Part II - Addressing collisions
Regulation and self-regulation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contested Regime CollisionsNorm Fragmentation in World Society, pp. 137 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Bibliography
Ahmed, I., Sutton, A. and Riley, R., ‘Assessment of Publication Bias, Selection Bias, and Unavailable Data in Meta-analyses Using Individual Participant Data: A Database Survey’, British Medical Journal, 344 (2012), d7762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R., ‘Verfassungsrecht und einfaches Recht – Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und Fachgerichtsbarkeit’, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 61 (2002), pp. 7–33.Google Scholar
Applegate, W. B., Furberg, C. D. and Byungton, R. P., ‘The Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Athersclerosis Study (Midas)’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 277 (1996), pp. 297–8.Google Scholar
Augsberg, I., ‘Subjektive und objektive Dimensionen der Wissenschaftsfreiheit’ in Voigt, F. (ed.), Freiheit der Wissenschaft. Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung, Normativität und Funktion (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012), pp. 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A., and Dörter, F., ‘The Association between a Journal’s Source of Revenue and the Drug Recommendations Made in the Articles it Publishes’, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183 (2011), pp. 544–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bombardier, C., Laine, L. and Reicin, A., ‘Comparison of Upper Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Rofecoxib and Naproxen in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. VIGOR Study Group’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 343 (2000), pp. 1520–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bumke, C., ‘Universitäten im Wettbewerb’, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 69 (2009), pp. 407–61.Google Scholar
Chan, A.-W., Hróbjartsson, A. and Haahr, M. T., ‘Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Comparison of Protocols to Published Articles’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 291 (2004), pp. 2457–65.Google Scholar
Christensen, R., and Fischer-Lescano, A., Das Ganze des Rechts. Vom hierarchischen zum reflexiven Verständnis deutscher und europäischer Grundrechte (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2007).Google Scholar
Clapham, A., Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, D., Freiheitsrechte und Arbeitsverfassung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Angelis, C., and Drazen, J. M., ‘Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 351 (2004), pp. 1250–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickersin, K., Min, Y.-I. and Meinert, C. L., ‘Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results. Follow-up of Applications Submitted to two Institutional Review Boards’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 267 (1992), pp. 374–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Dirnagl, U., and Lauritzen, M., ‘Fighting Publication Bias: Introducing the Negative Results Sections’, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 30 (2010), pp. 1263–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreier, H., Dimensionen der Grundrechte. Von der Wertordnungsjudikatur zu den objektiv-rechtlichen Grundrechtsgehalten (Hannover: Hennies and Zinkhusen, 1993).Google Scholar
Dürig, G., ‘Grundrechte und Zivilrechtsprechung’ in Maunz, T. (ed.), Vom Bonner Grundgesetz zur gesamtdeutschen Verfassung: Festschrift Hans Nawiasky (München: Isar, 1956), pp. 157–210.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, P. J., Berlin, J. A., Gopalan, R. and Matthews, D., ‘Publication Bias in Clinical Research’, The Lancet, 337 (1991), pp. 867–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyding, D., Lelgemann, M. and Grouven, U., ‘Reboxetine for a Cute Treatment of Major Depression: Sytematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published and Unpublished Placebo and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Controlled Trials’, British Medical Journal, 341 (2010), c4737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanelli, D., ‘Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data’, PLoS ONE, 5 (2010), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Kritik der praktischen Konkordanz’, Kritische Justiz, 2 (2008), pp. 166–77.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), pp. 999–1045.Google Scholar
Franzen, M., Breaking News: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften im Kampf um Aufmerksamkeit (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugh-Berman, A. J., ‘The Haunting of Medical Journals: How Ghostwriting Sold “HRT”’, PLoS Medicine, 7 (2010), e1000335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galtung, J., ‘Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: A Theoretical Paradigm’, Journal of Peace Research, 2 (1965), pp. 348–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamillscheg, F., ‘Die Grundrechte im Arbeitsrecht’, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 164 (1964), pp. 385–445.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S., ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of Constitutional Rights’, Michigan Law Review, 102 (2003), pp. 387–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstenberg, O., ‘Private Law, Constitutionalism and the Limits of Judicial Role’ in Scott, C. (ed.), Torture as Tort: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 687–703.Google Scholar
Graber, C., Zwischen Geist und Geld: Interferenzen von Kunst und Wirtschaft aus rechtlicher Sicht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1994).Google Scholar
Han, B.-C., ‘Im digitalen Panoptikum: Wir fühlen uns frei. Aber wir sind es nicht’, Der Spiegel, (2014)2, p. 106.Google Scholar
Hesse, K., Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 4th edn. (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1999).Google Scholar
Horton, R., ‘Medical Editors Trial Amnesty’, The Lancet, 350 (1997), pp. 756ff.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäger, H., Makrokriminalität: Studien zur Kriminologie kollektiver Gewalt (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989).Google Scholar
Jefferson, T., Jones, M., Doshi, P., Del Mar, C.B., Heneghan, C.J., Hama, R. and Thompson, M.J., ‘Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Preventing and Treating Influenza in Healthy Adults and Children’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2012), Art. No.: CD008965.Google Scholar
Kanalan, I., ‘Horizontal Effect of Human Rights in the Era of Transnational Constellations: On the Accountability of Private Actors for Human Rights Violations’, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2539110 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karavas, V., Digitale Grundrechte: Zur Drittwirkung der Grundrechte im Internet (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2006).Google Scholar
