Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press. [10, 34]

Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497–1512. [32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 231–309). New York: Random House. [7, 19]

Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York: The New Press. [36]

Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496. [20]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. New York: Cambridge University Press. [20]

Ainslie, G., & Haslam, N. (1992). Self-control. In Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 177–209). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [20]

Ajzen, I., & Peterson, G. L. (1988). Contingent value measurement: The price of everything and the value of nothing? In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Amenity resource valuation: Integrating economics with other disciplines (pp. 65–76). State College, PA: Venture. [33]

Alba, J. W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (1985). Effects of context and part-category cues on recall of competing brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 340–349. [34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454. [15, 17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alba, J. W., Hutchinson, J. W., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1991). Memory and decision making. In Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 1–49). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [10]

Alba, J. W., Lynch, J. G., Weitz, B., Janiszweki, C., Lutz, R. J., Sawyer, A. G., et al. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61, 38–53. [17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 14–26. [17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14, 1085–1096. [23, 24]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulate et axioms de l'école americaine [The behavior of rational man in risk situations: A critique of the axioms and postulates of the American school]. Econometrica, 21, 503–546. [1, 2, 9, 19, 27]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown. [22]

American Medical Association. (1993). Strategies for cadaveric organ procurement: Mandated choice and presumed consent. Chicago: American Medical Association. [37]

Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461–474. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. A., Davidovitz, L., & Plovin, A. (2003). Preference reversals and the analysis of income distributions (No. DARP 66). Retrieved April 20, 2005, from London School of Economics, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines Web site: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/publications/darp.asp. [1]

Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (in press). Decisions by rules: The case of unwillingness to pay for beneficial delays. Journal of Marketing Research. [28, 29]

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [21]

Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 186–197. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Memory (2nd ed., pp. 237–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [21]

Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100. [21]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, N. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]

Anderson, N. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Memory in the aging brain. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 411–425). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [21]

Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen. [28]

Ariely, D. (1998). Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19–45. [9, 13, 29]3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., & Carmon, Z. (2003). Summary assessment of experiences: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. In Loewenstein, G., Read, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (pp. 323–349). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [14]

Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279–290. [29]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). The importance of duration in ratings of and choices between sequences of outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 508–523. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2002). Determinants of anchoring effects (Working paper). [13]

Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105. [1, 13, 14, 21, 35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2006). Tom Sawyer and the myth of fundamental value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 1–10. [1, 14]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 223–232. [18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (2000). On the making of an experience: The effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 219–232. [13]3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkes, H. R. (2001). The attribution of cues, implicit memory, and human judgment. Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University. [21]

Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591–600. [29]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140. [29]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1982). Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry, 20, 1–9. [6, 27, 31, 34, 36]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. J., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [31, 33, 34]Google Scholar

Axelrod, P. (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. [18]

Ayres, I., & Gertner, R. (1989). Filling gaps in incomplete contracts: An economic theory of default rules. Yale Law Journal, 99, 87–130. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [20]

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. [35]

Barber, B., Heath, C., & Odean, T. (2002). Good rationales sell: Reason-based choice among group and individual investors in the stock market. (Working paper). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. [29]

Bar-Gad, I., & Bergman, H. (2001). Stepping out of the box: Information processing in the neural networks of the basal ganglia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 689–695. [11]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J. (1988). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press. [9, 34]

Baron, J. (1997a). Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 72–88. [34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J. (1997b). Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 301–309. [9, 23]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. [12]

Baron, J., & Greene, J. (1996). Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 107–125. [31, 32, 34]Google Scholar

Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference points and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 475–498. [37]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16. [34]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. [15]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]

Bartels, L. M. (1998, September). Democracy with attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Boston. [31]

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [1]

Bateman, I. A., Carson, R., Day, R., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., et al. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateman, I. A., Dent, S., Peters, E., Starmer, C., & Slovic, P. (2006). The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. (Report No. 06-06). Eugene, OR: Decision Research. [1, 23]

Bateman, I. A., & Willis, K. G. (1999). Valuing environmental preferences.New York: Oxford University Press. [38]Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 220–240. [9, 10, 28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Blount, S. (1999). Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 41–58. [29]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally.New York: The Free Press. [34]Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Schroth, H. A., Shah, P. P., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1994). The inconsistent role of comparison others and procedural justice in reactions to hypothetical job descriptions: Implications for job acceptance procedures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 326–352. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Understanding and managing competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225–241. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., White, S. B., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 39–43. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts.Chichester, UK: Wiley. [17, 18, 19]Google Scholar

