Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Data and transcription
- 1 An introduction to conversation and gender
- Part I Gender, person reference and self-categorization
- Part II Gender, repair and recipient design
- Part III Gender and action formation
- Part IV Gender identities and membership categorization practices
- References
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Data and transcription
- 1 An introduction to conversation and gender
- Part I Gender, person reference and self-categorization
- Part II Gender, repair and recipient design
- Part III Gender and action formation
- Part IV Gender identities and membership categorization practices
- References
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conversation and Gender , pp. 310 - 335Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
(1992). Topic transitions in physician–patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society, 21, 409–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
(1999). Interviewing persons with a learning disability: How setting lower standards may inflate well-being scores. Qualitative Health Research, 9 (4), 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (in press). Applied Conversation Analysis: Changing Institutional Practices. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
, & (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(1996). Men and Women in Interaction: Considering the Differences. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Locating culture in action: Membership categorization in texts and talk. In A. Lee & C. Poynton (eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
(1996). Mediation and empowerment in child protection cases. Mediation Quarterly, 14 (2), 111–34.Google Scholar
(2003). Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke:Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Conversations about Illness: Family Preoccupations with Bulimia. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2000). Inviting collaborations in stories about a woman. Language in Society, 29, 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Who are ‘they’? Speakers' practices for referring to known and unknown others. Manuscript.
(2009). A Natural History of Family Cancer: Interactional Resources for Managing Illness. Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press.Google Scholar
, & (2003). Making the case for airline compassion fares: The serial organization of problem narratives during a family crisis. Research on Language and Social Interation, 36, 351–93.Google Scholar
, Rose, M., Sharma, D., Sweetland, J., & (eds.) (2002). Gendered Practices in Language. Stanford, CA:Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
(2004). Ironic discourse: Evasive masculinity in brutish men's lifestyle magazines. Men and Masculinities, 7 (1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2010). Identity in social action: Conversation, narratives and genealogies. In M. Wetherell & C. T. Mohanty (eds.), Sage Handbook of Identities. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(2005). On multiple identities and educational contexts: Remarks on the study of inequalities and discrimination. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4 (1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Children Constructing their Social World: An Analysis of Gender Contrast in Children's Interaction in a Nursery School. Bergen Occasional Papers in Social Anthropology, No. 36: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Bergen.
(1993). Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip. Hawthome, NY:Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (1998). Morality in discourse. Special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31 (3/4).
, Bing, J. M., & (eds.) (1996). Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. Harlow:Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
(1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10, 543–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Participation in multilingual preschool play: Shadowing and crossing as interactional resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2133–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1991). Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Darn those new names and pronouns. PLAG Transgender Network. www.youth-guard.org/pflag-tnet/articles/pronouns.htm. Accessed 25 April 2006.
(1993). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). My Gender Workbook: How to Become a Real Man, a Real Woman, the Real You, or Something Else Entirely. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar
, & (2006). Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history-taking. In J. Heritage & D. W. Maynard (eds.), Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance. Sex Roles, 50 (9–10), 689–97.Google Scholar
(1999). Series foreword. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, & L. A. Sutton (eds.), Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Theories of discourse as theories of gender: Discourse analysis in language and gender studies. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2004). Language and Woman's Place: Text and Commentaries. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society, 33, 469–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociolinguistic cultural approach. Discourse Studies, 7 (4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Liang, A. C., & (eds.) (1999). Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, Bitan, T., & (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46 (5), 1349–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (2006). ‘No, we're not playing families’: Membership categorisation in children's play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39, 441- 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990b). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S. Case (ed.), Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Theatre. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). Reported speech in talking race on campus. Human Communication Research, 23, 475–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986). Language practices and self definition: The case of gender identity acquisition. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Rethinking language and gender studies. In S. Mills (ed.), Language and Gender: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Harlow:Longman.Google Scholar
(1997a). Demythologizing sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (eds.), Sociolinguistics: A Coursebook and Reader. Basingstoke:Macmillan.Google Scholar
(1997b). Theoretical debates in feminist linguistics: Questions of sex and gender. In R. Wodak (ed.), Gender and Discourse. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(1998b). Gender, language, and discourse: A review essay. Signs, 23 (4), 945–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005a). Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics, 26 (4), 482–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005b). Relativity and its discontents: Language, gender and pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2 (3), 321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages?Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Theoretical issues for the study of gender and spoken interaction. In P. Pichler & E.M. Eppler (eds.), Gender and Spoken Interaction. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
, & (2003b). Introduction: Language and desire in theory and practice. Language and Communication, 23, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, McAlinden, F., & O'Leary, K. (1988). Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (eds.), Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex. New York:Longman.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (1998). The Sociolinguistics Reader: Gender and Discourse (Vol. 2). London:Arnold.Google Scholar
