Book contents
- Corporate Personhood
- Corporate Personhood
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- 1 Legal Theories of the Corporate Person
- 2 Philosophical Dimensions of the Corporate Person
- 3 Social Science Dimensions of the Corporate Person
- 4 Constitutional Dimensions of the Corporate Person: Corporate Free Speech
- 5 Constitutional Dimensions of the Corporate Person: Corporate Religion and Race
- 6 Abolishing Corporate Personhood
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2019
Book contents
- Corporate Personhood
- Corporate Personhood
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- 1 Legal Theories of the Corporate Person
- 2 Philosophical Dimensions of the Corporate Person
- 3 Social Science Dimensions of the Corporate Person
- 4 Constitutional Dimensions of the Corporate Person: Corporate Free Speech
- 5 Constitutional Dimensions of the Corporate Person: Corporate Religion and Race
- 6 Abolishing Corporate Personhood
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Corporate Personhood , pp. 275 - 295Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ahdar, Rex, Companies as Religious Liberty Claimants, 5 Oxford J. L. & Religion 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Albert, Stuart & Whetten, David A., Organizational Identity, in 7 Research in Organizational Behavior 263 (L. L. Cummings & Barry M. Staw eds., 1985).Google Scholar
Albert, Stuart & Whetten, David A., Organizational Identity, in Revealing the Corporation: Perspectives on Identity, Image, Reputation, Corporate Branding, and Corporate-Level Marketing 77 (Balmer, John M. T. & Greyser, Stephen A. eds., 2003).Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A. & Demsetz, Harold, Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, 62 Am. Econ. Rev. 777 (1972).Google Scholar
Allen, William T., Our Schizophrenic Conception of the Business Corporation, 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 261 (1992).Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W., Ancient Law and the Punishment of Corporations: Of Frankpledge and Deodand, 71 B.U. L. Rev. 307 (1991).Google Scholar
Alvesson, Mats, Organizational Culture: Meaning, Discourse, and Identity, in The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate 11 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2d ed. 2011).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations (1994).Google Scholar
Amicus Curiae Brief of Corporate and Criminal Law Professors in Support of Petitioners, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014) (Nos. 13–354 & 13–356), 2014 WL 333889.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S. & Pildes, Richard H., Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement, 148 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1503 (2000).Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin, Beyond Anthropomorphism: Attributing Psychological Properties to Animals, in The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics 469 (Beauchamp, Tom L. & Frey, R. G. eds., 2011).Google Scholar
Ashforth, Blake E., Organizational, Subunit, and Individual Identities, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity 79 (Pratt, Michael G. et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Ashkanasy, Neal M. & Härtel, Charmine E. J., Positive and Negative Affective Climate and Culture, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture 136 (Schneider, Benjamin & Barbera, Karen M. eds., 2014).Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., The Cyclical Transformations of the Corporate Form: A Historical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility, 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 767 (2005).Google Scholar
Baddorf, Matthew, Phenomenal Consciousness, Collective Mentality, and Collective Moral Responsibility, Phil. Stud., doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0809-x ( 2016).Google Scholar
Bailyn, Jonathan, A Critical Race Theorist Account of Corporate Racial Standing, 16 Scholar 725 (2014).Google Scholar
Bainbridge, Stephen M., Community and Statism: A Conservative Contractarian Critique of Progressive Corporate Law Scholarship, 82 Cornell L. Rev. 856 (1997) (book review).Google Scholar
Bakan, Joel,, Psychopaths, Inc.: On Corporate Personhood, in The Occupy Handbook 353 (Byrne, Janet ed., 2012).Google Scholar
Baker, C. Edwin, Commercial Speech: A Problem in the Theory of Freedom, 62 Iowa L. Rev. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
Baker, C. Edwin, Scope of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech, 25 UCLA L. Rev. 964 (1978).Google Scholar
Balcerzak, Ashley, Study: Most Americans Want to Kill ‘Citizens United’ with Constitutional Amendment, Ctr. Pub. Integrity (May 10, 2018), www.publicintegrity.org/2018/05/10/21739/study-most-americans-want-kill-citizens-united-constitutional-amendment [https://perma.cc/4SKF-2PGJ].Google Scholar
Balkin, J.M., Some Realism About Pluralism: Legal Realist Approaches to the First Amendment, 1990 Duke L.J. 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., How Social Movements Change (or Fail to Change) the Constitution: The Case of the New Departure, 39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 27 (2005).Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., The Proliferation of Legal Truth, 26 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 5 (2003).Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. & Siegel, Reva B., Principles, Practices, and Social Movements, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 927 (2006).Google Scholar
Balmer, John M. T., Corporate Brand Cultures and Communities, in Brand Culture 34 (Schroeder, Jonathan E. & Salzer-Mörling, Miriam eds., 2006).Google Scholar
Baron, Robert S., So Right It’s Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making, in 37 Advances Experimental Soc. Psychol. 219 (Zanna, Mark P. ed., 2005).Google Scholar
Batchis, Wayne, The Right’s First Amendment: The Politics of Free Speech & the Return of Conservative Libertarianism (2016).Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, Foreword: The Debate on Contractual Freedom in Corporate Law, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 1395 (1989).Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (1973).Google Scholar
Benson, Robert W., How Many Strikes Do Big Corporations Get? The Petition to Revoke UNOCAL’s Corporate Charter, 55 Guild Prac. 113 (1998).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. & Neuhaus, Richard John, To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy (1977).Google Scholar
Berle, A.A. Jr., The Developing Law of Corporate Concentration, 19 U. Chi. L. Rev. 639 (1952).Google Scholar
Jr., Berle, Adolf, A., Constitutional Limitations on Corporate Activity – Protection of Personal Rights from Invasion Through Economic Power, 100 U. Pa. L. Rev. 933 (1952).Google Scholar
Jr., Berle, Adolf, A., Foreword, in The Corporation in Modern Society, at ix (Mason, Edward S. ed., 1959).Google Scholar
Berle, Jr., Adolf A. & Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays (Hardy, Henry & Hausheer, Roger eds., 1998).Google Scholar
Björnsson, Gunnar & Hess, Kendy, Corporate Crocodile Tears? On the Reactive Attitudes of Corporate Agents, 94 Phil. & Phenomenological Res. 273 (2017).Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M., Corporate Personhood and the Corporate Persona, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 785.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M. & Pollman, Elizabeth, The Derivative Nature of Corporate Constitutional Rights, 56 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1673 (2015).Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. & Scott, W. Richard, Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach (1962).Google Scholar
Bleifuss, Joel, Corporations Are Not People, In These Times (Sept. 19, 2011), http://inthesetimes.com/article/11937/corporations_are_not_people [https://perma.cc/7XVZ-ZYRK].Google Scholar
Blumberg, Phillip I., The Corporate Entity in an Era of Multinational Corporations, 15 Del. J. Corp. L. 283 (1990).Google Scholar
Boudin, Louis B., Truth and Fiction About the Fourteenth Amendment, 16 N.Y.U. L.Q. Rev. 19 (1938).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field, 38 Hastings L.J. 814 (1987).Google Scholar
Bratton, William W., The Economic Structure of the Post-Contractual Corporation, 87 Nw. U. L. Rev. 180 (1992).Google Scholar
Jr., Bratton, William, W., The “Nexus of Contracts” Corporation: A Critical Appraisal, 74 Cornell L. Rev. 407 (1989).Google Scholar
Brennan-Marquez, Kiel, A Business Can Exercise Religion, but Hobby Lobby Still Gets It Wrong, Bos. Rev. (July 7, 2014), http://bostonreview.net/blogs/kiel-brennan-marquez-hobby-lobby-for-profit-corporations-religion [https://perma.cc/3ZMJ-6V8A].Google Scholar
