Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 18
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2017
Print publication year:
2018
Online ISBN:
9781108182539

Book description

Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights deals with socio-economic rights in the context of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The book connects the ECtHR's socio-economic case law to an understanding of the Court's responsibility to recognize the limitations of supranational rights adjudication while protecting the most needy. By exploring the idea of core rights protection in constitutional and international law, a new perspective is developed that offers suggestions for improving the ECtHR's reasoning in socio-economic cases as well as contributing to the debate on indivisible rights adjudication in an age of 'rights inflation' and proportionality review. Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights will interest scholars and practitioners dealing with fundamental rights and especially those interested in judicial reasoning, socio-economic and supranational rights protection.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’, Yale Law Journal, 96 (1987), pp. 9431005.
Alexy, Robert, Theorie der Grundrechte (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1985).
Alexy, Robert, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, transl. Rivers, Julian (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Alkema, Evert, ‘The European Convention as a Constitution and Its Court as a Constitutional Court’ in Mahoney, P. et al. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective (Studies in memory of Rolf Ryssdal) (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000), pp. 4163.
Alston, Philip, ‘Out of the Abyss: The Challenges Confronting the New UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 9 (1987), pp. 332381.
Alston, Philip, ‘The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ in Alston, Philip (ed.), The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 473508.
Alston, Philip and Quinn, Gerard, ‘The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 9 (1987), pp. 156229.
Arai-Takahashi, Yukata, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002).
Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003).
Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘Discrimination as a Magnifying Lens: Scope and Ambit under Art. 14 and Protocol No. 12’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 330349.
Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll, ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15 (2017), pp. 935.
Barak, Aharon, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Bates, Ed, ‘The Birth of the European Convention on Human Rights – and the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, J. and Madsen, M.R. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Bates, Ed, ‘Analysing the Prisoner Voting Saga and the British Challenge to Strasbourg’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), pp. 503540.
Bendor, Ariel L. and Sela, Tal, ‘How Proportional Is Proportionality’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13 (2015), pp. 530544.
Bennett, Robert W. and Solum, Lawrence, Constitutional Originalism: A Debate (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011).
Berchtold, Klaus, ‘Council of Europe Activities in the Field of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ in Matscher, F. (ed.), The Implementation of Economic and Social Rights, National, International and Comparative Aspects (Kehl: N.P. Engel Verlag, 1991), pp. 355370.
Bettinson, Vanessa and Jones, Alwyn, ‘The Integration or Exclusion of Welfare Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: The Removal of Foreign National with HIV after N v UK (Application No. 26565/05; decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, 27 May 2008)’, Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 31 (2009), pp. 8394.
Bickel, Alexander, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Yale University Press, 1986).
Bilchitz, David, ‘Towards a Reasonable Approach to the Minimum Core: Laying the Foundations for Future Socio-Economic Rights Jurisprudence’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 19 (2003), pp. 126.
Bilchitz, David, Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Bilchitz, David, ‘Does Sandra Liebenberg’s New Book Provide a Viable Approach to Adjudication Socio-Economic Rights?’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 27 (2011), pp. 546557.
Bilchitz, David, ‘Necessity and Proportionality: Towards a Balanced Approach’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch., and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 4162.
Bilchitz, David, ‘Socio-Economic Rights, Economic Crisis, and Legal Doctrine’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12 (2014), pp. 710739.
Bittner, Claudia, ‘Casenote – Human Dignity as a Matter of Legislative Consistency in an Ideal World: The Fundamental Right to Guarantee a Subsistence Minimum in the German Federal Constitutional Court’s Judgment of 9 February 2010’, German Law Journal, 12 (2011), pp. 19411960.
Bomhoff, Jacco, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Borowski, Martin, Grundrechte als Prinzipien, 2nd ed., (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007).
Bossuyt, Marc, ‘Should the Strasbourg Court Exercise More Self-Restraint? On the Extension of the Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights to Social Security Regulations’, Human Rights Law Journal, 28 (2007), pp. 321332.
Bossuyt, Marc, ‘The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8 (2012), pp. 20132245.
Brand, Danie, ‘The Minimum Core Content of the Right to Food in Context: A Response to Rolf Künneman’ in Brand, D. and Russell, S. (eds.), Exploring the Core Content of Economic and Social Rights: South African and International Perspectives (Pretoria: Protea Book House, 2002), pp. 99108.
Brand, Danie, ‘Socio-Economic Rights and the Courts in South Africa: Justiciability on a Sliding Scale’ in Coomans, F. (ed.) Justiciability of Economic and Social Rights: Experiences from Domestic Systems (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2006), pp. 207236.
Brand, Danie and Russell, Sage (eds.), Exploring the Core Content of Economic and Social Rights: South African and International Perspectives (Pretoria: Protea Book House, 2002).
Brems, Eva, ‘Indirect Protection of Social Rights by the European Court of Human Rights’ in Barak-Erez, D. and Gross, A.M. (eds.), Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007), pp. 135167.
Brüning, Christoph, ‘Art. 19’ in Stern, Klaus and Becker, Florian (eds.), Grundrechte-Kommentar: Die Grundrechte des Grundgesetzes mit ihren europäischen Bezügen (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2010).
Budlender, Geoff, ‘The Role of the Courts in Achieving the Transformative Potential of Socio-Economic Rights’, ESR Review, 8 (2007), pp. 911.
Byrne, Iain, ‘Sandra Liebenberg, Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution’, (Book review), Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), pp. 183186.
Callewaert, Johan, ‘The Judgments of the Court, Background and Content’ in Macdonald, R.S.J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 713731.
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Are Human Rights Truly Universal’ in Savić, O. (ed.), The Politics of Human Rights (London and Brooklyn: Verso Books, 1999), pp. 149165.
Chapman, Audrey R., ‘A “Violations Approach” for Monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 18 (1996), pp. 2366.
Chapman, Audrey R., ‘Core Obligations Related to the Right to Health’ in Chapman, Audrey and Russell, Sage (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 185215.
Chapman, Audrey R. and Russell, Sage (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002).
Chapman, Audrey R. and Russell, Sage, ‘Introduction’ in Chapman, A.R. and Russell, S. (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 119.
Chlosta, Joachim, Der Wesensgehalt der Eigentumsgewährleistung. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mitbestimmungsproblematik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1975).
Christoffersen, Jonas, Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).
Cleveland, Sarah H., Helfer, Laurence R., Neuman, Gerald L. and Orentlicher, Diane F., Human Rights, 2nd ed., (Eagan: Thomson Reuters Foundation Press, 2009).
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo, ‘American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins’, International Constitutional Law Journal, 2 (2010), pp. 263286.
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo, ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 59 (2011), pp. 463490.
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo, ‘Proportionality and Justification’ (Article Review: Barak, Aharon, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, Cambridge University Press 2012), University of Toronto Law Journal, 63 (2013), pp. 458477.
Coomans, Fons, ‘In Search of the Core Content of the Right to Education’ in Chapman, A.R. and Russell, S. (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 217246.
Coomans, Fons, ‘In Search of the Core Content of the Right to Education’ in Brand, D. and Russell, S. (eds.), Exploring the Core Content of Economic and Social Rights: South African and International Perspectives (Pretoria: Protea Book House, 2002), pp. 159182.
Cousins, Mel, The European Convention on Human Rights and Social Security Law, Social Europe Series (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2008), vol. XV.
Cousins, Mel, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, Non-Discrimination and Social Security: Great Scope, Little Depth?’, Journal of Social Security Law, 16 (2009), pp. 118136.
Craven, Matthew C.R., The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Oxford University Press, 1995).
Crocquet, Nicolas A.J., ‘The European Court of Human Rights Norm-Creation and Norm-Limiting Processes: Resolving a Normative Tension’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 17 (2011), pp. 307373.
Davis, Dennis, ‘The Case against the Inclusion of Socio-Economic Demands in a Bill of Rights Except as Directive Principles’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (1992), pp. 475490.
Debeljak, Julie, ‘Balancing Rights in a Democracy: The Problems with Limitations and Overrides of Rights under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006’, Melbourne University Law Review, 32 (2008), pp. 422469.
Dembour, Marie-Benedicte, ‘“Finishing Off” Cases: The Radical Solution to the Problem of the Expanding ECtHR Caseload’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2002), pp. 604–623.
De Schutter, Olivier and Tulkens, Françoise, ‘Rights in Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights as a Pragmatic Institution’ in Brems, E. (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2008), pp. 169216.
De Vos, Pierre, ‘Pious Wishes or Directly Enforceable Human Rights? Social and Economic Rights in South Africa’s 1996 Constitution’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 13 (1997), pp. 67101.
De Vos, Pierre, ‘Grootboom, The Right of Access to Housing and Substantive Equality as Contextual Fairness’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 17 (2001), pp. 258276.
Dixon, Rosalind, ‘Creating Dialogue about Socio-Economic Rights: Strong Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (2007), pp. 391418.
Dreier, Horst, ‘Art. 19 II’ in Dreier, H. (ed.), Grundgesetz Kommentar, Band I, 3rd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag, 2013).
Drews, Claudia, Die Wesensgehaltgarantie des Art. 19 II GG, Diss. (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005).
Dürig, Günter, ‘Der Grundrechtssatz von der Menschenwürde. Entwurf eines praktikablen Wertsystems der Grundrecte aus Art. 1 Abs. I in Verbindung mit Art. 19 Abs. II des Grundgesetzes’, Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, 81 (1956), pp. 117157.
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).
Dworkin, Ronald, ‘Rights as Trumps’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 153167.
Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).
Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik’s Conception of Legal Culture’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 14 (1998), pp. 1137.
Edmundson, William, ‘Rethinking Exclusionary Reasons: A Second Edition of Joseph Raz’s Practical Reason and Norms’, Law and Philosophy, 12 (1993), pp. 329343.
Egidy, Stefanie, ‘Casenote – The Fundamental Right to the Guarantee of a Subsistence Minimum in the Hartz IV Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court’, German Law Journal, 12 (2011), pp. 19611982.
Eide, Asbjørn, ‘Realization of Social and Economic Rights and the Minimum Threshold Approach’, Human Rights Law Journal, 10 (1989), pp. 3550.
Eide, Asbjørn, ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights’ in Eide, A., Krause, C. and Rosas, A. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 928.
Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard University Press, 1980).
Enders, Christoph, ‘Art. 19’ in Epping, Volker and Hillgruber, Christian (eds.), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar GG, 16th ed. (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2012).
Faigman, David L., ‘Reconciling Individual Rights and Government Interests: Madisonian Principles versus Supreme Court Practice’, Virginia Law Review, 78 (1992), pp. 15211580.
Fallon, Richard H. Jr., ‘Individual Rights and the Powers of Government’, Georgia Law Review, 27 (1993), pp. 343390.
Feldman, David, ‘The Developing Scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (1997), pp. 25–247.
Ferraz, OctavioHarming the Poor Through Social Rights Litigation: Lessons from Brazil’, Texas Law Review, 89 (2010), pp. 16431668.
Flegar, Veronika, ‘Vulnerability and the Principle of Non-Refoulement in the European Court of Human Rights: Towards an Increased Scope of Protection for Persons Fleeing from Extreme Poverty?’, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 8 (2016), pp. 148169.
Foster, Steve, ‘Reluctancy Restoring Rights: Responding to the Prisoner’s Right to Vote’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), pp. 489507.
Fredman, Sandra, Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Fried, Charles, Right and Wrong (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978).
Frohwerk, Arno, Soziale Not in der Rechtsprechung des EGMR (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012).
Fuller, Lon L., ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978), pp. 353394.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, 2nd ed. (London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 1989).
Gardbaum, Stephen, ‘Limiting Constitutional Rights’, UCLA Law Review, 54 (2007), pp. 798854.
Gearty, Conor and Mantouvalou, Virginia, Debating Social Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011).
Gerards, Janneke, ‘Intensity of Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases’, Netherlands International Law Review, 51 (2004), pp. 135183.
Gerards, Janneke, Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).
Gerards, Janneke, ‘Fundamental Rights and Other Interests: Should It Really Make a Difference?’ in Brems, E. (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2008), pp. 655690.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’ in Huls, N., Adams, M. and Bomhoff, J. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts’ Rulings. Judicial Deliberations and Beyond (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009), pp. 407436.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘Pluralism, Deference, and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, European Law Journal, 17 (2011), pp. 80120.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Prism of Fundamental Rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8 (2012), pp. 173202.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘How to Improve the Necessity Test of the European Court of Human Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (2013), pp. 466490.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Scope of ECHR Rights and Institutional Concerns: The Relationship between Proliferation of Rights and the Case Load of the ECtHR’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 84105.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the National Courts: Giving Shape to the Notion of “Shared Responsibility”’ in Gerards, J.H. and Fleuren, J. (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 1393.
Gerards, Janneke, ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine, the Very Weighty Reasons Test and Grounds of Discrimination’ in Balboni, M. (ed.), The Principle of Non-Discrimination and the European Convention of Human Rights (forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2875230
Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014).
Gerards, Janneke and Fleuren, Joseph, ‘The Netherlands’ in Gerards, J.H. and Fleuren, J. (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 217260.
Gerards, Janneke and Senden, Hanneke, ‘The Structure of Fundamental Rights and the European Court of Human Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2009), pp. 619653.