, & (2001). Why the ‘good provider’ role still matters: Providing as a form of paternal involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 22 (1), 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Gender and Language: Towards a Feminist Pragmatics. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Speaking on behalf of the public in broadcast news interviews. In E. Holt & R. Clift (eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1988/9). When the medium becomes the message: The case of the Rather–Bush encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Meaning in interaction: The case of ‘actually’. Language, 77 (2), 245–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10 (5), 569–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Women's friendships, women's talk. In R. Wodak (ed.), Gender and Discourse. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(1998b). Gossip revisited: Language in an all-female group. In J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1999). Changing femininities: The talk of teenage girls. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, & L. A. Sutton (eds.), Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language (3rd ed.). Harlow:Longman.Google Scholar
, Danby, S., & (2009). Young children as rule makers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (8), 1477–92.Google Scholar
(1993). Empowerment and mediation: A narrative perspective. Negotiation Journal, 9 (3), 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Gender, culture and authority in a university life sciences laboratory. Discourse and Society, 8 (3), 313–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J., & (2001). Classroom ‘Families’: Cooperating or competing – girls' and boys' interactional styles in a bilingual classroom. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34 (1), 107–30.Google Scholar
(2005). Sex-based and non-sex-based gender systems. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Narratives as bad faith. In M. Andrews, S. Day Sclater, C. Squire, & A. Treacher (eds.), Lines of Narrative: Psychosocial Perspectives. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
(2001). ‘Can I be with?’ Negotiating play entry in a bilingual school. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 517–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Building bilingual oppositions: Code-switching in children's disputes. Language in Society, 33, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). Childhood and social interaction in everyday life: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (8), 1473–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). The serious and playful work of gender: Talk and social order in a preschool classroom. In N. Yelland (ed.), Gender in Early Childhood. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
(1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8 (1), 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Paternalism under the microscope. In A. Dundas Todd & S. Fisher (eds.), Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.Google Scholar
(1991). The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse and Society, 2 (4), 413–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Gender Blending: Confronting the Limits of Duality. Bloomington:Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1988). Empowerment or enforcement: Some questions about power and control in divorce mediation. In R. Dingwall & J. Eekelaar (eds.), Divorce Mediation and the Legal Process. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Sex, roles, and register: A corpus-based investigation of sex-linked features in university settings. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences.
(1978). Accusations: The occasioned use of members' knowledge of ‘religious geography’ in describing events. Sociology, 12, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Conversation analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, & (1992a). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1992b). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, Chatwin, J., & (2001). Conversation analysis: A method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expectations, 4, 58–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Language and gender in adolescence. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1998). Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2001). Conversation analysis, discursive psychology and the study of ideology: A response to Susan Speer. Feminism and Psychology, 11 (1), 136–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2001). Jekyll and Hyde: Men's constructions of feminism and feminists. Feminism and Psychology, 11 (4), 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology, 1 (4), 515–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Script formulations: An analysis of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investments and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7 (1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Facts, norms and dispositions: Practical uses of the modal would in police interrogations. Discourse Studies, 8 (4), 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Managing subjectivity in talk. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (eds.), Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2004). Discursive psychology, focus group interviews, and participants' categories. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). Self-help in calls for help with problem neighbours. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Other-initiated repair and membership categorization: Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (8), 1467–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Members' gendering work: ‘Women’, ‘feminists’ and membership categorization analysis. Discourse and Society, 13 (6), 819–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1999). ‘You're all a bunch of feminists’: Categorization and the politics of terror in the Montreal Massacre. Human Studies, 22, 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Noncustodial mothering: A cultural paradox of competent performance – performative competence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33 (1), 72–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Meanings of the unmarked: How ‘default’ person reference does more than just refer. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.) (2007). Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Boys' gossip telling: Staging identities and indexing (unacceptable) masculine behaviour. Text, 22 (2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Throwing like a girl: Situating gender differences in physicality across game contexts. Childhood, 10 (4), 475–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Shifting moral stances: Morality and gender in same-sex and cross-sex game interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (3), 331–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Staging insults and mobilizing categorizations in a multiethnic peer group. Discourse and Society, 16 (6),763–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls' relational talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (4), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Cross-sex peer conflict and the discursive production of gender in a Chinese preschool in Taiwan. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 539–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2005). Money, money, money: Is it still a rich man's world? http://fawcettsociety.org.uk. Accessed 22 May 2007.