Beach, L. R., & Lipshitz, R. (1993). Why classical decision theory is an appropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 21–35). Norwood, NJ: Ables. [18]

Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439–449. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201–308. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beattie, J., & Baron, J. (1991). Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 571–585. [9]Google ScholarPubMed

Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., & Spranca, M. D. (1994). Psychological determinants of decision attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 129–144. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beattie, J., Covey, J., Dolan, P., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., et al. (1998). On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 5–25. [35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15. [24]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, G. M., DeGroot, D. H., & Marschak, J. (1963). An experimental study of some stochastic models for wagers. Behavioral Science, 8, 41–55. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, G. S. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1–13. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217. [5]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846. [5]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 511–526. [5]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224–237. [18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168. [17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. [21]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981. [36]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart.Los Angeles: University of California Press. [16]Google Scholar

Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2001). To opt-in or opt-out? It depends on the question. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 25–27. [37]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellman, S., Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 32–38. [15]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 2–62). New York: Academic Press. [22]

Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 73–92. [20]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1999). Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science, 45, 364–381. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2002). How much is investor autonomy worth?Journal of Finance, 57, 1593–1616. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, L. (1993). Studies in human decision making: On the effects of experimental instructions, framing, and time constraints. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]

Benson, L., & Svenson, O. (1992). Post-decision consolidation following the debriefing of subjects about experimental manipulations affecting their prior decisions. Lund University, Psychological Research Bulletin, 32 (3). [19]Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press (Original work published in 1823). [27]Google Scholar

Benthin, A., Slovic, P., Moran, P., Severson, H., Mertz, C. K., & Gerrard, M. (1995). Adolescent health-threatening and health-enhancing behaviors: A study of word association and imagery. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17, 143–152. [23]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benthorn, L. (1994). On post-decision processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]

Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & O'Brien, J. R. (1985). Preference reversal and arbitrage. In Smith, V. L. (Ed.), Research in experimental economics (pp. 31–72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [8]

Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & Rietz, T. A. (2003). Preference reversals and induced risk preferences: Evidence for noisy maximization. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 139–170. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, L. (1982). Planning a tragedy.New York: Norton. [22]Google Scholar

Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk (L. Sommer, Trans.). Econometrica, 22, 23–36 (Reprinted from Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 1738, 5, 175–192). [2]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1, 17]Google Scholar

Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. In Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 50–84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [19]

Bettman, J. R., & Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 233–240. [7]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217. [1, 17, 29, 34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248. [17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W., & Staelin, R. (1986). Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information. Journal of Marketing and Public Policy, 5, 1–28. [34]Google Scholar

Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 141–154. [15, 17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettman, J. R., & Zins, M. A. (1979). Information format and choice task effects in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 141–153. [7]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betts, R., & Gelb, L. (1979). The irony of Vietnam: The system worked.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. [22]Google Scholar

Bewley, T. F. (1998). Why not cut pay?European Economic Review, 62, 459–490. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyth-Marom, R., & Fischhoff, B. (1997). Adolescent decisions about risk. In Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J., & Hurnelmans, K. (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transactions during adolescence (pp. 110–135). New York: Cambridge University Press. [35]

Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1983). Information accessibility as a moderator of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 1–14. [10]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1986). Consumers' use of memory and external information on choice: Macro and micro perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 382–405. [15]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biel, A., & Montgomery, H. (1986). Scenarios in energy planning. In Brehmer, B., Jungermann, H., Lourens, P., & Sevon, G. (Eds.), New directions in research on decision making (pp. 205–218). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [18]

Bigelow, J. (Ed.). (1887). The complete works of Benjamin Franklin (Vol. 4). New York: Putnam. [22]Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology.New York: Cambridge University Press. [22]Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage. [18]

Billings, R. S., & Scherer, L. L. (1988). The effect of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 1–19. [10]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In Wegener, B. (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401–485). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1]

Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319–330. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1979). Stimulus recognition may mediate exposure effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1090–1096. [25]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48–74. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183–215. [1, 11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R. C. (1986). Resource valuation under uncertainty: Theoretical principles for empirical research. In Smith, V. K. (Ed.), Advances in applied micro-economics (Vol. 4, pp. 133–152). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [33]

Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926–930. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 566–586. [15]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blattberg, R. C., & Neslin, S. A. (1990). Sales promotion: Concepts, methods, and strategies.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [22]Google Scholar

Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science, 46, 1485–1497. [32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom Kemdal, A., & Montgomery, H. (1997). Perspectives and emotions in personal decision making. In Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R., & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 72–89). London: Routledge. [18]

Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 30, 227–240. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bockenholt, U., Albert, D., Aschenbrenner, M., & Schmalhofer, F. (1991). The effects of attractiveness, dominance, and attribute differences on information acquisition in multiattribute binary choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 258–281. [18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, P. (1994). Behavior under uncertainty without preference reversals: A field experiment. Empirical Economics, 19, 185–200. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, P., & Lind, H. (1993). Preference reversal, real-world lotteries, and lottery-interested subjects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 22, 327–348. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. [23]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., & Luce, R. D. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 13, 193–212. [1, 8]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovie, P. (Ed.). (1992). Terence: The comedies.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. [16]Google Scholar

Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148. [24]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyle, K., Desvousges, W., Johnson, F., Dunford, R., & Hudson, S. (1994). An investigation of part-whole biases in contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 64–83. [32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. [24]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Braga, J., & Starmer, C. (2004). Does market experience eliminate preference reversal? Unpublished manuscript. [1]

Brandstätter, E., Kühberger, A., & Schneider, F. (2002). A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 79–100. [32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389. [19, 26]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.New York: Academic Press. [16]Google Scholar

Brehmer, B. (1990). Strategies in real-time dynamic decision making. In Hogarth, R. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 262–279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [18]

Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. J. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927. [27, 28, 30]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bromley, D. (Ed.). (1986). National resource economics: Policy problems and contemporary analysis.Boston: Kluwer/Nijhoff Publishing. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookshire, D. S., & Coursey, D. (1987). Measuring the value of a public good: An empirical comparison of elicitation procedures. American Economic Review, 77(4), 554–566. [33]Google Scholar

Brookshire, D. S., Thayer, M. A., Schulze, W. D., & D'Arge, R. C. (1982). Valuing public goods: A comparison of survey and hedonic approaches. American Economic Review, 72(1), 165–177. [33]Google Scholar

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company. (1999). Kool Natural Lights [Advertisement]. [23]

Brown, C., & Feinberg, F. (2002). How does choice affect evaluations?Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 331–332. [28]Google Scholar

Brown, T. C. (1984). The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics, 60, 231–246. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, T. C., & Slovic, P. (1988). Effects of context on economic measures of value. In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Integrating economic and psychological knowledge in valuations of public amenity resources (pp. 23–30). State College, PA: Venture. [33]

Brownstein, A. (2003). Biased pre-decision processing. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 545–568. [12, 19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 1–16. [15]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brucks, M. (1988). Search monitor: An approach for computer-controlled experiments involving consumer information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 117–121. [15]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152. [15]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking.New York: Wiley. [2]Google Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2002). Survey of decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 345–370. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., & Goldstein, D. G. (1992). Linking together different measures of preference: A dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 370–396. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., Hastie, R., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Decision making from a cognitive perspective.San Diego, CA: Academic. [23]Google Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1992). Fundamental derivations for decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 255–282. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459. [11, 12, 19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busemeyer, J. R., Townsend, J. T., & Stout, J. C. (2002). Motivational underpinnings of utility in decision making: Decision Field Theory analysis of deprivation and satiation. In Moore, S. C. & Oaksford, M. (Eds.), Advances in consciousness research: Vol. 44. Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour (pp. 197–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [11]

Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: The common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173–200. [24]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972). Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85, 1089–1128. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldwell, C. (2004, March 1). Select all: Can we have too many choices?The New Yorker, pp. 91–93. [1]Google Scholar

Calle, E. E., Thun, M. J., Petrelli, J. M., Rodriguez, C., & Heath, C. W., Jr. (1999). Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1097–1105. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 288–300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]

Camerer, C. F., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cab drivers: One day at a time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 407–441. [20]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., & Ho, T. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probabilities. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 167–196. [32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 1–3, 7–42. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 2111–2154. [37]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 117, 1232–1254. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplan, A. L. (1994). Current ethical issues in organ procurement and transplantation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1708–1709. [37]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [7]Google Scholar

Carlson, K. A., & Klein Pearo, L. (2004). Limiting predecisional distortion by prior valuation of attribute components. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 48–59. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 91–103. [21]Google ScholarPubMed