Brief of Amici Curiae Corporate Law Professors in Support of Respondents, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n, 138 S. Ct. 1719 (2018) (No. 16–111), 2017 WL 5127303.Google Scholar
Brief for Petitioners, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n, 138 S. Ct. 1719 (2018) (No. 16–111), 2017 WL 3913762.Google Scholar
Briloff, Abraham J., LBOs and MBOs in the Takeover Alphabet Soup: Some Questions for Lawyers, Answers from an Accountant, 15 J. Corp. L. 171 (1990).Google Scholar
Brodbeck, May, Methodological Individualisms: Definition and Reduction, in Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences 280 (Brodbeck, May ed., 1968).Google Scholar
Brown, W. Jethro, The Personality of the Corporation and the State, 21 Law Q. Rev. 365 (1905).Google Scholar
Buccola, Vincent S. J., Corporate Rights and Organizational Neutrality, 101 Iowa L. Rev. 499 (2016).Google Scholar
Buell, Samuel W., The Blaming Function of Entity Criminal Liability, 81 Ind. L. J. 473 (2006).Google Scholar
Butler, Henry N., The Contractual Theory of the Corporation, 11 Geo. Mason U. L. Rev., no. 4, Summer 1989, at 99.Google Scholar
Calmore, John O., Racialized Space and the Culture of Segregation: “Hewing a Stone of Hope from a Mountain of Despair,” 143 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1233 (1995).Google Scholar
Carrithers, Michael et al., eds., The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History (1985).Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter, Introducing Persons: Theories and Arguments in the Philosophy of Mind (1986).Google Scholar
Chambers, Henry L. Jr., Telescoping and Collectivizing Religious Free Exercise Rights, 75 Md. L. Rev. 392 (2015).Google Scholar
Chen, Ronald & Hanson, Jon, The Illusion of Law: The Legitimating Schemas of Modern Policy and Corporate Law, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Chia, Robert, Discourse Analysis as Organizational Analysis, 7 Organization 513 (2000).Google Scholar
Chirinko, Robert S. & Wilson, Daniel J., Can Lower Tax Rates Be Bought? Business Rent-Seeking and Tax Competition Among U.S. States (Fed. Reserve Bank of S.F. Working Paper Series, Paper 2009–29, 2010), www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp09-29bk.pdf [https://perma.cc/AM84-8WHP].Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. & Durham, W. Cole Jr., The Emergence of Corporate Religious Freedom, in The Changing Nature of Religious Rights Under International Law 256 (Evans, Malcolm D. et al. eds., 2015).Google Scholar
Clements, Jeff, Citizens United and Corporate Personhood: Jeff Clements Responds to Kent Greenfield’s Washington Post Op-ed, Free Speech for People (Jan. 23, 2012), http://freespeechforpeople.org/node/315 [https://perma.cc/9HKD-SLNX].Google Scholar
Clements, Jeffrey D., Corporations Are Not People: Why They Have More Rights Than You Do and What You Can Do About It (2012).Google Scholar
Cmty. Envtl. Legal Def. Fund, Statement on Efforts to Amend the U.S. Constitution Following Citizens United (Jan. 2012), https://celdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/CELDF-CITIZENS-UNITED-STATEMENT-JANUARY-17–2012.pdf [https://perma.cc/7AK8-F4UW].Google Scholar
Cmty. Envtl. Legal Def. Fund et al., Model Brief of Amici Curiae, Preface (2003), www.ratical.org/corporations/demoBrief.pdf [https://perma.cc/8YWK-H6WZ].Google Scholar
Coates, IV, John, C., Corporate Politics, Governance, and Value Before and After Citizens United, 9 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 657 (2012).Google Scholar
Coates, John C. & Taylor Lincoln, Fulfilling the Promise of ‘Citizens United’, Wash. Post: Opinions (Sep. 6, 2011), www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fulfilling-the-promise-of-citizens-united/2011/09/02/gIQAa4np7 J_story.html [https://perma.cc/2Q8 M-TEBM].Google Scholar
Coffin, Roger, A Responsibility to Speak: Citizens United, Corporate Governance and Managing Risks, 8 Hastings Bus. L.J. 103 (2012).Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, Social Movements, Law, and Society: The Institutionalization of the Environmental Movement, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 85 (2001).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix S., Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach, 35 Colum. L. Rev. 809 (1935).Google Scholar
Coleridge, Greg, Gorsuch’s Gory Expansion of Corporate Personhood, By What Authority (Program on Corps., Law & Democracy, South Yarmouth, MA), Mar./Apr. 2017, www.poclad.org/BWA/files/2017/BWAMarchApril2017.pdf [https://perma.cc/N423-MQVW].Google Scholar
Coleridge, Greg, The System Isn’t Broken, It’s Fixed: Ending Big Money and Corporations in Our Elections, 44 U. Toledo L. Rev. 541 (2013).Google Scholar
Collins, Jane L. & Kahn, Walker N., The Hijacking of a New Corporate Form? Benefit Corporations and Corporate Personhood, 45 Econ. & Soc’y 325 (2016).Google Scholar
Comment, Law for Sale: A Study of the Delaware Corporation Law of 1967, 117 U. Pa. L. Rev. 861 (1969).Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Mihaela, Attributions of Moral Responsibility: From Aristotle to Corporations, 62 Annals U. Bucharest Phil. Series, no. 1, 2013, at 19.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Mihaela & Kaptein, Muel, Mutually Enhancing Responsibility: A Theoretical Exploration of the Interaction Mechanisms Between Individual and Corporate Moral Responsibility, 129 J. Bus. Ethics 325 (2015).Google Scholar
Cooke, Robert A. & Szumal, Janet L., Using the Organizational Culture Inventory to Understand the Operating Cultures of Organizations, in Handbook of Organizational Culture & Climate 147 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2000).Google Scholar
Cormode, D. Scott, Does Institutional Isomorphism Imply Secularization?: Churches and Secular Voluntary Associations in the Turn-of-the-Century City, in Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations 116 (Demerath, N. J. III et al. eds., 1998).Google Scholar
Cornelissen, Joep P. et al., Bridging and Integrating Theories on Organizational Identity, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity 200 (Pratt, Michael G. et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Cortright, S. A. & Pierucci, Ernest S., Clearing Ground: Toward a Social Ethic of Corporate Management, in Rethinking the Purpose of Business 136 (Cortright, S. A. & Naughton, Michael J. eds., 2002).Google Scholar
Cressey, Donald R., The Poverty of Theory in Corporate Crime Research, in 1 Advances in Criminological Theory 31 (Laufer, William S. & Adler, Freda eds., 1989).Google Scholar
Cressman, Derek D., When Money Talks: The High Price of “Free” Speech and the Selling of Democracy (2016).Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, Meir, Rights, Persons, and Organizations: A Legal Theory for Bureaucratic Society (2d ed. 2016).Google Scholar
Danziger, Kurt, Historical Psychology of Persons: Categories and Practice, in The Psychology of Personhood: Philosophical, Historical, Social-Developmental, and Narrative Perspectives 59 (Martin, Jack & Bickhard, Mark H. eds., 2013).Google Scholar
Davis, Joseph Stancliffe, Essays in the Earlier History of American Corporations (Vol. 2) (Lawbook Exch. 2006) (1917).Google Scholar
DeBow, Michael E. & Lee, Dwight R., Shareholders, Nonshareholders and Corporate Law: Communitarianism and Resource Allocation, 18 Del. J. Corp. L. 393 (1993).Google Scholar
De George, Richard T., Corporations and Morality, in Shame, Responsibility and the Corporation 57 (Hugh Curtler ed., 1986).Google Scholar
De George, Richard T., Social Reality and Social Relations, 37 Rev. Metaphysics 3 (1983).Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Mansfield, Harvey C. & Winthrop, Delba eds. & trans., Univ. of Chi. Press 2000) (1840).Google Scholar
Dempsey, James, Corporations and Non-Agential Moral Responsibility, 30 J. Applied Phil. 334 (2013).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (MIT Press 1981 ) (1978).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality, 35 Yale L.J. 655 (1926).Google Scholar
Dibadj, Reza, Expressive Rights for Shareholders after Citizens United?, 46 U.S.F. L. Rev. 459 (2011).Google Scholar
Dixon, Bruce A., Time for a Corporate Death Penalty, Black Agenda Rep. (June 9, 2010), https://blackagendareport.com/content/time-corporate-death-penalty [https://perma.cc/4GX9-H3KZ].Google Scholar
Dodd, Senator Christopher, S., Press Release, Sen. Dodd Introduces Constitutional Amendment to Reverse Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling, U.S. Fed. News, Feb. 25, 2010, 2010 WLNR 3913103.Google Scholar