, & (eds.) (2002). Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar
(1983). Interaction: The work women do. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA:Newbury House.Google Scholar
, Fox, B., & (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The TCU revisited. Pragmatics, 6 (3), 427–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Fox, B., & (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford, B. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1994). The golden dreams of the social constructionist. Journal of Anthropological Research, 50 (2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1996). The Fibromyalgia Help Book: Practical Guide to Living Better with Fibromyalgia. St Paul, MN:Smith House Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Language and gender research in an experimental setting. In V. L. Bergvall, J. M. Bing, & A. F. Freed (eds.), Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. Harlow:Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
, & (1996). Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference? Language in Society, 23, 1–26.Google Scholar
(1998). Constructing the ‘other’ through talk. Feminism and Psychology, 8 (4), 530–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review, 56, 818–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). The problematics of representation in community mediation hearings: Implications for mediation practice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 12 (4), 23–46.Google Scholar
(1996). Moral reasoning in interactional context: Strategic uses of care and justice arguments in mediation hearings. Sociological Inquiry, 66 (2), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). The relevance of interactional and institutional contexts for the study of gender differences: A demonstrative case study. Symbolic Interaction, 21 (1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Negotiating negotiation: The collaborative production of resolution in small claims mediation hearings. Discourse and Society, 11 (3), 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1999). Misplaced mistrust: The collaborative construction of doubt in 911 emergency calls. Symbolic Interaction, 22 (4), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Vise, K., & (2002). Disputing neutrality: When mediation empowerment is perceived as bias. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20 (2), 205–30.Google Scholar
(1979). The boys have the muscles and the girls have the sexy legs: Adult–child speech and the use of generic person labels. In O. K. Garnica & M. L. King (eds.), Language, Children and Society. Oxford:Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003b). On sexism in conversational joking. Media and Culture, 6. www.media-culture.org.au/0311/1-glenn-feature-sexism.html>.
(1961). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis:Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
(1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66, (6, pt II), 133–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Footing. In E. Goffman, Forms of Talk. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Compliments and Compliment Responses: Grammatical Structure and Sequential Organization. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). Rethinking ‘status’ and ‘role’: Toward a general model of the cultural organization of social relationships. In M. Banton (ed.), The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. London:Tavistock.Google Scholar
(1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Irvington.Google Scholar
(1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1986a). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text, 6 (3), 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986b). Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62 (1/2), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987a). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50 (2), 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987b). Unilateral departure. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
, & (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1 (1), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1990). He-Said She-Said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington:Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch. In S. Hoyle & C. T. Adger (eds.), Kids' Talk: Strategic Language Use in Later Childhood. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Organizing participation in cross-sex jump rope: Situating gender differences within longitudinal studies of activities. Research on Language and Social Interaction (special issue), 34 (1), 75–106.Google Scholar
(2002a). Building power asymmetries in girls' interaction. Discourse and Society, 13 (6), 715–30.Google Scholar
(2002b). Exclusion in girls' peer groups: Ethnographic analysis of language practices on the playground. Human Development, 45 (6), 392–415.Google Scholar
(2003). Gender, ethnicity and class in children's peer interactions. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2006). The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status and Exclusion. Oxford:Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Goodwin, C., & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2002). Multi-modality in girls' game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1621–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus: A Practical Guide for Improving Communication and Getting What you Want in your Relationships. London:Thorsons.Google Scholar
(1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society, 17, 401–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1997). Argumentative talk in divorce mediation sessions. American Sociological Review, 2 (1), 151–70.Google Scholar
(2001). Laughter as a patient's resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text, 21, 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Realizing the illness: Patients' narratives of symptom discovery. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (eds.), Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (1995). Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar
(2001). Obvious, all too obvious? Methodological issues in using sex/gender as a variable in educational research. In B. Francis & C. Skelton (eds.), Investigating Gender: Contemporary Perspectives in Education. Buckingham:Open University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1985). The cultural context of gender segregation in children's peer groups. Child Development, 56, 219–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1985). Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
, & (2008). Sex differences in language processing: Functional MRI methodological considerations. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27 (6), 1221–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Litosseliti, L., Saunston, H., & (eds.) (2008). Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke:Palgrave.Google Scholar
Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (2001). Standards of care for gender identity disorders (6th version). www.hbigda.org. Accessed July 2008.