Greer, Steven, The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Greer, Steven and Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Revisiting the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2013), pp. 655687.
Gunther, Gerald, ‘The Supreme Court, 1971 Term – Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection’, Harvard Law Review, 86 (1972), pp. 148.
Häberle, Peter, Die Wesensgehaltgarantie des Art. 19 II GG – zugleich ein Beitrag zum institutionellen Verständnis der Grundrecht und zur Lehre vom Gesetzesvorbehalt, 3rd ed. (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1983).
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).
Hamel, Walter, Die Bedeutung der Grundrechte im sozialen Rechtsstaat. Eine Kritik an Gesetzgebung und Rechtsprechung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1957).
Harris, David J., O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Edward P. and Buckley, Carla M., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Harris, David J., O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Edward P. and Buckley, Carla M., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2014).
Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
Haysom, Nicholas, ‘Constitutionalism, Majoritarian Democracy and Socio-Economic Rights’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (1992), pp. 451463.
Helfer, Laurence R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1997), pp. 273392.
Hennette-Vauchez, Stéphanie, ‘Constitutional v. International? When Unified Reformatory Rationales Mismatch the Plural Paths of Legitimacy of ECHR Law’ in Christoffersen, J. and Rask Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 144164.
Herbert, Georg, ‘Der Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte’, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift, 12 (1985), pp. 321335.
Hörmann, Jens-Hendrik, Rechtsprobleme des Grundrechts auf Gewährleistung eines menschenwürdigen Existenzminimums: Zu den Auswirkungen des ‘Regelleistungsurteils’ auf die ‘Hartz IV’-Gesetzgebung und andere Sozialgesetze (Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 2012).
Ignatieff, Michael, ‘Human Rights as Ideology’ in Ignatieff, M. (Gutmann, A. (ed.)), Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press, 2001).
Jäckel, Hartmut, Grundrechtsgeltung und Grundrechtssicherung – eine rechtsdogmatische Studie zu Artikel 19 Abs. 2 GG (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1967).
Jakab, András, ‘Re-Defining Principles as “Important Rules” a Critique of Robert Alexy’ in Borowski, M. (ed.), On the Nature of Legal Principles (Proceedings of the Special Workshop ‘The Principles Theory’ held at the 23rd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Science (IVR), Kraków, 2007) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag/Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010), pp. 145160.
Jarass, Hans D., ‘Art. 19’ in Jarass, Hans D. and Pieroth, Bodo (eds.), GG. Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Kommentar, 14th ed. (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2012).
Kaufmann, Arthur, ‘Über den “Wesensgehalt” der Grund- und Menschenrechte’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 (1984), pp. 384399.
Kavanagh, Aileen, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act, (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Kende, Mark S., ‘The South African Constitutional Court’s Embrace of Socio-Economic Rights: A Comparative Perspective’, Chapman Law Review, 6 (2003), pp. 137160.
Kende, Mark S., ‘The South African Constitutional Court’s Construction of Socio-Economic Rights: A Response to the Critics’, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 19 (2004), pp. 617629.
Kenny, Jo, ‘European Convention on Human Rights and Social Welfare’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2010), pp. 495–503.
King, Jeff, Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Kingreen, Thorsten, ‘Schätzungen “ins Blaue hinein”: Zu den Auswirkungen des Hartz IV-Urteils des Bundesverfassungsgerichts auf das Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2010), pp. 558–562.
Klatt, Matthias and Meister, Moritz, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Klug, Heinz Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Knüllig, Werner, Bedeutung und Auslegung des Artikels 19 Abs. I und II des Grundgesetzes, doctoral thesis (Kiel, 1954).
Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘Social Rights as Components in the Civil Right to Personal Liberty – Another Possible Step Forward in the Integrated Human Rights Approach?’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 20 (2002), pp. 2951.
Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘The Justiciability of Indivisible Rights’, Nordic Law Journal, 72 (2003), pp. 339.
Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘Dichotomies, Trichotomies or Waves of Duties’, Human Rights Law Review, 5 (2005), pp. 81103.
Koch, Ida Elisabeth, ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Components in Civil and Political Rights: A Hermeneutic Perspective’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 10 (2006), pp. 405430.
Koch, Ida Elisabeth, Human Rights as Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-Economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).
Koch, Ida Elisabeth and Vested-Hansen, Jens, ‘International Human Rights and National Legislatures – Conflict or Balance’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 75 (2006), pp. 328.
Kratochvíl, Jan, ‘The Inflation of the Margin of Appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 29 (2011), pp. 324357.
