religious perceptions of the ship in Bronze Age Northern Europe’. In Clark, P. (ed.) The Dover Bronze Age boat in Context: Society and water transport in prehistoric Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 122–37.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2005. ‘Bronze Age tripartite cosmologies’. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 80(2): 135–48.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2009a. ‘Slangen i bronzealderens mytologi. Orden og kaos’. In Brattli, T. (ed.) Det 10. nordiske bronzealdersymposium, Trondheim 5.8. okt. 2006 (Vitark 6, Acta Archaologica Nidrosiensa). Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag, pp. 8097.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2009b. ‘En solguds mange skikkelser. En mystisk kosmologisk rejse’. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 199214.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2010. ‘The sun image from Trundholm (‘The Chariot of the Sun’) – a commented history of research’. In Meller, H. and Bertemes, F. (eds.) Der Griff nach den Sternen. Wie Europas Eliten zu Macht und Reichtum kamen. Internationales Symposium in Halle (Saale) 16.–21. Februar 2005. Tagungen des Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte Halle (Saale), Band 05, pp. 521–36.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2013a. The Nordic razor and the Mycenaean lifestyle. Antiquity 87(336): 461–72.Google Scholar
Kaul, F. 2013b. ‘Med de dødes sjæle rundt og rundt gennem de kosmologiske landskaber’. In Boddum, S., Mikkelsen, M. and Terkildsen, N. (eds.) Dødekulten i yngre bronzealders lokale kulturlandskab, Seminarrapport. Viborg and Holstebro: Viborg Museum and Holsterbro Museum, pp. 135–46.Google Scholar
Keates, S. 2002. ‘“The flashing blade”: copper, colour and luminosity in North Italian Copper Age society’. In Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. (eds.) Colouring the Past. Oxford: Berg, pp. 109–25.Google Scholar
Keller, C. 2001. ‘Thought and production: insights of the practitioner’. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.) Anthropological Perspectives on Technology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 3345.Google Scholar
Kemp, B. J. and Vogelsang-Eastwood, G. M. 2001. The ancient textile industry at Amarna. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T. L. 2010. Traditions and Transformations: Approaches to Eneolithic (Copper Age) and Bronze Age Metalworking and Society in Eastern Central Europe and the Carpathian Basin. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2184. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T. L. and Pernicka, E. 2009. ‘Aspects of the Production of Copper Age Jázladány Types Axes’. In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies – Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 258–76.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T. L. and Stöllner, T. 2009. ‘Singen Copper, Alpine Settlement and Early Bronze Age Mining: Is There a Need for Elites and Strongholds?’. In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies – Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 67104.Google Scholar
Kienlin, T. L., Bischoff, E. and Opielka, H. 2006. ‘Copper and Bronze during the Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age: A metallographic examinaton of axes from the North Alpine Region’. Archaeometry 48(3): 453–68.Google Scholar
Kiss, V. 2012a. Middle Bronze Age Encrusted Pottery in Western Hungary. Varia Archaeologica Hungarica XXVII. Budapest: ArchaeolinguaGoogle Scholar
Kiss, V. 2012b. ‘Central European and Southeastern Alpine Influences upon Western Transdanubia’s Early and Middle Bronze Age’. In Anreiter, P., Banffy, E., Bartosiewicz, L., Meid, W. and Metzner-Nebelsick, C. (eds.) Archaeological, Cultural and Linguistic Heritage: Festschrift fur Elisabeth Jerem in Honour of her 70th Birthday. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 321–35.Google Scholar
Kitov, G. 2005. The Valley of the Thracian Rulers. Varna: Slavena Edition.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, S. T. 1943. Ull och ylle. Bidrag till den svenska yllemanufakturens historia. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
Koestler, A. 1968 Drinkers of Infinity: Essays 1955–1967. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Kohring, S. 2013. ‘Conceptual knowledge as technologically materialised: a case study of pottery production, consumption and community practice’. In Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. (eds.) Embodied Knowledge. Historical Perspectives on Belief and Technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 106–16.Google Scholar
Køie, M. 1943. ‘Tøj fra yngre bronzealder fremstillet af nælde’. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, pp. 99102.Google Scholar
König, P. 2004. Spätbronzezeitliche Hortfunde aus Bosnien und der Herzegowina. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung 20, Band 11. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Kossack, G. 1954. Studien zum Symbolgut der Urnenfelder-und Hallstattzeit Mittleuropas. Berlin: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Kossack, G. 1999. Religiöses Denken in dinglicher und bildlicher Überlieferung Alteuropas aus der Spätbronze- und frühen Eisenzeit (9.-6. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Geb.). Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften N. F. 116. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kovács, T. 1972. ‘Askoi, bird-shaped vessels, bird-shaped rattles in Bronze Age Hungary’. Folia Archaeologica 23: 728.Google Scholar
Kovács, T. 1990. Eine bronzezeitliche Rarität: Askos mit menschlichem Gesicht von Tiszafüred und seine südöstlichen Beziehungen. Folia Archaeologica 41: 927.Google Scholar
Kreiter, A. 2007. Technological Choices and Material Meanings in Early and Middle Bronze Hungary: Understanding the Active Role of Material Culture through Ceramic Analysis. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1604. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 2010. ‘Rock Art and Religion. The sun journey in Indo-European mythology and Bronze Age rock art’. In Fredell, Å., Kristiansen, K. and Criado Boado, F. (eds.) Representations and Communications: Creating an Archaeological Matrix of Late Prehistoric Rock Art. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. and Larsson, T. B. 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristić, D. 2003. Glamija: nekropola bronzanog doba u Korbovu. Arheološke monografije 15. Belgrade: Narodni muzej u Beogradu.Google Scholar
Kubach, W. 1977. Die Nadeln in Hessen und Rheinhessen. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. G. H. 2008. Bronze Age Metalworking the Netherlands (C. 2000–800 bc). A research into the preservation of metallurgy related artefacts and the social position of the smith. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. G. H. 2013. ‘The sound of fire, taste of copper, feel of bronze, and colours of the cast: sensory aspects of metalworking technology’. In Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. (eds.) Embodied Knowledge. Historical Perspectives on Belief and Technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 137–50.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. G. H. 2014. Early Bronze Age Metalworking Craftsmanship. An Enquiry into Metalworking skill and craft based on axes in the North Alpine Region. Unpublished PhD thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Larsson, Å. M. 2008. ‘The Hand that Makes the Pot. Craft Traditions in South Sweden in the Third Millennium bc’. In Berg, I. (ed.) Breaking the Mould: challenging the past through pottery. Conference Proceedings Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 8191.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, J. 2004. Creative Land. Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Lechtmann, H. 1996. ‘Arsenic Bronze: Dirty Copper or Chosen Alloy? A View from the Americas’. Journal of Field Archaeology 23 (4): 477514.Google Scholar