(2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). London:Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Applied ethnomethodology: Looking for the local rationality of reading activities. Human Studies, 13, 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Ethnicity and gender issues in language. In H. Landrine (ed.), Bringing Cultural Diversity to Feminist Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
, & (1991). Gender, power and miscommunication. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. M. Wiemann (eds.), ‘Miscommunication’ and Problematic Talk. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.Google Scholar
(2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 251–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). ‘You're not takin me seriously’: Ethics and asymmetry in calls to a child protection helpline. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Turn medial tag questions. Paper presented at National Communication Association, Chicago.
, & (2007). Crying receipts: Time, empathy and institutional practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2010). Interrogating tears: Some uses of ‘tag questions’ in a child protection helpline. In A. F. Freed & S. Ehrlich (eds.), ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (2005). Developments in discursive psychology. Discourse and Society (special issue), 16 (5), 595–601.
, & (eds.) (2007). Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002a). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in references to persons (and places). In N. Enfield & T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (2006). Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68 (1), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , & (2007). Reducing patients' unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22 (10), 1429–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). The local order of deviance in school: Membership categorisation, motives and morality in referral talk. In S. Hester & D. Francis (eds.), Local Educational Order. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1997). Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Boston:International Institute for Ethnomethodology and University Press of America.Google Scholar
, & (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London:Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Social constructionism, postmodernism and feminist sociolinguistics. Gender and Language, 1 (1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1999). The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28, 173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Just gassing: An analysis of direct reported speech in a conversation between two employees of a gas supply company. Text, 19, 505–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33 (4), 425–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.) (2007a). Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2007b). ‘I'm eyeing your chop up mind’: Reporting and enacting. In E. Holt & R. Clift (eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1998). How gender creeps into talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31 (3), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1990). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London:Falmer Press.Google Scholar
, & (1993). Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In D. Tannen (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Values and moral judgment: Communicative praxis as moral order. In G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3 (2), 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkien (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Irvington.Google Scholar
(1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally-occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 34, 1–12.Google Scholar
(1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1996). On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16 (1), 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004a). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2004b). A note on laughter in ‘male–female’ interaction. Discourse Studies, 6, 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004c). ‘At first I thought’: A normalizing device for extraordinary events. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
, , & (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
, & (2009). ‘Doing gender’ as canon or agenda: A symposium on West and Zimmerman. Gender and Society, 23 (1), 72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text and Talk, 26 (6), 699–731.Google Scholar
(2008). The balancing act: Framing gendered parental identities at dinnertime. Language in Society, 37, 539–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b). How to resist an idiom. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 121–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Doing feminist conversation analysis. In P. McIlvenny (ed.), Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2005a). Speaking as a heterosexual: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (3), 221–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005b). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52 (4), 477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Talking sex and gender. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (eds.), Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(2007a). Feminist research practice: The promise of conversation analysis for feminist research. Feminism and Psychology, 17, 133–48.Google Scholar
(2007b). Is ‘woman’ always relevantly gendered? Gender and Language, 1 (1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (2007c). Special feature: Feminist conversation analysis: Research by students at the University of York, UK. Feminism and Psychology, 17 (2), 133–236.
(2008a). Developing feminist conversation analysis: A response to Wowk. Human Studies, 31 (2), 179–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008b). Conversation analysis: Technical matters for gender research. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (eds.), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke:Palgrave.Google Scholar
, & (2007). Birth trauma: Talking with women and the value of conversation analysis. British Journal of Midwifery, 15 (5), 256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). Word selection and social identities in talk-in-interaction. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Sociological Association. Chicago. August.
, & (2005). The de-gaying and regaying of AIDS: Contested homophobias in lesbian and gay awareness training. Discourse and Society, 16 (2), 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). Becoming a ‘bloke’: The construction of gender in interaction. Feminism and Psychology, 17 (2), 214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (in press). Identifying and remediating heterosexist talk. In C. Antaki (ed.), Applied Conversation Analysis: Changing Institutional Practices. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
(2008). Language and Gender Research from a Queer Linguistic Perspective. Saarbrücken:VDM.Google Scholar
(2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8 (1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2004). Positioning a ‘mature’ self in interactive practices: How adolescent males negotiate ‘physical attraction’ in group talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 471–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Language and gender/sexuality. Language and Culture Mailing List: Online Symposium. www.language-culture.org/archives/subs/kulick-don/index.html.
(1999). Narrative identity: Preschoolers' self-construction through narrative in same-sex friendship group dramatic play. Narrative Inquiry, 9 (2), 427–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a). Children's gender indexing in language: From the separate worlds hypothesis to considerations of culture, context, and power. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34 (1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b). Constituting the emotions: A longitudinal study of emotion talk in a preschool friendship group of boys. In B. Baron & H. Kotthoff (eds.), Gender in Interaction: Perspectives on Femininity and Masculinity in Ethnography and Discourse. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
, & (1996). ‘Separate worlds for girls and boys?’ Views from U.S. and Chinese mixed-sex friendship groups. In D. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (eds.), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Mahwaw, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1972b). Rules for ritual insults. In W. Labov, Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
, & (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Language, gender, and politics: Putting ‘women’ and ‘power’ in the same sentence. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2003). At Play in Belfast: Children's Folklore and Identities in Northern Ireland. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2005). Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist presumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 371–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). Some uses of third-person reference forms in speaker self-reference. Discourse and Society, 9, 493–525.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2005). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. London:Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4 (2), 141–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Finding ‘face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59 (4), 303–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Collaborative turn sequences. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007a). Introduction: Person-reference in conversation analytic research. Discourse Studies, 9 (4), 427–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007b). Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference. Discourse Studies, 9, 526–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Transgender Emergence: Therapeutic Guidelines for Working with Gender-Variant People and their Famillies. Binghampton, NY:Haworth Clinical Practice Press.Google Scholar
(1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (eds.), Erving Goffman: Studies in the Interactional Order. Cambridge:Polity.Google Scholar
(1999). Conversationally implicating lesbian and gay identity. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, & L. A. Sutton (eds.), Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Gender and Language: An Introduction and Resource Book. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (eds.) (1997). Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory, 1 (1), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Ethnomethodology and the logic of practice. In K. Knorr-Cetina, E.v. Savigny, & T. R. Schatzki (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
, & (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text and Memory at the Iran–Contra Hearings. Durham, NC:Duke University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33, 703–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1995). Wages and gender composition: Why do women's jobs pay less? Journal of Labor Economics, 13 (3), 426–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1982). A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (ed.), Language and Social Identity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1998). A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2002). Becoming women: Transgendered identities, psychosexual therapy and the challenge of metamorphosis. Sexualities, 5 (4), 449–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Good News, Bad News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
, Houtkoop, H., Schaeffer, N. C., & van der Zouwen, H. (eds.) (2002). Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York:Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
(2003). ‘What's in a name?’: Social labeling and gender practices. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2003). Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1987). An initial investigation in the usability of fictional conversation for doing conversation analysis. Semiotica, 67 (1–2), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002a). Introduction: Researching talk, gender and sexuality. In P. McIlvenny (ed.), Talking Gender and Sexuality: Conversation, Performativity and Discourse in Interaction. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (2002b). Talking Gender and Sexuality: Conversation, Performativity and Discourse in Interaction. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Vernon, A. E., & (1995). Division of labor in conversations: Are Fishman's results replicable and generalizable? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24 (4), 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & Al-Roubaie, A. (2008). Interruptions, status and gender in medical interviews: The harder you brake, the longer it takes. Discourse and Society, 19 (5), 645–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1988 [1970]). On ‘understanding’ in the analysis of natural conversation. In M. Moerman (ed.), Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Toward the study of lesbian speech. In A. Livia and K. Hall (eds.), Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1995). Lesbians in the living room: Collusion, co-narration in conversation. In W. L. Leap (ed.), Beyond the Lavender Lexicon: Authenticity, Imagination, and Appropriation in Lesbian and Gay Languages. Amsterdam:Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
(2002). The case of the indefinite pronoun: Discourse and the concealment of lesbian identity in class. In L. Litosseliti & J. Sunderland (eds.), Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1995). Framing radical bisexuality: Toward a gender agenda. In N. Tucker (ed.), Bisexual Politics: Theories, Queries, and Visions. New York:Haworth Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Gender and language use in Japanese preschool children. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34 (1), 15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). How mediation can effectively address the male–female power imbalance in divorce. Mediation Quarterly, 9 (3), 227–39.Google Scholar
