Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:33:45.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Girls and Computer Science: Fitting In, Fighting Back, and Fleeing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Janet Ward Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

The preceding chapter examined boys' and girls' reactions to the opportunity to use a computer lab at lunchtime. However, gender differences in students' reactions to computing were not restricted to that milieu. Enrollment patterns at Whitmore for courses involving computing reflected gender-linked patterns that have been documented elsewhere in large-scale surveys. For example, as mentioned earlier, Whitmore girls were much more likely than boys to enroll in the business courses in which computers were used for word processing, consistent with Becker and Sterling's (1987) finding that the only computer-intensive courses in which girls were overrepresented relative to their proportion in the student population are word processing classes.

Also consistent with national trends was the finding that girls at Whitmore were somewhat less likely than boys to enroll in programming courses (Anderson, Welch, & Harris, 1984; Chen, 1986; Linn, 1985; Lockheed, 1985; Sutton, 1991). The difference between the male and female enrollment in Computer Science 1 was relatively small. However, in both years of the study male enrollment outpaced female enrollment, resulting in a total of 95 male Computer Science 1 students over the 2-year period compared with 80 female students. (African American students enrolled in Computer Science 1 in numbers just slightly under their representation in the track from which most computer science students came, constituting 56% of the computer science students and about 60% of the students in the regular track.) The disparity between male and female enrollment in computer science increased substantially as students progressed from the introductory to the more advanced courses, a trend also found in previous studies (Linn, 1985; Oakes, 1990).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×