Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:31:37.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Social Structures of Accumulation and the Criminal Justice System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Susan M. Carlson
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Western Michigan University
Michael D. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Western Michigan University
Raymond J. Michalowski
Affiliation:
Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northern Arizona University
Terrence McDonough
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Michael Reich
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David M. Kotz
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Social structure of accumulation (SSA) theory posits that at particular historical moments a unique set of economic, political, and social institutions come together to provide the conditions necessary for a period of sustained, vigorous capital accumulation, particularly by regulating class conflict and competition (Kotz 1987). Gordon, Edwards, and Reich (1982: 25) further suggest that “… different social structures of accumulation may incorporate (or exclude) differing sets of social institutions” with a tendency of the institutional ensemble to become more complex and include more institutions over time.

To date, SSA analyses of the post-World War II SSA in the United States have been limited to the four pillars that comprise the SSA – limited capital-labor accord, capital-citizen accord, pax Americana, and containment of inter-capitalist rivalry (Bowles, Gordon, and Weisskopf 1990) – or “core institutions” (Kotz 1987; McDonough 1994) that impinge most directly on the accumulation process. Scant attention has been given to other institutions that may play an important supportive role in facilitating capital accumulation.

This chapter provides an analysis of one such institution – the criminal justice system – across phases of the post-World War II SSA in the United States. Several SSA authors have discussed prisons and the new “garrison state” (Bowles, Gordon, and Weisskopf 1990; Gordon 1996), rising expenditures on the criminal justice system (Lippit 1997), and the war on drugs (Houston 1992) as characterizing the most recent phase of the post-World War II SSA, but none have theorized the role of the criminal justice system in the capital accumulation process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Contemporary Capitalism and its Crises
Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century
, pp. 239 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Affholter, Patrick and Wicksall, Bethany 2002. “Eliminating Michigan's Mandatory Minimum Sentences for Drug Offenses.” Michigan Senate Fiscal Agency.
Anderson, Elijah 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elijah 1990. Street Wise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Harry Elmer 1921. “The Economics of American Penology as Illustrated by the Experience of the State of Pennsylvania.” Journal of Political Economy 29, 8: 617–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Harry Elmer 1922. “Some Leading Phases of the Evolution of Modern Penology.” Political Science Quarterly 37, 2: 251–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgois, Phillipe 1995. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, Gordon, David M. and Weisskopf, Thomas E. 1989. “Business ascendency and economic impasse: A structural retrospective on conservative economics, 1979–87.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 1: 107–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, Gordon, David M. and Weisskopf, Thomas E. 1990. After the Waste Land: A Democratic Economics for the Year 2000. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
,Bureau of Justice Statistics 2009. “Adults on Probation, in Jail or Prison, and on Parole.” Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Onlinehttp://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/csv/t612006csv.Google Scholar
Carlson, Susan M. and Michalowski, Raymond J. 1997. “Crime, Unemployment, and Social Structures of Accumulation: An Inquiry into Historical Contingency.” Justice Quarterly 14, 2: 101–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Susan B. et al. 2006. Historical Statistics of the United States Millennial Edition Online. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clinton, William J. 1994. “Administration of William J. Clinton, 1994.” GPO Access.
,Correctional Association of New York 2009. “Analysis of Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Bill.” Correctional Association of New York http://droptherock.ipower.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/analysis-of-rockefeller-reform-bill.pdf.
Currie, Elliot 1993. Reckoning: Drugs, the Cities, and the American Future. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
,Executive Office of the President 1995. Economic Report of the President. GPO.
,Federal Bureau of Investigation 2007. “FBI History: Timeline of FBI History.” Federal Bureau Investigation.
,Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 2007. “Consumer Price Index, 1913-.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
,Federal Sentencing Reporter 2008. “Summary of Provisions of the Second Chance Act.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 20, 4:279–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Howard B. 1931. “The Prison Labor Problem.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 157: 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, David M. 1996. Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial ‘Downsizing’. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, David M., Edwards, Richard, and Reich, Michael 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gramlich, John 2009a. “Tracking the Recession: Prison Economics.” http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=403563.
Gramlich, John 2009b. “Strapped States Eye Prison Savings.” http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=365279.