(2000). Transgender issues. In J. Ussher (ed.), Women's Health: Contemporary International Perspectives. Leicester:BPS Books.Google Scholar
(1995). Membership categorization devices under construction: Social identity boundary maintenance in everyday discourse. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Twice-told tales: Collaborative narration of familiar stories. Language in Society, 26, 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). ‘I don't have no damn cultures’: Doing normality in a deviant setting. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 239–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2008). Generation gaps in attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (3), 276–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.) (2009). Gender and Spoken Interaction. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Speed and reduction in postpositioned self-initiated self-repair. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2, 6, 143–62.Google Scholar
(1975). Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Division of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
(1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. London:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a fishing device. Sociological Inquiry, 50 (3 and 4), 186–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984a). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1984b). Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling ‘how I know’. Journal of Pragmatics, 8 (5–6), 607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984c). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1986). Extreme case formulations: A new way of legitimating claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2005). A conversation analytic approach to relationships: Their relevance for interactional conduct. In K. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, & (2003). ‘I'm a bit concerned’: Call openings on a child protection helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 197–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2011). Somewhere between evil and normal: Traces of morality in a child protection helpline. In J. Cromdal & M. Tholander (eds.), Morality in Practice: Exploring Childhood, Parenthood and Schooling in Everyday Life. London:Equinox.Google Scholar
(2008). Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12 (1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press for Change (2007). Response to draft good practice guidelines for the assessment and treatment of gender dysphoria. www.pfc.org.uk. Accessed January 2009.
(2005). Studies in Modern Childhood: Society, Agency, Culture. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Grammar and social organisation: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2006). The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35 (5), 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). The use of empowerment in child custody mediation: A feminist critique. Mediation Quarterly, 11 (4), 361–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Widening the lens of language and gender research: Integrating critical discourse analysis and cultural practice theory. Linguistik Online, 2 (1/99), 1–14.Google Scholar
(2004). The sequential organization of ‘explicit’ apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (3), 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). The concept of trouble responsibility in conversational repair and its implications for interactional organization and interpersonal alignment. Unpublished paper, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
, & (2006). Physicians' opening questions and patients' satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 60, 279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date. Gender and Sexuality, 28 (9–10), 258–68.Google Scholar
(1978). On the achievement of a series of stories. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1966). The search for help: No one to turn to. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
(1972). On the analysability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
(1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1975). Everyone has to lie. In M. Sanches & B. Blount (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1978). Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1979). A revolutionary category: Hotrodder. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Irvington.Google Scholar
(1984a). Notes on methodology (ed. G. Jefferson). In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1984b). On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987 [1973]). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1992). Lectures on Conversation (Vols. I and II, ed. G. Jefferson). Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
, & (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Irvington.Google Scholar
, Schegloff, E. A., & (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Linell, P., Startkammar, H., & (2001). Routinization and sensitivity: Interaction in oncological follow-up consultations. Health, 5 (2), 139–63.Google Scholar
(n. d.). Increments. Unpublished manuscript.
(1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York:Free Press.Google Scholar
(1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: Can I ask you a question? Sociological Inquiry, 50 (4), 104–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987a). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. Smelser (eds.), The Micro–Macro Link. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1987b). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50 (2), 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational Organization and its Development (Vol. XXXVIII in the series Advances in Discourse Processes). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.Google Scholar
(1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and Social Structure. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1992a). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992b). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97 (5), 1295–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26 (1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996a). Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. In E. H. Hovy & D. R. Scott (eds.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account. New York:Springer.Google Scholar
(1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson, & E. A. Schegloff (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996c). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1998a). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society, 9, 413–16.