Carroll, J. D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., & Neriove, S. (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences: Vol. 1. Theory (pp. 105–155). New York: Seminar Press. [6]

Carson, R. T., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R., Krosnick, J., Mitchell, R., Presser, S., et al. (1994). Prospective interim lost use value due to DDT and PCB contamination in the Southern California Bight.La Jolla, CA: Natural Resource Damage Assessment. [31]Google Scholar

Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The issue of scope in contingent valuation studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 1263–1267. [31, 32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1995). Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 155–173. [31]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casey, J. T. (1991). Reversal of the preference reversal phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 224–251. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). 1991–2001 prevalence of obesity among U.S. adults, by characteristics. Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/prev_char.htm. [38]

Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology.New York: Guilford Press. [1, 32]Google Scholar

Chapman, G. B., & Bornstein, B. (1996). The more you ask the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519–540. [31]3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223–242. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115–153. [13, 14, 15, 21]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases (pp. 120–138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]

Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. [24]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherry, T. L., Crocker, T. D., & Shogren, J. F. (2003). Rationality spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 63–84. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Form vs. function: Emotional and behavioral consequences of trading off hedonic vs. utilitarian attributes (Working paper).University of Texas, Austin. [29]Google Scholar

Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2002). Defined contribution pensions: Plan rules, participant decisions, and the path of least resistance. In Poterba, J. M. (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 16, pp. 67–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [38]

Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2004). For better or for worse: Default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. In Wise, D. (Ed.), Perspectives in the economics of aging (pp. 81–121). University of Chicago. [37]

Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1978). Problem-solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 307–323. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1980). A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 107–122. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1984). Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values: Women's values during childbirth. Medical Decision Making, 4, 47–58. [27]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chu, Y. P., & Chu, R. L. (1990). The subsidence of preference reversals in simplified and marketlike experimental settings: A note. American Economic Review, 80(4), 902–911. [1]Google Scholar

Cicchetti, C., & Dubin, J. (1994). A microeconomic analysis of risk aversion and the decision to self-insure. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 169–186. [20]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, M., & Block, W. (2002). A free market for human organs. Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 27, 227–236. [37]Google Scholar

Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis.Belmont, CA: Duxbury. [34]Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. [37]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, M. S. (1993). The naturalistic basis of decision biases. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 51–99). Norwood, NJ: Ables. [18]

Cohen, M. S., Freeman, J. P., & Wolf, S. (1996). Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Human Factors, 38, 206–219. [18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. [15, 21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. G. (1972). Personal responsibility for consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 558–593. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–215. [24]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Constans, J. I., & Mathews, A. M. (1993). Mood and the subjective risk of future events. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 545–560. [24]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coombs, C. H. (1958). On the use of inconsistency of preference in psychological measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1–7. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coombs, C. H., Bezembinder, T. G., & Goode, F. M. (1967). Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 72–103. [2, 3, 6]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coombs, C. H., & Pruitt, D. G. (1960). Components of risk in decision making: Probability and variance preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 265–277. [1, 2]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [16]

Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortese, A. E., & Stepanek, M. (1998, May 4). Goodbye to fixed pricing? How electronic commerce could create the most efficient market of them all. Business Week, pp. 70–71. [15]Google Scholar

Coupey, E. (1994). Restructuring: Constructive processing of information displays in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 83–99. [17, 19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupey, E., Irwin, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 459–467. [9, 15]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coursey, D. L., Hovis, J. J., & Schulze, W. D. (1987). The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 679–690. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, J. C., & Epstein, S. (1989). Preference reversals without the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 79(3), 408–426. [1, 8]Google Scholar

Cox, J. C., & Grether, D. M. (1996). The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets, and incentives. Economic Theory, 7, 381–405. [1, 13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. M. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. [33]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cropper, M. L., Aydede, S. K., & Portney, P. R. (1994). Preferences for life-saving programs: How the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 243–265. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cubitt, R. P., Munro, A., & Starmer, C. (2004). Testing explanations of preference reversal. The Economic Journal, 114, 709–726. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., & Schulze, W. D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: Assessment of the contingent valuation method.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld. [1, 33]Google Scholar

Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible?American Economic Review, 85(1), 260–266. [31]Google Scholar

