Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T15:04:05.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Whither NATO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2010

Bruce D. Jones
Affiliation:
New York University
Shepard Forman
Affiliation:
New York University
Richard Gowan
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

NATO IN AFGHANISTAN: THE BEGINNING OF THE END OR THE END OF THE BEGINNING?

In October 2006 the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan – under North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) command since August 2003 – assumed operational control of the whole of the country. With nearly forty thousand troops drawn from more than thirty-five countries, the Alliance was now charged with providing security and bringing stability to a deeply fractured country outside its treaty-defined area of operations. The range of tasks given to NATO forces in Afghanistan is broad and complex, from combat operations at one end to the rebuilding of roads, bridges, and schools at the other. On the face of it, the assumption of such extensive responsibilities is testimony to an extraordinary transformation on the part of the Alliance, evidence of just how far it has come from its early and initially timid forays into peacekeeping on the European continent in the early 1990s.

And yet, NATO's first operation outside the Euro-Atlantic area has proved a far greater challenge than initial planning assumptions, some of them simplistically lifted from its experiences in the Balkans, appeared to suggest. By early 2009, progress made in extending the authority of the Afghan government outside Kabul remains, at best, patchy. Critically, military operations have failed to reverse the resurgence of Taliban influence since 2002, which now extends beyond the movement's traditional strongholds in the southern provinces of Helmand, Uruzgan, and Kandahar.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cooperating for Peace and Security
Evolving Institutions and Arrangements in a Context of Changing U.S. Security Policy
, pp. 98 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,International Council on Security and Development, Struggle for Kabul: The Taliban Advance (London: MF Publishing Ltd, December 2008), pp. 5–6Google Scholar
Giustozzi, Antonio, Koran, Kalashnikov and Laptop – The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan (London: Hurst, 2007)Google Scholar
Filkins, Dekter, “Pakistan Says 1.3 Million Flee Fight with Taliban,” New York Times, 12 May 2009Google Scholar
Afghanistan Conflict – Military Challenges,” Strategic Comments 13, Issue 8, October 2007
Lieven, Anatol, “Afghanistan: An Unsuitable Candidate for State Building,” Conflict, Security and Development 7, No. 3 (2007), pp. 483–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, Jamie, “A NATO for the 21st Century: Toward a New Strategic Concept,” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 31, no. 2 (Summer 2007), p. 49Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gustav, ed., A History of NATO: The First Fifty Years, Vols. 1–3 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001)CrossRef
Windsor, Philip, Strategic Thinking: An Introduction and Farewell (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002), p. 95Google Scholar
Berdal, Mats, “From Operation ‘Maritime Monitor’ to ‘Allied Force’: Reflections on Relations between NATO and UN in the 1990s,” in Schmidt, Gustav, ed., A History of NATO: The First Fifty Years 1 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 57–71Google Scholar
Butler, Nicola, “NATO: From Collective Defence to Peace Enforcement,” in Schnabel, and Thakur, , eds. Kosovo and the Challenge of Collective Intervention (Tokyo: UNU Press, 2000), pp. 273–90Google Scholar
Windsor, Philip, “NATO's Twenty-Five Years,” in Berdal, Mats, ed., Studies in International Relations – Essays by Philip Windsor (Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2004), p. 94Google Scholar
Deni, John R., Alliance Management and Maintenance: Restructuring NATO for the 21st Century (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), p. 86Google Scholar
Nevers, Renée, “NATO's International Security Role in the Terrorist Era,” International Security, 31, No. 4, (Spring 2007), p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,White House, The National Security Strategy of the US of America (Washington, DC: White House, 2006), p. 46Google Scholar
Whitlock, Craig, “Afghanistan Appeal May Temper European Allies' Ardor for Obama,” Washington Post, February 6, 2009Google Scholar
Butcher, Martin, “NATO, Riga and Beyond,” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 84 (Spring 2007)Google Scholar
Smith, Julianne, et al., Transforming NATO (…again): A Primer for the NATO Summit in Riga 2006 (Washington DC: Center for Strategic International Studies, 2006), p. 16Google Scholar
Labi, Aisha, “Have Skills, Will Travel,” Time Magazine, January 27, 2003Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip, “Europeanization of NATO: A Convenient Myth,” International Herald Tribute, June 7, 1996Google Scholar
Bell, Robert, “Transformation Scorecard,” NATO Review, no. 1 (Spring 2005), p. 22Google Scholar
Boland, Frank, “NATO's Defence Capabilities Initiative: Preparing for Future Challenges,” NATO Review, no. 2 (Summer 1999), pp. 26–28Google Scholar
Binnendijk, Hans and Kugler, Richard, “Transforming European Forces,” Survival, 44, no. 3 (January 2002), p. 126Google Scholar
Bialos, Jeffrey P. and Koehl, Stuart L., The NATO Response Force: Coalition Warfare through Technology Transfer and Information Sharing (Washington DC: Center for Technology and National Security Policy, NDU, 2005), p. vGoogle Scholar
Ek, Carl, “NATO's Prague Capabilities Commitment,” CRS Report for Congress, RS21659 (Washington DC: CRS, July 22, 2008), p. 3Google Scholar
Overhaus, Marco, “Transatlantic Co-Operation and the Future of NATO,” Foreign Policy in Dialogue, vol. 8, no. 25 (2008), pp. 22–23Google Scholar
European Military Capabilities: Building Armed Forces for Modern Operations (London, IISS, June 2008), p. 93
Bird, Tim, “The European Union and Counter-Insurgency: Capability, Credibility, and Political Will,” Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 28, no. 1 (2007), p. 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, Peter, “War game at NATO talks highlights the need for quick deployment,” Financial Times, October 10, 2003Google Scholar
Mihalka, Michael, “NATO Response Force: Rapid? Responsive? A Force?,” Connections: The Quarterly Journal, vol. 4, no. 2 (2005), p. 79Google Scholar
Schmidt, John R., “Last Alliance Standing? NATO after 9/11,” The Washington Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1 (Winter 2007), pp. 97–98, 103–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Frederick W., Finding the Target: The Transformation of American Military Policy (New York: Encounter Books, 2006)Google Scholar
Frantzen, Henning-A., NATO and Peace Support Operations, 1991–1999: Policies and Doctrines (New York: Routledge, 2005), pp. 2–3, 5, 78–81Google Scholar
Ucko, David, The New Counterinsurgency Era: Transforming the U.S. Military for Modern Wars (Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Binnendijk, Hans and Kugler, Richard, “Needed – A NATO Stabilization and Reconstruction Force,” Defense Horizons, no. 45 (September 2004), p. 3Google Scholar
,NATO, NATO Transformed (Brussels: NATO, June 2004), p. 10Google Scholar
Brunnstrom, David and Morgan, David, “NATO Allies Offer Limp Response to U.S. Afghan Call,” Reuters, February 19, 2009Google Scholar
Nelson, C. Richard, How Should NATO Handle Stabilisation Operations and Reconstruction Efforts? Policy Paper (Washington DC: Atlantic Council, September 2006)Google Scholar
Korski, Daniel and Williams, Michael, “Creating a NATO Military Advisory Force,” World Defence Systems, no. 17, November 2008, pp. 148–151Google Scholar
Dempsey, Judy, “German General Giving up on Afghan Mission,” International Herald Tribune, 12 September 2007Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×