Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:05:33.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Why is female kin bonding so rare? Comparative sociality of neotropical primates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

P. C. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Some female primates remain in their natal groups for life. Female kin in these cohesive, matrilineal groups form affiliative bonds that are expressed through proximity, grooming, and agonistic support against members of other matrilines and unrelated males. Kin-bonded females generally play key roles in determining group movements, defending resources during intergroup encounters, and repelling or assisting extra-group males in their attempts to immigrate or oust resident males from positions in the group (Wrangham, 1980). Male-biased dispersal often, but not always, covaries with the occurrence of female kin bonding, contributing to the avoidance of inbreeding and corresponding to the lower levels of nepotism among males in multi-male groups (Moore, 1984; Pusey and Packer, 1987).

The prevalence of female kin bonding and male-biased dispersal among many of the best studied Old World monkeys has fuelled an enduring myth in which primates with different dispersal and social systems were treated as deviant exceptions to this otherwise ‘typical’ primate pattern (Moore, 1984; Strier, 1994a). Long-term studies on a greater diversity of primate taxa have since shifted this perspective, however, and now the distribution of female kin bonding and male-biased dispersal across primates is more appropriately recognised as a reflection of phylogenetic or ecological affinities instead of a universal standard against which all interspecific and intraspecific variability is compared (Moore, 1992). Thus, female kin bonding with male-biased dispersal among Strepsirhines can be seen as consistent with a primitive mammalian condition, whereas the absence of female kin bonding among extant hominoids can be considered a derived condition, reflecting both their monophyletic antiquity (Lee, 1994) and the relaxation of predation pressures on these large-bodied primates.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×