Krieger, Heike, ‘Positive Verpflichtungen unter der EMRK: Unentbehrliches Element einer gemeineuropäischen Grundrechtsdogmatik, leeres Versprechen oder Grenze der Justitiabilität?’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 74 (2014), pp. 187213.
Krüger, Herbert, ‘Der Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte i.S. des Art. 19 GG’, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 8 (1955), pp. 597602.
Kumm, Mattias, ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (2004), pp. 574596.
Kumm, Mattias, ‘Who Is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law’, German Law Journal, 7 (2006), pp. 341369.
Künnemann, Rolf, ‘The Right to Adequate Food: Violations to Its Minimum core Content’ in Chapman, A.R. and Russell, S. (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2002), pp. 163183.
Landau, David, ‘The Promise of a Minimum Core Approach: The Colombian Model for Judicial Review of Austerity Measures’ in Nolan, A. (ed), Economic and Social Rights after the Global Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 276298.
Langa, Pius, ‘The Vision of the Constitution’, South African Law Journal, 120 (2003), pp. 670679.
Langford, Malcolm, ‘The Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory’ in Langford, M. (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 345.
Lasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-l’E, Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Laurens, Lavrysen, Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2016).
Leckie, Scott, ‘The Human Right to Adequate Housing’ in Eide, A., Krause, C. and Rosas, A. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 149168.
Lehmann, Karin, ‘In Defense of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core’, American University International Law Review, 22 (2006), pp. 163197.
Leijten, Ingrid, ‘From Stec to Valkov: Possessions and Margins in the Social Security Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 13 (2013), pp. 309349.
Leijten, Ingrid, ‘Social Security as a Fundamental Rights Issue in Europe: Ramaer and Van Willigen and the Development of Property Protection and Non-Discrimination under the ECHR’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 73 (2013), pp. 177208.
Leijten, Ingrid, ‘Defining the Scope of Economic and Social Guarantees in the Case Law of the ECtHR’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 109136.
Leijten, Ingrid, ‘The German Right to an Existenzminimum, Human Dignity, and the Possibility of Minimum Core Socioeconomic Rights Protection’, German Law Journal, 16 (2015), pp. 2348.
Leijten, Ingrid, ‘Separation of Powers and the Limits to the “Constitutionalization” of Fundamental Rights Adjudication by the ECtHR and the CJEU’ in Ten Napel, H.M.Th.D. and Voermans, W.J.M. (eds.), The Powers that Be: Rethinking the Separation of Powers: A Leiden Response to Christoph Möllers (Leiden University Press, 2015) pp. 275293.
Letsas, George, ‘The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), pp. 279305.
Letsas, George, ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2006), pp. 705732.
Letsas, George, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Letsas, George, ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’ in Ulfstein, Geir, Follesdal, Andreas and Peters, Birgit (eds), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 106141.
Letsas, George, ‘The Scope and Balancing of Rights: Diagnostic or Constitutive?’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 3864.
Leuprecht, Peter, ‘Innovations in the European System of Human Rights Protection: Is Enlargement Compatible with Reinforcement?’, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 8 (1998), pp. 313336.
Liebenberg, Sandra, ‘The Right to Social Assistance: The Implications of Grootboom for Policy Reform in South Africa’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 17 (2001), pp. 232357.
Liebenberg, Sandra, ‘South Africa: Adjudicating Social Rights Under a Transformative Constitution’ in Longford, M. (ed.), Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 75101.
Liebenberg, Sandra, Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution (Cape Town: Juta and Company, 2010).
Lord, Hoffmann, ‘The Universality of Human Rights’, Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture (2009).
Lord Lester of Herne Hill, ‘Universality versus Subsidiarity: A Reply’, European Human Rights Law Review (1998), pp. 73–81.
Mahoney, Paul, ‘Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 11 (1990), pp. 5788.
Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘Work and Private Life: Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania’, European Law Review, 30 (2005), pp. 573585.
Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘N v UK: No Duty to Rescue the Nearby Needy?’, Modern Law Review, 72 (2009), pp. 815828.
Mantouvalou, Virginia, ‘Labour Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An Intellectual Justification for an Integrated Approach to Interpretation’, Human Rights Law Review, 13 (2013), pp. 529555.
Masterman, Roger, ‘The United Kingdom’ in Gerards, J. and Fleuren, J. (eds.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Case Law of the ECtHR in National Case Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2014), pp. 297332.
Matscher, Franz, ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’ in Macdonald, R.S.J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 6381.
Merrills, J.G., The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Manchester University Press, 1993).