Dubbink, Wim & Smith, Jeffery, A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility, 14 Ethical Theory & Moral Prac. 223 (2011).Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A., From Citizens to Plutocrats: Nineteenth-Century Shareholder Voting Rights and Theories of the Corporation, in Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture 66 (Lipartito, Kenneth & Sicilia, David B. eds., 2004).Google Scholar
Eagles, Thad, Note, Free Exercise, Inc.: A New Framework for Adjudicating Corporate Religious Liberty Claims, 90 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 589 (2015).Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. & Fischel, Daniel R., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (1991).Google Scholar
Edmonds, S. Chris, The Culture Engine: A Framework for Driving Results, Inspiring Your Employees, and Transforming Your Workplace (2014).Google Scholar
Edwards, Jan & Morgan, Molly, Abolish Corporate Personhood, Reclaim Democracy (May 20, 2004), http://reclaimdemocracy.org/abolish-corporate-personhood/ [https://perma.cc/7K4 V-NDQY].Google Scholar
Egan, Matt, Wells Fargo Uncovers up to 1.4 Million More Fake Accounts, CNN Money (Aug. 31, 2017), http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/31/investing/wells-fargo-fake-accounts/index.html [https://perma.cc/Y24 F-Q5KT].Google Scholar
Egan, Matt, Wells Fargo Ups Its Customer Settlement to $142 Million over Fake Accounts, CNN Money (Apr. 21, 2017), http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/21/investing/wells-fargo-expands-customer-settlement/index.html [https://perma.cc/Q3LV-ZZ2E].Google Scholar
Eggen, Dan, Poll: Large Majority Opposes Supreme Court’s Decision on Campaign Financing, Wash. Post (Feb. 17, 2010), www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/17/AR2010021701151.html [https://perma.cc/7RQD-ZEDQ].Google Scholar
Ehrhart, Mark G. et al., Organizational Climate and Culture: An Introduction to Theory, Research, and Practice (2014).Google Scholar
Elsbach, Kimberly D. & Dukerich, Janet M., Organizational Identity and the Undesired Self, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity 257 (Pratt, Michael G. et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas I., Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment, 72 Yale L.J. 877 (1963).Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A., Citizens United v. FEC: The Constitutional Right That Big Corporations Should Have But Do Not Want, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 639 (2011).Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr., Channeling: Identity-Based Social Movements and Public Law, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 419 (2001).Google Scholar
Estes, Ralph, Tyranny of the Bottom Line: Why Corporations Make Good People Do Bad Things (1996).Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, 88 J. Pol. Econ. 288 (1980).Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. & Jensen, Michael C., Separation of Ownership and Control, 26 J. L. & Econ. 301 (1983).Google Scholar
Feldman, Daniel C. & O’Neill, Olivia Amanda, The Role of Socialization, Orientation, and Training Programs in Transmitting Culture and Climate and Enhancing Performance, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture 44 (Schneider, Benjamin & Barbera, Karen M. eds., 2014).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Corporate Persons II: Persons and Their Associations, in 63 Proc. Aristotelian Soc’y, Supp. Vol. 267 (1989).Google Scholar
Fisch, Jill E., The “Bad Man” Goes to Washington: The Effect of Political Influence on Corporate Duty, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 1593 (2006).Google Scholar
Fisch, Jill E., Measuring Efficiency in Corporate Law: The Role of Shareholder Primacy, 31 J. Corp. L. 637 (2006).Google Scholar
Flamholtz, Eric G. & Randle, Yvonne, Corporate Culture: The Ultimate Strategic Asset (2011).Google Scholar
Flamholtz, Eric G. & Randle, Yvonne, Implications of Organizational Life Cycles for Corporate Culture and Climate, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture 235 (Schneider, Benjamin & Barbera, Karen M. eds., 2014).Google Scholar
Flynn, John J., The Jurisprudence of Corporate Personhood: The Misuse of a Legal Concept, in Corporations and Society: Power and Responsibility 131 (Samuels, Warren J. & Miller, Arthur S. eds., 1987).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G., Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person, 68 J. Phil. 5 (1971).Google Scholar
Franzen, Giep & Bouwman, Margot, The Mental World of Brands: Mind, Memory and Brand Success (2001).Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation, in Ethical Theory and Business 56 (Beauchamp, Tom L. & Bowie, Norman E. eds., 6th ed. 2001).Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, Planet of the APs: Reflections on the Scale of Law and Its Users, 53 Buff. L. Rev. 1369 (2006).Google Scholar
Gans, David H. & Kendall, Douglas T., A Capitalist Joker: The Strange Origins, Disturbing Past, and Uncertain Future of Corporate Personhood in American Law, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 643 (2011).Google Scholar
Gans, David H. & Shapiro, Ilya, Religious Liberties for Corporations?: Hobby Lobby, the Affordable Care Act, and the Constitution (2014).Google Scholar
Gaylord, Scott W., For-Profit Corporations, Free Exercise, and the HHS Mandate, 91 Wash. U. L. Rev. 589 (2014).Google Scholar
Gedicks, Frederick Mark, “Substantial” Burdens: How Courts May (and Why They Must) Judge Burdens on Religion under RFRA, 85 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 94 (2017).Google Scholar
Geisinger, Alex C. & Stein, Michael Ashley, Expressive Law and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 114 Mich. L. Rev. 1061 (2016).Google Scholar
Gibson, David, Doing Good and Doing Well: Faith-Based Investing Converts the Skeptics, USA Today (May 31, 2017), www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2017/05/31/faith-based-investing/102351062 [https://perma.cc/775 N-P4RX].Google Scholar
Gibson, Kevin, Toward an Intermediate Position on Corporate Moral Personhood, 101 J. Bus. Ethics (Supp. 1) 71 (2011).Google Scholar
Jr., Gibson, Roger, F., Corporations, Persons, and Moral Responsibility, 21 J. Thought, no. 2, Summer 1986, at 17.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Associations and Law: The Classical and Early Christian Stages (Heiman, George ed. & trans., 1977).Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto, Political Theories of the Middle Age (Frederic William Maitland trans., Lawbook Exch. 2002) (1900).Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher, ed., The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient and Modern Philosophy (1990).Google Scholar
Gioia, Dennis A. & Hamilton, Aimee L., Great Debates in Organizational Identity Study, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity 21 (Pratt, Michael G. et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Gobé, Marc, Emotional Branding: The New Paradigm for Connecting Brands to People (2001).Google Scholar
Gordon, Gwendolyn, Culture in Corporate Law or: A Black Corporation, a Christian Corporation, and a Māori Corporation Walk into a Bar …, 39 Seattle U. L. Rev. 353 (2016).Google Scholar
Graham, Howard Jay, The “Conspiracy Theory” of the Fourteenth Amendment, 47 Yale L.J. 371 (1938).Google Scholar
Graham, Howard Jay, The “Conspiracy Theory” of the Fourteenth Amendment: 2, 48 Yale L.J. 171 (1938).Google Scholar
Graham, Howard Jay, An Innocent Abroad: The Constitutional Corporate “Person,” 2 UCLA L. Rev. 155 (1955).Google Scholar
Grantham, Ross, Commentary on Goddard, in Corporate Personality in the 20th Century 65 (Rickett, Charles E. F. & Grantham, Ross B. eds., 1998).Google Scholar
Gray, John Chipman, The Nature and Sources of the Law (Gray, Roland ed., Macmillan Co. 2d ed. 1921) (1909).Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent, Religious Toleration and Claims of Conscience, in The Rise of Corporate Religious Liberty 3 (Schwartzman, Micah et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Greendorfer, Marc A., Blurring Lines Between Churches and Secular Corporations: The Compelling Case of the Benefit Corporation’s Right to the Free Exercise of Religion (with a post-Hobby Lobby Epilogue), 39 Del. J. Corp. L. 819 (2015).Google Scholar
Greenfield, Kent, The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities (2006).Google Scholar
Greenfield, Kent & Winkler, Adam, The U.S. Supreme Court’s Cultivation of Corporate Personhood, Atlantic (June 24, 2015), www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/raisins-hotels-corporate-personhood-supreme-court/396773 [https://perma.cc/FV24-LTS3].Google Scholar