Krajewska, A., ‘In Search of the Holy Grail of Transparent and Coherent Global Health Law’, 2013, available at: http://campus.hec.fr/global-transparency/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Krajewska-Transparency-and-global-health.pdf.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S., Science in the Public Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar
Ladeur, K. H., Kritik der Abwägung in der Grundrechtsdogmatik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004).Google Scholar
Ladeur, K. H. Das Medienrecht und die Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. In Sachen Dieter Bohlen, Maxim Biller, Caroline von Monaco u.a. (Köln: Halem, 2007).Google Scholar
Lexchin, J., Bero, L., Djulbegovic, B. and Clark, O., ‘Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome and Quality: Systematic Review’, British Medical Journal, 326 (2003), pp. 1167–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luhmann, N., Grundrechte als Institution: Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1965).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. ‘The World Society as a Social System’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Essays on Self-Reference (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), pp. 175–90.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. ‘Das Paradox der Menschenrechte und drei Formen seiner Entfaltung’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 6: Die Soziologie und der Mensch (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1995), pp. 229–36.Google Scholar
Mathews, J., and Stone Sweet, A., ‘All Things in Proportion? American Rights Review and the Problem of Balancing’, Emory Law Journal, 4 (2011), pp. 102–79.Google Scholar
Medwedjew, S. A., Der Fall Lyssenko. Eine Wissenschaft kapituliert (Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe, 1971).Google Scholar
Muir Watt, H., ‘Conflict of Laws Unbounded: The Case of Legal-Pluralist Revival’, Transnational Legal Theory, 7 (2016 forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowotny, H., ‘The Changing Nature of Public Science’ in Nowotny, H. (ed.), The Public Nature of Science under Assault. Politics, Markets, Science and the Law (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2005), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Nolan, J., ‘With Power Comes Responsibility: Human Rights and Corporate Responsibilities’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 28 (2005), p. 581ff.Google Scholar
Nowrot, K., ‘Den “Kinderschuhen” entwachsen: Die (Wieder-) Entdeckung der rechtssoziologischen Perspektive in der Dogmatik der Völkerrechtssubjektivität’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 28 (2007), pp. 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petryna, A., When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects (Princeton University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, C., and Olsen, B. R., ‘Editorial: Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine’, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, 1 (2002), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Library of Science, Medicine Editors, ‘Ghostwriting Revisited: New Perspectives but Few Solutions in Sight’, PLoS Medicine, 8 (2011), e1001084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quack, C., and Wackerbeck, A., ‘Die Verpflichtung zur Registrierung und Veröffentlichung klinischer Studien: Darstellung der europäischen Rechtslage im Vergleich zur US-Regelung nach dem FDA Amendment Act’, GesundheitsRecht, 1 (2010), pp. 6–12.Google Scholar
Ridder, H. Die soziale Ordnung des Grundgesetzes (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüfner, W., ‘Grundrechtsadressaten’ in Isensee, J. and Kirchhof, P. (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2011), pp. 83-125.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J., ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rightsand Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008).Google Scholar
Schaaber, J., Kochen, M., Müller-Oerlinghausen, B. and Niebling, W., ‘Warum unabhängige Arzneimittelzeitschriften und Fortbildungsveranstaltungen wichtig sind’ in Lieb, K., Klemperer, D., Ludwig, W.-D. and Kochen, M. (eds.), Interessenskonflikte in der Medizin – Hintergründe und Lösungsmöglichkeiten (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), pp. 238–50.Google Scholar
Schierbeck, J., ‘Operational Measures for Identifying and Implementing Human Rights Issues in Corporate Operations’ in Eide, A., Bergesen, O. and Goyer, P. (eds.), Human Rights and the Oil Industry (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2000), pp. 161–77.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Aßmann, E., ‘Wissenschaftsplanung im Wandel’ in Erbguth, W., Oebbecke, J. and Rengeling, H.-W. (eds.), Planung. Festschrift für Werner Hoppe zum 70. Geburtstag (München: C.H. Beck, 2000), pp. 649–65.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., ‘Freiheitsrechte und institutionelle Garantien der Reichsverfassung (1931)’ in Schmitt, C. (ed.), Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985), pp. 140–78.Google Scholar
Schott, G., Pachl, H. and Limbach, U., ‘Finanzierung von Arzneimittelstudien durch pharmazeutische Unternehmen und die Folgen; Teil 1: qualitative systematische Literaturübersicht zum Einfluss auf Studienergebnisse, -protokoll und -qualität’, Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 107 (2010), pp. 279–85.Google Scholar
Schott, G., Pachl, H. and Limbach, U. ‘Finanzierung von Arzneimittelstudien durch pharmazeutische Unternehmen und die Folgen; Teil 2: qualitative systematische Literaturübersicht zum Einfluss auf Autorenschaft, Zugang zu Studiendaten sowie -registrierung und Publikation’, Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 107 (2010), pp. 295–301.Google Scholar
Schwabe, J., Die sogenannte Drittwirkung der Grundrechte. Zur Einwirkung der Grundrechte auf den Privatrechtsverkehr (München: Goldmann, 1971).Google Scholar
Smith, M. L., ‘Publication Bias and Meta-analysis’, Evaluation in Education, 4 (1980), pp. 22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, F., ‘Das Grundrecht der Kunstfreiheit: Kommentar zu einem Grundlagentext von Helmut Ridder’ in Vesting, T., Korioth, S. and Augsberg, I. (eds.), Grundrechte als Phänomene kollektiver Ordnung. Zur Wiedergewinnung des Gesellschaftlichen in der Grundrechtstheorie und Grundrechtsdogmatik (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 247–82.Google Scholar
Stern, J., and Simes, R. J., ‘Publication Bias: Evidence of Delayed Publication in a Cohort Study of Clinical Research Projects’, British Medical Journal, 315 (1997), pp. 640–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stichweh, R. ‘Einheit und Differenz im Wissenschaftssystem der Moderne’ in Halfmann, J. and Rohbeck, J. (eds.), Zwei Kulturen der Wissenschaft - Revisited (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2007), pp. 213–28.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M., Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland IV (München: C.H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar
Sutton, A., Duval, S. J. and Tweedie, R. L., ‘Empirical Assessment of Effect of Publication Bias on Meta-Analysis’, British Medical Journal, 320 (2000), pp. 1574–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonks, A., ‘A Clinical Trials Register for Europe’, British Medical Journal, 325 (2002), pp. 1314–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tramèr, M. R., Reynolds, D. J., Moore, A. and McQuay, H., ‘Impact of Covert Duplicate Publication on Meta-Analysis: a Case Study’, British Medical Journal, 315 (1997), pp. 635–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verschraegen, G., ‘Differentiation and Inclusion: A Neglected Sociological Approach to Fundamental Rights’ in Madsen, M. R. and Verschraegen, G. (eds.), Making Human Rights Intelligible: Towards a Sociology of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Vesting, T. ‘Die Tagesschau-App und die Notwendigkeit der Schaffung eines “Intermedienkollisionsrechts”’ in Spiecker, I. (ed.), Karlsruher Dialog zum Informationsrecht (Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2013), vol. IV, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Vesting, T. Die Medien des Rechts: Computernetzwerke (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viens, A. M., and Savulescu, J., ‘Introduction to the Olivieri Symposium’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30 (2004), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 3rd edn. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1968).Google Scholar
Wheatley, S., ‘Deliberating about Cosmopolitan Ideas: Does a Democratic Conception of Human Rights Make Sense?’ in Frouville, O. d. (ed.), Le Cosmopolitisme Juridique (Paris: Pedone, 2015), available at: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2485068.Google Scholar
Wiethölter, R., ‘Justifications of a Law of Society’ in Perez, O. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law (Oxford: Hart, 2005), pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, ‘International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)’, 2012, available at: www.who.int/ictrp/en.Google Scholar
Zöllner, W., ‘Regelungsspielräume im Schuldvertragsrecht: Bemerkungen zur Grundrechtsanwendung im Privatrecht und zu den sogenannten Ungleichgewichtslagen’, Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 196 (1996), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Ackerman, B., ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’, Virginia Law Review, 83 (1997), pp. 771–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlan, H., Entre le cristal et la fumée: essai sur l’organisation du vivant (Paris: Seuil, 1979).Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Biaggini, G., Die Idee der Verfassung – Neuausrichtung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung?’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht, 119 (2000), pp. 445–76.Google Scholar
Botero, E. S., Entre el Juez Salomón y el Dios Sira. Decisiones interculturales e interés superior del niño (Bogotá: University of Amsterdam and Unicef, 2006).Google Scholar
Burdeau, G., Traité de Science Politique, 2nd edn (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1968), vol. I.Google Scholar
Canotilho, J. J. G., ‘Brancosos’ e interconstitucionalidade: Itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional (Coimbra: Almedina, 2006).Google Scholar
Calliess, G.-P., ‘Reflexive Transnational Law: The Privatisation of Civil Law and the Civilisation of Private Law’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 23 (2002), pp. 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calliess, G.-P., and Maurer, A., ‘Transnationales Recht – Eine Einleitung’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Carroll, L., ‘Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There [1872]’. The Complete Works of Lewis Carroll (London: The Nonesuch Press and New York: Random House, 1939), pp. 133–272.Google Scholar
Darwin, C., The Origins of Species. Introduction by Matthews, L. H. (London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1971) [6th edn, 1872].Google Scholar
Engels, F., ‘Die Lage Englands. II. Die englische Konstitution’ in Marx, K. and Engels, F. (eds), Werke. 15th edn (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1988), Vol. I, pp. 569–92 [first published in Vorwärts!, No 75, 18 September 1844].Google Scholar
Fassbender, B., ‘The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 (1998), pp. 529–619.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2005).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Fragmentierung des Weltrechts: Vernetzung globaler Regimes statt etatischer Rechtseinheit’ in Albert, M. and Stichweh, Rudolf (eds.), Weltstaat und Weltstaatlichkeit: Beobachtungen globaler politischer Strukturbildung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2007), pp. 37–61.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M., ‘Frontiers: National and Transnational Order’ in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 25–50.Google Scholar
Gross, O., ‘“Control Systems” and the Migration of Anomalies’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 403–30.Google Scholar
Günther, K., Der Sinn für Angemessenheit: Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988) [English trans.: The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993)].Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S., ‘Disease and Evolution’ in Dronamraju, K. R. (ed.), Selected Genetic Papers of J. B. S. Haldane (New York and London: Garland, 1990), pp. 325–34 [first published in La Ricerca Scientifica, Supplemento, 19 (1949), pp. 2–11].Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D., ‘Sex versus Non-Sex versus Parasite’, Oikos, 35 (1980), pp. 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R. and Tanese, R., ‘Sexual Reproduction as an Adaptation to Resist Parasites (A Review)’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87 (1990), pp. 3566–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D., Henderson, P. A. and Moran, N. A., ‘Fluctuation of Environment and Coevolved Antagonist Polymorphism as Factors in the Maintenance of Sex’ in Alexander, R. D. and Tinkle, D. W. (eds.), Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (New York: Chiron Press, 1981), pp. 363–81.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D., Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (Hassocks: The Harvester Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., Allgemeine Staatslehre (Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Berlin and Zurich: Gehlen, 1925).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State, English trans. by Wedberg, A. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946).Google Scholar
