Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T02:21:41.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Confucian Civility and Expressive Liberty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Sungmoon Kim
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

As we have seen in previous chapters, many Confucian democrats argue not only that Confucianism is compatible with democracy as a political institution, but also that it can further invigorate a democratic way of life, which they count as essentially communitarian, because of its fundamental assumption of the self as a social self, and its faith in the harmony between individual and community and their mutual growth in mediation of Confucian rituals (li 禮). As we have seen in Chapters 1 and 2, however, this overly positive thesis on the possibility of Confucian democracy as a communitarian sociopolitical practice is vulnerable to and invites many challenging questions: What is meant by “social self”? Does the ontological claim that the Confucian self is a social self naturally (or always) support the ethical claim that it is a civil self? What exactly is meant by the “harmony” between individual and community? How can the relationship be immune to tyranny by the majority, to which democracy is highly susceptible, and what does it mean in the context of ethical pluralism, which is, according to John Rawls, the core characteristic of a modern democratic society? Furthermore, if Confucian harmony is attained by participation in the li by the members of the community, what is the relation between li and law, or more specifically, how can we place li within the broader institutional framework of democratic constitutionalism? In short, precisely in what sense is Confucian democracy an alternative sociopolitical practice to liberal democracy in East Asian societies?

Of course, these questions cannot be answered adequately in the societal abstract. After all, how a person is “social” (or civil) cannot be evaluated without taking into account the sociopolitical and cultural context in which his or her society is embedded, and historically, each Confucian East Asian country – be it China, Taiwan, Vietnam, or Korea – has developed its distinct local Confucian civil and political culture. To borrow Alexis de Tocqueville’s much celebrated language, Confucian East Asians may have a similar Confucian heart, but they have certainly cultivated and lived with different habits of the heart.

Type
Chapter
Information
Confucian Democracy in East Asia
Theory and Practice
, pp. 246 - 269
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Ryu, Su-young, “Han’gukinui yugyojeok gachicheukjeongmunhang gaebal yeon’gu” [Item Development for Korean Confucian Values], Korean Journal of Management 15 (2007), 171–205.Google Scholar
Galston, William A., Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kateb, George, “The Value of Association,” in Freedom of Association, ed. Gutmann, Amy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), 53Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, Identity in Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard, Uncivil Society: The Perils of Pluralism and the Making of Modern Liberalism (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004)Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, Culture and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), 24–5Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, “Freedom of Expression,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993), 207–63, 214n23Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas, “A Theory of Freedom of Expression,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1972), 204–26, 223Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N., Ordinary Vices (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W., Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T., The Democracy of the Dead: Dewey, Confucius, and the Hope for Democracy in China (Chicago: Open Court, 1999)Google Scholar
Tan, Sor-hoon, Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon, “Between Good and Evil: Xunzi’s Reinterpretation of the Hegemonic Rule as Decent Governance,” Dao 12 (2013), 73–92, esp. 76–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencius, trans. Lau, D. C. (New York: Penguin, 1970)
Weiming, Tu, Humanity and Self-Cultivation (Berkeley, CA: Asian Humanities Press, 1979), 10Google Scholar
Seligman, Adam B., Weller, Robert, Puett, Michael J., and Simon, Bennett, Ritual and Its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008])CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Sang-chin, Han’gukin shimlihak [The Psychology of the Korean People] (Seoul: Chung Ang University Press, 2000), 160–92Google Scholar
Ivanhoe, Philip J., Confucian Moral Self Cultivation (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000), 29–42Google Scholar
Knoblock, John, Xunzi: A Translation and Study of Complete Works, 3 vols. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988, 1990, 1994)Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. and Rosemont, Henry Jr., The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation (New York: Ballantine Books, 1998)Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon, “Self-Transformation and Civil Society: Lockean vs. Confucian,” Dao 8 (2009), 383–401, 394–5Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph, “Exploring the Nonfamilial in Confucian Political Philosophy,” in Hahm, and Bell, , Politics of Affective Relations, 61–74, 67–8)
Kim, Sungmoon, “Beyond Liberal Civil Society: Confucian Familism and Relational Strangership,” Philosophy East and West 60 (2010), 476–98Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull, Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, Diamond, Larry, Nathan, Andrew J., and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.), How East Asians View Democracy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fred Alford, C., Think No Evil: Korean Values in the Age of Globalization (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Hwang, Kyung Moon, “Country or State? Reconceptualizing Kukka in the Korean Enlightenment Period, 1896–1910,” Korean Studies 24 (2000), 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgesen, Geir, Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics (Surrey: Curzon, 1998), 94Google Scholar
Angle, Stephen C. says, “even while contemporary Confucians identify and criticize oppression, they should not reject all forms of hierarchy and deference, both of which are sometimes mistakenly identified with oppression” (Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism [Cambridge: Polity, 2012], 128)Google Scholar
Jeon, Hye-young, “Han’gukeoe banyeongdoen yugyomunhwajeok teukseong” [The Confucian Characteristics Reflected in Korean Language], in Han’gukmunhwawa han’gukin [Korean Culture and the Korean People], ed. the Association of International Korean Studies (Seoul: Sagyejeol, 1998), 235–58Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, “Disputing Civil Society in a Confucian Context,” Korea Observer 35 (2004), 433–62Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Touchstone, 2000), 18–24Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×