Greenwood, Daniel J. H., Essential Speech: Why Corporate Speech Is Not Free, 83 Iowa L. Rev. 995 (1998).Google Scholar
Greenwood, Daniel J. H., Neofeudalism: The Surprising Foundations of Corporate Constitutional Rights, 2017 U. Ill. L. Rev. 163.Google Scholar
Grossman, Richard L. & Adams, Frank T., Taking Care of Business: Citizenship and the Charter of Incorporation, New Solutions, Spring 1993, at 7.Google Scholar
Guldenschuh, David, Article V Progress Report, Article V Caucus, http://articlevcaucus.com/news/article-v-progress-report-4/ [https://perma.cc/25QX-N4SC].Google Scholar
Guthey, Eric, New Economy Romanticism, Narratives of Corporate Personhood, and the Antimanagerial Impulse, in Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture 321 (Lipartito, Kenneth & Sicilia, David B. eds., 2004).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian, Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory (1995).Google Scholar
Hadani, Michael, Bonardi, Jean-Philippe & Dahan, Nicolas M., Corporate Political Activity, Public Policy Uncertainty, and Firm Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis, 15 Strategic Org. 338 (2016).Google Scholar
Hadani, Michael & Schuler, Douglas A., In Search of El Dorado: The Elusive Financial Returns on Corporate Political Investment, 34 Strategic Mgmt. J. 165 (2013).Google Scholar
Hager, Mark M., Bodies Politic: The Progressive History of Organizational “Real Entity” Theory, 50 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 575 (1989).Google Scholar
Haji, Ish, On the Ultimate Responsibility of Collectives, 30 Midwest Stud. Phil. 292 (2006).Google Scholar
Hallowell, Billy, Here Are 5 Christian Companies That Join Chick-fil-A in Publicly-Proclaiming Their Bible-Based Views, Blaze (Aug 2, 2012), www.theblaze.com/news/2012/08/02/here-are-5-christian-companies-that-join-chick-fil-a-in-publicly-proclaiming-their-bible-based-faith/ [https://perma.cc/9R7S-4XQN].Google Scholar
Hammerstrom, Doug, The Hijacking of the Fourteenth Amendment, Reclaim Democracy (2002), http://reclaimdemocracy.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/fourteenth_amendment_hammerstrom.pdf [https://perma.cc/TSL5-W5VE].Google Scholar
Hammerstrom, Doug, Why Bother with Corporate Personhood, www.nancho.net/corperson/cpbother.html [https://perma.cc/K4XK-B7CQ].Google Scholar
Harris, Ron, Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720–1844 (2000).Google Scholar
Harris, Ron, The Transplantation of the Legal Discourse on Corporate Personality Theories: From German Codification to British Political Pluralism and American Big Business, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1421 (2006).Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver, An Economist’s Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, 89 Colum.L. Rev. 1757 (1989).Google Scholar
Härtel, Charmine E. J. & Ashkanasy, Neal M., Healthy Human Cultures as Positive Work Environments, in The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate 85 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2d ed. 2011).Google Scholar
Hartley, Roger C., How Failed Attempts to Amend the Constitution Mobilize Political Change (2017).Google Scholar
Hartman, Edwin M., The Commons and the Moral Organization, 4 Bus. Ethics Q. 253 (1994).Google Scholar
Hartmann, Thom, The Crash of 2016: The Plot to Destroy America – and What We Can Do to Stop It (2013).Google Scholar
Hartmann, Thom, Unequal Protection: How Corporations Became “People” – and You Can Fight Back (2d ed. 2010).Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L., Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, The Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections (2016).Google Scholar
Hasnas, John, The Phantom Menace of the Responsibility Deficit, in The Moral Responsibility of Firms 89 (Orts, Eric W. & Craig Smith, N. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Hasnas, John, Should Corporations Have the Right to Vote? A Paradox in the Theory of Corporate Moral Agency, J. Bus. Ethics, doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3172-0 ( 2016).Google Scholar
Hatch, Mary Jo, Material and Meaning in the Dynamics of Organizational Culture and Identity with Implications for the Leadership of Organizational Change, in The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate 341 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2d ed. 2011).Google Scholar
Hatch, Mary Jo, with Cunliffe, Ann L., Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives (3d ed. 2013).Google Scholar
Hatch, Mary Jo & Schultz, Majken, Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies Can Align Strategy, Culture, and Identity Through Corporate Branding (2008).Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz & Simmel, Marianne, An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior, 57 Am. J. Psychol. 243 (1944).Google Scholar
Held, Virginia, Corporations, Persons, and Responsibility, in Shame, Responsibility and the Corporation 159 (Curtler, Hugh ed., 1986).Google Scholar
Helfand, Michael A. & Richman, Barak D., The Challenge of Co-Religionist Commerce, 64 Duke L.J. 769 (2015).Google Scholar
Henn, Harry G. & Alexander, John R., Laws of Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (3d student ed. 1983).Google Scholar
Hess, Kendy, The Unrecognized Consensus About Firm Moral Responsibility, in The Moral Responsibility of Firms 169 (Orts, Eric W. & Craig Smith, N. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Hess, Kendy M., Because They Can: The Basis for the Moral Obligations of (Certain) Collectives, 38 Midwest Stud. Phil. 203 (2014).Google Scholar
Hess, Kendy M., The Free Will of Corporations (and Other Collectives), 168 Phil. Stud. 241 (2014).Google Scholar
Hess, Kendy M., “If You Tickle Us…”: How Corporations Can Be Moral Agents Without Being Persons, 47 J. Value Inquiry 319 (2013).Google Scholar
Hess, Kendy M., The Modern Corporation as Moral Agent: The Capacity for “Thought” and a “First-Person Perspective,” 26 Sw. Phil. Rev., no. 1, Jan. 2010, at 61.Google Scholar
Hessen, Robert, Editorial, Creatures of the State? The Case Against Federal Chartering of Corporations, Barron’s Nat’l Bus. & Fin. Wkly., May 24, 1976, at 7.Google Scholar
Hightower, Jim, Organize in 2012, Other Words (Jan. 9, 2012), https://otherwords.org/organize_in_2012/ [https://perma.cc/W332-PL99].Google Scholar
Hindriks, Frank, How Autonomous Are Collective Agents? Corporate Rights and Normative Individualism, 79 Erkenntnis 1565 (2014).Google Scholar
Hilt, Eric, Early American Corporations and the State, in Corporations and American Democracy 37 (Lamoreaux, Naomi R. & Novak, William J. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J., Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory, 88 W. Va. L. Rev. 173 (1985).Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, The Classical Corporation in American Legal Thought, 76 Geo. L.J. 1593 (1988).Google Scholar
Huber, Wm. Dennis, Law, Language and Corporatehood: Corporations and the U.S. Constitution, 1 Int’l J. for Rule Law, no. 2, Dec. 2017, at 78.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard, The Legitimacy of the Business Corporation in the Law of the United States 1780–1970 ( 1970).Google Scholar
Indep. Dirs. of the Bd. of Wells Fargo & Co., Sales Practices Investigation Report ( 2017), https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3549238/Wells-Fargo-Sales-Practice-Investigation-Board.pdf [https://perma.cc/4JKQ-P382].Google Scholar
Interbrand, Best Global Brands 2017 Rankings, www.interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2017/ranking/ [https://perma.cc/QD6E-CDNT].Google Scholar
Iwai, Katsuhito, Persons, Things and Corporations: The Corporate Personality Controversy and Comparative Corporate Governance, 47 Am. J. Comp. L. 583 (1999).Google Scholar
Janis, Irving L., Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (2d ed. 1982).Google Scholar
Jeavons, Thomas H., Identifying Characteristics of “Religious” Organizations: An Exploratory Proposal, in Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations 79 (Demerath, N. J. III et al. eds., 1998).Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 J. Fin. Econ. 305 (1976).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyman, Law and Legal Theory in the History of Corporate Responsibility: Corporate Personhood, 35 Seattle U. L. Rev. 1135 (2012).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyman & Millon, David, Corporate Law After Hobby Lobby, 70 Bus. Law. 1 (2014/2015).Google Scholar
