Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T20:32:12.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Pharmacies, health care institutions, and conscientious objection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mark R. Wicclair
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
Get access

Summary

The focus of previous chapters has been on conscience-based refusals by individual physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. This chapter will consider conscientious objection in relation to pharmacies and health care institutions. Even if it is acknowledged that it is appropriate to accommodate individual pharmacists with conscience-based objections to dispensing a medication when the constraints and requirements proposed in Chapter 3 are satisfied, it remains to consider whether pharmacies may justifiably refuse to stock and dispense a medication for reasons of conscience. Similarly, even if it is acknowledged that it is appropriate to accommodate conscience-based objections of individual physicians, nurses, and pharmacists who practice in health care institutions (e.g. hospitals and nursing homes) when those constraints and requirements are satisfied, it remains to consider whether institutions may justifiably refuse to provide a service for reasons of conscience.

PHARMACIES

Dispensing obligations of pharmacy licensees

Pharmacies are licensed by states, are granted a monopoly to dispense medications that require prescriptions, and are subject to regulation. State boards of pharmacy confer licenses to operate pharmacies with the justified expectation that they will promote specified ends – typically, the public health, safety, and welfare. These are the ends identified in a Model State Pharmacy Act. The Model Act's “Legislative Declaration” (Section 102) includes the following statement: “The Practice of Pharmacy in the State of__is declared a professional practice affecting the public health, safety, and welfare and is subject to regulation and control in the public interest.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Conscientious Objection in Health Care
An Ethical Analysis
, pp. 135 - 167
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×