Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:28:00.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Courts Enforcing Political Accountability

The Role of Criminal Justice in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Diana Kapiszewski
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Gordon Silverstein
Affiliation:
Yale Law School
Robert A. Kagan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

On October 6, 2009, the Italian Constitutional Court quashed the so-called lodo Alfano, a statute hastily passed by the right-wing parliamentary majority in July 2008, just after winning the parliamentary elections. The statute had the effect of freezing all criminal proceedings against the highest state officials: the president of the Republic, the presidents of the two chambers of Parliament, and the prime minister. In fact, the actual goal of the statute was to suspend all the criminal charges brought against Berlusconi. The reaction of Berlusconi and his allies to the decision has been to denounce the court's leftist propensities and call for radical reforms of the judicial system. Without doubt, the court's decision was by no means favourable to Berlusconi, as it is likely that in the near future he will have to confront several criminal proceedings. However, in the recent past it was a criminal investigation that opened the way for the return to power of the Italian tycoon.

In January 2008, the justice minister of the center-left Prodi government, Clemente Mastella – together with his wife and twenty-three members of his small party – was put under investigation. The charges were several, ranging from extortion against the chief executive of the Campania region to various administrative illegalities. As a consequence, the minister resigned, denouncing the investigation as a “persecution.” After some days, the weak twelve-party government led by Romano Prodi collapsed, opening the way to new elections. Thus, in April, the center-right coalition – led by Silvio Berlusconi – which had ruled 2001–2006, was returned to power – with a stronger majority. Although the Prodi government was far from stable, the judicial intervention was the trigger of the crisis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Consequential Courts
Judicial Roles in Global Perspective
, pp. 163 - 180
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adut, Ari 2004. “Scandal as Norm Entrepreneurship Strategy: Corruption and the French Investigating Magistrates,” Theory and Society 33: 529–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaud, Olivier 1999. Le sang contaminé: Essai critique sur la criminalisation de la responsabilité des gouvernants. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bell, John 2006. Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colombo, Gherardo 2006. “Investigating and Prosecuting Large-Scale Corruption,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 4: 510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conso, Giovanni (ed.) 1979. Pubblico ministero e accusa penale. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Cotta, Maurizio and Verzichelli, Luca 2008. Political Institutions in Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan R. 1986. The Faces of Justice and State Authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella and Vannucci, Alberto 2007. “Corruption and Anti‑Corruption: The Political Defeat of ‘Clean Hands’ in Italy,” West European Politics 30: 830–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Federico, Giuseppe 2004. Manuale di ordinamento giudiziario. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
Di Federico, Giuseppe and Sapignoli, Michele 2002. Processo penale e diritti della difesa. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Giglioli, Pier Paolo 1996. “Political Corruption and the Media: the Tangentopoli Affair,” International Social Science Journal 48: 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, Elisabetta 2000. “Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance,” American Journal of Comparative Law 48: 227–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo 2003. Giustizia e politica. I nodi della Seconda Repubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo and Patrizia, Pederzoli 2002. The Power of Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana and Taylor, Matthew M 2008. “Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America,” Perspectives on Politics 6: 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maravall, José Maria 2003. The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon, in José Maria, Maravall and Przeworski, Adam (eds.). Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John H. and Perdomo, Rogelio 2007. The Civil Law TraditionStanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David 1996. “The Judges and Political Corruption in Italy,” Journal of Law and Society 23: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederzoli, Patrizia 2008. La corte costituzionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, Alessandro 1998. Il potere dei giudici. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Pujat, Veronique and Rodhes, Martin 1999. Party Finance and Political Scandals in Italy, Spain and France, West European Politics 22: 41–63.Google Scholar
Rayner, Hervé 2005. Les scandales politiques.L’opération “Main propres” en Italie. Paris: Michel Houdiard Editeur.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin 2005. “Law, Courts and Politics,” in Robert, Kagan and Ginsburg, Tom (eds.). Institutions and Public Law: Comparative Approaches. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 275–297.Google Scholar
Soulez-Larivière, Daniel 1993. Du cirque médiatico-judiciaire et des moyens d'en sortir. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2004. L’institution judiciaire remotivée. Paris:Livrairie General de Droit et Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Vogliotti, Massimo 2004. “Les relations police-parquet en Italie: un équilibre menacé?Droit et Societé 58: 453–504.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×