Miller, Bradley W., ‘Justification and Rights Limitations’ in Huscroft, G. (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Moellendorf, Darrel, ‘Reasoning about Resources: Soobramoney and the Future of Socio-Economic Rights Claims’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 14 (1998), pp. 327333.
Möller, Kai, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Möller, Kai, ‘From Constitutional to Human Rights: On the Moral Structure of International Human Rights’, Global Constitutionalism, 3 (2014), pp. 373403.
Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Moseneke, Dikgang, ‘Transformative Adjudication’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 18 (2002), pp. 309319.
Mowbray, Alastair, The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004).
Mowbray, Alastair, ‘The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 5 (2005), pp. 5779.
Mowbray, Alistair, Cases, Materials and Commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Mureinik, Etienne, ‘Beyond a Charter of Luxuries: Economic Rights in the Constitution’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 8 (1992), pp. 464474.
Mureinik, Etienne, ‘A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 10 (1994), pp. 3148.
Neumann, Volker, ‘Menschenwürde und Existenzminimum’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (1995), pp. 426–432.
Nolette, Paul, ‘Lessons learned from the South African Constitutional Court: Toward a Third Way of Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’, Michigan State Journal of International Law, 12 (2003), pp. 91119.
Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Nussbaum, Martha, Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Nussberger, Angelika, ‘Procedural Review by the ECtHR: View from the Court’, in Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds.), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 161176.
O’Cinneide, Colm, ‘A Modest Proposal: Destitution, State Responsibility and the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2008), pp. 583–605.
O’Cinneide, Colm, ‘The Problematic of Social Rights – Uniformity and Diversity in the Development of Social Rights Review’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch. and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 299317.
O’Connell, Paul, Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences (London: Routledge, 2012).
O’Neill, Onora, Towards Justice and Virtue (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Örücü, Esin, ‘The Core of Rights and Freedoms: The Limits of Limits’ in Campbell, Tom et al. (eds.), Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, (1986), pp. 3759.
Ost, François, ‘The Original Canons of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Delmas-Marty, M. and Chodkiewicz, Ch. (eds.), The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), pp. 283318.
Palmer, Ellie, ‘Protecting Socio-Economic Rights through the European Convention on Human Rights: Trends and Developments in the European Court of Human Rights’, Erasmus Law Review, 2 (2009), pp. 397425.
Palmer, Ellie, ‘Beyond Arbitrary Interference: The Right to a Home? Developing Socio-Economic Duties in the European Convention on Human Rights’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 61 (2010), pp. 225243.
Peroni, Lourdes and Timmer, Alexandra, ‘Vulnerable Groups: The Promise of an Emerging Concept in European Human Rights Convention Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (2013), pp. 10561058.
Petersen, Niels, ‘How to Compare the Length of Lines to the Weight of Stones’, German Law Journal, 14 (2013), pp. 13871408.
Pieterse, Marius, ‘Coming to Terms with Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 20 (2004), pp. 383417.
Pieterse, Marius, ‘Resuscitating Socio-Economic Rights: Constitutional Entitlements to Health Care Services’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 22 (2006), pp. 473502.
Pildes, Richard H., ‘Avoiding Balancing: The Role of Exclusionary Reasons in Constitutional Law’, Hastings Law Journal, 45 (1994), pp. 711751.
Popelier, Patricia and Van de Heyning, Catherine, ‘Subsidiarity Post-Brighton: Procedural Rationality as Answer’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 30 (2017), pp. 523.
Popelier, Patricia, Lambrechts, Sarah and Lemmens, Koen (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights: Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level (Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia, 2016).
Porter, Bruce, ‘The Crisis of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Strategies for Addressing it’ in Squires, J., Langford, M. and Thiele, B. (eds.), The Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in the Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Australian Human Rights Centre in collaboration with the Centre for Housing Rights and Evictions, 2005), pp. 4369.
Prebensen, S.C., ‘Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mahoney, P (ed.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective. Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000), pp. 11231137.
Rainey, Bernadette, Wicks, Elizabeth and Ovey, Clare, Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, 6th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2014).
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971) (1999).
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
Raz, Joseph, ‘On the Nature of Rights’, Mind, 93 (1984), pp. 194214.
Raz, Joseph, Practical Reasons and Norms, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 1990).
Raz, Joseph, ‘On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions’ in Alexander, L. (ed.), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 152193.
Remiche, Adélaide, ‘Yordanova and Others v. Bulgaria: The Influence of the Social Right to Adequate Housing on the Interpretation of the Civil Right to Respect for One’s Home’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), pp. 787800.
Remmert, Barbara, ‘Art. 19’ in Maunz, Theodor and Dürig, Günther (eds.), Grundgesetz (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2012).
Ress, George, ‘The Effects of Decisions and Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Domestic Legal Order’, Texas International Law Journal, 40 (2005), pp. 359382.
Rietiker, Daniel, ‘The Principle of “Effectiveness” in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Its Different Dimensions and Its Consistency with Public International Law – No Need for the Concept of Treaty Sui Generis’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 79 (2010), pp. 245277.
Rivers, Julian, ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, Cambridge Law Journal, 65 (2006), pp. 174207.
Roux, Theunis, ‘Understanding Grootboom – A Response to Cass R. Sunstein’, Constitutional Forum, 12 (2002), pp. 4151.
Ryssdal, Rolv, ‘The Coming of Age of the European Convention of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (1996), pp. 18–29.
Sachs, Albie, ‘The Judicial Eenforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’, Current Legal Problems, 56 (2003), pp. 579601.
Sachs, Michael, ‘Art. 19’ in Sachs, Michael (ed.), GG. Grundgesetz Kommentar, 7th ed. (Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 2011).
Sadurski, Wojciech, ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), pp. 397453.
Sadurski, Wojciech, Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Saul, Ben, Kinley, David and Mowbray, Jacqueline, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2014).
Schauer, Frederick, ‘Categories and the First Amendment: A Play in Three Acts’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 34 (1981), pp. 265307.
Schauer, Frederick, ‘A Comment on the Structure of Rights’, Georgia Law Review, 27 (1993), pp. 415434.
Schauer, Frederick, ‘Do Cases Make Bad Law?’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 73 (2006) pp. 883918.
Scheinin, Martin, ‘Economic and Social Rights as Legal Rights’ in Eide, A. et al. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 2954.
Schlag, Pierre, ‘Rules and Standards’, UCLA Law Review, 33 (1985), pp. 379429.
Schlink, Bernhard, Abwägung im Verfassungsrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1976).
Schnath, Matthias, ‘Auswirkungen des neuen Grundrechts auf Gewährleistung des Existenzminimums auf die besonderen Hilfen nach dem Zwölften Sozialgesetzbuches (SGB XII)’, Sozialrecht aktuell (2010), pp. 173–176.
Schneider, Ludwig, Der Schutz des Wesensgehalts von Grundrechten nach Art. 19 Abs. 2 GG (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983).
Scott, Craig, ‘The Interdependence and Permeability of Human Rights Norms: Towards a Partial Fusion of the International Covenants on Human Rights’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 27 (1989), pp. 769877.
Scott, Craig, ‘Reaching Beyond (Without Abandoning) the Category of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 21 (1999), pp. 633660.
Scott, Craig, ‘Towards a Principled, Pragmatic Judicial Role’, ESR Review, 1 (1999), pp. 47.
Scott, Craig and Alston, Philip, ‘Adjudicating Constitutional Priorities in a Transnational Context: A Comment on Soobramoney’s Legacy and Grootboom’s promise’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 16 (2000), pp. 206268.
Seiler, Christian, ‘Das Grundrecht auf ein menschenwürdiges Existenzminimum: Zum Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 9.2.2010’, JuristenZeitung, 65 (2010), pp. 500505.
Sen, Amartya, ‘The Standard of Living: Lives and Capabilities’ in Hawthorn, G. (ed.), The Standard of Living (Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 2038.
Sen, Amartya, ‘Freedom and Needs’, New Republic (10 January and 17 January 1994), pp. 31–38.
Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Senden, Hanneke, Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, doctoral thesis (Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland: Intersentia, 2011).
Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, 1996).
Smet, Stijn, ‘The “Absolute” Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment in Article 3 ECHR: Truly a Question of Scope Only?’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 273293.
Spielmann, Dean, ‘Wither the Margin of Appreciation’, Current Legal Problems, 67 (2014), pp. 4965.
Steiner, Henry J., ‘Securing Human Rights: The First Half-Century of the Universal Declaration, and Beyond’, Harvard Magazine (September–October 1998), pp. 45–46.
Steiner, Henry J., Alston, Philip and Goodman, Ryan, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Steinberg, Carol, ‘Can Reasonableness Protect the Poor? A Review of South Africa’s Socio-Economic Rights Jurisprudence’, South African Law Journal, 123 (2006), pp. 264284.
Stern, Klaus, Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Band III/2. Allgemeine Lehren der Grundrechte (Munich, Verlag C.H. Beck, 1994).