Dahlstrand, U., & Montgomery, H. (1984). Information search and evaluative processes in decision making: A computer-based process tracing study. Acta Psychologica, 56, 113–123. [18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dale, H. C. A. (1959). A priori probabilities in gambling. Nature, 183, 842–843. [2]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain.New York: Avon. [1, 23, 24]Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 41, 81–94. [23]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darley, J. M., & Berscheid, E. (1967). Increased liking caused by the anticipation of interpersonal contact. Human Relations, 10, 29–40. [30]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, A. R., Yantis, S., Norwood, M., & Montano, D. E. (1985). Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1184–1198. [26]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, D., & Marschak, J. (1959). Experimental tests of a stochastic decision theory. In Churchman, C. W. & Ratoosh, P. (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and theories (pp. 233–269). New York: Wiley. [2]

Dawes, R. M. (1977). Predictive models as a guide to preference. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-7, 355–358. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582. [17]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making, judgment, and inference. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 589–597). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [19]

Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Do security analysts overreact?American Economic Review, 80(2), 52–57. [38]Google Scholar

Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation.New York: Academic Press. [16]Google Scholar

Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America.New York: Harper & Row (Original work published 1830). [16]Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation.New York: Plenum Press. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1981). The psychology of self-determination.Lexington, MA: Heath. [16]Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York: Plenum Press. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeKay, M., & McClelland, G. (1996). Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 60–83. [31, 34]Google Scholar

Delucchi, K. L. (1983). The use and misuse of chi-square: Lewis and Burke revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 166–176. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeMaio, T. J., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1996). Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field. In Schwarz, N. & Sudman, S. (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communication processes in survey research (pp. 177–195). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [34]

Dember, W. N., Galinsky, T. L., & Warm, J. S. (1992). The role of choice in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 201–204. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dembo, T. (1931). Der Ärger als dynamisches Problem [Anger as a dynamic problem]. Psychologische Forschung, 15, 1–144. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829. [23]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., & Wilson, K. N. (1992). Measuring nonuse damages using contingent valuation: An experimental evaluation of accuracy (Research Triangle Institute Monograph 92–1).Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. [1, 9, 31]Google Scholar

Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., & Wilson, K. N. (1993). Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 91–164). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [32]

Desvousges, W. H., Smith, V. K., & Fisher, A. (1987). Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the Monongahela River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, 248–267. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devine, P. C. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. [15]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231. [10, 16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 369–384. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (1999). Comparison effects on preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 293–306. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 189–200. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 146–160. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 60–71. [32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, P. A. (1996). Testing the internal consistency of contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 337–347. [31]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64. [31]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, P. A., Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G., & Denning, M. (1993). Does contingent valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 41–85). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [31]

Dickens, W. T., & Katz, L. F. (1987). Inter-industry wage differences and industry characteristics. In Lang, K. & Leonard, J. S. (Eds.), Unemployment and the structure of labor markets (pp. 48–89). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. [13]

Dickie, M., Fisher, A., & Gerking, S. (1987). Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 69–75. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diederich, A. (1997). Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 260–274. [11]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2003). Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 304–322. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In Costa, P. T. & Siegler, I. C. (Eds.), Advances in cell aging and gerontology: Vol. 15. Relevant advances in psychology and aging (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [28]

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180–209. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dougherty, M. R. P., Gronlund, S. D., & Gettys, C. F. (2003). Memory as a fundamental heuristic for decision making. In Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 125–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]

Downs, J. S., Murray, P. J., Bruine de Bruin, W., White, J. P., Palmgren, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2004). An interactive video program to reduce adolescent females' STD risk: A randomized controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1561–1572. [35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, J. R., O'Connor, D. J., Reynolds, G. M., & Bottomley, P. A. (1999). The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases. Psychology & Marketing, 16, 225–243. [1]3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drolet, A. (1997). Generic preferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [17]

Drolet, A., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (2000). Indifference curves that travel with the choice set. Marketing Letters, 11, 199–209. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Location, location, location: The misprediction of satisfaction in housing lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1421–1432. [28]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunning, D., Griffin, D. W., Milojkovoc, J., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social predication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568–581. [30]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517. [30]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College. [31]Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [31]

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In David, P. A. & Reder, M. W. (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press. [28]

Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Building a better theory of well-being (IZA discussion paper).Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. [28]Google Scholar

Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction.New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. [23]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W. (1953). Probability-preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 349–364. [1, 2]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, W. (1954a). Probability-preferences among bets with differing expected values. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 56–67. [1, 2]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W. (1954b). The reliability of probability-preferences. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 68–95. [1, 2]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W. (1954c). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417. [1, 18, 19, 33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W. (1954d). Variance preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 441–452. [2]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W. (1955). The prediction of decisions among bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 201–214. [2, 3]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473–498. [1, 33]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, W. (1962). Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychological Review, 69, 109–135. [2]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, W., & Fasolo, B. (2001). Decision technology. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 581–606. [12]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, W., & Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute evaluation.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [12]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, W., & Winterfeldt, D. (1987). Public values in risk debates. Risk Analysis, 7, 141–158. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 7, 86–106. [34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In Wallsten, T. S. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [17]

Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88. [19, 33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisele, P. (2000). Post-decision consolidation: Group members in different social settings compared to individual decision makers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 275–282. [19]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576. [34]Google Scholar

Ellickson, R. C. (1989). Bringing culture and human frailty to rational actors: A critique of classical law and economics. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 65, 23–55. [27]Google Scholar

Elliott, R., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Neural response during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuro-imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 4697–4704. [1, 25]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk ambiguity and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. [27]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, J., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Utility from memory and anticipation. In Elster, J. & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 213–224). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [27, 32]

Emanuel, E. E., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 2221–2226. [36]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396. [13, 21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724. [1, 23, 32]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Erber, M. W., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1995). Attitude strength and attitude stability. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 433–454). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [26]

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. [10, 18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksen, C. W. (1980). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review, 67, 279–300. [25]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erwin, P. G., & Calev, A. (1984). The influence of Christian name stereotypes on the marking of children's essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 223–227. [23]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition.New York: Oxford University Press. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An ethically defensible market in organs [Editorial]. (2002). British Medical Journal, 325, 114–115. [37]CrossRef

Fair, R. C. (1978). A theory of extramarital affairs. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 45–61. [5]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory.New York: Oxford University Press. [6]Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [23]

Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. [31]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435. [17, 32, 34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman-Stewart, D., Brundage, M. D., Manen, L., & Svenson, O. (2004). Patient-focused decision making in early-stage prostate cancer: Insights from a cognitively based decision aid. Health Expectations, 7, 126–141. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [18, 19, 30]Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [12, 19]Google Scholar

Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S. M., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 283–300. [9, 23, 32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. [23, 32]3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, G. W. (1995). Range sensitivity to attribute weights in multiattribute value models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 252–266. [10]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, G. W., Carmon, Z., Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (1999). Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Science, 45, 1057–1075. [1, 21, 28, 29]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, G. W., Damodaran, N., Laskey, K. B., & Lincoln, D. (1987). Preferences for proxy attributes. Management Science, 33, 198–214. [6, 9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, G. W., & Hawkins, S. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580–597. [1, 9, 10, 18, 29]Google Scholar

Fischer, G. W., Jia, J., & Luce, M. F. (2000). Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: The Rand MAU model. Management Science, 46, 669–684. [11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, P. M. (1991). Brand logo recognition by children ages 3 to 6 years: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 3145. [23]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≢ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299. [19]Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1980). Clinical decision analysis. Operations Research, 28, 28–43. [35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1983). Predicting frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 113–116. [1, 21, 35]Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1991). Value elicitation: Is there anything in there?American Psychologist, 46, 835–847. [15, 19, 21, 31, 34, 35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1993). Transaction analysis: A framework and an application to insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 53–69. [35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 232–248. [19, 35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1997). What do psychologists want? Contingent valuation as a special case of asking questions. In Kopp, R. J., Pommerehne, W. W., & Schwartz, N. (Eds.), Determining the value of non-marketed goods: Economic, psychological, and policy relevant aspects of contingent valuation methods (pp. 189–217). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing. [34]

Fischhoff, B. (2005). Cognitive issues in stated preference methods. In Mäler, K.-G. & Vincent, J. R. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics: Vol. 2. Valuing environmental changes (pp. 937–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [35]

Fischhoff, B., & Furby, L. (1988). Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 147–184. [33, 34, 35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Quadrel, M. J., Kamlet, M., Loewenstein, G., Dawes, R. M., Fischbeck, P., et al. (1993). Embedding effects: Stimulus representation and response mode. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 211–234. [33, 34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344. [33]Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values. In Wallstein, T. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 117–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [6, 19, 34, 35]