Koselleck, R., ‘Begriffsgeschichtliche Probleme der Verfassungsgeschichtsschreibung’ in Koselleck, R. (ed.), Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006), pp. 365–401.Google Scholar
Lassalle, F., ‘Über Verfassungswesen’ [1962] in Friederici, H. J. (ed.), Reden und Schriften (Cologne: Röderberg, 1987), pp. 120–47.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Rechtssoziologie 3rd edn (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987) [English trans.: A Sociological Theory of Law, 2nd edn (Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, 2014)].Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984) [English trans.: Social Systems (Stanford University Press, 1995)].Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., ‘Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9 (1990), pp. 176–220.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., ‘Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstruktivistische Perspektiven (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990), pp. 228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993) [English trans.: Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press, 2004)].Google Scholar
Maduro, M. P., A Constituição Plural: Constitucionalismo e União Européia (Cascais: Principia, 2006).Google Scholar
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J., Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J., Der Baum der Erkenntnis: Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens, German trans. by Ludewig, Kurt, 3rd edn (Bern, Munich and Vienna: Scherz, 1987).Google Scholar
Meirmans, S., ‘The Evolution of the Problem of Sex’ in Schön, I., Martens, K. and van Dijk, P. (eds.), Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E., ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle’, American Anthropologist, 108 (2006), pp. 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, R., ‘Was ist nichtstaatliches Recht? – Eine Einführung’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
Neiman, M., and Koskella, B., (2009), ‘Sex and Red Queen’ in Schön, I., Martens, K. and van Dijk, P. (eds.), Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 133–59.Google Scholar
Neves, M., ‘Justicia y Diferencia en una Sociedad Global Compleja’, Doxa – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 24 (2001), pp. 349–77.Google Scholar
Neves, M., ‘A força simbólica dos direitos humanos’, Revista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado, 4 (2005), pp. 1–35 [English trans.: ‘The Symbolic Force of Human Rights’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33 (2007), pp. 411–44].Google Scholar
Neves, M., Entre Têmis e Leviatã: uma relação difícil – o Estado democrático de direito a partir e além de Luhmann e Habermas (São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006).Google Scholar
Neves, M., Transconstitucionalismo (São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2009) [English trans.: Transconstitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2013)].Google Scholar
Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism and Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited?’, Common Market Law Review, 36 (1999), pp. 703–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernice, I., ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union’, European Law Review, 27 (2002), pp. 511–29.Google Scholar
Pires, F. L., Introdução ao direito constitucional europeu (seu sentido, problemas e limites) (Coimbra: Almedina, 1997).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples, with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ridley, M., The Red Queen: Sex and Evolution of Human Nature (New York: Harper Collins, 2003).Google Scholar
Roach, K., ‘The Post-9/11 Migration of Britain’s Terrorism Act 2000’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 373–402.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L., ‘The Migration of Anti-constitutional Ideas: the Post-9/11 Globalization of Public Law and the International State of Emergency’ in Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge University Press), pp. 347–73.Google Scholar
Segato, R. L., ‘Antropologia e direitos humanos: alteridade e ética no movimento de expansão dos direitos universais’, Mana: Estudos de antropologia social, 12 (2006), pp. 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segato, R. L., ‘Que cada pueblo teja los hilos de su historia. El pluralismo jurídico en diálogo didáctico con legisladores’ in Chenaut, N., Gómez, M., Ortiz, H. and Sierra, M. T. (eds.), Justicia y diversidad en América Latina. Pueblos indígenas ante la globalización (Mexico: CIESAS and Quito: FLACSO, 2011), pp. 357–81.Google Scholar
Smend, R., ‘Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht’ in Smend, R., (ed.) Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze, 2nd edn (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1968 [orig. 1928]), pp. 119–276.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., (1982). ‘Reflexives Recht: Entwicklungsmodelle des Rechts in vergleichender Perspektive’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 68 (1982), pp. 13–59.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Recht als autopoietisches System (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989) [English trans.: Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993)].Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 63 (2003), pp. 1–28 [English trans.: ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’, in C. Joerges, I.-J. Sand and G. Teubner (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 3–28].Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Die Anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch “private” transnationale Akteure’, Der Staat, 45 (2006), pp. 161–87 [English trans.: ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46].Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Verfassungsfragmente: gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2012) [English trans.: Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalisation (Oxford University Press, 2012)].Google Scholar
Teubner, G., and Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Cannibalizing Epistemes: Will Modern Law Protect Traditional Cultural Expressions?’ in Graber, C. B. and Burri-Nenova, M. (eds.), Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), pp. 17–45.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C., A Sociology of Constitutions. Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomuschat, C., ‘Die internationale Gemeinschaft’, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 33 (1995), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M., ‘The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law’, paper presented at the seminar ‘The Changing Role of Highest Courts in an Internationalizing World’, sponsored by the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law, 23–24 October 2008 (available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317766).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L., ‘Molecular Evolution as Predicted by Natural Selection’, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 3 (1974), pp. 89–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viellechner, L. ‘Was heißt Transnationalität im Recht?’ in Calliess, G.-P. (ed.), Transnationales Recht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