Lehoerff, A. 2015. ‘Metal Craftsmen of Bronze Age Society. Their Role in War’. In Roberts, B., Strack, S. and Uckelmann, M. (eds.) Craft and People. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Lemmonier, P. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, 88. Ann Arbor, MI: Museum of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, P. (ed.) 1993. Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1965. Le geste et la parole. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Letica, Z. 1974. ‘Praistorijska nekropola Pesak kod Korbova’. Starinar 24–25: 163–74.Google Scholar
Leuzinger, U. 2002. ‘Textilherstellung’. In de Capitani, A. et al. (eds.) Die jungsteinzeitliche Seeufersiedlung Arbon Bleiche 3. Archäologie im Thurgau 11. Frauenfeld: Abteilung für Erziehung und Kultur des Kantons Thurgau, pp. 115–34.Google Scholar
Leuzinger, U. and Rast-Eicher, A. 2011. ‘Flax processing in the Neolithic and Bronze Age pile-dwelling settlements of eastern Switzerland’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 535–42.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Liep, J. 2001. ‘Introduction’. In Liep, J. (ed.) Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 113.Google Scholar
Ling, J. 2008. Elevated rock art: Towards a maritime understanding of Bronze Age rock art in northern Bohuslän, Sweden. GOTARC Serie B, Gothenburg Archaeological Thesis 49. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Ling, J. 2013. Rock Art and Seascapes in Uppland. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Livingstone Smith, A. 2000. ‘Processing clay for pottery in Northern Cameroon: social and technical requirements’. Archaeometry 42: 2142.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. 1973. ‘Right and Left in Greek Philosophy’. In Needham, R. (ed.) Right and Left, Essays on Dual Symbolic Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 167–86.Google Scholar
Ložnjak Dizdar, D. 2004. ‘Odnos daljske i bosutske grupe na prostoru hrvatskog Podunavlja početkom starijeg željeznog doba’. Prilozi Instituta za arheologuju u Zagrebu 21: 1935.Google Scholar
Ložnjak Dizdar, D. 2011. ‘Early Urnfield Culture in Northern Croatia – New Challenges’. In Dizdar, M., Ložnjak Dizdar, D. and Mihelić, S.. Early Urnfield Culture in Northern Croatia – New Challenges. Osijek: Arkeološki muzej Osijek i Arkeološki muzej Zagreb, pp. 1235.Google Scholar
Lozuk, J. 1995. ‘A problem of the Baden group Metallurgy at the site of Saloš, Donja Vrba near Slavonski Brod’. In Ancient mining and metallurgy in Southeast Europe. Bor: International Symposium Donji Milanovic, May 20–25, 1990, pp. 55–8.Google Scholar
Lynn Linton, E. 1861. Witch Stories. London: Chapmann and Hall.Google Scholar
Lysenko, O. and Komarova, S. 1992. Fabric – Ritual – Man. Weaving Traditions of the East Europe Slavs. St Petersburg: Fortis.Google Scholar
Machnik, J. 1991. The Earliest Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin. Bradford: University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Maier, U. and Schlichtherle, H. 2011. ‘Flax cultivation and textile production in Neolithic wetland settlements on Late Constance and in Upper Swabia (South-West Germany)’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 567–78.Google Scholar
Majnarić-Pandžić, N. 1985. ‘Srednjobrončanodbni grobovi na Atu u Vršcu’. Opuscula Archaeologica 10: 4161.Google Scholar
Majnarić-Pandžić, N. 1998. ‘Brončano i željezno doba’. In Dimitrijević, S., Težak-Gregl, T. and Majnarić-Pandžić, N. (eds.) Povijest umjetnosti u Hrvatskoj – Prapovijest. Zagreb: Naklada Naprijed.Google Scholar
Makilam. 2007. The Magical Life of Berber Women in Kabylia. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Maniatis, Y. and Tite, M. S. 1981. Technological examination of Neolithic-Bronze Age pottery from central and southeast Europe and from the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Science 8(1): 5976.Google Scholar
Mannering, U., Gleba, M. and Bloch Hansen, M. 2012. ‘Denmark’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 91121.Google Scholar
Manning, S. W. 1996. ‘Dating the Aegean Bronze Age: without, with, and beyond, radiocarbon’. In Randsborg, K. (ed.) Absolute Chronology, Archaeological Europe 2500–500 bc. Acta Archaeologica 67, Supplementa I. Copenhagen: Acta Archaeologica, pp. 1537.Google Scholar
Manning, S. W. 2009. ‘Beyond the Santorino eruption’. In Warburton, D. V. (ed.) Time’s Up! Dating the Minoan eruption of Santorini. Acts of the Minoan Eruption Chronology Workshop, Sandbjerg, November 2007. Monographs of the Danish Institute at Athens 10, 2009. Athens: Danish Institute at Athens, pp. 207–26.Google Scholar
Manning, S. W., Bronk Ramsey, C., Doumas, C., Marketou, T., Cadogan, G. and Pearson, C. L. 2002. ‘New evidence for an early date for the Aegean Late Bronze Age and Theraeruption’. Antiquity 76: 733–44.Google Scholar
Marazov, I. 2007. Between Medusa and Helios. Sofia: Bulgarian Bestseller, National Museum of Book and Polygraphy.Google Scholar
Marković, Z. 2003. ‘O genezi i počecima licenskokeramičke kulture u Sjevernoj Hrvatskoj – On genesis and appearance of the Litzen-pottery in Northern Croatia’. Opuscula Archaeologica 27: 117–50.Google Scholar
Mårtensson, L., Andersson, , Nosch, E., , M.-L. and Batzer, A. 2006a. Technical Report, Experimental Archaeology Part 2:1: Flax. Copenhagen: Danish National Research Foundation’s Centre for Textile Research.Google Scholar
Mårtensson, L., Andersson, , Nosch, E., , M.-L. and Batzer, A. 2006b. Technical Report, Experimental Archaeology Part 2:2: Whorl or Bead? Copenhagen: Danish National Research Foundation’s Centre for Textile Research.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Matthäus, H. 1980. Mykenische Vogelbarken, Antithetische Tierprotomen in der Kunst des östlichen Mittelmeerraumes. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 10: 319–30.Google Scholar
Matthäus, H. 1981. ‘Kyknoi de esan to harma. Spätmykenische und urnenfelderzeitliche Vogelplastik’, in Lorenz, H. (ed.) Studien zur Bronzezeit. Festschrift für Wilhelm Albert von Brunn. Mainz: von Zabern, pp. 227–97.Google Scholar
Mattison, S. 2003. The Complete Potter. London: Apple Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1979. ‘Body Techniques’. In Mauss, M. (ed.) Sociology and Psychology: Essays by Marcel Mauss, Part IV, trans. B. Brewer. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 97123.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. 2012. ‘Postcards from Somewhere: ‘Marginal’ Cultural Production, Creativity and Community’. In Gibson, C. (ed.) Creativity in Peripheral Places: Redefining the Creative Industries. London: Routledge, pp. 1124.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCorriston, J. 1997. ‘The Fiber Revolution’. Current Anthropology 38 (4): 517–35.Google Scholar
McCreesh, N. C., Gize, A. P. and David, A. R. J. 2011. ‘Ancient Egyptian hair gel: new insight into ancient Egyptian mummification procedures through chemical analysis’. Journal of Archaeological Science 38 (12): 3432–4.Google Scholar
Médard, F. 2010. L’art du tissage au Néolithique. IVe-IIIe millénaires avant J.-C. en Suisse. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Médard, F. 2012. ‘Switzerland: Neolithic Period’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 367–77.Google Scholar
Medović, P. 1988. Kalakača, naselje ranog gvozdenog doba. Novi Sad: Vojvođanski Muzej.Google Scholar
Medović, P. 2006. Vojvodina u Praistoriji. Od Neandertalaca do Kelta. Novi Sad: Platoneum.Google Scholar
Meller, H. (ed.) 2004. Der geschmiedete Himmel. Die weite Welt im Herzen Europas vor 3600 Jahren. Ausstellungskatalog. Stuttgart: Theiss-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. 1991. ‘The Origin and Iconography of the Late Minoan Painted Larnax’. Hesperia Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 60: 285307.Google Scholar
Méri, I. 1942. ‘A mészbetétágy elkészítésének módja a kisapostagi edényeken’. In Mozsolics, A. (ed.) A kisapostagi korabronzkori urnatemető (Der frübronzezeitliche Urnenfriedhof von Kisapostag). Archaeologica Hungarica n. 26. Budapest: Magyar Történeti Múzeum, pp. 4553.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Messick, B. 1987. ‘Subordinate discourse: women, weaving, and gender relations in North Africa’. American Ethnologist 14 (2): 210–25.Google Scholar
Metzner-Nebelsick, C. 1997. ‘Hallstattzeitliche Zentren in Südostpannonien’. Zalai Múzeum 8: 926.Google Scholar
Metzner-Nebelsick, C. 2002. Der ‘Thrako-Kimmerisch’ Formenkreis aus der Sicht der Urnenfelder- und Hallstattzeit im südöstlichen Pannonien. Vorgeschichtliche Forschungen Bd. 23. Rahden/Westfalen: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. 2008. ‘Media and the senses in the making of religious experience: an introduction’. Material Religion 4: 124–35.Google Scholar
Michelaki, K. 2006. Household Economies: Production and Consumption of Household Ceramics Among the Maros Villagers of Bronze Age Hungary. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1503. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Michelaki, K. 2008. ‘Making Pots and Potters in the Bronze Age Maros Villages of Kiszombor-Új-Élet and Kláraflava-Hajdova’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (3): 32752.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, M. 2013. ‘Rituelle anlæg og højgravpladser i relation til yngre bronzealders dødekult’. In Boddum, S., Mikkelsen, M. and Terkildsen, N. (eds.) Dødekulten i yngre bronzealders lokale kulturlandskab, Seminarrapport. Viborg and Holstebro: Viborg Museum and Holsterbro Museum, pp. 5590.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 2009. Odin, magic, and a Swedish trial from 1484. Scandinavian Studies 81 (3): 263–86.Google Scholar
Mlekuž, D., Gašparič, A. Z., Horvat, M. and Budja, M. 2012. ‘Houses, pots and food. The pottery from Maharski prekop in context’. Documenta Praehistorica 39: 325–38.Google Scholar
Mödlinger, M. 2013. ‘Bronze Age bell helmets: new aspects on typology, chronology and manufacture’. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 88(1): 152–79.Google Scholar
Molander, B. 1996. Kunskap i handling. Gothenburg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
Molander, B. 2008. ‘”Have I kept inquiry moving?” On the Epistemology of Reflection’. Phenomenology & Practice 2(1): 423.Google Scholar
Molander, B. 2013. ‘Attentiveness in Musical Practice and Research’. Music + Practice 1(1). www.musicandpractice.org/volume-1/attentiveness-in-musical-practice-and-research/.Google Scholar
Möller-Wiering, S. 2012. ‘Germany: Bronze and Pre-Roman Iron Ages’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 122–38.Google Scholar
Montelius, O. 1917. Minnen från vår forntid. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Mortensen, B. 1999. ‘El-Omari’. In Bard, K.A. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. London: Routledge, pp. 592–4.Google Scholar
Muhly, J. D. 1988. ‘The Beginnings of Metallurgy in the Old World’. In Maddin, R. (ed.) The beginning and use of metals and alloys. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Muhly, J. D. 1989. ‘Çayönü Tepesi and the Beginnings of Metallurgy in the Ancient World’. In Hauptmann, A, Pernicka, E. and Wagner, G. A (eds.) Old World Archaeometallurgy: Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Old World Archaeometallurgy’, Heidelberg, 1987. Der Anschnitt Beiheft 7. Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum, pp. 111.Google Scholar
Müller, R. 2012. ‘Késő bronzkori, aranyszalaggal díszített textíliák (Spätbronzezeitliche, mit Goldbändern verzierte Textilien)’. Archeometriai Műhely 2012/2: 117–22.Google Scholar
Müller, S. 1897. Vor Oldtid. Danmarks forhistorische Archæologi. Copenhagen: Det nordiske Forlag.Google Scholar
Müller, S. 1903. Solbilledet fra Trundholm. Copenhagen: Nordiske Fortidsminder, pp. I, 6.Google Scholar
Müller, S. 1921. Oldtidens Kunst i Danmark. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H. 1955. ‘Das urnenfelderzeitliche Wagengrab von Hart a. D. Alz, Oberbayern’. Bayerische Vorgeschichtsblätter 2: 4675.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H. 1980. Handbuch der Vorgeschichte, Band IV, 1–3 Bronzezeit. Munich: Verlag.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H. 2009a. ‘Bronzezeitliche Heilszeichen’. In Müller-Karpe, H. (ed.) Religionsarchäologie: Achäologische Beiträge zur Religionsgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Lembeck, pp. 8091.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H. 2009b. ‘Bronzezeitliche Waffen als Symbole göttlicher Macht’. In Müller-Karpe, H. (ed.) Religionsarchäologie: Archäologische Beiträge zur Religionsgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Lembeck, pp. 100–5.Google Scholar
Myking, T., Hertzberg, A. and Skrøppa, T. 2005. ‘History, manufacture and properties of lime bast cordage in northern Europe’. Forestry 78(1): 6571.Google Scholar
Nakamura, F. 2007. ‘Creating or Performing Words? Observations on Contemporary Japanese Calligraphy’. In Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.) Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 7998.Google Scholar
NACCCE: National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education 1999. All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Needham, S. P. 1996. ‘Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age’. Acta Archaeologia 67: 121–40.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, J.-W. 1974–1975. Mitt. Der Österreichischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte 25: 6589.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, J.-W. 1994. Bronzezeit in Ostösterreich. Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe Niederösterreichs. St Pölten: Verlag Niederösterreichisches Pressehaus.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, J.-W. 1993. Archäologie in Niederösterreich. St. Pölten und das Traisental. St Pölten: Verlag Niederösterreichisches Pressehaus.Google Scholar
Nordenborg Myhre, L. 2004. Trialectic Archaeology. Monuments and Space in Southwest Norway 1700–500 bc. Stavanger: Arkeologisk Museum i Stavanger.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, A. 1999. Weaving samples of sailcloth on a warp-weighted loom. Experiments carried out at the Viking Ship Museum in Roskilde, Denmark in 1999. Roskilde: Vikingeskibsmuseet.Google Scholar
Norman, D. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Norman, D. 2004. Emotional Design. Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Northover, P. 1989. ‘Properties and Use of Arsenic-Copper Alloys’. In Hauptmann, A., Pernicka, E. and Wagner, G. A. (eds.) Old World Archaeometallurgy: Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Old World Archaeometallurgy’, Heidelberg, 1987.Der Anschnitt Beiheft 7. Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum, pp. 111–18.Google Scholar
Novotná, M. 1970. Die Bronzehortfunde in der Slowakei. Spätbronzezeit. Archaeologica Slovaca, Fontes Instituti Archaeologici Nitriensis Academiae Scientiarum Slovacae 9. Bratislava: Vydavatelstvo Slovenskej Akadémie Vied.Google Scholar
O’Brien, W. 1999. ‘Arsenical Copper in Early Irish Metallurgy’. In Young, S. M. M., Pollard, A. M., Budd, P. and Ixer, R. A. (eds.) Metals in Antiquity. British Archaeological Reports International Series 792. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 3342.Google Scholar
Olausson, D. S. and Larsson, L. 1982. ‘Testing for the presence of thermal pretreatment of flint in the Mesolithic and Neolithic of Sweden’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 9(3): 275–85.Google Scholar
Olsen, B. 2010. In Defence of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Plymouth, MA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B. S. 2001. ‘Innovation, Production and Specialization in Early Prehistoric Copper Metallurgy’. European Journal of Archaeology 4 (1): 87112.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B. S. and Roberts, B. W. 2008. ‘The emergence of metallurgy in Europe’. In Jones, A. (ed.) Prehistoric Europe: theory and practice. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 193225.Google Scholar
Owoc, M. A. 2002. ‘Munselling the Mound: The Use of Soil Colour as Metaphor in British Bronze Age Funerary Ritual’. In Jones, A. and McGregor, G. (eds.) Colouring the Past. The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Berg, pp. 127–40.Google Scholar
Palincaş, N. 2010. ‘Reconfiguring anatomy: ceramics, cremation and cosmology in the Late Bronze Age in the Lower Danube’. In Rebay-Salisbury, K., Sørensen, M. L. S. and Hughes, J. (eds.) Body Parts and Bodies Whole: changing relations and meanings. Studies in Funerary Archaeology 5. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 7289.Google Scholar
Pallasmaa, J. 2009. The Thinking Hand. Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Pare, C. F. E. 1987a. ‘Der Zeremonialwagen der Hallstattzeit – untersuchungen zu Konstruktion, Typologie und Kulturbeziehungen’. In Barth, F. E. (ed.) Vierrädrige Wagen der Hallstattzeit: Untersuchungen zu Geschichte und Technik. Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 12. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, pp. 189232.Google Scholar
Pare, C. F. E. 1987b. ‘Der Zeremonialwagen der Urnenfelderzeit – seine Entstehung, Form und Verbreitung’. In Barth, F. E. (ed.) Vierrädrige Wagen der Hallstattzeit: Untersuchungen zu Geschichte und Technik. Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 12. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, pp. 2567.Google Scholar
Pare, C. 1989. ‘From Dupljaja to Delphi: The ceremonial use of the wagon in later prehistory’. Antiquity 63: 80100.Google Scholar
Pare, C. (ed.) 2000. Metals Make the World Go Round. The supply and circulation of metals in Bronze Age Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Pásztor, E. 2009. ‘The significance of the sun, moon and celestial bodies to societies in the Carpathian Basin during the Bronze Age’. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5: 127–34.Google Scholar
Patay, P. 1990. Die Bronzegefäße in Ungarn. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung 2, Band 10. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Patek, E. 1993. Westungarn in der Hallstattzeit. Quellen und Forschungen zur prähistorischen und provinzialrömischen Archäologie. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. 2007a. The senses of touch: haptics, affects, and technologies. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. 2007b. ‘Feel the Presence’: the Technologies of Touch’. In Paterson, M. (ed.) The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects adn Technologies. Oxford and New York: Berg, pp. 127–45.Google Scholar
Pearce, M. 2007. Bright Blades and Red Metal: Essays on North Italian prehistoric metalwork. Accordia Specialist Studies on Italy Volume 14. London: Accordia Research Institute, University of London.Google Scholar
Pelegrin, P. 1990. ‘Prehistoric lithic technology: Some aspects of research’. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9: 116–25.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 1998. ‘Die Ausbreitung der Zinnbronze im 3. Jahrtausend’. In Hänsel, B. (ed.) Mensch und Umwelt in der Bronzezeit Europas. Kiel: Oetker-Voges, pp. 135–47.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 1999. ‘Trace Element Fingerprinting of Ancient Copper: A Guide to Technology or Provenance?’ In Young, S. M. M., Pollard, A. M., Budd, P. and Ixer, R. A. (eds.) Metals in Antiquity. British Archaeological Reports International Series 792. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 163–71.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 2002. ‘Archaeometallurgy in Frieberg’. In Butler, J., Pernicka, E., E. and Krause, R. (eds.) Die Anfänge der Metallurgie in der alten Welt: The beginnings of metallurgy in the old world. Rahden: Marie Leidorf, pp. 1521.Google Scholar
Peroni, V. B. 1979. I rasoi nell’ Italia continentale. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung VIII, Band 2. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Peruzzi, E. 1980. Myceneans in Early Latium. Incunabula Graeca Vol. LXXV. Rome: Edizione dell’Ateneo & Bizzarri.Google Scholar
Pescheck, C. 1972. ‘Unterfranken, Ein Reicher Grabfund mit Kesselwagen aus Unterfranken’. Germania 50: 2956.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. M. F. 1917. Tools and Weapons. London: British School of Archaeology in Egypt, University College.Google Scholar
Petrović, B. 2006. Kaluđerske Livade. Belgrade: Belgrade City Museum.Google Scholar
Peyronel, L. 2007. ‘Spinning and Weaving at Tell Mardikh-Ebla (Syria): Some Observations on Spindle-Whorls and Loom-Weights from Bronze and Iron Ages’. In Gillis, C. and Nosch, M.-L (eds.) Ancient Textiles: Production, Craft and Society. Proceedings from the First International Conference on Ancient Textiles, held at Lund, Sweden and Copenhagen, Denmark, on March 19–23, 2003. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 2635.Google Scholar
Picton, J. and Mack, J. 1989. African Textiles. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Popa, G. 2008. ‘Leder, Fell und Haut – wichtige Rohstoffe für den prähistorischen Bergbau’. In Kern, A., Kowarik, K., Rausch, A. W. and Reschreiter, H. (eds.) Salz-Reich, 7000 Jahre Hallstatt. Vienna: Veröffentlichungen der Prähistorischen Abteilung 2, pp. 102–5.Google Scholar
Popović, P. and Vukmanović, M. 1998. Vajuga-Pesak. Nekropola starijeg gvozdenog doba. Đerdapske Sveske, Posebna Izdanja 3. Belgrade: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
PCRG (Prehistoric Ceramic Research Group). 2011. The Study of Later Prehistoric Pottery: General Policies and Guidelines for analysis and Publications. Occasional Paper No 1 and No 2. 3rd Edition Revised 2011. Prehistoric Ceramic Research Group.Google Scholar
Premk, A., Popović, P. and Bjelajac, L. J. 1986. ‘Vajuga – Pesak: izveštaj o sondanim iskopavanjima u 1980. Godini’. Đerdapske Sveske 2: 111–17.Google Scholar
Primas, M. 2002. ‘Early tin bronze in central and Southern Europe’. In Bartelheim, M., Pernicka, E. and Krause, R. (eds.) The beginnings of metallurgy in the Old World. Rahden/Westf: MarieLeidorf, pp. 303–14.Google Scholar
Probst, E. 2011. Die Litzenkeramik oder Draßburger Kultur in Österreich. Eine Kultur der Bronzezeit von etwa 2000 bis 1600. Munich: Chr. Grin Verlag.Google Scholar
Proust, M. 1932. Remembrance of things Past, translated from the French by C. K. Scott Moncrieff; Volume 5 (The Captive), Chapter II (The Verdurins Quarrel with M. de Charlus). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Prüssing, G. 1991. Die Bronzegefäße in Österreich. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung 2, Band 5. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Radivojević, M. 2015. Inventing Metallurgy in Western Eurasia: a Look Through the Microscope Lens. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25: 321–38.Google Scholar
Radivojević, M., Rehren, T., Pernicka, E., Šljivar, D., Brauns, M. and Borić, D. 2010. ‘On the origins of extractive metallurgy: new evidence from Europe’. Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (11): 2775–87.Google Scholar
Randsborg, K. 1993. Kivik. Archaeology and iconography. Acta Archaeologica 64 (1). Copenhagen: Acta Archaeologica.Google Scholar
Randsborg, K. 2011. Bronze Age Textiles: Men, Women and Wealth. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Randsborg, K. and Christensen, K. 2006. Bronze Age Oak-Coffin Graves. Archaeology and Dendro-Dating. Acta Archaeologica 77. Acta Archaeologica Supplementa. Copenhagen: Acta Archaeologica.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2005. ‘Bast before Wool: The First Textiles’. In Bichler, P., Grömer, K., Hofmann-de Keijzer, R., Kern, A. and Reschreiter, H. (eds.) Hallstatt Textiles. Technical Analysis, Scientific Investigation and experiment on Iron Age Textiles. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1351. Oxford: Archeopress, pp. 117–31.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2008. Textilien, Wolle, Schafe der Eisenzeit in der Schweiz (Antiqua 44). Basel: Veröffentlichung der Archäologie Schweiz.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2012a. ‘Switzerland: Bronze and Iron Ages’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 378–96.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2012b. ‘Ornamente auf Textilien – Textile Ornamente’. In Boschetti-Maradi, A., de Capitani, A., Hochuli, S. and Niffeler, U. (eds.) Form, Zeit und Raum. Grundlagen für eine Geschichte aus dem Boden. Festschrift für Werner E. Stöckli zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Antiqua 50. Basel: Archäologie Schweiz, pp. 225–34.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2013. ‘Die Faserqualität von Fellen und Textilien aus dem Salzbergwerk von Hallstatt / The Fibre Quality of skins and textiles from the Hallstatt salt mines’. In Grömer, K., Kern, A., Reschreiter, H. and Rösel-Mautendorfer, H. (eds.) Textiles from Hallstatt. Weaving Culture in Bronze Age and Iron Age Salt Mines. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 163–78.