Joo, Thomas W., The Modern Corporation and Campaign Finance: Incorporating Corporate Governance Analysis into First Amendment Jurisprudence, 79 Wash. U. L.Q. 1 (2001).Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence, 83 Va. L. Rev. 349 (1997).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (Wolff, Robert Paul ed., Lewis White Beck trans., Bobbs-Merrill Co. 1969) (1785).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Robert G., Corporations, Common Goods, and Human Persons, 4 Ave Maria L. Rev. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Kim, Susanna M., Characteristics of Soulless Persons: The Applicability of the Character Evidence Rule to Corporations, 2000 U. Ill. L. Rev. 763.Google Scholar
Kish-Gephart, Jennifer J. et al., Bad Apples, Bad Cases, and Bad Barrels: Meta-Analytic Evidence About Sources of Unethical Decisions at Work, 95 J. Applied Psychol. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
Korten, Fran, 10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics, YES! Mag. (Jan. 25, 2010), www.yesmagazine.org/people-power/10-ways-to-stop-corporate-dominance-of-politics [https://perma.cc/KZT6-FXWV].Google Scholar
Krannich, Jess M., The Corporate “Person”: A New Analytical Approach to a Flawed Method of Constitutional Interpretation, 37 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 61 (2005).Google Scholar
Kreiner, Glen E., Organizational Identity: Culture’s Conceptual Cousin, in The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate 463 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2d ed. 2011).Google Scholar
Kuhner, Timothy K., Capitalism v. Democracy: Money in Politics and the Free Market Constitution (2014).Google Scholar
Ladd, John, Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations, 54 Monist 488 (1970).Google Scholar
Ladd, John, Persons and Responsibility: Ethical Concepts and Impertinent Analogies, in Shame, Responsibility and the Corporation 77 (Curtler, Hugh ed., 1986).Google Scholar
LaFollette, Hugh, Introduction, in The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics 1 (LaFollette, Hugh ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (1999).Google Scholar
Lakoff, Sanford A., Private Government in the Managed Society, in Private Government 218 (Lakoff, Sanford A. with Rich, Daniel eds., 1973).Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904 (1985).Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Partnerships, Corporations, and the Limits on Contractual Freedom in U.S. History: An Essay in Economics, Law, and Culture, in Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture 29 (Lipartito, Kenneth & David B. Sicilia eds., 2004).Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R. & Novak, William J., Corporations and American Democracy: An Introduction, in Corporations and American Democracy 1 (Lamoreaux, Naomi R. & Novak, William J. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Latham, Earl, The Body Politic of the Corporation, in The Corporation in Modern Society 218 (Mason, Edward S. ed., 1959).Google Scholar
Laufer, William S., Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds: The Failure of Corporate Criminal Liability (2006).Google Scholar
Levitt, Justin, Confronting the Impact of Citizens United, 29 Yale L. & Pol’y Rev. 217 (2010).Google Scholar
Lewis, Anthony, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment (2007).Google Scholar
Linzey, Thomas, Awakening a Sleeping Giant: Creating a Quasi-Private Cause of Action for Revoking Corporate Charters in Response to Environmental Violations, 13 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 219 (1995).Google Scholar
Linzey, Thomas, Petition to Attorney General of Delaware to Revoke Corporate Charters of WMX Technologies and Chemical Waste Management Inc., 52 Guild Prac. 116 (1995).Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth & Sicilia, David B., Afterword: Toward New Renderings, in Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture 343 (Lipartito, Kenneth & Sicilia, David B. eds., 2004).Google Scholar
Lipartito, Kenneth & Sicilia, David B., Introduction: Crossing Corporate Boundaries, in Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture 1 (Lipartito, Kenneth & Sicilia, David B. eds., 2004).Google Scholar
List, Christian, What Is It Like to Be a Group Agent?, Noûs 1, doi:10.1111/nous.12162 ( 2016).Google Scholar
List, Christian & Pettit, Philip, Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents (2011).Google Scholar
Long, Norton E., The Corporation, Its Satellites, and the Local Community, in The Corporation in Modern Society 202 (Mason, Edward S. ed., 1959).Google Scholar
Lund, Christopher C., Religious Liberty After Gonzales: A Look at State RFRAs, 55 S.D. L. Rev. 466 (2010).Google Scholar
Magid, Henry Meyer, English Political Pluralism: The Problem of Freedom and Organization (AMS Press, Inc. 1966) (1941).Google Scholar
Maitland, Ian, How Insiders Abuse the Idea of Corporate Personality, in The Moral Responsibility of Firms 106 (Orts, Eric W. & Craig Smith, N. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Manski-McCabe-Graves: ‘Overrule the Court’ Rally in Madison, Democracy Square (Feb. 16, 2010), http://ds.liberalart.space/news/manski-mccabe-graves-overrule-court-rally-madison [https://perma.cc/TJ4 C-JB8 G].Google Scholar
Mark, Gregory A., Hobby Lobby and Corporate Personhood: Taking the U.S. Supreme Court’s Reasoning at Face Value, 65 DePaul L. Rev. 535 (2016).Google Scholar
Mark, Gregory A., Comment, The Personification of the Business Corporation in American Law, 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1441 (1987).Google Scholar
Martin, Jack & Bickhard, Mark H., Introducing Persons and the Psychology of Personhood, in The Psychology of Personhood: Philosophical, Historical, Social-Developmental, and Narrative Perspectives 1 (Martin, Jack & Bickhard, Mark H. eds., 2013).Google Scholar
Mason, Edward S., Introduction, in The Corporation in Modern Society 1 (Mason, Edward S. ed., 1959).Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; the Notion of Self (W.D. Halls trans. ), in The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History 1 (Carrithers, Michael et al. eds., 1985).Google Scholar
May, Larry, The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group-Based Harm, and Corporate Rights (1987).Google Scholar
Mayer, Carl J., Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights, 41 Hastings L.J. 577 (1990).Google Scholar
Mayer, David M., A Review of the Literature on Ethical Climate and Culture, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture 415 (Schneider, Benjamin & Barbera, Karen M. eds., 2014).Google Scholar
McCluskey, Martha T., The Substantive Politics of Formal Corporate Power, 53 Buff. L. Rev. 1453 (2006).Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W., Reconsidering Citizens United as a Press Clause Case, 123 Yale L.J. 412 (2013).Google Scholar
McKenna, Michael, Collective Responsibility and an Agent Meaning Theory, 30 Midwest Stud. Phil. 16 (2006).Google Scholar
Meese, Alan J. & Oman, Nathan B., Hobby Lobby, Corporate Law, and the Theory of the Firm: Why For-Profit Corporations Are RFRA Persons, 127 Harv. L. Rev. F. 273 (2014).Google Scholar
Messieh, Nancy, 12 Tech Companies That Offer Their Employees the Coolest Perks, Next Web (Apr. 9, 2012), https://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/04/09/12-startups-that-offer-their-employees-the-coolest-perks/ [https://perma.cc/H2U7-X4DY].Google Scholar
Metzger, Michael B., Corporate Criminal Liability for Defective Products: Policies, Problems, and Prospects, 73 Geo. L.J. 1 (1984).Google Scholar
Meyers, William, The Santa Clara Blues: Corporate Personhood versus Democracy (2000), http://reclaimdemocracy.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/santa_clara_blues.pdf [https://perma.cc/RZ78-XHY9].Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur S., Corporations and Our Two Constitutions, in Corporations and Society: Power and Responsibility 241 (Samuels, Warren J. & Miller, Arthur S. eds., 1987).Google Scholar
Miller, Darrell A. H., Guns, Inc.: Citizens United, McDonald, and the Future of Corporate Constitutional Rights, 86 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 887 (2011).Google Scholar
Millon, David, The Single Constituency Argument in the Economic Analysis of Business Law, in Law & Economics: Toward Social Justice 43 (Gold, Dana L. ed., 2009).Google Scholar
Moore, Geoff, Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications, 21 J. Bus. Ethics 329 (1999).Google Scholar
Moore, John D., The First Amendment Case for Corporate Religious Rights, 16 Nev. L.J. 1 (2015).Google Scholar
Morawetz, Victor, A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations (Vol. 1) (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 2d ed. 1886).Google Scholar
Morawetz, Victor,, A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations other than Charitable (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 1882).Google Scholar