Von Foerster, H., ‘On Constructing Reality’ in von Foerster, H. (ed.), Observing Systems (Seaside: Intersystems Publications, 1981), pp. 288–309.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, Winckelmann, J. (ed.), 5th edn (Tübingen: Mohr, 1985) [1st edn 1922].Google Scholar
Weiler, J., The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Welsch, W., Vernunft: Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft, 2nd edn (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘The Protection of Indigenous Peoples in International Law’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 59 (1999), pp. 369–82.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P., ‘Transnational Law’ in Smits, J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (London: Edward Elgar, 2006), pp. 738–54.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Anderson, G. W., “Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 881–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., “The ‘Not-a-Cat’ Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-State Actors?” in Alston, P. (ed.) Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Bailey, S., and Mattei, U., “Social Movements as Constituent Power: The Italian Struggle for the Commons,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 965–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, L. C., “The 3rd UN Forum on Business and Human Rights: Streaming Live With Thoughts on the Forum as Estates General,” Law at the End of the Day, December 2, 2014, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-3rd-un-forum-on-business-and-human.html.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “The 2nd UN Forum on Business and Human Rights: Live Streaming and Thoughts on Trends in Managing Business Behaviors,” Law at the End of the Day, December 3, 2013, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-2nd-un-forum-on-busness-and-human.html.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “A Conversation About Polycentricity in Governance Systems Beyond the State,” Law at the End of the Day November 11, 2013, available at http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.de/2013/11/a-conversation-about-polycentricity-in.html.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “Sovereign Investing and Markets-Based Transnational Rule of Law Building: The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund in Global Markets,” American University International Law Review 29 (2013), pp. 1–121.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “Transnational Constitutions’ Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple Inc.,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), p. 805–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, L. C., “The Structural Characteristics of Global Law for the 21st Century: Fracture, Fluidity, Permeability, and Polycentricity,” Tilburg Law Review 17 (2012), pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “Governance without Government: An Overview and Application of Interactions Between Law-State and Governance-Corporate System,” in Handl, G., Zekoll, J. and Zumbansen, P. (eds.) Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden, Netherlands & Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), pp. 87–123.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “Private Actors and Public Governance Beyond the State: The Multinational Corporation, the Financial Stability Board, and the Global Governance Order,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18 (2011), pp. 751–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, L. C., “Rights and Accountability in Development v. DAS Air and Global Witness v. Afrimex: Small Steps towards an Autonomous Transnational Legal System for the Regulation of Multinational Corporations,” Melbourne Journal of International Law 10 (2009), pp. 258–307.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “From Moral Obligation to International Law: Disclosure Systems, Markets and the Regulation of Multinational Corporations,” Georgetown Journal of International Law, 39 (2008), pp. 591–653.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “The Autonomous Global Corporation: On the Role of Organizational Law Beyond Asset Partitioning and Legal Personality,” Tulsa Law Review 41 (2006), pp. 541–71.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., “Retaining Judicial Authority: A Preliminary Inquiry on the Dominion of Judges,” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 12 (2003), p. 117.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L., “Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996), p. 1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calliess, G.-P., and Zumbansen, P., Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Claire Cutler, A., Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J., “Constitutionalization of Nongovernmental Certification Programs,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), pp. 1035–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Final Statement by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from Survival International Against Vedanta Resources Plc, Urn 09/1373. Available at www.oecd.org/investment/mne/43884129.pdf.Google Scholar
Final Statement By The UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations against Unilever Plc on Pakistan’s Khanewal Factory, 2009, (UK). Available at www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/44478619.pdf.Google Scholar
Final Statement by The UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Complaint from the International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations against Unilever Plc on Pakistan’s Rahim Yar Khan Factory, 2009, Urn 09/1221, At 1 (UK). Available at www.oecd.org/investment/mne/44478663.pdf.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., “Global Constitutional Struggles: Human Rights between Colère Publique and Colère Politique” in Kaleck, W., Ratner, M., Singelnstein, T. and Weiss, P. (eds.) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes (Heidelberg: Springer, 2007), pp. 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (2003–2004), pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar
Foster, L. A., “Critical Cultural Translation: A Socio-Legal Framework for Regulatory Orders,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 21 (2014), pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., “A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?” in Habermas, J. (ed.) Between Naturalism and Religion (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008), pp. 312–52.Google Scholar
Hamann, A., and Fabri, H. R., “Transnational networks and constitutionalism,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2008), pp. 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Initial Assessment by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Survival International and Vedanta Resources Plc, March 27, 2009. Available at www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/969215/jump.Google Scholar
Johns, F. E., “The Invisibility of the Transnational Corporation: An Analysis of International Law and Legal Theory,” Melbourne University Law Review, 19 (1994), pp. 893–923.Google Scholar
Joint IOE-ICC-BIAC Comments on the Draft Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Geneva, January 26, 2011. Available at www.iccwbo.org/Data/Policies/2011/ICC-IOE-BIAC-joint-recommendations-to-the-UN-Working-Group-on-Business-Human-Rights/.Google Scholar
Kjaer, P., “Transnational Normative Orders: The Constitutionalism of Intra- and Trans-Normative Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis,” European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), pp. 907–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollers, C., “Transnational Governance without Public Law?” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 329–38.Google Scholar
OECD, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2011), OECD Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Available at www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD, Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2013 Responsible Business Conduct in Action, Executive Summary. Available at http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/MNE-Annual-Report-2013-Summary.pdfGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, J., “The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault,” The British Journal of Sociology, 37 (1986), pp. 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., “Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), pp. 579–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queinnec, Y., “The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: An Evolving Legal Status” (Association Sherpa Report, June 2007).Google Scholar
Renner, M., “Occupy the System! Societal Constitutionalism and Transnational Corporate Accounting,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 941–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, A., “The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State,” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 56 (2008), pp. 605–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödl, F., “Fundamental Rights, Private Law, and Societal Constitution: On the Logic of the So-Called Horizontal Effect,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 1015–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G., Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton 2013).Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G., Letter, “Bizarre Response by Human Rights Groups to UN Framework Plan,” Financial Times, January 19, 2011. Available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/629fbcd0-2361-11e0-8389-00144feab49a.html#axzz2ngb0wGXd.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G., Opening remarks by UN Special Representative John Ruggie, October 5, 2009. Available at www.business-humanrights.org/Documents/Ruggie-speech-to-Geneva-consultation-Oct-2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Sachs, N., “Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law,” University of California Law Review, 55 (2008), pp. 837–904.Google Scholar
Sand, I.-J., “Polycontextuality as an Alternative to Constitutionalism” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 41–66.Google Scholar
Shamir, R., “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony” in de Sousa Santos, B. and Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.) Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, G., McCorquodale, R., and De Schutter, O., “The Third Pillar: Access to Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations by Transnational Business” (ICAR, CORE ECCJ, December 2013).Google Scholar
Special Representative of the Secretary-General, “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework,” UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31 (March 21, 2011). Available at www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., “Self-Constitutionalizing TNCs?: On the Linkage of ‘Private’ and ‘Public’ Corporate Codes of Conduct,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18 (2011), pp. 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., “The Corporate Codes of Multinationals: Company Constitutions Beyond Corporate Governance and Co-Determination” in Nikel, R. (ed.), Conflict of Laws and Laws of Conflict in Europe and Beyond: Patterns of Supranational and Transnational Juridification (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Teubner, G., “Societal Constitutionalism: An Alternative to State Centered Constitutional Theory” in Joerges, C., Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), pp. 2–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Differences,” in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties Of Capitalism (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 417–41.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., “The King’s Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy,” Law & Society Review, 31 (1997), pp. 763–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law without a State (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C., “A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 551–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council Res. 17/4, 17th Sess., July 6, 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/17/4 (July 6, 2011). Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G11/144/71/PDF/G1114471.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council, Forum on Business and Human Rights, Second session, 3 and 4 December 2013, Background note by the Secretariat A/HRC/FBHR/2013/2 (24 September 2013).Google Scholar
Ward, H., “Securing Transnational Corporate Accountability through National Courts: Implications and Policy Options,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 24 (2001), pp. 451–74.Google Scholar
Watt, H. M., “Private International Law Beyond the Schism,” Transnational Legal Theory, 3 (2011), pp. 347–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissbrodt, D., “Keynote Address: International Standard-Setting on the Human Rights Responsibilities of Businesses,” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26 (2008), pp. 373–91.Google Scholar