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2014. ‘Bronze and Iron Age Wools in Europe’. In Breniquet, C. and Michel, C. (eds.) Wool Economy in the Ancient Near East and the Aegean. From the Beginnings of Sheep Husbandry to Institutional Textile Industry. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 1221.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. 2015. ‘Schnidejoch: Neolithische, bronzezeitliche und römische Geflechte und Gewebe’. In Hafner, A. (ed.) Schnidejoch und Lötschenpass. Archäologische Forschungen in den Berner Alpen. Bd 2. Bern: Archäologischer Dienst des Kantons Bern, pp. 30–8.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. forthcoming. ‘In the Beginning was the Fibre’. In Sofaer, J. (ed.) Considering Creativity. Creativity, Knowledge and Practice in Bronze Age Europe. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. and Bender Jørgensen, L. 2013. ‘Sheep Wool in Bronze Age and Iron Age Europe’. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 1224–41.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. and Dietrich, A. 2015. Neolitische und bronzezeitliche Gewebe und Geflechte. Die Funde aus den Seeufersiedlungenim Kanton Zürich. Zürich: Monographie der Kantonsarchäologie Zürich 46.Google Scholar
Rast-Eicher, A. and Reinhard, J. 1998. ‘Gewebe und Geflechte’. In Hochuli, U. S., Niffeler, U. and Rychner, V. (eds.) Die Schweiz vom Paläolithikum bis ins Mittelalter, Die Bronzezeit, Basel: Archäologie Schweiz, pp. 285–90.Google Scholar
Reich, C. 2005. ‘Vogelmensch und Menschvogel. Bronzezeitliche Vogel-Mensch-Darstellungen im mittleren und unteren Donauraum’. In Horejs, B., Jung, R., Kaiser, E. and Teržan, B. (eds.) Interpretationsraum Bronzezeit. Festschrift Bernhard Hänsel. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, pp. 231–9.Google Scholar
Reich, C. 2006. Das Gräberfeld von Szeremle und die Gruppen mit inkrustierter Keramiknentlang der mittleren und unteren Donau. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Reim, H. 1981. ‘Ein Brandgrab der älteren Urnenfelderkultur von Gammertingen, Kreis Sigmaringen’. Fundberichte aus Baden-Württemberg 6: 122–40.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C. 1969. ‘The Autonomy of the South-East European Copper Age’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 35: 1247.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C. 1973. Before civilization: The radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C. and Zubrow, E. W. 1994. The Ancient Mind. Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, P. 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, É. 2005. ‘Textil és négyzetrendszeres fonatlenyomatok az Alföld neolitikumából. – Woven and Plaited Fabrics in the Neolithic of the Great Hungarian Plain’. In Lőrinczy, G. and Bende, L. (eds.) Hétköznapok vénuszai. Hódmezővásárhely: Hódmezővásárhelyi Múzeum, pp. 123–44.Google Scholar
Richter, É. 2010. ‘Our Threads to the Past: Plaited Motifs as Predecessors of Woven Binding Structures’. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgaard, M. (eds.) NESAT X. North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 211–16.Google Scholar
Říhovský, J. 1993. Die Fibeln in Mähren. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung 14, Band 9. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Rimkutė, V. 2010. ‘The Neolithic Mats of the Eastern Baltic Littoral’. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgaard, M. (eds.) NESAT X. North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 217–20.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. 2009. ‘Origins, Transmission and Traditions: Analysing Early Metal in Western Europe’. In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies – Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 129–43.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W. and Frieman, C. J. 2012. ‘Drawing Boundaries and Building Models: investigating the concept of the ‘Chalcolithic frontier’ in northwest Europe’. In Allen, M. J., Gardiner, J. and Sheridan, J. A. (eds.) Is there a British Chalcolithic: People, place and polity in the later 3rd millennium. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 2739.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. and Thornton, C. 2014 (eds.) Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Roberts, S., Sofaer, J. and Kiss, V. 2008. ‘Characterisation and textural analysis of Middle Bronze Age Transdanubian inlaid wares of the Encrusted Pottery Culture, Hungary. A preliminary study’. Journal of Archaeological Science 35 (2): 322–30.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. E., Moltsen, A. and Harild, J. 1995. Arkæobotaniske analyse af bronzealder gårdsanlæg og marksystemer ved Bjerre Enge, Hanstholm, Thy. Nationalmuseets Naturvidenskabelige Undersøgelser (NNU). Rapport Nr. 15. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Roes, A. 1939/1940. ‘Der Hallstattvogel’. Jahrbuch für prähistorische und ethnographische Kunst 13/14: 5784.Google Scholar
Rolf, B. 1995. Profession, tradition och tyst kunskap. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa.Google Scholar
Rønne, P. 1989. ‘Early bronze age spiral ornament – the technical background’. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8 (1991): 126–43.Google Scholar
Rønne, P. 1991. ‘Forsøgsarkaeologi og bronzealderens ornamentik (Experimental archaeolog and Bronze Age ornamentation)’. In Madsen, B. (ed.) Eksperimental Arkæologi. Studier i Teknologi og Kultur 1. Lejre: Historisk-arkæologisk forsøgscenter, pp. 3149.Google Scholar
Rønne, P. and Bredsdorff, T. Hjejle. 2011. ‘Cire perdue støbning I bronzealderen. Hvordan laver man en voksmodel? - Cire perdue casting in the Bronze Age. How to make a Wax Model’. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 2008 (2011): 5976.Google Scholar
Rooijakkers, T. 2005. ‘Unravelling Beni Hassan: Textile Production in the Beni Hassan Tomb Paintings’. Archaeological Textiles Newsletter 41: 213.Google Scholar
Runco, M. 1994. ‘Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity’. In Runco, M. A. (ed.) Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 272–90.Google Scholar
Runco, M. 2004. ‘Creativity’. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 657–87.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1990a. ‘Danish Bronze Age Wools’. Journal of Danish Archaeology 7 (1988): 136–43.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1990b. ‘The natural pigmentation of animal textile fibres’. Textile History 21(2): 135–48.Google Scholar
Rye, O. 1981. Pottery Technology: Principles and Reconstruction. Washington, DC: Taraxacum.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Şandor-Chicideanu, M. 2003. Cultura Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare. Contribuții la cunoaşterea epocii bronzului la Dunărea Mijlocie și Inferioară. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Nereamia Napocae.Google Scholar
Schauer, P. 1987. ‘Der vierrädrige Wagen in Zeremonialgeschehen und Bestattungsbruach der orientalish-ägäischen Hochkulturen und ihrer Randgebiete’. In Barth, F. Eckart, Biel, J., Egg, M., France-Lanord, A., Joachim, H. E., Pare, C., Schauer, P. and Uenz, H. P. (eds.) Vierrädrige Wagen der Hallstattzeit: Untersuchungen zu Geschichte und Technik. Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 12. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums: Rudolf Habelt, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Schauer, P. 1988–1989. ‘Mittelbronzezeitliche Vogelplastik’. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft Wien 118–19: 4559.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. and Svenbro, J. 1996. The Craft of Zeus. Myths of Weaving and Fabric. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheu, A., Geörg, C., Schulz, , Burger, A., , J. and Benecke, N. 2012. ‘The arrival of domesticated animals in South-Eastern Europe as seen from ancient DNA’. In Kaiser, E., Burger, J. and Schier, W. (eds.) Population Dynamics in Prehistory and Early History. New Approaches by Using Stable Isotopes and Genetics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 4554.Google Scholar
Schibler, J. 2008. ‘Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Viehzucht während des 3. Jahrtausends v. Chr. aufgrund der Tierknochenfunde der Fundstellen im Alpenvorland’. In Dörfler, W. and Müller, J. (eds.) Umwelt – Wirtschaft – Siedlungen im dritten vorchristlichen Jahrtausend Mitteleuropas und Südskandinaviens, Internationale Tagung Kiel 4.-6.- November 2005. Neumünster: OFFA 84, pp. 379–92.Google Scholar
Schibler, J., Hüster-Plogmann, H., Jacomet, St., Brombacher, Chr., Gross-Klee, E. and Rast-Eicher, A. (eds.) 1997. Ökonomie und Ökologie neolithischer und bronzezeitlicher Ufersiedlungen am Zürichsee. Monografien der Kantonsarchäologie Zürich 20. Zürich and Egg: Fotorotar AG, Neue Medien.Google Scholar
Schick, T. 1988. ‘Nahal Hemar cave – cordage, basketry and fabrics’. Atiqot 38: 3143.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. and Skibo, J. 1997. ‘The Explanation of Artefact Variability’. American Antiquity 62 (1): 2750.Google Scholar
Schlabow, K. 1958. ‘Textilien und Leder’. In Feustel, R. (ed.) Bronzezeitliche Hügelgräberkultur im Gebiet von Schwarza (Südthüringen). Weimar: H. Böhlaus Nachf, pp. 28–7.Google Scholar
Schlabow, K. 1959. ‘Beiträge zur Erforschung der jungsteinzeitlichen und bronzezeitlichen Gewebetechnik Mitteldeutschlands’. Jahresschrift für Mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte 43: 101–20.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N. 1991. ‘Le fait technique total: la raison pratique et les raisons de la pratique dans l’œuvre de Marcel Mauss’. Terrain: carnets du patrimoine ethnologique 16: 114–30.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N. 1994. ‘Mindful technology: unleashing the chaîne opératoire for an archaeology of mind’. In Renfrew, C. and Zubrow, E. (eds.) The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–51.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. R. 1945. Die Burg Vučedol. Zagreb: Hrvatski državni arheološki muzej.Google Scholar
Schofield, L. 2007. The Mycenaeans. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schreiber, R. 1984. ‘Szimbolikus ábrázolások korobronzkori edényeken. (Symbolische darstellungen an frübronzezeitlichen Gefässen)’. Archaeológiai Értesítõ 111: 328.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M., Heyd, V. and Pernicka, E. 2007. ‘Archäometallurgie in der Slowakei – Erze und Metall’. In Hrubý, P. (ed.) Stříbrná Jihlava 2007. Studie k dĕjinám hornictví a důlních prací; přispĕvky z konference stříbrná Jihlava 04. – 07.10.2007 v Jihlavĕ; vĕnováno Pavlu Rousovi k 60. narozeninám: Silberne Stadt Jihlava 2007. Studien zur Geschichte des Bergbaus und der Bergwerke; Beiträge aus der Konferenz Silberne Stadt Jihlava 04. – 07.10.2007 in Jihlava (Iglau); Festschrift für Pavel Rous zum 60. Geburtstag. Jihlava: Archaia Brno, pp. 172–87.Google Scholar
Seager Thomas, M. 2008. ‘From Potsherds, to People: Sussex Prehistoric Pottery’. Sussex Archaeological Collections 146: 1951.Google Scholar
Sellet, F. 1993. ‘Chaîne Opératoire; The Concept and its Applications’. Lithic Technology 18(1/2): 106–12.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. 2009. The Craftsman. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Shalganova, T. 1995. ‘The Lower Danube Incrusted Pottery Culture’. In Bailey, D.W. and Panayotov, I. (eds.) Prehistoric Bulgaria, Monographs in World Archaeology 22. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press, pp. 291308.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1993. ‘What would a Bronze Age world system look like? Relations between temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in Later Prehistory’. Journal of European Archaeology 1 (2): 157.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1997. Economy and Society in Prehistoric Europe: Changing Perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Shishlina, N. I., Orfinskaya, O. V. and Golikov, V. P. 2003. ‘Bronze Age Textiles from the North Caucasus: New Evidence of Fourth Millennium bc Fibres and Fabrics’. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 22(4), pp. 331–44.Google Scholar
Šimić, J. 2000. Kulturne skupine s inkrustiranom keramikom u brončanom dobu sjeveroistočne hrvatske. Zagreb and Osijek: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti. Zavod zaznanstveni i umjetnički rad Osijek. Muzej Slavonije Osijek.Google Scholar
Singer, I. 2013. Modes of Creativity. Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, C. M. 1991. Approaches to Archaeological ceramics. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Sjömar, P. 2011. ‘Hantverkares Kunskap’. In Löfgren, E. (ed.) Hantverkslaboratorium. Mariestad: Handverkslaboratoriet, pp. 6288.Google Scholar
Skougaard, M. and Hansen, H. T. 1983. Uld og hør. Tekstilfremstilling iI 1800-tallets bondesamfund. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Sobchack, V. 2008. Embodying transcendence: on the literal, the material, and the cinematic sublime. Material Religion 4: 194203.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. 2006. ‘Pots, Houses and Metal: Technological Relations at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary’. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25(2): 127–47.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. 2013. ‘Swedish Helmet Bowls. Cosmologies in Clay’. In Bergerbrant, S. and Sabatini, S. (eds.) Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 361–5.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. 2014. Similarity and Difference in Balkan Ceramic Material Culture: The Case of Encrusted Pottery. Paper presented at the conference Balkan Dialogues. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. 2015. Clay in the Age of Bronze: Essays in the Archaeology of Prehistoric Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. and Budden, S. 2012. ‘Many Hands Make Light Work: Embodied Knowledge at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary’. In Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. (eds.) Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 117–27.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. and Roberts, S. 2016. ‘Technical Innovation and Practice in Eneolithic and Bronze Age Encrusted Ceramics in the Carpathian Basin, Middle and Lower Danube’. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 46(4): 479–96.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. and Sørensen, M. L. S. 2002. ‘Becoming cultural: society and the incorporation of bronze’. In Ottaway, B. and Wager, E. C. (eds.) Metals and society: papers from a session held at the European Association of Archaeologists sixth annual meeting in Lisbon 2000. (BAR International Series: 1061). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 117–21.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J., with contributions by Bech, J.-H., Budden, S., Choyke, A., Eriksen, B.V., Horváth, T., Kovács, G. Kreiter, A., Muhlenbock, C. and Sticka, H.-P. 2010. ‘Chapter 7. Technology and Craft’. In Earle, T. and Kristiansen, K. (eds.) Organising Bronze Age Societies. European Society in Late Prehistory: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185217.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J., Bender Jørgensen, L. and Choyke, A. 2013a. ‘Craft Production: Ceramics, Textiles and Bone’. In Fokkens, H. and Harding, A (eds.) Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 469–91.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J., Mihelić, S., Roberts, , , S. and Williams, R. 2013b. The Composition of Inlays in Encrusted Ceramics from the Pannonian Plain. Paper presented at the Croatian Archaeological Society Meeting, Vukovar.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. L. S. 1984. The transition from Bronze Age to Iron Age in Scandinavia: A study of the changes reflected by the bronzes from period 5 and 6 in Scandinavia. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. L. S. 1997. ‘Reading dress: the construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology 5(1): 93114.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. L. S. 2013. ‘Identity, Gender, and Dress in the European Bronze Age’. In Fokkens, H. and Harding, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 216–33.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. 2008. Landscapes of the body: Burials of the Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. European Journal of Archaeology 11(1): 4974.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. L. S. and Rebay-Salisbury, K. 2013. Embodied Knowledge: perspectives on belief and technology. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Soressi, M. and Geneste, J. 2011. ‘Special Issue: Reduction Sequence, Chaîne Opératoire, and Other Methods: The Epistemologies of Different Approaches to Lithic Analysis; The History and Efficacy of the Chaîne Opératoire Approach to Lithic Analysis; Studying Techniques to Reveal Past Societies in an Evolutionary Perspective’. PaleoAnthropology 336: 334–50, doi: 10.4207/PA.2011.ART63.Google Scholar
Spantidaki, Y. and Moulherat, C. 2012. ‘Greece’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 185200.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E. 1936. Sonnenwagen und Hakenkreuz im nordischen Kreis. Germania 20: 19.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E. 1954. ‘Nordische Bronzezeit und frühes Griechentum’. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 1: 28110.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E. 1955. ‘Das bronzene Zierband von Kronshagen bei Kiel. Eine Ornamentstudie zur Vorgeschichte der Vogelsonnenbarke’. Offa 14: 3120.Google Scholar
Stafford, B. 2007. Echo Objects. The Cognitive Work of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stika, H.-P. and Heiss, A. G. 2013. ‘Seeds from the Fire Charred Plant Remains from Kristian Kristiansen’s excavations in Sweden, Denmark, Hungary and Sicily’. In Bergerbrant, S. and Sabatini, S. (eds.) Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 7786.Google Scholar
Stradal, M. and Brommer, U. 1990. Mit Nadel und Faden. Kulturgeschichte der klassischen Handarbeiten. Heidenheim: Herder, Freiburg.Google Scholar
Strahm, C. and Hauptmann, A. 2009. ‘The Metallurgical Developmental Phases in the Old World’. In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies – Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 116–28.Google Scholar
Sturm-Berger, M. 2002. ‘Zur Bedeutung der Darstellungen von Enten, Gänsen und Schwänen in europäischen Bronze- und Eisenzeit-Kulturen’. Adoranten. Årsskrift för Scandinavian Society: 6384.Google Scholar
Sturm-Berger, M. 2004. ‘Mythos der europäischen Wasservögel. Nochmals zu Enten, Gänsen, Schwänen’. Adoranten (Årsskrift for Scandinavian Society for Prehistoric Art): 118–19.Google Scholar
Sundström, A. 2010. ‘A Bronze Age Plaited Starting Border’. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgaard, M. (eds.) North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 233–4.Google Scholar
Szabó, G. 2003. ‘The expanding world: Masters of bronzeworking in the Carpathian Basin’. In Visy, Z. (ed.) Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, pp. 163–7.Google Scholar
Szabó, G. and Hajdu, T. 2011. ‘A mészbetétes edények díszíének szimbolikája a bonyhádi vegyes rítusú bronzkori temető embertani leleleteinek feldolgozása tükrében’ (Symbolism of the ornaments of encrusted pottery in the light of anthropological finds from the Bronze Age mixed rite cemetery at Bonyhád). Anthropologiai Közlemények 52: 85108.Google Scholar
Szathmári, I. 2003. ‘Beiträge zu den Vogeldarstellung der bronzexeitlichen Tell-Kulturen’. In Jerem, E. and Razcky, P. (eds.) Morgenrot der Kulturen. Frühe Etappen der Menscheitsgeschichte in Mittel- und Südosteuropa. Festschrift für Nándor Kalicz zum 75 Geburtsatag. Archeolingua 15. Archeolingua: Budapest, pp. 513–23.Google Scholar
Szentmiklosi, A. 2006. ‘The relations of the Cruceni-Belegiš culture with the Žuto Brdo–Gârla Mare culture’. Analele Banatului, S.N., Arheologie – Istorie XIV: 229270.Google Scholar
Sziki, G. Á., Biró, K. T., Uzonyi, I., Dobos, E. and Kiss, Á. Z., 2002. ‘Investigation of incrusted pottery found in Hungary by m-PIXE method’. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 210: 478–82.Google Scholar
Tadmor, M., Kedem, D., Bergmann, F., Hauptmann, A., Pernicka, E. and Schmitt Strecker, S. 1995. ‘The Nahal Mishmar Hoard from the Judean Desert: Technology, Composition, and Provenance’. Atiqot 27: 95148.Google Scholar
Talaa, D. 1991. Urgeschichtliche Funde aus Vösendorf. Vösendorf.Google Scholar
Tasić, N. 1972. ‘The Mokrin necropolis and its position in the development of the Early Bronze Age in Voivodina’. In Foltiny, S. (ed.) Mokrin II. The Early Bronze Age Necropolis. Belgrade: Smithsonian Institution, pp. 928.Google Scholar
Tasić, N. 1991. Antropomorfne, zoomorfne i ornitomorfne figure na Basarabi keramici. Zbornik radova posvećenih akademiku Alojzu Bencu. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka I Umjetnosti Bosne I Hercegovine.Google Scholar
Tasić, N. 2002. ‘The Necropolis at Belegiš and Issue of the Belegiš Culture’. In Vranić, S. (ed.) Belegiš, Stojića Gumno – nekropola spaljenih pokojnika. Belegiš. Stojića Gumno – A Necropolis of Cremation Burials. Belgrade: Muzej grada Beograda, pp. 190–5.Google Scholar
Tasić, N. 2003–2004. ‘Historical picture of development of Bronze Age cultures in Vojvodina’. Starinar LIII–LIV: 2334.Google Scholar
Tasić, N. 2004. ‘Historical picture of development of early Iron Age in the Serbian Danube basin’. Balcanica 35: 722.Google Scholar
Tatarkiewicz, W. 1980. A History of Six Ideas. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. 2009. What Color Is the Sacred? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. F. 1999. ‘Envaluing metal: theorizing the Eneolithic “hiatus”’. In Young, S. M. M., Pollard, A. M., Budd, P. and Ixer, R. A (eds.) Metals in Antiquity. British Archaeological Reports International Series 792. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 2232.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thornton, C. P. 2009. ‘Archaeometallurgy: Evidence of a paradigm shift?’ In Kienlin, T. and Roberts, B. (eds.) Metals and Societies. Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway (Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie). Bonn: Habelt, pp. 2533.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. 2000. ‘Afterwords’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18(2): 213–55.Google Scholar
Torma, I. 1971. ‘Das Gräberfeld von Szakály aus der mittleren Bronzezeit’. Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Instituts der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2: 3544.Google Scholar
Torma, I. 1978. ‘A balatonakali bronzkori sír (Das bronzezeitliche Grab in Balatonakali)’. A Veszprém Megyei Múzeumok Közleményei 13: 1524.Google Scholar
Todorović, J. 1977. Karaburma II. The Necropolis of the Bronze Age. Belgrade: Belgrade City Museum.Google Scholar
Trachsler, W. 1966. ‘Precursors of polychrome painted pottery: some examples from the prehistory of Switzerland’. In Matson, F. R. (ed.) Ceramics and Man. London: Methuen, pp. 152–60.Google Scholar
Treherne, P. 1995. ‘The Warrior's Beauty: The Masculine Body and Self-Identity in Bronze-Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology 3: 105–44.Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. and Papert, S. 1992. ‘Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete’. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 11(1): 333.Google Scholar
Tylecote, R. F. 1976. A History of Metallurgy. Metals Society.Google Scholar
Tylecote, R. F. 1987. The Early History of Metallurgy in Europe. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Urban, O. 2000. Der lange Weg zur Geschichte. Die Urgeschichte Österreichs. Vienna: Ueberreuter.Google Scholar
Uzsoki, A. 1959. ‘Elözetes Jelentés a Mosonszentmiklós-jánoshá zapusztai Bronzkori Temetö Ásatásaának Eredményeiröl’. Arrabona 1: 5373.Google Scholar
Valamoti, S. M. 2011. ‘Flax in Neolithic and Bronze Age Greece: archaeobotanical evidence’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 549–60.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S. 1993. ‘Giving the potter a choice’. In Lemonnier, P. (ed.) Technological choices. Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge, pp. 238–88.Google Scholar
Vandkilde, H. 1996. From Stone to Bronze. The Metalwork of the Late Neolithic and Earliest Bronze Age in Denmark. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXXII. Moesgård, Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society, Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Varberg, J., Gratuze, B. and Kaul, F. 2015. ‘Between Egypt, Mesopotamia and Scandinavia: Late Bronze Age glass beads found in Denmark’. Journal of Archeological Science 54: 168–81.Google Scholar