Greenberg, David F. and Humphries, Drew 1980. “The Cooptation of Fixed Sentencing Reform.” Crime and Delinquency 26, 2: 206–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Paige M. and Beck, Allen J. 2005. “Prisoners in 2004.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, NCJ 210677.Google Scholar
Houston, David 1992. “Is there a New Social Structure of Accumulation?Review of Radical Political Economics 24, 2: 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huling, Tracy 2003. “Building a Prison Economy in Rural America” Pp. 197–213. In Mauer, Marc and Chesney-Lind, Meda eds. Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Kotz, David M. 1987. “Long Waves and Social Structures of Accumulation: A Critique and Reinterpretation.” Review of Radical Political Economics 19, 4: 16–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotz, David M. 2003. “Neoliberalism and the Social Structure of Accumulation Theory of Long-Run Capital Accumulation.” Review of Radical Political Economics 35, 3: 263–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraska, Peter B. and Kappeler, Victor E. 1997. “Militarizing American Police: The Rise and Normalization of Paramilitary Units.” Social Problems 44, 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippit, Victor D. 1997. “The Reconstruction of a Social Structure of Accumulation in the United States.” Review of Radical Political Economics 29, 3: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftin, Colin, Heumann, Milton, and McDowall, David.1983. “Mandatory Sentencing and Firearms Violence: Evaluating an Alternative to Gun Control.” Law & Society Review 17, 2: 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftin, Colin, and McDowall, David 1981. “ ‘One with a Gun Gets You TwO': Mandatory Sentencing and Firearms Violence in Detroit.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 455, 1: 150–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Austin H. 1931. “Education in the Prisons of Tomorrow.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 157: 72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Doris Layton, Brame, Robert, McDowall, David, and Souryal, Claire 1995. “Boot Camp Prisons and Recidivism in Eight States.” Criminology 33, 3: 327–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl 1967. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
McCollum, Sylvia G. 1994. “Prison College Programs.” The Prison Journal 73, 1: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Terrence 1994. “The Construction of Social Structures of Accumulation in US History” Pp. 101–32. In Kotz, David M., McDonough, Terrence and Reich, Michael eds. Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Blake 1934. “A Half Century of Southern Penal Exploitation.” Social Forces 13, 1: 112–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Blake 1935. “Penal Slavery and Southern Reconstruction.” The Journal of Negro History 20, 2: 153–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Blake 1977. American Prisons: A History of Good Intentions. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Raymond J. 1985. Order, Law, and Crime. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Raymond J. and Carlson, Susan M. 1999. “Unemployment, Imprisonment, and Social Structures of Accumulation: Historical Contingency in the Rusche-Kirchheimer Hypothesis.” Criminology 37, 2: 217–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, H. G. 1969. “The Continuum of Corrections.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 381: 81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, James 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusche, Georg 1978. “Labor Market and Penal Sanction: Thoughts on the Sociology of Criminal Justice.” Crime and Social Justice Fall-Winter: 2–8.
Rusche, Georg and Kirchheimer, Otto 1967. Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Scott-Hayward, Christine S. 2009. The Fiscal Crisis in Corrections: Rethinking Policies and Practices. Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Sellin, Thorsten 1965. “Penal Servitude: Origin and Survival.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109, 5: 277–81.Google Scholar
Taylor, Carl S. 1990. Dangerous Society. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Tibbitts, Clark 1933. “Penology and Crime.” The American Journal of Sociology 38, 6: 896–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinto, Eda Katharine 2001. “The Role of Gender and Relationship in Reforming the Rockefeller Drug Laws.” New York University Law Review 76: 906–44.Google Scholar
Ubah, Charles A. 2004. “Abolition of Pell Grants for Higher Education of Prisoners: Examining Antecedents and Consequences.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 39, 2: 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007a. “Selected Statistics: Trends in Justice Expenditure and Employment.” U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
,U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2007b. “Selected Statistics: Justice Expenditure and Employment Extracts.” U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
West, Heather C. and Sabol, William J. 2009. Prison Inmates at Midyear 2008. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Western, Bruce and Beckett, Katherine 1999. “How Unregulated is the U.S. Labor Market? The Penal System as a Labor Market Institution.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 1030–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyand, L. D. 1926. “Wage Systems in Prisons.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 125: 251–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, Daniel F. and Turner, Nicholas R. 2002. Is the Budget Crisis Changing the Way We Look at Sentencing and Incarceration? Vera Institute of Justice.
Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×