Morgan, Molly & Edwards, Jan, Abolish Corporate Personhood, 59 Guild Prac. 209 (2002).Google Scholar
Morris, Paul et al., Beyond Anecdotes: An Empirical Study of “Anthropomorphism,” 8 Soc’y & Animals 151 (2000).Google Scholar
Move to Amend, The Path to the 28th Amendment: Strategic Plan to Pass the “We the People Amendment” to the United States Constitution (2016), https://movetoamend.org/sites/default/files/move_to_amend_strategic_plan.pdf [https://perma.cc/24K3-V8WM].Google Scholar
Myers, Joe, How Do the World’s Biggest Companies Compare to the Biggest Economies?, World Econ. F. (Oct. 19, 2016), www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/10/corporations-not-countries-dominate-the-list-of-the-world-s-biggest-economic-entities/ [https://perma.cc/G3QD-C3HQ].Google Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire, Who Are Law’s Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects, 66 Mod. L. Rev. 346 (2003).Google Scholar
Needleman, Martin L. & Needleman, Carolyn, Organizational Crime: Two Models of Criminogenesis, 20 Soc. Q. 517 (1979).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Jeffrey, Bellotti and the Question of Corporate Moral Agency, 1988 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 683.Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Jeffrey, Law and the Virtues: Developing a Legal Theory for Business Ethics, 5 Bus. Ethics Q. 361 (1995) (book review).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Jeffrey, The Moral Status of the Corporation: Comments on an Inquiry, 2 Bus. Ethics Q. 461 (1992).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Jeffrey & Risser, David T., Conceptions of the Corporation and Ethical Decision Making in Business, 12 Bus. & Prof. Ethics J., no. 1, Spring 1993, at 73.Google Scholar
Neuborne, Burt, Of “Singles” Without Baseball: Corporations as Frozen Relational Moments, 64 Rutgers L. Rev. 769 (2012).Google Scholar
Nichols, John, The Senate Tried to Overturn ‘Citizens United’ Today. Guess What Stopped Them?, Nation (Sep. 11, 2014), www.thenation.com/article/senate-tried-overturn-citizens-united-today-guess-what-stopped-them/ [https://perma.cc/J9PG-6JZW].Google Scholar
Note, What We Talk About When We Talk About Persons: The Language of a Legal Fiction, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1745 (2001).Google Scholar
Oakes, Jeannie et al., Grassroots Organizing, Social Movements, and the Right to High-Quality Education, 4 Stan. J. C.R. & C.L. 339 (2008).Google Scholar
O’Kelley, Charles R. Jr., The Constitutional Rights of Corporations Revisited: Social and Political Expression and the Corporation After First National Bank v. Bellotti, 67 Geo. L.J. 1347 (1979).Google Scholar
Olins, Wally, How Brands Are Taking over the Corporation, in The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand 51 (Schultz, Majken et al. eds., 2000).Google Scholar
Öncer, Ayla Zehra & Yildiz, Müge Leyla, The Impact of Ethical Climate on Relationship Between Corporate Reputation and Organizational Identification, 58 Procedia Soc. & Behav. Sci. 714 (2012).Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Mark, Few Resist the Temptation to Opine on Chick-fil-A, N.Y. Times (Aug. 3, 2012), www.nytimes.com/2012/08/04/us/taking-sides-on-chick-fil-a-is-a-temptation-few-can-resist.html [https://perma.cc/7JDJ-3ZY7].Google Scholar
Orts, Eric W., Theorizing the Firm: Organizational Ontology in the Supreme Court, 65 DePaul L. Rev. 559 (2016).Google Scholar
Padfield, Stefan J., The Silent Role of Corporate Theory in the Supreme Court’s Campaign Finance Cases, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 831 (2013).Google Scholar
Patton, William & Bartlett, Randall, Corporate “Persons” and Freedom of Speech: The Political Impact of Legal Mythology, 1981 Wis. L. Rev. 494 (1981).Google Scholar
Peterson, Dane K., Deviant Workplace Behavior and the Organization’s Ethical Climate, 17 J. Bus. & Psychol. 47 (2002).Google Scholar
Petriglieri, Jennifer L. & Devine, Beth A., Mobilizing Organizational Action Against Identity Threats, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity 239 (Pratt, Michael G. et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael J., Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions of the Corporation, 2 Bus. Ethics Q. 435 (1992).Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael J., Reappraising the Real Entity Theory of the Corporation, 21 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1061 (1994).Google Scholar
Phillips, Nelson & Hardy, Cynthia, Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction (2002).Google Scholar
Pibel, Doug, Real People v. Corporate “People”: The Fight Is On, YES! Mag. (May 27, 2010), www.yesmagazine.org/issues/water-solutions/real-people-v.-corporate-people-the-fight-is-on [https://perma.cc/4B52-A787].Google Scholar
Piety, Tamara R., Against Freedom of Commercial Expression, 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 2583 (2008).Google Scholar
Piety, Tamara R., Brandishing the First Amendment: Commercial Expression in America (2012).Google Scholar
Pilon, Roger, Corporations and Rights: On Treating Corporate People Justly, 13 Ga. L. Rev. 1245 (1979).Google Scholar
Plitt, Mark, Savjani, Ricky R. & Eagleman, David M., Are Corporations People Too? The Neural Correlates of Moral Judgments About Companies and Individuals, 10 Soc. Neuroscience 113 (2015).Google Scholar
Pollman, Elizabeth, Citizens Not United: The Lack of Stockholder Voluntariness in Corporate Political Speech, 119 Yale L.J. Online 53 (2009).Google Scholar
Pollman, Elizabeth, Line Drawing in Corporate Rights Determinations, 65 DePaul L. Rev. 597 (2016).Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick & Maitland, Frederic W., Corporation and Person, in Anthropology and Early Law 300 (Krader, Lawrence ed., 1966).Google Scholar
Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Vocation of the Business Leader: A Reflection (4th ed. 2014), www.stthomas.edu/media/catholicstudies/center/ryan/publications/publicationpdfs/vocationofthebusinessleaderpdf/PontificalCouncil_4.pdf [https://perma.cc/LEL9-U8A7].Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, Stop Fussing over Personhood, Slate (Dec. 11, 2013), www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2013/12/personhood_for_corporations_and_chimpanzees_is_an_essential_legal_fiction.html [https://perma.cc/3AR2-DHFT].Google Scholar
Post, Robert C., Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (2014).Google Scholar
Pratt, Michael G., Disentangling Collective Identities, in 5 Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Identity Issues in Groups 161 (Polzer, Jeffrey T. ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Price, Nancy & E. Delk, David, Corporations Are Not People, Alliance for Democracy, www.thealliancefordemocracy.org/brochure.pdf [https://perma.cc/3WH3-HKXM].Google Scholar
Program on Corps., Law & Democracy, Why Abolish All Corporate Constitutional Rights, By What Authority, Nov. 2010, www.poclad.org/BWA/files/2010–11/BWANov2010.pdf [https://perma.cc/T3LD-UJXK].Google Scholar
Quigley, William, Catholic Social Thought and the Amorality of Large Corporations: Time to Abolish Corporate Personhood, 5 Loy. J. Pub. Int. L. 109 (2004).Google Scholar
Radin, Max, The Endless Problem of Corporate Personality, 32 Colum. L. Rev. 643 (1932).Google Scholar
Radin, Max, The Legislation of the Greeks and Romans on Corporations (Tuttle, Morehouse & Taylor Press 1910).Google Scholar
Rafanelli, Lucia M., A Defense of Individualism in the Age of Corporate Rights, 25 J. Pol. Phil. 281 (2017).Google Scholar
Ravitch, Frank S., Be Careful What You Wish for: Why Hobby Lobby Weakens Religious Freedom, 2016 BYU L. Rev. 55.Google Scholar
Ravitch, Frank S., Freedom’s Edge: Religious Freedom, Sexual Freedom, and the Future of America (2016).Google Scholar
Redish, Martin H. & Wasserman, Howard M., What’s Good for General Motors: Corporate Speech and the Theory of Free Expression, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 235 (1998).Google Scholar
Rienzi, Mark L., God and the Profits: Is There Religious Liberty for Moneymakers?, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 59 (2013).Google Scholar
Ripken, Susanna K., Corporations Are People Too: A Multi-Dimensional Approach to the Corporate Personhood Puzzle, 15 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 97 (2009).Google Scholar
Ripken, Susanna Kim, Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Corporate Power: The Tension Between Constitutional Law and Corporate Law, 6 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 285 (2012).Google Scholar
