Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T03:31:36.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Political Communication and Electronic Democracy: American Exceptionalism or Global Trend?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Thomas Zittel
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy Memorial Fellow, The Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies at Harvard University, Cambridge
Frank Esser
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
Barbara Pfetsch
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

The concept of electronic democracy has experienced a remarkable career in the social sciences during the past decade. It is not a new concept, despite the most recent outburst of publications and conferences on the topic. It can be traced back to the early 1970s when normative theorists of democracy perceived new digital media such as telephone and computer networks as tools for democratic reform (cf. Krauch 1972; Etzioni et al. 1975; Becker 1981; Barber 1984). However, it has changed in character since those days. Today, electronic democracy is being used as an empirical-analytical concept that carries the assumption that new digital media in general and computer networks in particular are in the process of changing the nature of political communication and democratic government (Rheingold 1993; Grossman 1995; Browning 1996; Rash 1997).

This so-called cyber-optimism is driven by the far-reaching diffusion of computer networks as a means of communication during the late 1990s. Few people knew about this medium before. It was primarily used by researchers around the globe to communicate and to share their research. This changed significantly during the past decade. The number of those with access to the Internet increased from 26 million in 1996 to 407 million in 2000 worldwide (NUA 2001). Among established democracies significant minorities of one quarter up to one third of the population were online by the end of the year 2000.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Political Communication
Theories, Cases, and Challenges
, pp. 231 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press
Becker, Ted. 1981. Teledemocracy: Bringing Power Back to the People. The Futurist 15 (12): 6–9Google Scholar
Bellamy, Christine. 2000. Modelling Electronic Democracy: Towards Democratic Discourses in the Information Age. In Jens Hoff, Ivan Horrocks, and Pieter Tops, eds. Democratic Governance and New Technology: Technologically Mediated Innovations in Political Practice in Western Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 33–53
Bimber, Bruce. 1998. The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism. Polity 31 (1): 133–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Graeme. 1996. Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Influence American Politics. Wilton: Pemberton Press
Buchstein, Hubertus. 2001. Modernisierung der Demokratie durch E-Voting. Leviathan 29 (2): 147–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press
Coleman, Stephen. 1999. Cutting Out the Middle Man: From Virtual Representation to Direct Deliberation. In Barry N. Hague and Brian D. Loader, eds. Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. London: Routledge, pp. 195–210
Coleman, Stephen, John Taylor, and Wim van de Donk, eds. 1999. Parliaments in the Age of the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press in association with The Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press
Dahl, Robert A., and Edward R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: University Press
Etzioni, Amitai, Kenneth, Laudon, and Sara, Lipson. 1975. Participatory Technology: The MINERVA Communications Tree. Journal of Communication 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, James F. 1998. Das ganze Land in einem Raum. In Claus Leggewie, and Christa Maar, eds. Internet & Politik: Von der Zuschauer-zur Beteiligungsdemokratie. Köln, Germany: Bollmann
Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press
Fühles-Ubach, Simone, and Hans-Peter, Neumann. 1998. Zwei Jahre Deutscher Bundestag im Internet: Konzeptionen, Organisation, Erfahrungen, Resonanz und Perspektiven. Nachrichten für Dokumentation 4: 205–10Google Scholar
Grossman, Lawrence K. 1995. The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. New York: Viking
Hagen, Martin. 1997. Elektronische Demokratie: Computernetzwerke und Politische Theorie in den USA. Hamburg, Germany: Lit
Hagen, Martin. 2000. Digital Democracy and Political Systems. In Kenneth L. Hacker and Jan van Dijk, eds. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. London: Sage
Hague, Barry N, and Brian D. Loader. 1999. Digital Democracy: An Introduction. In Barry N. Hague and Brian D. Loader, eds. Digital Democracy. Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. London: Routledge
Höflich, Joachim P. 1994. Der Computer als interaktives Massenmedium. Publizistik 39 (4): 389–405Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1981. American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge: Belknap Press
Jordan, Tim. 1999. Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge
Kamps, Klaus, ed. 1999. Elektronische Demokratie? Perspektiven Politischer Partizipation. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag
Kleinsteuber, Hans. 1995. “Technologies of Freedom”: Warum Werden in den USA Medien so Ganz Anders Interpretiert?Amerikastudien 40: 183–202Google Scholar
Kleinsteuber, Hans J, and Martin, Hagen. 1998. Was bedeutet “elektronische Demokratie”? Zur Diskussion und Praxis in den USA und Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (1): 128–43Google Scholar
Krauch, Helmut. 1972. Computer-Demokratie. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI-Verlag
Laudon, Kenneth C. 1977. Communications Technology and Democratic Participation. New York: Praeger
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W. W. Norton
Loader, Brian D. 1997. The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring. In Brian D. Loader, ed. The Governance of Cyberspace. New York: Routledge
Lyon, David. 1997. Cyberspace Sociality: Controversies over Computer Mediated Relationships. In Brian D. Loader, ed. The Governance of Cyberspace. New York: Routledge
Mambrey, Peter, Hans-Peter Neumann, and Kerstin Sieverdingbeck. 1999. Bridging the Gap between Parliament and Citizen – the Internet Services of the German Bundestag. In Stephen Coleman, John Taylor, and Wim van de Donk, eds. Parliament in the Age of the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press in association with The Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government
Margolis, Michael, and David Resnick. 2001. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace “Revolution.” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Marschall, Stefan. 2001. Parteien und Internet – Auf dem Weg zu Internet-basierten Mitgliederparteien. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (10): 38–46Google Scholar
McLean, Iain. 1989. Democracy and New Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press
Morris, Merrill, and Christine, Ogan. 1996. The Internet as Mass Medium. Journal of Communication 46: 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E, and Donald, E. Stokes. 1963. Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 57: 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutter, Christa. 2002. Das Rubbelfeld auf dem Stimmzettel. Die Weltwoche January 3: 15Google Scholar
Negroponte, Nicholas. 1995. Total Digital: Die Welt Zwischen 0 und 1 oder die Zukunft der Kommunikation. Munich: Bertelsmann
Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
NUA. 2001. How Many Online? (online) (cited January 2002). Available from World Wide Web: at http://www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster
Rash, Wayne Jr. 1997. Politics on the Nets: Wiring the Political Process. New York: Freeman
Ravetz, Joe. 1998. The Internet, Virtual Reality and Real Reality. Brian D. Loader, ed. Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency, and Policy in the Information Society. London: Routledge
Rheingold, Howard. 1993. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review 4: 1033–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sclove, Richard E. 1995. Democracy and Technology. New York: Guilford Press
Slaton, Christa D. 1992. Televote: Expanding Citizen Participation in the Quantum Age. New York: Praeger
Startt, James D, and David Sloan. 1994xs. The Historical Search for Significance. In James D. Startt and David Sloan, eds. The Significance of the Media in American History. Northport, AL: Vision Press
Street, John. 1992. Politics and Technology. London: Macmillan
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1976. Über die Demokratie in Amerika. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag
Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The Third Wave. New York: Morrow
Wilhelm, Anthony G. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×