Vasić, R. 1973. Kulturne grupe starijeg gvozdenog doba u Jugoslaviji. Belgrade: Arheološki Institut.Google Scholar
Vasić, R. and Vasić, V. 2003. Bronzezeitliche und eisenzeitliche Vogeldarstellungen im Zentralbalkan. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 78: 156–89.Google Scholar
Vasić, V. and Vasić, R. 2000. ‘The origins of some ‘waterfowl cultures’ on the Balkan peninsula’. SEHUMED 16: 131–8.Google Scholar
Vasić, V. and Vasić, R. 2003–2004. ‘Identifikacija ptičjih predstava u praistoriji. (Identification of bird representations in prehistory)’. Starinar 53–54: 181–92.Google Scholar
Velušček, A. and Greif, T. 1998. ‘Talilnik in livarski kalup z Maharskega prekopa na Ljubljanskem barju’. Arheološki vestnik 49: 3153.Google Scholar
Verhecken, A. 2010. ‘The Moment of Inertia: a Parameter for the Functional Classification of Worldwide Spindle-Whorls from all Periods’. In Andersson Strand, E., Gleba, M., Mannering, U., Munkholt, C. and Ringgaard, M. (eds.) NESAT X. North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 257–70.Google Scholar
Vicze, M. 2009. ‘Nagyrév symbolism revisited: Three decorated vessels from Százhalombatta and Dunaújváros’. Tissicum 19.Google Scholar
Vicze, M. 2011. Bronze Age Cemetery at Dunaújváros-Duna-dűlő. Dissertationes Pannonicae Series IV, Volume 1. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Archaeological Sciences.Google Scholar
Vicze, M. 2013. ‘Expecting the Unexpected: Szàzhalombatta-Földvàr Surprises Once Again’. In Bergerbrant, S. and Sabatini, S. (eds.) Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 71–6.Google Scholar
Vicze, M. and Poroszlai, I. (eds.) 2005. Százhalombatta Archaeological Expedition. Report 2. Százhalombatta.Google Scholar
Viklund, K. 2011. ‘Flax in Sweden: the archaeobotanical, archaeological and historical evidence’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 20: 509–15.Google Scholar
Vinski-Gasparini, K. 1973. Kultura polja sa žarama u sjevernoj Hrvatskoj (Die Urnenfelderkultur in Nordkroatien) (Monografije-Sveuciliste u Zagrebu, Filozofski facultet-Zadar, svezak 1). Zadar: Filozofski fakultet.Google Scholar
Vinski-Gasparini, K. 1983. ‘Kultura polja sa žarama sa svojim grupama’. In Basler, D., Benac, A., Gabrovec, S., Garašanin, M., Tasič, N., Čović, B. and Vinski-Gasparini, K. (eds.) Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV. Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija Nauka I Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja, pp. 647–67.Google Scholar
Visy, Z. (ed.) 2003. Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage.Google Scholar
Vogelsang-Eastwood, G. 1999. Tutankhamun’s Wardrobe. Garments from the Tomb of Tutankhamun. Rotterdam: Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn.Google Scholar
Vogt, E. 1937. Gewebe und Geflechte der Steinzeit. Basel: Verlag E. Birkhäuser and Cie.Google Scholar
Vollmann, D. 2005. Studien zum Übergang von der späten Kupferzeit zur frühen Bronzezeit im östlichen Mitteleuropa. Bonn: Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 77.Google Scholar
von Merhart, G. 1952. ‘Studien über einige Gattungen von Bronzegefäßen’. In Festschrift des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums in Mainz zur Feier seines hundertjährigen Bestehens 1952, Band 2. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, pp. 171.Google Scholar
von Quillfeldt, I. 1995. Die Vollgriffschwerter in Süddeutschland. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung 4, Band 11. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
von Stokar, W. 1938. Spinnen und Weben bei den Germanen. Eine vorgeschichtlich-naturwisenschaftliche Untersuchung. Mannus-Bücherei Bd. 59. Leipzig: Curt Rabitzsch Verlag.Google Scholar
Vranić, S. 2002. Belegiš. Stojića Gumno – A Necropolis of Cremation Burials. Belgrade: Muzej grada Beograda.Google Scholar
Vretemark, M. (with contributions by Stika, H.-P., Berzsényi, B. and Henriksen, P. S.) 2010. ‘Subsistence Strategies’. In Earle, T. and Kristiansen, K. (eds.) Organizing Bronze Age Societies. The Mediterranean, Central Europe and Scandinavia Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–84.Google Scholar
Vukmanović, M. and Popović, P. 1986a. ‘Predmeti kultne namene na nalazištima Bronzanog Doba na Đerdapu’. Zbornik Narodnog Muzeja u Beogradu XVI(1): 8999.Google Scholar
Vukmanović, M. and Popović, P. 1986b. ‘Recherces archeologiques sur la laocalité “Livade” prés de Mala Vrbica’. Đerdpske Sveske III. Belgrade: Arheološki Institut, pp. 713.Google Scholar
Waetzoldt, H. 1972. Untersuchungen zur Neusumerischen Textilindustrie. Studi Economici e Tecnologici I. Rome: Centro per le antichità e la storia dell’arte del Vicino Oriente.Google Scholar
Wallaert-Pêtre, H. 2001. ‘Learning How to Make the Right Pots: Apprenticeship Strategies and Material Culture, a Case Study in Handmade Pottery from Cameroon’. Journal of Anthropological Research 57 (4): 471–93.Google Scholar
Wallaert, H. 2012. ‘Apprenticeship and the Confirmation of Social Boundaries’. In Wendrich, W. (ed.) Archaeology and Apprenticeship. Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 2042.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. and Ottaway, B. S. 2004. Casting experiments and microstructure of archaeologically relevant bronzes. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1331. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Washburn, D. 1999. ‘Perceptual Anthropology: The Cultural Salience of Symmetry’. American Anthropologist 101: 547–62.Google Scholar
Weber, C. 1996. Die Rasiermesser in Südosteuropa. Prähistorische Bronzefunde, Abteilung VIII, Band 5. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Wells, P. S. 2008. Image and Response Early Europe. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wells, P. S. 2012. How Ancient European Saw the World. Vision, Patterns and the Shaping of the Mind in Prehistoric Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wendrich, W. (ed.) 2012. Archaeology and Apprenticeship. Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, And Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, M. H. 2003. ‘The absolute chronology of Late Helladic III A2 revisited’. Annual of the British School at Athens 98: 239–50.Google Scholar
Winghart, S. 1993. ‘Das Wagengrab von Poing, Lkr. Ebersberg, und der Beginn der Urnenfelderzeit in Südbayern’. In Dannheimer, H. and Gebhard, R. (eds.) Das keltische Jahrtausend (Ausstellungskatalog der Pähistorischen Staatssammlung, Band 23). Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, pp. 8893.Google Scholar
Winghart, S. 1999. ‘Die Wagengräber von Poing und Hart a.d. Alz. Evidenz und Ursachen spätbronzezeitlicher Elitenbildung in der Zone nordwärts der Alpen’. In Eliten in der Bronzezeit. Ergebnisse zweier Kolloquien in Mainz und Athen. Mainz: Monographien Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum 43.1, pp. 515–32.Google Scholar
Wirth, S. 2006. ‘Vogel-Sonnen-Barke’. In Beck, H., Geuenich, D. and Steuer, H. (eds.) Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, Band 32. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 552–63.Google Scholar
Wirth, S. 2010. ‘Sonnenbarke und zyklisches Weltbild. Bemerkungen zur Ikonographie der mitteleuropäischen Spätbronzezeit’. In Meller, H. and Bertemes, F. (eds.) Der Griff nach den Sternen, Band 1. Wissenschaftlicher Begleitband zur internationalen Tagung in Halle, 16.–21. Februar 2005 (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle (Saale), Band 5). Halle (Saale): Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt & Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte, pp. 501–15.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1996. The Art of Manipulating Fabric. Iola: Krause.Google Scholar
Wosinsky, M. 1904. Az Őskor Mészbetétes Díszítésû Agyagmûvessége. Budapest.Google Scholar
Zeiere, I. 2012. ‘Latvia’. In Gleba, M. and Mannering, U. (eds.) Textiles and Textile Production in Europe. From Prehistory to ad 400. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 266–74.Google Scholar
Zohary, D., Hopf, M. and Weiss, E. 2012. Domestication of Plants in the Old World. The origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×