Stone-Sweet, Alec and Keller, Helen, ‘The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Orders’ in Stone-Sweet, A. and Keller, H. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 1136.
Stone-Sweet, Alec and Mathews, Jud, ‘All Things in Proportion? American Rights Doctrine and the Problem of Balancing’, Emory Law Journal, 60 (2011), pp. 711751.
Sullivan, Kathleen M., ‘Post-Liberal Judging: The Roles of Categorization and Balancing’, University of Colorado Law Review, 63 (1992), pp. 293317.
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements’, Harvard Law Review, 108 (1995), pp. 17331772.
Sunstein, Cass R., Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (Oxford University Press, 1996).
Sunstein, Cass R., Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa’, Constitutional Forum, 11 (2000–2001), pp. 123132.
Sunstein, Cass R., ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law’, Social Research, 74 (2007), pp. 124.
Taskyrakis, Stavros, ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2009), pp. 468493.
Teitgen, Pierre-Henri, ‘Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Macdonald, R.S.J., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993), pp. 314.
Toebes, Brigit, The Right to Health as a Human Right in International Law (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia/Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).
Tomuschat, Christian, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Tulkens, Françoise, How Can We Ensure Greater Involvement of National Courts in the Convention System? Dialogue between Judges (European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe, 2012), pp. 610.
Urbina, Francisco J., ‘A Critique of Proportionality’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57 (2012), pp. 4980.
Van der Schyff, Gerhard, Limitation of Rights: A Study of the European Convention and the South African Bill of Right (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2005).
Van der Schyff, Gerhard, ‘Interpreting the Protection Guaranteed by Two-Stage Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: The Case for Wide Interpretation’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J.H. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 6583.
Van Dijk, Pieter, Van Hoof, Fried, Van Rijn, Arjen and Zwaak, Leo (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 4th ed. (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2006).
Von Bernstorff, Jochen, ‘Kerngehaltsschutz durch den UN-Menschenrechtsausschuss und den EGMR: vom Wert Kategorialer Argumentationsformen’, Der Staat, 50 (2011), pp. 165190.
Von Bernstorff, Jochen, ‘Proportionality Without Balancing: Why Judicial Ad Hoc Balancing in Unnecessary and Potentially Detrimental to the Realisation of Individual and Collective Self-Determination’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch. and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 6386.
Von Hippel, Eike, Grenzen und Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Liberal Rights: Two Sides of the Coin’ in Waldron, Jeremy, Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 134.
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, Yale Law Journal, 155 (2006), pp. 13461406.
Warbrick, Colin, ‘The Structure of Article 8’, European Human Rights Law Review (1998), pp. 32–44.
Warbrick, Colin, ‘Economic and Social Interests and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Baderin, M.A. and McCorquodale, R., Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Action (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 241256.
Webber, Grégoire, The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Weinrib, Jacob, Dimensions of Dignity. The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
Wesson, Murray, ‘Grootboom and Beyond’: Reassessing the Socio-Economic Jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court’, South African Journal on Human Rights, 20 (2004), pp. 284308.
Wesson, Murray, ‘The Emergence and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights’ in Lazarus, L., McCrudden, Ch. and Bowles, N. (eds.), Reasoning Rights: Comparative Judicial Engagement (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014), pp. 281297.
Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘A Constitutional Future for the European Court of Human Rights?’, Human Rights Law Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 161166.
Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, The Present, The Future’, American University International Law Review, 22 (2007), pp. 521538.
Wintemute, Robert, ‘“Within the Ambit”: How Big Is the “Gap” in Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights? Part 1’, European Human Rights Law Review (2004), pp. 366–382.
Wintemute, Robert, ‘Filling the Article 14 “Gap”: Government Ratification and Judicial Control of Protocol No. 12 ECHR: Part 2’, European Human Rights Law Review (2004), pp. 484–499.
Xenos, Dimitris, The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights (London/Oxford/Edinburgh: Routledge, 2012).
Young, Katherine G., ‘The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content’, Yale Journal of International Law, 33 (2008), pp. 113175.
Young, Katherine G., Constituting Socio-Economic Rights (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Young, Katherine G., ‘Proportionality, Reasonableness, and Socio-Economic Rights’ (20 January 2017) in Jackson, V.C. and Tushnet, M. (eds.) Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2017); Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 430. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2892707
Zivier, Ernst, Der Wesensgehalt der Grundrechte (Berlin: Ernst Reuter Gesellschaft der Förderer und Freunde der Freien Universität e.v.,1962).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...