Wiener, A., and Liste, P., “Lost without Translation?: Cross-Referencing and a New Global Community of Courts,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 21 (2014), pp. 263–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, H., “Amnesty Criticises UN Framework for Multinationals,” Financial Times, January 17, 2011.Google Scholar
Zürn, M., “Sovereignty and Law in a Denationalised World” in Appelbaum, R. P., Felstiner, W. L. F. and Gessner, V. (eds.) Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Bibliography
Adams, C. A., ‘The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting Performance Portrayal Gap’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17 (2004), 731–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, T., and de Jesús Butler, I., ‘The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), 771–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allianz Group, Economic Research & Corporate Development, ‘Working Paper: Is Speculation to Blame for Rising Food Prices? – A Compilation of Facts and Findings’, (18 June 2012), www.foodwatch.org/uploads/media/Allianz_Workingpaper06-2012_ger_01.pdf.Google Scholar
Amnesty International, ‘Non-Financial Reporting: Amnesty International Position Paper’, (April 2013), www.amnesty.org/en/documents/POL30/001/2013/en/.Google Scholar
Augenstein, D., ‘Study of the Legal Framework on Human Rights and the Environment Applicable to European Enterprises Operating Outside the European Union’ (University of Edinburgh, 2010).Google Scholar
Backer, L. C., ‘Multinational Corporations, Transnational Law: The United Nations’ Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations as a Harbinger of Corporate Social Responsibility in International Law, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 37 (2006), 287–389.Google Scholar
Bass, H. H., ‘Finanzspekulation und Nahrungsmittelpreise: Anmerkungen zum Stand der Forschung’, Materialien des Wissenschaftsschwerpunktes ‚‚Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft‘‘, 42 (2013).Google Scholar
Bockmann, R., Internationale Koordinierung nationaler Enforcement-Aktivitäten: Eine kritische Analyse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Deutschen Prüfstelle für Rechnungslegung (Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, O., ‘Sustainability Reports as Simulacra? A Counter-Account of A and A+ GRI Reports’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26 (2013), 1036–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, R., ‘The Role of NGOs – An Overview’ in Alfredsson, G. et al. (eds.),International Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms – Essays in Honor of Jakob Th. Möller (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009), pp. 673–80.Google Scholar
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Levy, D. L., ‘Building Institutions Based on Information Disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s Sustainability Reporting’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17 (2009), 571–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R., and Milne, M. J., ‘The Triple Bottom Line: How New Zealand Companies Measure Up’, Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business, 11 (2004), 37–50.Google Scholar
Clapham, A., ‘UN Human Rights Reporting Procedures: An NGO Perspective’ in Alston, P. and Crawford, J. (eds.), The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring (Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 175–98.Google Scholar
Dao, T. H. P., ‘Monitoring Compliance with IFRS: Some Insights from the French Regulatory System’, Accounting in Europe, 2 (2005), 107–35.Google Scholar
Davy, U., ‘Welche rechtlichen Grundregeln müssen für einen wirksamen Menschenrechtsschutz gelten? Bedeutung gerichtlicher und außergerichtlicher Schutzverfahren’ in Gusy, C. (ed.), Grundrechtsmonitoring – Chancen und Grenzen außergerichtlichen Menschenrechtsschutzes (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011), pp. 238–64.Google Scholar
Deegan, C. and Rankin, M., ‘Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9 (1996), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, O., ‘Food Commodities Speculation and Food Price Crises: Regulation to Reduce the Risks of Price Volatility’, Briefing Note 02, (September 2010), www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/food/docs/Briefing_Note_02_September_2010_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
De Schutter, O., Eide, A., et al., ‘Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 34 (2012), 1084–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva, S., Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations – Humanizing Business (London and New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ), ‘EU Legislation on Non-financial Reporting by Companies – Position Paper of the European Coalition for Corporate Justice’, www.corporatejustice.org/IMG/pdf/position_paper_final-2.pdf.Google Scholar
European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ), ‘Principles & Pathways: Legal Opportunities to Improve Europe’s Corporative Accountability Framework’, (November 2010), www.corporatejustice.org/IMG/pdf/eccj_principles_pathways_webuseblack.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Impact Assessment – Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups’, SWD(2013) 127 final of 16 April 2013.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., Human Rights in Times of Austerity – The EU Institutions and the Conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2013).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Der Kampf um die Internetverfassung’, Juristenzeitung, 69 (2014), 965–74.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), ‘Number of Hungry People Rises to 963 Million’, (9 December 2008), www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/8836/.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), ‘The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2009 – Economic Crises – Impacts and Lessons Learned’, (2009), www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0876e/i0876e00.htm.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), ‘The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2013 – The Multiple Dimensions of Food Security’, (2013), www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3434e/i3434e00.htm.Google Scholar
Foodwatch, ‘foodwatch-Argumentationspapier zur Studie “Finanzspekulation und Nahrungsmittelpreise” von Prof. Hans-Heinrich Bass’, (21 November 2013), www.foodwatch.org/uploads/media/2013-11-21_Argumentationspapier_Bass-Studie_01.pdf.Google Scholar
Freeman, M., ‘Conclusion: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Economic and Social Rights’ in Minkler, L. (ed.), The State of Economic and Social Human Rights – A Global Overview (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 365–88.Google Scholar
Gallahofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E., and Roberts, C., ‘The Emancipatory Potential of Online Reporting: The Case of Counter Accounting’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19 (2006), 681–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germanwatch and Miseror, ‘Nationaler Aktionsplan zur Umsetzung der UN-Leitprinzipien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte – Anforderungen an den Umsetzungsprozess in Deutschland’, (July 2012), www.germanwatch.org/de/download/6648.pdf.Google Scholar
Global Reporting Initiative, ‘G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines’, (2013), www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf.Google Scholar
Gray, R., ‘Does Sustainability Reporting Improve Corporate Behaviour?: Wrong Question? Right Time?’, Accounting and Business Research, 36 (2006), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, D., ‘Social Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness’, Journal of Corporation Law, 21 (1999), 41–84.Google Scholar
Ivanic, M., and Martin, W., ‘Implications of Higher Global Food Prices for Poverty in Low Income Countries’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4594, (April 2008), www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4594.Google Scholar
Keller, H., ‘Reporting Systems’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (June 2009).Google Scholar
Klein, E., The Monitoring System of Human Rights Treaty Obligations – Colloquium Potsdam, 22/23. November 1996 (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz, 1998).Google Scholar
Kinley, D., and Chambers, R., ‘The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of Public International Law’, Human Rights Law Review, 6 (2006), 447–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krennerich, M., Soziale Menschenrechte – Zwischen Recht und Politik (Schwalbach: WochenschauVerlag, 2013).Google Scholar
Kretzmer, D., ‘Human Rights, State Reports’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (October 2008).Google Scholar
Laufer, W. S., ‘Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing’, Journal of Business Ethics, 43 (2003), 253–61.Google Scholar
Liese, A., ‘Epistula (non) Erubescit. Das Staatenberichtsverfahren als Instrument internationaler Rechtsdurchsetzung’, Die Friedens‐Warte, 59 (2006), 51–69.Google Scholar
Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., and LaGore, W., ‘A Research Note on Standalone Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Signaling or Greenwashing?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24 (2013), 350–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, I., ‘Perspektiven “reflexiven Rechts” im Kontext gegenwärtiger Deregulierungstendenzen’, Kritische Justiz, 19 (1986), 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, A., ‘The 2008 Food Price Crisis: Rethinking Food Security Policies’, UNCTAD: G-24 Discussion Paper Series, 56 (2009), www.unctad.org/en/Docs/gdsmdpg2420093_en.pdf.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, B., ‘Stakeholder Democracy: Challenges and Contributions from Social Accounting’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 14 (2005), 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxfam Deutschland, ‘Oxfam Hintergrundpapier, Hungerroulette – Wie viel deutsche Finanzinstitute durch Nahrungsmittelspekulationen einnehmen’, (May 2013), www.oxfam.de/files/20130507_hungerroulette.pdf.Google Scholar
Oxfam Deutschland, ‘Mit Essen spielt man nicht! Die deutsche Finanzbranche und das Geschäft mit dem Hunger’, (2013), www.oxfam.de/sites/www.oxfam.de/files/o_nms_2013_mb_web.pdf.Google Scholar
Pies, I., and Glauben, T., ‘Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme zum Argumentationspapier von Foodwatch’, Diskussionspapier Nr. 2013-26 des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, (2013), http://ethik.wiwi.uni-halle.de/forschung/news199874/.Google Scholar
Pies, I., and Will, M. G., ‘Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen – Analyse und Bewertung aus wirtschaftsethischer Sicht’, Diskussionspapier Nr. 2013-24 des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, (2013), http://wcms.itz.uni-halle.de/download.php?down=32275&elem=2728397.Google Scholar
The Regional Office for Europe of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘The EU and International Human Rights Law’, (2008), www.europe.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/EU_and_International_Law.pdf.Google Scholar
Reporting and Assurance Frameworks Initiative (RAFI), ‘Draft UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework’, (November 2014), www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/documents/DRAFT_UNGPReportingFramework_11Nov2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., and Seidl, D., ‘Managing Legitimacy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World’, Journal of Management Studies, 50 (2013), 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skouloudisa, A., Evangelinosa, K., and Kourmousis, F., ‘Assessing Non-financial Reports According to the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines: Evidence from Greece’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (2010), 426–38.Google Scholar
Tilt, C. A., ‘The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate Social Disclosure – Some Empirical Evidence’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7 (1994), 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Die anonyme Matrix: Zu Menschenrechtsverletzungen durch “private” transnationale Akteure’, Der Staat, 44 (2006), 161–87.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Reflexives Recht – Entwicklungsmodelle des Rechts in vergleichender Perspektive’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 68 (1982), 13–59.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Selbst‐Konstitutionalisierung transnationaler Unternehmen? Zur Verknüpfung “privater” und “staatlicher” Corporate Codes of Conduct”’ in Grundmann, S. v. et al. (eds.), Unternehmen, Markt und Verantwortung: Festschrift für Klaus Hopt (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010), pp. 1449–70.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and Arbeiterkammer Wien, ‘Price Formation in Financialized commodity markets: The Role of Information. Study prepared by the Secretariat of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development’, (June 2011), www.unctad.org/en/docs/gds20111_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Wensen, K. v., Broer, W., Klein, J., and Knopf, J., ‘The State of Play in Sustainability Reporting in the EU’, (2011), www.ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6727&langId=en.Google Scholar
Weißbrodt, D., and Kruger, M., ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’, American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003), 901–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘The reforms of the European Financial Supervisory System: An Overview’, European Company and Financial Law Review, 7 (2010), 240–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar