Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T03:37:16.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Expertise and Reason in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies and the Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Robert W. Weisberg
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

The thesis of this chapter is that knowledge and reason play an important role in creative thinking. I equate knowledge and expertise (e.g., Ericsson, 1996, 1998, 1999; Weisberg, 2005), the capacity to perform at a high level, acquired through practice (e.g., an expert pilot); or the possession of exceptional knowledge, acquired through study (e.g., an expert on medieval art). Reason is the ability to draw conclusions, a process in which one thought follows from another as the result of deduction or induction. Creative thinking refers to processes underlying production of creative products, which are novel works – or innovations – brought about through goal-directed activities. Thus, we examine the hypothesis that skill and knowledge, as well as reasoning processes, play important roles in innovation. That hypothesis is of interest because much theorizing concerning creative thinking assumes exactly the opposite, that is, that expertise and reason cannot support creative thinking (e.g., Csikszentmihalyi, 1996; Simonton, 2003; Sternberg, 1996). I first consider two general orientation issues: the definition of creativity and whether expertise and reasoning should be considered separate. I then examine the negative view concerning expertise and reason in creativity, which I call the tension view. I then present evidence, from case studies of creative achievements as well as from laboratory studies of problem solving, that expertise and reason play critical roles in creative thinking.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calder, A. (1966). An autobiography with pictures. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
DeGroot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 (Whole No. 270).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329–333.Google Scholar
Everett, W. (2001). The Beatles as musicians: The Quarry Men through “Rubber Soul.”New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem. Memory & Cognition, 32, 990–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Are all insight problems created equal? The search for the prototypical insight problem. Manuscript in preparation, Temple University.Google Scholar
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 5 (pp. 157–188). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Friedel, R., & Israel, P. (1986). Edison's electric light: Biography of an invention. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heppenheimer, T. A. (2003). First flight. The Wright brothers and the invention of the airplane. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Holmes, F. L. (1996). Expert performance and the history of science. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 313–319). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
James, W. (1880, October). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–459.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Reexamining the equal-odds rule in classical composers. In Frois, J. P., Andrade, P., & Marques, J. F. (Eds.) Art and science: Proceedings of the XVIII Congress of the International Association of Empirical Esthetics, 540–543. Lisbon, Portugal: IAEI.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2005). Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of the musical genres of Mozart. Psychology of Music, 33, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, E. G. (1989). Jackson Pollock. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J. (1987). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623–634.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., & Weibe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and non-insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In Keane, M. T. & Gilhooly, K. J. (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 1–44). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Olby, R. (1994). The path to the double helix: The discovery of DNA. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Pariser, D. (1987). The juvenile drawings of Klee, Toulouse-Lautrec, and Picasso. Visual Arts Research, 13, 53–67.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. (2000). The eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Reising, R. (2002). Every sound there is: The Beatles' “Revolver” and the transformation of rock and roll. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sadie, S. (Ed.). (2001). The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Scheerer, M. (1963). On problem-solving. Scientific American, 208, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1995). Foresight in insight? A Darwinian answer. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 465–494). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Costs of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 347–354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2003). Case studies of innovation. In Shavinina, L. (Ed.), International handbook of innovation. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 22, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In Ericsson, A. & Feltovich, P. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook on Expertise and Expert Performance. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., & Sturdivant, N. (2005). An analysis of the creative productivity in four classical composers. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., & Suls, J. M. (1973). An information-processing analysis of Duncker's candle problem. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaslaw, N. (1989). Mozart's symphonies: Context, performance practice, reception. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×