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152. [23, 35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., & Hope, C. (1984). Defining risk. Policy Sciences, 17, 123–139. [35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Welch, N., & Frederick, S. (1999). Construal processes in preference assessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 139–176. [34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishburn, P. C. (1984). SSB utility theory: An economic perspective. Mathematical Social Sciences, 8, 63–94. [6, 8]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishburn, P. C. (1985). Nontransitive preference theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 32, 39–50. [1, 6, 8]Google Scholar

Fisher, I. (1906). The nature of capital and income.New York: Macmillan. [2]Google Scholar

Fisher, I. (1968). Is ‘utility’ the most suitable term for the concept it is used to denote? In Page, A. N. (Ed.), Utility theory: A book of readings (pp. 49–51). New York: Wiley (Reprinted from American Economic Review, 8, 335–337, 1918). [27]

Fisher, R. (1969). Basic negotiating strategy: International conflict for beginners.London: Allen Lane. [20]Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906. [7]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167–203). New York: Guilford Press. [19]

Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210. [6]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morwitz, V. G. (1996). The effect of measuring intent on brand-level purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 1–11. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florig, H. K., Morgan, M. G., Morgan, K. M., Jenni, K. E., Fischhoff, B., & Fischbeck, P. S., et al. (2001). A test bed for studies of risk taking. Risk Analysis, 21, 913–922. [35]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., & Doherty, M. L. (1986). Process tracing methods: Contribution, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75–117. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. [21, 30]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, V., Bateman, I. J., & Harley, D. (1997). Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation: A non-experimental comparison. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 123–138. [31]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603. [9, 13, 14]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franciosi, R., Kujal, P., Michelitsch, R., & Smith, V. (1993). Experimental tests of the endowment effect (Working paper).Tucson: University of Arizona, Department of Economics. [27]Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. (1992). The role of moral sentiments in the theory of intertemporal choice. In Elster, J. & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 265–286). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [27]

Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as public good. Economic Journal, 107, 1832–1847. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, B. (1950). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin.New York: Pocket Books. [26]Google Scholar

Frederick, S. (2002). Automated choice heuristics. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 548–558). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [29, 32]

Frederick, S. (2003). Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less?Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 39–53. [35, 38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1998). Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk Decision and Policy, 3, 109–123. [9, 13, 14, 31, 32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [28]

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.[38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55. [27]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freeman, A. M. III. (1993a). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods.Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [34]Google Scholar

Freeman, A. M., III. (1993b). Nonuse values in natural resource damage assessments. In Kopp, R. & Smith, V. K. (Eds.), Valuing natural assets: The economics of natural resource damage assessment (pp. 264–303). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [33]

Freeman, A. M. III. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods (2nd ed.).Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. [36]Google Scholar

Freud, A. (1937). The ego and the mechanisms of defense.London: Hogarth Press. [30]Google Scholar

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and economics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [28]Google Scholar

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research?Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2003). Economic consequences of mispredicting utility. Unpublished manuscript. [28]

Frey, D. (1981). Postdecisional preference for decision-relevant information as a function of its source and the degree of familiarity with its information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 51–67. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41–80. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose: A personal statement.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. [38]Google Scholar

Friedrich, J., Barnes, P., Chapin, K., Dawson, I., Garst, V., & Kerr, D. (1999). Psycho-physical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8, 277–299. [23]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction.New York: Cambridge University Press. [24]Google Scholar

Frisch, D., & Clemen, R. T. (1994). Beyond expected utility: Rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 46–54. [17, 34]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frisch, D., & Jones, S. K. (1993). Assessing the accuracy of decisions. Theory and Psychology, 3, 115–135. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gäbel, H. (2002). Donor and non-donor registries in Europe.Stockholm, Sweden: On behalf of the committee of experts on the Organizational Aspects of Co-operation in Organ Transplantation of the Council of Europe. [37]Google Scholar

Gaeth, G. J., & Shanteau, J. (1984). Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experienced decision makers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 263–282. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallhofer, L., & Saris, W. (1989). Decision trees and decision rules: The empirical decision analysis procedure. In Montgomery, H. & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 293–311). Chichester, UK: Wiley. [18]

The Gallup Organization, Inc. (1993). The American public's attitude toward organ donation and transplantation.Boston: Author. [37]

Ganzach, Y. (1995). Attribute scatter and decision outcome: Judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 113–122. [10]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganzach, Y. (1996). Preference reversals in equal-probability gambles: A case for anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 95–109. [11]3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, P. C., & Edwards, W. (1975). Public values: Multiattribute-utility measurement for social decision making. In Kaplan, M. F. & Schwartz, S. (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp. 1–37). New York: Academic Press. [33]