(1998b). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41 (3–4), 235–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1999). ‘Schegloff's texts’ as ‘Billig's data’: A critical reply. Discourse and Society, 10 (4), 558–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap, and turn-taking. In J. H. Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
(2001b). Getting serious: Joke serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (12), 1947–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). On dispensability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (2), 95–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007a). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007b). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007c). Conveying who you are: The presentation of self, strictly speaking. In N. Enfield & T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007d). Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization. Discourse Studies, 9, 433–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007e). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. London:Berg.Google Scholar
(2009). One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. In J. Sidnell (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , & (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53 (2), 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Gender and academic discourse: Global restrictions and local possibilities. Language in Society, 37, 515–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Complementary and conflicting identities: Images and interaction in an interracial school. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (eds.), The Development of Children's Friendships. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1962). Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers. Vol. I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
(1973 [1953]). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (ed.), Alfred Schutz: Collected Papers. Vol. I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
(1986). Gender: A useful category of histoical analysis. American Historical Review, 91 (5), 1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). On owning knowledge. In R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth:Penguin.Google Scholar
, & (2007). Memory in interaction: An analysis of repeat cells to a home birth helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40 (1), 117–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse and Society, 11 (3), 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Constructing and managing male exclusivity in talk-in-interaction. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2005). Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1978). K is mentally ill: The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12, 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Feminism and conversation analysis: An oxymoron? Feminism and Psychology, 9 (4), 417–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants' orientations. Feminism and Psychology, 11 (1), 107–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002a). What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice. Discourse and Society, 13, 783–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b). Sexist talk: Gender categories, participants' orientation and irony. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 (3), 347–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002c). ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4 (4), 511–25.Google Scholar
(2005a). Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London:Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005b). The interactional organization of the gender attribution process. Sociology, 39 (1), 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Natural and contrived data. In In P. Alasuutari, J. Brannen, & L. Bickman (eds.), The Handbook of Social Research. London:Sage.Google Scholar
(2009). Passing as a transsexual woman in the gender identity clinic. In M. Wetherell (ed.), Theorizing Identities and Social Action. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2010). Pursuing views and testing commitments: Hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (eds.), Why Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(forthcoming). The epistemics of self-praise.
, & (2007). On passing: The interactional organization of appearance attributions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. In V. Clarke & E. Peel (eds.), Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives. Chichester:John Wiley.Google Scholar
, & (2008). Transsexual Identities: Constructions of Gender in an NHS Gender Identity Clinic. End of Award report. Award No:RES-148–25–0029. London: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
, & (2006). Gatekeeping gender: Some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. Discourse and Society, 17 (6), 785–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). ‘Suppose you couldn't go any further with treatment, what would you do?’: Hypothetical questions in interactions between psychiatrists and transsexual patients. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (eds.), Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, & (2000). The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims. Discourse and Society, 11 (4), 543–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2002). From performatives to practices: Judith Butler, discursive psychology, and the management of heterosexist talk. In P. McIlvenny (ed.), Talking Gender and Sexuality: Conversation, Performativity and Discourse in Interaction. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2007). Alternative recognitionals in person reference. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, Mangione-Smith, R., Elliott, M., McDonald, L., & (2003). Why do physicians think parents expect antibiotics? What parents report vs what physicians believe. Journal of Family Practice, 52 (2), 140–8.Google ScholarPubMed
, Enfield, N. J., & (2007). Person reference in interaction. In N. J. Enfield & T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Use of alternative (non-)recognitionals: A marked practice to display social distance. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association Conference, Goteborg, Sweden, July.
, & (2007). Gendered ‘people’: How linguistically non-gendered terms can have gendered interactional relevance. Feminism and Psychology, 17 (2), 224–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). An evaluation of two studies of gender and language in educational settings. Gender and Education, 9 (2), 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Talking about gender: The conversational construction of gender categories in academic discourse. Discourse and Society, 9 (2), 217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Toward a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse. Feminism and Psychology, 10 (4), 552–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism and Psychology, 13 (3), 317–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1 (2), 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Analysing gender and language. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9 (1), 118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction. Sociological Review, 54 (3), 467–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008a). Categories and sequences: Formulating gender in talk-in-interaction. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (eds.), Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Basingstoke:Palgrave.Google Scholar
(2008b). Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasioning audience laughter in television ‘sitcoms’. Social Semiotics, 18 (3), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). Doing actions with identity categories: Complaints and denials in neighbour disputes. Text and Talk, 29 (1), 75–97.Google Scholar
, & (2007). ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse and Society, 18 (3), 337–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2011). Mundane morality and gender in familial neighbour disputes. In J. Cromdal & M. Tholander (eds.), Morality in Practice: Exploring Childhood, Parenthood and Schooling in Everyday Life. London:Equinox.Google Scholar
, & (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse and Society, 12 (2), 243–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2002). Gender and sexuality in talk-in-interaction: Considering a conversation analytic perspective. In P. McIlvenny (ed.), Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
, & (2002a). Gender, language, conversation analysis and feminism. Discourse and Society, 13 (6), 707–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.) (2002b). Gender, language, conversation analysis and feminism. Discourse and Society (special issue), 13 (6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986). Towards reciprocity: Politics, rank and gender in the interaction of a group of schoolchildren. In J. Cook-Gumperz, W. A. Corsaro, & J. Streeck (eds.), Children's Worlds and Children's Language. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
, & (1998). Generic he in conversation? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (2006). Language and Gender: An Advanced Resource Book. London:Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). Doing gender against the odds: A sociolinguistic analysis of educational discourse. In P. Pichler & E. M. Eppler (eds.), Gender and Spoken Interaction. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2003). ‘When shall we go for a ride?’: A case of the sexual harassment of a young girl. Discourse and Society, 14 (2), 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Women and men talking: An interactional sociolinguistic approach. In M. R. Walsh (ed.), Women, Men, and Gender: Ongoing Debates. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Talk in the intimate relationship: His and hers. In J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2002). Cross-gender teasing as a socializing practice. Discourse Processes, 34, 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.) (1975). Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA:Newbury House.Google Scholar
, Kramarae, C., & (eds.) (1983). Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA:Newbury House.Google Scholar
, & van de Vliert, E. (1994). Applying cooperation and competitive conflict theory to mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 11 (4), 303–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology, 41 (4), 645–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2003). Gender and body hair: Constructing the feminine woman. Women's Studies International Forum, 26, 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Analysing context: Framing the discussion. Research in Language and Social Interaction, 31 (1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). When ‘difference’ is ‘dominance’: A critique of the ‘anti-power-based’ cultural approach to sex differences. Language and Society, 21, 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1998). Introduction. In I. Velody & R. Williams (eds.), The Politics of Constructionism. London:Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Mediation: An analysis, review, and proposed research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16, 51–65.Google Scholar
(2001). Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organizations. Harlow:Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(1978). Categorization, authorization and blame negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 5, 105–13.Google Scholar
, & (1982). Interviews and the interactional construction of accounts of homosexual identity. Social Analysis, 11, 56–78.Google Scholar
(2000). Gender relevance in talk-in-interaction and discourse. Discourse and Society, 11 (2), 286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b). Towards understanding gender and talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society, 13 (6), 767–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Not just ‘doctor's orders’: Directive–response sequences in patients' visits to women and men physicians. Discourse and Society, 1, 85–112.Google Scholar
(1995). Women's competence in conversation. Discourse and Society, 6 (1), 107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1993). Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. In P. England (ed.), Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory. New York:Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
, & (2002a). Accountability in action: The accomplishment of gender, race and class in a University of California Board of Regents. Discourse and Society, 13 (4), 537–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2002b). Accountability and affirmative action: The accomplishment of gender, race, and class in a University of California Board of Regents Meeting. In S. Fenstermaker & C. West (eds.), Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
, & (1988). Conversational shift work: A study of topical transitions between women and men. Social Problems, 35, 551–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9 (3), 431–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11 (5), 661–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1988). When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems, 35 (4), 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). ‘Accomplishing the case’ in pediatrics and child health: Medicine and morality in inter-professional talk. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24 (4), 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2009). When are persons ‘white’? On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society, 20 (5), 613–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). They are all ‘doing gender’ but are they all passing? A case study of the appropriation of a sociological concept. Sociological Review, 55 (2), 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). ‘But you don't class yourself’: The interactional management of membership and non-membership. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London:Sage.Google Scholar
, & (2003). Constructing identities: A feminist conversation analytic approach to positioning in action. In R. Harré & F. Moghaddam (eds.), The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. Westpost, CT:Praeger.Google Scholar
, & (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69 (2), 150–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2007). Conversation analysis, gender and sexuality. In A. Weatherall, B. Watson, & C. Gallios (eds.), Language, Discourse and Social Psychology. London:Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2000). Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family Conflict and What To Do About It. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London:Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London:Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Blame allocation, sex and gender in a murder interrogation. Women's Studies International Forum, 7 (1), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Kitzinger's feminist conversation analysis: Critical observations. Human Studies, 30, 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Stance in Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992a). They were all doing gender, but they weren't all passing: Comment on Rogers. Gender and Society, 6 (2), 192–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992b). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Identity, context, and interaction. In C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London:Sage.Google Scholar
, & (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA:Newbury House.Google Scholar