Ripken, Susanna Kim, Corporate First Amendment Rights After Citizens United: An Analysis of the Popular Movement to End the Constitutional Personhood of Corporations, 14 U. Pa. J. Bus. L. 209 (2011).Google Scholar
Riva, Paola et al., Humanizing Machines: Anthropomorphization of Slot Machines Increases Gambling, 21 J. Experimental Psychol. Applied 313 (2015).Google Scholar
Rodionova, Zlata, World’s Largest Corporations Make More Money Than Most Countries on Earth Combined, Independent (Sep. 13, 2016), www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/worlds-largest-corporations-more-money-countries-world-combined-apple-walmart-shell-global-justice-a7245991.html [https://perma.cc/QBU5-RUYC].Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J., The Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm and Industrial Organization, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2063 (2001).Google Scholar
Rönnegard, David, How Autonomy Alone Debunks Corporate Moral Agency, 32 Bus. & Prof. Ethics J. 77 (2013).Google Scholar
Rönnegard, David & Velasquez, Manuel, On (Not) Attributing Moral Responsibility to Organizations, in The Moral Responsibility of Firms 123 (Orts, Eric W. & Craig Smith, N. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Rosen, Mark D., Establishment, Expressivism, and Federalism, 78 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 669 (2003).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, David, The Corporate Paradox of Citizens United and Hobby Lobby, 11 N.Y.U. J. L. & Liberty 308 (2017).Google Scholar
Rothschild, Matthew, Corporations Aren’t Persons: Amend the Constitution, Progressive, Apr. 2010, at 16.Google Scholar
Rowland, Wade, Greed, Inc.: Why Corporations Rule the World and How We Let It Happen (Arcade Publ’g 2012) (2005).Google Scholar
Rubin, Dale, Corporate Personhood: How the Courts Have Employed Bogus Jurisprudence to Grant Corporations Constitutional Rights Intended for Individuals, 28 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 523 (2010).Google Scholar
Rucker, Philip, Mitt Romney Says ‘Corporations Are People,’ Wash. Post (Aug. 11, 2011), www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romney-says-corporations-are-people/2011/08/11/gIQABwZ38I_story.html [https://perma.cc/6LF6-BE5 C].Google Scholar
Rutledge, Thomas E., A Corporation Has No Soul – The Business Entity Law Response to Challenges to the PPACA Contraceptive Mandate, 5 Wm. & Mary Bus. L. Rev. 1 (2014).Google Scholar
Sackman, Sonja A., Culture and Performance, in The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate 188 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2d ed. 2011).Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J., The Idea of the Corporation as a Person: On the Normative Significance of Judicial Language, in Corporations and Society: Power and Responsibility 113 (Samuels, Warren J. & Miller, Arthur S. eds., 1987).Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. & Miller, Arthur S., Introduction: Corporate America, in Corporations and Society: Power and Responsibility 1 (Samuels, Warren J. & Miller, Arthur S. eds., 1987).Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford A., The Corporation Is a Person: The Language of a Legal Fiction, 61 Tul. L. Rev. 563 (1987).Google Scholar
Schein, Edgar H., with Peter Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership (5th ed. 2017).Google Scholar
Scherer, Andreas Georg, Modes of Explanation in Organization Theory, in The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory 310 (Tsoukas, Haridimos & Knudsen, Christian eds., 2003).Google Scholar
Schneider, Benjamin & Barbera, Karen M., Introduction, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture 3 (Benjamin Schneider & Karen M. Barbera eds., 2014).Google Scholar
Schragger, Richard & Schwartzman, Micah, Some Realism About Corporate Rights, in The Rise of Corporate Religious Liberty 345 (Schwartzman, Micah et al. eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger, Corporate Persons, in 63 Proc. Aristotelian Soc’y, Supp. Vol. 239 (1989).Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J., Blame, Emotion, and the Corporation, in The Moral Responsibility of Firms 143 (Orts, Eric W. & Craig Smith, N. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J., Citizens United and the Ineluctable Question of Corporate Citizenship, 44 Conn. L. Rev. 575 (2012).Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J., Conscience and Complicity: Assessing Pleas for Religious Exemptions in Hobby Lobby’s Wake, 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1897 (2015).Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J., Corporate Piety and Impropriety: Hobby Lobby’s Extension of RFRA Rights to the For-Profit Corporation, 5 Harv. Bus. L. Rev. 173 (2015).Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J., Denying Corporate Rights and Punishing Corporate Wrongs, 25 Bus. Ethics Q. 517 (2015).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ilya & McCarthy, Caitlyn W., So What If Corporations Aren’t People?, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 701 (2011).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert J. & Dowson, Douglas, Manhattan Inst., Corporate Political Spending: Why the New Critics Are Wrong (2012), www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/lpr_15.pdf [https://perma.cc/L3ZM-UKQM].Google Scholar
Sherman, Steven J. & Percy, Elise J., The Psychology of Collective Responsibility: When and Why Collective Entities Are Likely to Be Held Responsible for the Misdeeds of Individual Members, 19 J. L. & Pol’y 137 (2010).Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the de facto ERA, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1323 (2006).Google Scholar
Sims, Ronald R. & Sauser, William I. Jr., Received Wisdom, Groupthink, and Organizational Ethical Culture, in Received Wisdom, Kernels of Truth, and Boundary Conditions in Organizational Studies 373 (Svyantek, Daniel J. & Mahoney, Kevin T. eds., 2013).Google Scholar
Smedley, Audrey & Smedley, Brian D., Race as Biology Is Fiction, Racism as a Social Problem Is Real: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives on the Social Construction of Race, 60 Am. Psychologist 16 (2005).Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas A., The Use and Abuse of Corporate Personality, 2 Stan. Agora 69 (2001).Google Scholar
Soares, C., Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility, 46 J. Bus. Ethics 143 (2003).Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C., Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (1992).Google Scholar
Somin, Ilya, People Organized as Corporations Are People Too, Volokh Conspiracy (Jan. 21, 2010, 5:12 PM), http://volokh.com/2010/01/21/people-organized-as-corporations-are-people-too/ [https://perma.cc/6GXF-P25 L].Google Scholar
Sopoci-Belknap, Kaitlin, Citizens United v. FEC: Supreme Court Sides with Large Corporations, Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County (Feb. 28, 2010), www.duhc.org/profiles/blogs/citizens-united-v-fec-supreme [https://perma.cc/7GNE-E6DY].Google Scholar
Spicker, Stuart F., ed., The Philosophy of the Body: Rejections of Cartesian Dualism (1970).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Russell B. Jr., Corporations and Social Responsibility: In Search of the Corporate Soul, 42 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 709 (1974).Google Scholar
Stolberg, Sheryl Gay, Obama Turns Up Heat Over Ruling on Campaign Spending, N.Y. Times, Jan. 24, 2010, at A18.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher D., Corporate Vices and Corporate Virtues: Do Public/Private Distinctions Matter?, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1441 (1982).Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher D., Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior (1975).Google Scholar
Strassfeld, Robert N., Note, Corporate Standing to Allege Race Discrimination in Civil Rights Actions, 69 Va. L. Rev. 1153 (1983).Google Scholar
Stratman, Thomas & Verret, J. W., How Does Corporate Political Activity Allowed by Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Affect Shareholder Wealth?, 58 J.L. & Econ. 545 (2015).Google Scholar
Strauss, David A., The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1457 (2001).Google Scholar
Strine, Jr., Leo E., A Job Is Not a Hobby: The Judicial Revival of Corporate Paternalism and Its Problematic Implications, 41 J. Corp. L. 71 (2015).Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C., On Beyond Interest: Rational, Normative and Cognitive Perspectives in the Social Scientific Study of Law, 1997 Wis. L. Rev. 475.Google Scholar
Sugarman, Jeff, Persons and Historical Ontology, in The Psychology of Personhood: Philosophical, Historical, Social-Developmental, and Narrative Perspectives 81 (Martin, Jack & Bickhard, Mark H. eds., 2013).Google Scholar
Suggs, Robert E., Racial Discrimination in Business Transactions, 42 Hastings L.J. 1257 (1991).Google Scholar
Summers, Robert S., Pragmatic Instrumentalism in Twentieth Century American Legal Thought – A Synthesis and Critique of Our Dominant General Theory About Law and Its Use, 66 Cornell L. Rev. 861 (1981).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. & Hastie, Reid, Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter (2015).Google Scholar
Szanto, Thomas, Do Group Persons Have Emotions – Or Should They?, in Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Methods and Perspectives: Proceedings of the 37th International Wittgenstein Symposium 261 (Rinofner-Kreidl, Sonja & Harald Wiltsche eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Taylor, Henry O., A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations Having Capital Stock (Philadelphia, Kay & Brother 1884).Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M., The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law (2008).Google Scholar
Tergesen, Anne, Financial Advisers Put Faith in Religion-Based Investing, Wall St. J. (Apr. 5, 2017), www.wsj.com/articles/financial-advisers-put-faith-in-religion-based-investing-1490363559 [https://perma.cc/C7JR-QCXH].Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul B., Why Do We Need a Theory of Corporate Responsibility?, in Shame, Responsibility and the Corporation 113 (Curtler, Hugh ed., 1986).Google Scholar
Tissaw, Michael A., The Person Concept and the Ontology of Persons, in The Psychology of Personhood: Philosophical, Historical, Social-Developmental, and Narrative Perspectives 19 (Martin, Jack & Bickhard, Mark H. eds., 2013).Google Scholar
Tolbert, Pamela S. & Hall, Richard H., Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes (10th ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn from Modern Physics, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1989).Google Scholar
Trumbull, Mark, Can ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Really Get Money out of Politics?, Christian Sci. Monitor (Oct. 14, 2011), www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/1014/Can-Occupy-Wall-Street-really-get-money-out-of-politics [https://perma.cc/A2XT-D8UJ].Google Scholar
Tsuk, Dalia, From Pluralism to Individualism: Berle and Means and 20th-Century American Legal Thought, 30 Law & Soc. Inquiry 179 (2005) (book review).Google Scholar
Tucker, Anne, Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis of Free Speech and Corporate Personhood in Citizens United, 61 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 497 (2010).Google Scholar
Tur, Richard, The ‘Person’ in Law, in Persons and Personality: A Contemporary Inquiry 116 (Peacocke, Arthur & Gillett, Grant eds., 1987).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Do For-Profit Corporations Have Rights of Religious Conscience?, 99 Cornell L. Rev. Online 70 (2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Comm’n on Civil Rights, Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling Nondiscrimination Principles with Civil Liberties (2016), www.usccr.gov/pubs/Peaceful-Coexistence-09–07-16.PDF [https://perma.cc/728 R-TJX8].Google Scholar
U.S. Conf. of Cath. Bishops, HHS Proposal Falls Short in Meeting Church Concerns; Bishops Look Forward to Addressing Issues with Administration (Feb. 7, 2013), http://usccb.org/news/2013/13–037.cfm [https://perma.cc/TN87-EPWS].Google Scholar
Vacharkulksemsuk, Tanya et al., Establishing a Positive Emotional Climate to Create 21st-Century Organizational Change, in The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate 101 (Ashkanasy, Neal M. et al. eds., 2d ed. 2011).Google Scholar
van Kleef, Gerben A. & Fischer, Agneta H., Emotional Collectives: How Groups Shape Emotions and Emotions Shape Groups, 30 Cognition & Emotion 3 (2016).Google Scholar
vanden Heuvel, Katrina, Stanching the Flow of Corporate Dollars into Campaigns, Wash. Post: Opinions (Nov. 8, 2011), www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/stanching-the-flow-of-corporate-dollars-into-campaigns/2011/11/04/gIQAy2cR1 M_story.html [https://perma.cc/G2LQ-QKU2].Google Scholar
Vargas, Michael, The Next Stage of Social Entrepreneurship: Benefit Corporations and the Companies Using This Innovative Corporate Form, Bus. L. Today, July 2016, www.americanbar.org/publications/blt/2016/07/01_vargas.html [http://perma.cc/JW2 L-MP5S].Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel, Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility, 13 Bus. Ethics Q. 531 (2003).Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel G., Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do, 2 Bus. & Prof. Ethics J., no. 3, Spring 1983, at 1.Google Scholar
Victor, Bart & Cullen, John B., The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates, 33 Admin. Sci. Q. 101 (1988).Google Scholar
Victor, Bart & Cullen, John B., A Theory and Measure of Ethical Climate in Organizations, 9 Res. Corp. Soc. Performance & Pol’y 51 (1987).Google Scholar
Vischer, Robert K., Do For-Profit Businesses Have Free Exercise Rights?, 21 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 369 (2013).Google Scholar
Wade, Cheryl L., Effective Compliance with Antidiscrimination Law: Corporate Personhood, Purpose and Social Responsibility, 74 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1187 (2017).Google Scholar
Walt, Steven & Schwartzman, Micah, Morality, Ontology, and Corporate Rights, 11 Law & Ethics Hum. Rts. 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N., Methodological Individualism and Social Tendencies, in Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences 269 (Brodbeck, May ed., 1968).Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H., Corporate and Individual Moral Responsibility: A Reply to Jan Garrett, 8 J. Bus. Ethics 821 (1989).Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H., Corporate Moral Agency and the Responsibility to Respect Human Rights in the UN Guiding Principles: Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?, 1 Bus. & Hum. Rts J. 5 (2016).Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H. & Freeman, R. Edward, Corporate Responsibility, in The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics 514 (LaFollette, Hugh ed., 2003).Google Scholar
Whetten, David A. & Foreman, Peter, An Organizational Identity Lens for Organizational Climate Scholarship, in The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture 443 (Schneider, Benjamin & Barbera, Karen M. eds., 2014).Google Scholar
White, James Boyd, How Should We Talk About Corporations? The Languages of Economics and of Citizenship, 94 Yale L.J. 1416 (1985).Google Scholar
White, James Boyd, Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism (1990).Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Sheldon, Captured: The Corporate Infiltration of American Democracy (2017).Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam, Citizens United, Personhood, and the Corporation in Politics, in Corporations and American Democracy 359 (Lamoreaux, Naomi R. & Novak, William J. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam, Corporate Personhood and the Rights of Corporate Speech, 30 Seattle U. L. Rev. 863 (2007).Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam, Masterpiece Cakeshop’s Surprising Breadth, Slate (June 6, 2018), https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/masterpiece-cakeshop-grants-constitutional-religious-liberty-rights-to-corporations.html [https://perma.cc/XM8 L-7J2 G].Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam, “Other People’s Money”: Corporations, Agency Costs, and Campaign Finance Law, 92 Geo. L.J. 871 (2004).Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam, We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights (2018).Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan, The Modern Corporation: Private Agent or Public Actor?, 50 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1673 (1993).Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher J., “An Artificial Being”: John Marshall and Corporate Personhood, 40 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 201 (2017).Google Scholar
Yener, Müjdelen et al., The Effect of Ethical Climate on Work Engagement, 58 Procedia Soc. & Behav. Sci. 724 (2012).Google Scholar
Yosifon, David G., The Public Choice Problem in Corporate Law: Corporate Social Responsibility After Citizens United, 89 N.C. L. Rev. 1197 (2011).Google Scholar
Zolt, Eric M., Tax Deductions for Charitable Contributions: Domestic Activities, Foreign Activities, or None of the Above, 63 Hastings L.J. 361 (2012).Google Scholar