Garvil, J., Gärling, T., Lindberg, E., & Montgomery, H. (1991, August). In search of evidence for dominance structuring in decision making. Paper presented at the 13th European Research Conference of Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making, Fribourg, Switzerland. [18]

Gertner, J. (2003, September 7). The futile pursuit of happiness. The New York Times, Sec. 6, p. 44. [1]Google Scholar

Gettys, C. F., Pliske, R. M., Manning, C., & Casey, J. T. (1987). An evaluation of human act generation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 23–51. [9]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Rethinking rationality. In Gigerenzer, G. & Selten, R. (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [1]

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart.New York: Oxford University Press. [21]Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Driver-Linn, E., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The trouble with Vronsky: Impact bias in the forecasting of future affective states. In Barrett, L. F. & Salovey, P. (Eds.), The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 114–143). New York: Guilford Press. [28]

Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 503–514. [30]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, D. T., Gill, M. J., & Wilson, T. D. (2002). The future is now: Temporal correction in affective forecasting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 430–444. [28, 29, 30, 32]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychological Science, 15, 14–19. [30]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638. [28, 30]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (2002). Durability bias in affective forecasting. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 292–312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [28]

Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178–197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [1, 28, 30]

Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1995). Case-based decision theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 605–639. [13]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395. [16]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimbel, R. W., Strosberg, M. A., Lehrman, S. E., Gefenas, E., & Taft, F. (2003). Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. Progress in Transplantation, 13, 5–15. [37]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972a). Stress and adaptation: Experimental studies of behavioral effects of exposure to aversive events.New York: Academic Press. [16]Google Scholar

Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972b). Urban stress.New York: Academic Press. [16]Google Scholar

Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306, 447–452. [1]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 631–645. [20]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, J. I. (2003). Linking reward expectation to behavior in the basal ganglia. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 12–14. [11]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 10–16. [11]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldstein, W. M. (1984). The relationship between judgment and choice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(07B), 2341. [7]

Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94, 236–254. [1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentiono, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford Press. [18]

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implementational mindsets in the control of action. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403–422). New York: Guilford Press. [12]

Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Ratajczak, H. (1990). From weighting to willing: Approaching a change decision through pre- or postdecisional mentation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 41–65. [18]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implementational mind mind-sets: Cognitive turning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1119–1127. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129–166. [32]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

González-Vallejo, C., Erev, I., & Wallsten, T. S. (1994). Do decision quality and preference order depend on whether probabilities are verbal or numerical?American Journal of Psychology, 107, 157–172. [29]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

González-Vallejo, C., & Moran, E. (2001). The evaluability hypothesis revisited: Joint and separate preference reversal as a function of attribute importance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 216–233. [28]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorovitz, S. (1982). Doctors' dilemmas: Moral conflict and medical care.New York: Macmillan. [36]Google Scholar

Gourville, J. T. (1998). Pennies-a-day: The effect of temporal re-framing on transaction evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 395–408. [20]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D., Jacowitz, K., Kahneman, D., & McFadden, D. (1998). Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics, 20, 85–116. [13, 31]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 45, 33–41. [34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618. [19]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Carnot, C. G., Beach, R., & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 315–318. [21]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., Flynn, J., Johnson, S. M., Satterfield, T. A., Slovic, P., & Wagner, R. (1997). Decision pathway surveys: A tool for resource managers. Land Economics, 73, 240–254. [34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., Keeney, R., & Winterfeldt, D. (1992). Adapting the environmental impact statement process to inform decision makers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1, 58–75. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., Brown, T. C., Peterson, G. L., & Slovic, P. (1995). How precise are monetary representations of environmental improvements?Land Economics, 71, 462–473. [1]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1993). Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 177–197. [1, 17, 33, 34]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., MacGregor, D. G., & Lichtenstein, S. (1992). Assessing the quality of expressed preference measures of value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 17, 277–292. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R., & McDaniels, T. (1987). Valuing environmental losses: What promise does the right measure hold?Policy Sciences, 20, 11–26. [33]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grether, D. M. (1980). Bayes rules as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 537–557. [38]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grether, D. M., & Plott, C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69(4), 623–638. [1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 33, 34]Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G. (Eds.), The logic of grammar (pp. 64–75). Encino, CA: Dickenson. [35]

Griffin, D. W., Dunning, D., & Ross, L. (1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1128–1139. [30]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed