Aalberg, Toril and Curran, James (eds), How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach, New York: Routledge, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ali, Zarqa S, ‘Media Myths and Realities in Natural Disasters’ (2013) 2 European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 125Google Scholar

Ammori, Marvin, ‘The “New” New York Times: Free Speech Lawyering in the Age of Google and Twitter’ (2014) 127 Harvard Law Review 2259Google Scholar

Anderson, David, ‘Is Libel Law Worth Reforming’ (1991) 140 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, David, ‘The Failure of American Privacy Law’ in Markesinis, Basil S (ed), Protecting Privacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Anderson, David, ‘An American Perspective’ in Deakin, Simon, Johnston, Angus and Markesinis, Basil (eds), Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law, 5th ed, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003Google Scholar

Anderson, David, ‘Defamation and Privacy: An American Perspective’ in Deakin, Simon, Johnston, Angus and Markesinis, Basil, Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law, 6th ed, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008Google Scholar

Anderson, David, ‘Weschler’s Triumph’ (2014) 66 Alabama Law Review 229Google Scholar

Ardia, David S, ‘Reputation in a Networked World: Revisiting the Social Foundations of Defamation Law’ (2010) 45 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 261Google Scholar

Assange, Julian, Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Autobiography, Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2011Google Scholar

Assange, Julian with Applebaum, Jacob, Müller-Maguhn, Andy and Zimmermann, Jérémie, Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet, New York: OR Books, 2012Google Scholar

Baker, C Edwin, ‘Scope of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech’ (1978) 25 UCLA Law Review 964Google Scholar

Baker, Roy, ‘Extending Common Law Qualified Privilege to the Media: A Comparison of the English and Australian Approaches’ (2002) 7 Media & Arts Law Review 87Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack M, ‘The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age’ (2009) 36 Pepperdine Law Review 427Google Scholar

Bambauer, Derek E, ‘Shopping Badly: Cognitive Biases, Communications, and the Fallacy of the Marketplace of Ideas’ (2006) 77 University of Colorado Law Review 649Google Scholar

Barbas, Samantha, ‘The Death of the Public Disclosure Tort: A Historical Perspective’ (2010) 22 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 171Google Scholar

Barbas, Samantha, ‘The Sidis Case and the Origins of Modern Privacy Law’ (2012) 36 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 21Google Scholar

Barber, Nicholas W, ‘A Right to Privacy’ (2003) Public Law 602Google Scholar

Barendt, Eric, Freedom of Speech, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1996 and 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Barendt, Eric, ‘What Is the Point of Libel Law?’ (1999) 52 Current Legal Problems 110Google Scholar

Barendt, Eric, ‘Reynolds Privilege and Reports of Police Investigations’ (2012) 4 Journal of Media Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barendt, Eric, ‘English Privacy Law in the Light of the Leveson Report’ in Witzleb, Normann, Lindsay, David, Paterson, Moira and Rodrick, Sharon (eds), Emerging Challenges in Privacy Law: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Barker, Kit, ‘Private and Public: The Mixed Concept of Vindication in Torts and Private Law’ in Pitel, Stephen GA, Neyers, Jason W and Chamberlain, Erika (eds), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013Google Scholar

Barrett, David A, ‘Declaratory Judgments for Libel: A Better Alternative’ (1986) 74 California Law Review 847CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Benedict and Nicol, Dianne, ‘The Grant of Interlocutory Injunctions in Defamation Cases in Australia following the Decision in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v. O’Neill’ (2006) 25 University of Tasmania Law Review 156Google Scholar

Beckett, Charlie with Ball, James, WikiLeaks: News in the Networked Era, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012Google Scholar

Bellah, Robert N, ‘The Meaning of Reputation in American Society’ (1986) 74 California Law Review 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benn, Stanley I, ‘Privacy, Freedom and Respect for Persons’ in Roland Pennock, J and Chapman, John W (eds), Privacy, NOMOS vol XIII, New York: Atherton Press, 1971Google Scholar

Bernal, Paul, ‘A Defence of Responsible Tweeting’ (2014) 19 Communications Law 12Google Scholar

Bezanson, Randall P, ‘Libel Law and the Realities of Litigation: Setting the Record Straight’ (1985) 71 Iowa Law Review 215Google Scholar

Bezanson, Randall P, ‘The Libel Suit in Retrospect: What Plaintiffs Want and What Plaintiffs Get’ (1986) 74 California Law Review, 789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bezanson, Randall P, Cranberg, Gilbert and Soloski, John, Libel Law and the Press: Myth and Reality, New York: Free Press, 1987Google Scholar

Bilboe, Wendy, ‘The Thredbo Landslide: Was It Only Media Ethics That Came Tumbling Down?’ (1998) 20 Australian Journalism Review 88Google Scholar

Bing, Jon, ‘Data Protection, Jurisdiction and the Choice of Law’ (1999) 6 Privacy Law & Policy Reporter 92Google Scholar

Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–69), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, facsimile edition, 2002Google Scholar

Bloustein, Edward J, ‘Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser’ (1964) 39 NYU Law Review 962Google Scholar

Boivin, Denis, ‘Accommodating Freedom of Expression and Reputation in the Common Law of Defamation’ (1997) 22 Queen’s Law Journal 229Google Scholar

Bollinger, Lee C, Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open: A Free Press for a New Century, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H, ‘Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems’ (1971) 47 Indiana Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Brennan, William J, ‘The Supreme Court and the Meiklejohn Interpretation of the First Amendment’ (1965) 79 Harvard Law Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Jennifer E, ‘News Photographs and the Pornography of Grief’ (1987) 2 Journal of Mass Media Ethics 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Sheila, ‘What’s the Problem, Girls? CCTV and the Gendering of Public Safety’ in Norris, Clive, Moran, Jade and Armstrong, Gary (eds), Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998Google Scholar

Brüggemeier, Gert, Ciacchi, Aurelia and O’Callaghan, Patrick (eds), Personality Rights in European Tort Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnett, Nicholas F, ‘New York Times v. Sullivan’ in Parker, Richard (ed), Free Speech on Trial: Communication Perspectives on Landmark Supreme Court Decisions, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2003Google Scholar

Burrows, John F, ‘Invasion of Privacy’ in Todd, Stephen (ed), The Law of Torts in New Zealand, 6th ed, Wellington: Thomson Reuters, 2013Google Scholar

Burrows, John F, News Media Law in New Zealand, Wellington: Sweet & Maxwell, 1974Google Scholar

Burrows, John F, News Media Law in New Zealand, 3rd ed, Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1990Google Scholar

Burrows, John and Cheer, Ursula, Media Law in New Zealand, 4th ed, Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Burrows, John and Cheer, Ursula, Media Law in New Zealand, 5th ed, Auckland: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Burrows, John and Cheer, Ursula, Media Law in New Zealand, 6th ed, Wellington: LexisNexis, 2010Google Scholar

Busuttil, Godwin and McCafferty, Patrick, ‘Interim Injunctions and the Overlap between Privacy and Libel’ (2010) 2 Journal of Media Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Petra, ‘The Case for a Right of Privacy in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’ (2013) 11 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 213Google Scholar

Bygrave, Lee A, Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, Peter, The Anatomy of Tort Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997Google Scholar

Carroll, Robyn and Witzleb, Normann, ‘“It’s Not Just about the Money” – Enhancing the Vindicatory Effect of Private Law Remedies’ (2011) 37 Monash University Law Review 216Google Scholar

Castle, Philip, ‘Journalism and Trauma: Proposals for Change’ (1999) 7 Asia Pacific Media Educator 143Google Scholar

Chadwick, Paul and Mullaly, Jennifer, Privacy and the Media, Sydney: Communications Law Centre, 1997Google Scholar

Cheer, Ursula, Reality and Myth: The New Zealand Media and the Chilling Effect of Defamation Law (PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) http://hdl.handle.net/10092/3050Google Scholar

Cheer, Ursula and Rosanowski, Sarah, ‘The Impact of Law on Media Reporting of Earthquakes in Christchurch 2010–2011’ (2013) 18 Media & Arts Law Review 220Google Scholar

Cheung, Anne SY, ‘Liability of Internet Host Providers in Defamation Actions: From Gatekeepers to Identifiers’, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2014/013, 2014, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2428566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citron, Danielle Keats and Franks, Mary Anne, ‘Criminalizing Revenge Porn’ (2014) 49 Wake Forest Law Review 345Google Scholar

Clarke, Richard A, Morell, Michael J, Stone, Geoffrey R, Sunstein, Cass R and Swire, Peter, Liberty and Security in a Changing World: Report and Recommendations of The President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies (Washington: Office of the Director of National Intelligence, 2013)Google Scholar

Clayton, Richard and Tomlinson, Hugh, Privacy and Freedom of Expression, 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Clayton, Richard and Tomlinson, Hugh, The Law of Human Rights, 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew, The Law of Defamation and the Internet, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001; 2nd ed, 2005; 3rd ed, 2010Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew, ‘Five Years On: A Report Card on Australia’s National Scheme Defamation Laws’ (2011) 16 Media & Arts Law Review 317Google Scholar

Collins, Matthew, Collins on Defamation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Colonna, Liane, ‘Article 4 of the EU Data Protection Directive and the Irrelevance of the EU-US Safe Harbour Program?’ (2014) 4 International Data Privacy Law 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooley, Charles Horton, Human Nature and the Social Order, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1922Google Scholar

Cooley, Charles Horton, The Two Major Works of Charles H Cooley: Social Organisation, Human Nature and the Social Order, Glencoe: Free Press, 1956Google Scholar

Council of Europe, Collected Edition of the Travaux préparatoires of the European Convention on Human Rights, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975Google Scholar

Cowen, Zelman, The Private Man: The Boyer Lectures 1969, Sydney: Australian Broadcasting Commission, 1969Google Scholar

Cowling, M (ed), Selected Writings of John Stuart Mill, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968Google Scholar

Cram, Ian, ‘Political Expression, Qualified Privilege and Investigative Journalism – An Analysis of Developments in English Defamation Law Post Reynolds v. Times Newspapers’ (2005) 11 Canterbury Law Review 143Google Scholar

Crocker, Jennifer and Knight, Katherine M, ‘Contingencies of Self-Worth’ (2005) 14 Current Directions in Psychological Science 200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crocker, Jennifer and Park, Lora E, ‘The Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem’ (2004) 130 Psychological Bulletin 392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dahlgren, Peter, Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009Google Scholar

Danay, Robert, ‘The Medium Is Not the Message: Reconciling Reputation and Free Expression in Cases of Internet Defamation’ (2010) 56 McGill Law Journal 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Zwart, Melissa, ‘Whistleblowers and the Media: Friends or “Frenemies”?’ (2013) 38 Alternative Law Journal 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dearden, Richard and Wagner, Wendy, ‘Canadian Libel Law Enters the 21st Century: The Public Interest Responsible Communication Defence’ (2009–2010) 41 Ottawa Law Review 351Google Scholar

DeCew, Judith Wagner, ‘The Scope of Privacy in Law and Ethics’ (1986) 5 Law and Philosophy 145Google Scholar

Denning, Alfred, What Next in the Law?, London: Butterworths, 1982Google Scholar

Dent, Chris, ‘Compensation and/or Correcting the Record: A Framework for the Regulation of (Defamatory) Speech’ (2011) 16 Media & Arts Law Review 123Google Scholar

Dent, Chris and Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘Defamation Law’s Chilling Effect: A Comparative Content Analysis of Australian and US Newspapers’ (2004) 9 Media & Arts Law Review 89Google Scholar

Deppa, Joan with Russell, Maria, Hayes, Dona and Flocke, Elizabeth Lynne, The Media and Disasters: Pan Am 103, New York: New York University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Descheemaeker, Eric, ‘Protecting Reputation: Defamation and Negligence’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 603CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descheemaeker, Eric, ‘Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law’, (2010) 18 Tort Law Review 133Google Scholar

Descheemaeker, Eric, ‘“Veritas non est defamatio”? Truth as a Defence in the Law of Defamation’, (2011) 31 Legal Studies 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descheemaeker, Eric, ‘“A Man Must Take Care not to Defame his Neighbour”: The Origins and Significance of the Reynolds Defence’, Research Paper No 2013/07, University of Edinburgh School of Law, February 13, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doley, Cameron and Mullis, Alastair (eds), Carter-Ruck on Libel and Privacy, 6th ed, London: LexisNexis, 2010Google Scholar

Domscheit-Berg, Daniel, Inside WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World’s Most Dangerous Website, Melbourne: Scribe Publications, 2011Google Scholar

Dudziak, Mary, ‘Brown as a Cold War Case’ (2004) 91 Journal of American History 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duelfer, Charles, Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD, Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 2004Google Scholar

Durant, Alan, Meaning in the Media: Discourse, Controversy and Debate, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978Google Scholar

Elliott, Deni, ‘Family Ties: A Case Study of Coverage of Families and Friends during the Hijacking of TWA Flight 847’ (1988) 5 Political Communication and Persuasion 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellwood, John P, ‘Outing, Privacy and the First Amendment’ (1992) 102 Yale Law Journal 747CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emerson, Thomas I, ‘Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment’ (1963) 72 Yale Law Journal 877CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emler, Nicholas, ‘A Social Psychology of Reputation’ (1990) 1 European Review of Social Psychology 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Englund, Liselotte, Forsberg, Rebecca and Saveman, Britt-Inger, ‘Survivors’ Experience of Media Coverage after Traumatic Injury Events’ (2013) 22 International Emergency Nursing 25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Erdos, David, ‘Elite Supply “Blockages” and the Failure of National Bill of Rights Initiatives in Australia: A Comparative Westminster Analysis’ (2008) 46 Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farber, Daniel, ‘Afterword: Property and Free Speech’ (1999) 93 Northwestern University Law Review 1239Google Scholar

Fathaigh, Ronan Ó, ‘The Recognition of a Right of Reply under the European Convention’ (2012) 4 Journal of Media Law 322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, David, ‘Secrecy, Dignity or Autonomy? Views of Privacy as a Civil Liberty’ (1994) 47 Current Legal Problems 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, David, ‘Human Dignity as a Legal Value: Part 1’ [1999] Public Law 68Google Scholar

Feldman, David, ‘Human Dignity as a Legal Value: Part 2’ [2000] Public Law 61Google Scholar

Fenwick, Helen and Phillipson, Gavin, Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Fink, Udo, ‘Protection of Privacy in the EU, Individual Rights and Legal Instruments’ in Witzleb, Normann, Lindsay, David, Paterson, Moira and Rodrick, Sharon (eds), Emerging Challenges in Privacy Law: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Fleming, John G, ‘Retraction and Reply: Alternative Remedies for Defamation’ (1978) 12 University of British Columbia Law Review 15Google Scholar

Fowler, Andrew, The Most Dangerous Man in the World: The Inside Story on Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2012Google Scholar

Franklin, Marc A, ‘A Declaratory Judgment Alternative to Current Libel Law’ (1986) 74 California Law Review 809CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, Paul, ‘Privacy: One Concept or Many?’ in Pennock, J Roland and Chapman, John W (eds), Privacy, NOMOS vol XIII, New York: Atherton Press, 1971Google Scholar

Fried, Charles, ‘Privacy’ (1968) 77 Yale Law Journal 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gajda, Amy, The First Amendment Bubble: How Privacy and Paparazzi Threaten a Free Press, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnett, Richard and Richardson, Megan, ‘Libel Tourism or Just Redress: Reconciling the (English) Right to Reputation with the (American) Right to Free Speech in Cross-Border Libel Cases’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gavison, Ruth E, ‘Privacy and the Limits of the Law’ (1980) 89 Yale Law Journal 421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gavison, Ruth E, ‘Too Early for a Requiem: Warren and Brandeis were Right on Privacy vs Free Speech’ (1992) 43 South Carolina Law Review 437Google Scholar

Geiringer, Claudia, ‘The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of R v. Hansen’ (2008) 6 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 59Google Scholar

Genn, Hazel, ‘Civil Justice Reform and the Role of ADR’ (Paper delivered as New Zealand Law Foundation Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Christchurch, 17 September 2009)Google Scholar

George, Patrick, Defamation Law in Australia, 2nd ed, Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis, 2011Google Scholar

Gerety, Tom, ‘Redefining Privacy’ (1977) 12 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 233Google Scholar

Gewirtz, Paul, ‘Privacy and Speech’ [2001] Supreme Court Review 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giroux, Henry A, ‘Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State’ (2015) 29 Cultural Studies 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaeser, Edward and Sunstein, Cass R, ‘Does More Speech Correct Falsehoods?’ (2014) 43 Journal of Legal Studies 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, Erving, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1967Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin I and Cox, James C, ‘Speech, Truth, and the Free Market for Ideas’ (1996) 2 Legal Theory 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golvan, Colin and McDonald, Michael, Writers and the Law, Sydney: Law Book Co, 1986Google Scholar

Gould, Douglas R, ‘Is Editing What Judges Are For? Judicial Review of Journalists’ Editorial Decisions in Defamation Cases in the United Kingdom and European Court of Human Rights’ (2008) 46 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 732Google Scholar

Gould, Kim, ‘Statutory Qualified Privilege Succeeds, but Too Early for the Media to Go “Dancing in the Streets”’ (2011) 16 Media & Arts Law Review 241Google Scholar

Greenwald, Glenn, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA and the Surveillance State, London: Penguin Books, 2014Google Scholar

Greenwalt, Kent, ‘Free Speech Justifications’ (1989) 89 Columbia Law Review 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grote, Rainer, ‘The ECHRs rulings in Von Hannover v. Germany (No.2) and Axel Springer AG v. Germany: Rebalancing Freedom of the Press with the Respect for Privacy’ (2012) 55 German Yearbook of International Law 639Google Scholar

Gunther, Gerald, ‘Learned Hand and the Origins of Modern First Amendment Doctrine: Some Fragments of History’ (1975) 27 Stanford Law Review 719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Kermit L and Urofsky, Melvin I, New York Times v. Sullivan: Civil Rights, Libel Law, and the Free Press, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2011Google Scholar

Hallin, Daniel C and Mancini, Paolo, Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Handford, Peter, ‘Intentional Negligence: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2010) 32 Sydney Law Review 29Google Scholar

Haravuori, Henna, Suomalainen, Laura, Berg, Noora, Kiviruusu, Olli and Marttunen, Mauri, ‘Effects of Media Exposure on Adolescents Traumatized in a School Shooting’ (2011) 24 Journal of Traumatic Stress 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, David J, O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Edward P and Buckley, Carla M, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Hartshorne, John, ‘An Appropriate Remedy for the Publication of False Private Information’ (2012) 4 Journal of Media Law 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Nikki A, McIntosh, Daniel N, Silver, Roxane Cohen and Holman, Alison E, ‘Early Responses to School Violence: A Qualitative Analysis of Students’ and Parents’ Immediate Reactions to the Shootings at Columbine High School’ (2007) 4 Journal of Emotional Abuse 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healy, Thomas, The Great Dissent: How Oliver Wendell Holmes Changed His Mind – and Changed the History of Free Speech in America, New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2013Google Scholar

Heemsbergen, Luke, ‘Whistleblowing and Digital Technologies: An Interview with Suelette Dreyfus’ (2013) 5 Platform: Journal of Media and Communication 67Google Scholar

Heymann, Laura A, ‘The Law of Reputation and the Interest of the Audience’ (2011) 52 Boston College Law Review 1341Google Scholar

Hörnle, Julia, ‘Google’s Algorithms, Search Results and Relevancy under Data Protection Law – Whose Data Quality?’ (2014) 25 Entertainment Law Journal 209Google Scholar

Horwitz, Paul, ‘Free Speech as Risk Analysis: Heuristics, Biases, and Institutions in the First Amendment’ (2003) 76 Temple Law Review 1Google Scholar

Horwitz, Paul, ‘The First Amendment’s Epistemological Problem’ (2012) 87 Washington Law Review 445Google Scholar

Howarth, David, ‘Libel: Its Purpose and Reform’ (2011) 74 Modern Law Review 845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Kirsty, ‘Photographs in Public Places and Privacy’ (2009) 2 Journal of Media Law 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Kirsty, ‘No Reasonable Expectation of Anonymity?’ (2010) 2 Journal of Media Law 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Kirsty, ‘A Behavioural Understanding of Privacy and Its Implications for Privacy Law’ (2012) 75 Modern Law Review 806CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Chris DL, ‘Conceptualizing Privacy and Elucidating Its Importance: Foundational Considerations for the Development of Canada’s Fledgling Privacy Tort’ (2011) 37 Queen’s Law Journal 167Google Scholar

International Commission of Jurists, ‘The Legal Protection of Privacy: A Comparative Survey of Ten Countries’ (1972) 24 International Social Science Journal 413Google Scholar

Ipp, David, ‘Themes in the Law of Torts’ (2007) 81 Australian Law Journal 609Google Scholar

Irving, Helen, ‘The Over-Rated Mr Clark: Putting Andrew Inglis Clark’s Contribution to the Constitution into Perspective’ in ‘The Truest Patriotism’: Andrew Inglis Clark and the Building of an Australian Nation (Papers on Parliament No. 61, May 2014)Google Scholar

James, Steven, ‘The Right to Privacy Catches Up with Search Engines: The Unforgettable Decision in Google Spain v. AEPD’ (2014) 20 Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 130Google Scholar

Jenkins, Roy, Churchill, London: Macmillan, 2001Google Scholar

Johnston, Angus, ‘Putting the Cart before the Horse? Privacy and the Wainwrights’ (2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joo, Thomas W, ‘The Worst Test of Truth: The “Marketplace of Ideas” as a Faulty Metaphor’ (2014) 89 Tulane Law Review 383Google Scholar

Jordan, Brid, ‘Reputation and Article 8: Karakó v. Hungary’ (2010) 21 Entertainment Law Review 109Google Scholar

Joseph, Philip A, Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand, 3rd ed, Wellington: Thomson Brookers, 2007Google Scholar

Jourard, Sidney M, ‘Some Psychological Aspects of Privacy’ (1966) 31 Law and Contemporary Problems 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan M, Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Braman, Donald, ‘Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus’ (2011) 14 Journal of Risk Research 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011Google Scholar

Kalven, Harry Jr, ‘The New York Times Case: A Note on “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”’ [1964] Supreme Court Review 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalven, Harry Jr, ‘Privacy in Tort Law – Were Warren and Brandeis Wrong?’(1966) 31 Law & Contemporary Problems 326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals; with On a Supposed Right to Lie because of Philanthropic Concerns, translated by Ellington, J, 3rd ed, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1993Google Scholar

Katz, Ellen D, ‘Hobby Lobby and the Pathology of Citizens United’ (2014) 9 Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy 23Google Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘Lange and Reynolds Qualified Privilege: Australian and English Defamation Law and Practice’ (2004) 28 Melbourne University Law Review 406Google Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T, Defamation: Comparative Law and Practice, Abingdon: UCL Press, 2006Google Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘What Conversation? Free Speech and Defamation Law’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 697CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘Investigating Chilling Effects: News Media and Public Speech in Malaysia, Singapore, and Australia’ (2010) 4 International Journal of Communication 440Google Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘Six Years of Australian Uniform Defamation Law: Damages, Opinion and Defence Meanings’ (2012) 35 University of NSW Law Review 31Google Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘Protecting Speech in Defamation Law: Beyond Reynolds-Style Defences’ (2014) 6 Journal of Media Law 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenyon, Andrew T and Walker, Sophie, ‘The Cost of Losing the Code: Historical Protection of Public Debate in Australian Defamation Law’ (2014) 38 Melbourne University Law Review 554Google Scholar

Kerr, Orin, ‘The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet’ (2015) 67 Stanford Law Review 285Google Scholar

Kinzie, David J, Boehnlein, James, Riley, Crystal and Sparr, Lisa, ‘A Cross-cultural Study of Reactivation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: American and Cambodian Psychophysiological Response to Viewing Traumatic Video Scenes’ (1998) 186 Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koljonen, Kari, Raittila, Pentti and Väliverronen, Jari, ‘Crisis Journalism at a Crossroads? Finnish Journalists’ Reflections on Their Profession after Two School Shooting Cases’ (2011) 5 Journalism Practice 719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koltay, András, Freedom of Speech: The Unreachable Mirage, Budapest: CompLex, 2013Google Scholar

Korff, Douwe, EC Study on Implementation of Data Protection Directive: Comparative Summary of National Laws (Cambridge, 2002) (Study Contract ETD/2001/B5-3001/A/49)Google Scholar

Koziol, Helmut and Warzilek, Alexander (eds), The Protection of Personality Rights against Invasions by Mass Media, New York: Springer Wein, 2005Google Scholar

Krauss, Stanton D, ‘An Inquiry into the Right of Criminal Juries to Determine the Law in America’ (1998) 89 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krotoszynski, Ronald J Jr, ‘Responding to a World without Privacy: On the Potential Merits of a Comparative Law Perspective’ in Sarat, Austin (ed), A World without Privacy: What Law Can and Should Do?, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015Google Scholar

Krueger, Joachim I, Vohs, Kathleen D and Baymeister, Roy F, ‘Is the Allure of Self-Esteem a Mirage After All?’ (2008) 63 American Psychologist 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuner, Christopher, Transborder Data Flows and Data Privacy Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwok, Kelvin Hiu Fai, ‘Liability of Online Service Providers for Defamatory Content: The Case of Online Discussion Forums’ (2014) 130 Law Quarterly Review 206Google Scholar

Laurie, Graeme, Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leary, Mark R, Tambor, Ellen S, Terdal, Sonja K and Downs, Deborah L, ‘Self-esteem as an Inter-personal Monitor: The Sociometer Hypothesis’ (1995) 68 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leigh, David and Harding, Luke, WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange’s War on Secrecy, London: Guardian Books, 2011Google Scholar

Leveson, , Right Honourable Lord Justice Brian, An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press, HC 780 (2012)Google Scholar

Levi, Lili, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Anthony, ‘New York Times v. Sullivan Reconsidered: Time to Return to “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”’ (1983) 83 Columbia Law Review 603CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Anthony, Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment, New York: Random House, 1991Google Scholar

Lewis, David, Brown, AJ and Moberly, Richard, ‘Whistleblowing, Its Importance and the State of the Research’ in Brown, AJ, Lewis, David, Moberly, Richard and Vandekerckhove, Wim (eds), International Handbook on Whistleblowing Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014Google Scholar

Libow, Judith A, ‘Traumatized Children and the News Media’ (1992) 62 American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, ‘Nobody’s Fool: The Rational Audience as First Amendment Ideal’ [2010] University of Illinois Law Review 799Google Scholar

Lindsay, David, ‘The “Right to Be Forgotten” in European Data Protection Law’ in Witzleb, Normann, Lindsay, David, Paterson, Moira and Rodrick, Sharon (eds), Emerging Challenges in Privacy Law: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014Google Scholar

Lobb, Ano, Mock, Nancy and Hutchinson, Paul L, ‘Traditional and Social Media Coverage and Charitable Giving following the 2010 Earthquake in Haiti’ (2012) 27 Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lombarte, Artemi Rallo, ‘The Origins and Importance of the Right to Be Forgotten’ (Keynote address presented at ‘The “Right to Be Forgotten” and Beyond: Data Protection and Freedom of Expression in the Age of Web 2.0’, Oxford Privacy Information Law and Society Conference University of Oxford, 12 June 2012) available via http://www.csls.ox.ac.uk/conferences/oxpilsconference2012Google Scholar

Loveland, Ian, Political Libels: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000Google Scholar

McAlister, R and Meehan, C, ‘An Exploration of Media Reporting of Victims of Murder and Manslaughter in Northern Ireland’, Research Report for Support after Murder Manslaughter Northern Ireland, University of Ulster, 2011Google Scholar

McCrudden, Christopher, ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’(2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 655CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Barbara, ‘Tort’s Role in Protecting Privacy: Current and Future Directions’ in Degeling, Simone, Edelman, James and Goudkamp, James (eds), Torts in Commercial Law, Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters, 2011Google Scholar

McFarlane, Alexander, ‘Victims of Trauma and the News Media’ (letter to editor) (1986) 145 Medical Journal of Australia 664CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGonagle, Marie, A Textbook on Media Law, 2nd ed, Dublin: Thomson Round Hall, 2003Google Scholar

McNamara, Lawrence, Reputation and Defamation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macfie, Rebecca, Tragedy at the Pike River Mine: How and Why 29 Men Died, Wellington: Awa Press, 2013Google Scholar

Matthiesson, Sophie and Barendt, Eric, ‘Carina Trimingham v. Associated Newspapers: A Right to Ridicule?’ (2012) 4 Journal of Media Law 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayton, William T, ‘Toward a Theory of First Amendment Process: Injunctions of Speech, Subsequent Punishment, and the Costs of the Prior Restraint Doctrine’ (1982) 67 Cornell Law Review 245Google Scholar

Mead, George H, Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, Alexander, Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government, New York: Harper, 1948Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, Alexander, Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People, New York: Oxford University Press, 1960Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, Alexander, ‘The First Amendment is an Absolute’ [1961] Supreme Court Review 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Middlebrooks, Donald M, ‘Reviving Thomas Jefferson’s Jury: Sparf and Hansen v. United States, Reconsidered’ (2004) 46 American Journal of Legal History 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milmo, Patrick and Rogers, WVH, Gatley on Libel and Slander, 11th ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008Google Scholar

Mitchell, Paul, ‘The Foundations of Australian Defamation Law’ (2006) 28 Sydney Law Review 477Google Scholar

Mitchell, Paul, ‘The Nature of Responsible Journalism’ (2011) 3 Journal of Media Law 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreham, NA, ‘Privacy in the Common Law: A Doctrinal and Theoretical Analysis’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 628Google Scholar

Moreham, NA, ‘Privacy in Public Places’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal 606CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreham, NA, ‘Beyond Information: Physical Privacy in English Law’ (2014) 73 Cambridge Law Journal 350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreham, NA and Mark, Warby (eds), Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media, 3rd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreham, Nicole, ‘Privacy Rights’ in Warby, Mark, Moreham, Nicole and Christie, Iain (eds), Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media, 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar

Morgan, Jonathan, ‘Privacy, Confidence and Horizontal Effect: “Hello” Trouble’ (2003) 62 Cambridge Law Journal 444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morison, WL, Report on the Law of Privacy, Sydney: Government Printer NSW, 1973Google Scholar

Mulheron, Rachel, ‘A Potential Framework for Privacy? A Reply to Hello!’ (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 679CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, Denis, ‘Ethics and Trauma: Lessons from Media Coverage of Black Saturday’ (2010) 18 Australian Journal of Rural Health 5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muller, Denis, and Gawenda, Michael, Black Saturday: In the Media Spotlight, Melbourne: Cussonia Press, 2011Google Scholar

Mullis, Alastair and Doley, Cameron (eds), Carter-Ruck on Libel and Privacy, London: LexisNexis, 2010Google Scholar

Mullis, Alastair and Parkes, Richard (eds), Gatley on Libel and Slander, 12th ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013Google Scholar

Mullis, Alastair and Scott, Andrew, ‘Reframing Libel: Taking (All) Rights Seriously and Where It Leads’ (2012) 63 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 3Google Scholar

Mullis, Alastair and Scott, Andrew, ‘The Swing of the Pendulum: Reputation, Expression and the Re-Centring of English Libel Law’ (2012) 63 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullis, Alastair and Scott, Andrew, ‘Tilting at Windmills: The Defamation Act 2013’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murchison, Brian C, Soloski, John, Bezanson, Randall P, Cranberg, Gilbert and Wissler, Roselle L, ‘Sullivan’s Paradox: The Emergence of Judicial Standards of Journalism’ (1994) 73 North Carolina Law Review 7Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, New York: Harper & Row, 1962Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, ‘Concealment and Exposure’ (1998) 27 Philosophy & Public Affairs 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Research Council of the National Academy of Science, Protecting Individual Privacy in the Struggle against Terrorists: A Framework for Program Assessment, Washington: National Academic Press, 2008Google Scholar

Norton, Jane, ‘Hosking v. Runting and the Role of Freedom of Expression’ (2004) 10 Auckland University Law Review 245Google Scholar

Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason, Richey, Sean and Freed, Gary L, ‘Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial’ (2014) 133 Pediatrics e835 DOI:10.1542/peds2013–2365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Laughlin, Matt J, ‘Exigent Circumstances: Circumscribing the Exclusionary Rule in Response to 9/11’ (2002) 70 UMKC Law Review 707Google Scholar

Palacios, Agustín, Cueli, José, Camacho, José, Clériga, Ramón, Cuevas, Pablo, Ayala, Jaime and Cossoff, Linda, ‘The Traumatic Effect of Mass Communication in the Mexico City Earthquake: Crisis Intervention and Preventive Measures’ (1986) 13 International Review of Psycho-Analysis 279Google Scholar

Palmer, Geoffrey, ‘The Law of Defamation in New Zealand – Its Recent Evolution and Problems’, in Burrows, JF, Finn, Jeremy and Todd, Stephen (eds), Law, Liberty, Legislation: In Honour of John Burrows QC, Wellington: LexisNexis, 2008Google Scholar

Palmer, Geoffrey, Reform: A Memoir, Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2013Google Scholar

Pantti, Mervi, Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin and Cottle, Simon, Disasters and the Media, New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2012Google Scholar

Papandrea, Mary-Rose, ‘Citizen Journalism and the Reporter’s Privilege’ (2007) 91 Minnesota Law Review 515Google Scholar

Parker, Richard B, ‘A Definition of Privacy’ (1974) 27 Rutgers Law Review 275Google Scholar

Parkes, Richard, ‘Privacy, Defamation and False Facts’, in Warby, Mark, Moreham, Nicole and Christie, Iain (eds), Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media, 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Parkes, Richard and Mullis, Alastair (eds), Gatley on Libel and Slander, 12th ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013Google Scholar

Partlett, David F, ‘Tort Liability and the American Way: Reflections on Liability for Emotional Distress’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partlett, David F, ‘The Libel Tourist and the Ugly American: Free Speech in an Era of Modern Global Communications’ (2009) 47 University of Louisville Law Review 629Google Scholar

Partlett, David F, ‘Fifty Years Decline in Privacy: The Forgotten Right to be Forgotten and Forgiven’, Uppsala University Sweden, September 2014Google Scholar

Partlett, David and McDonald, Barbara, ‘International Publications and Protection of Reputation: A Margin of Appreciation but Not Subservience’ (2011) 62 Alabama Law Review 477Google Scholar

Payne, Christopher F, ‘Handling the Press’ (1994) 3 Disaster Prevention and Management 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Mark, The Journalist’s Guide to Media Law, St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 1997Google Scholar

Perez-Lugo, Marla, ‘Media Uses in Disaster Situations: A New Focus on the Impact Phase’ (2004) 74 Sociological Inquiry 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfefferbaum, Betty, Gurwitch, Robin H, McDonald, Nicholas B, Leftwich, Michael J, Sconzo, Guy M, Messenbaugh, Anne K and Schultz, Rosemary A, ‘Posttraumatic Stress among Young Children after the Death of a Friend or Acquaintance in a Terrorist Bombing’ (2000) 51 Psychiatric Services 386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Phillipson, Gavin, ‘Transforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right of Privacy under the Human Rights Act’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillipson, Gavin, ‘Max Mosley Goes to Strasbourg: Article 8, Claimant Notification and Interim Injunctions’ (2009) 1 Journal of Media Law 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillipson, Gavin, ‘The “Global Pariah”, the Defamation Bill and the Human Rights Act’ (2012) 63 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillipson, Gavin, ‘Leveson, The Public Interest and Press Freedom’ (2013) 5 Journal of Media Law 220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillipson, Gavin and Fenwick, Helen, ‘Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Remedy in the Human Rights Act Era’ (2000) 63 Modern Law Review 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickard, Victor, America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015Google Scholar

Post, Robert C, ‘The Social Foundations of Defamation Law: Reputation and the Constitution’ (1986) 74 California Law Review 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, Di, ‘Media Intrusion into Grief’ (1990) 57 Media Information Australia 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, James and McMahon, Felicity (eds), Blackstone’s Guide to The Defamation Act 2013, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013Google Scholar

Prosser, William L, ‘Privacy’ (1960) 48 California Law Review 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabban, David M, Free Speech in Its Forgotten Years, 1870–1920, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997Google Scholar

Rachels, James, ‘Why Privacy Is Important’ (1975) 4 Philosophy & Public Affairs 323Google Scholar

Redish, Martin H, Freedom of Expression: A Critical Analysis, Charlottesville: Michie Co, 1984Google Scholar

Reiman, Jeffrey H, ‘Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood’ (1976) 6 Philosophy & Public Affairs 26Google Scholar

Richards, Neil M, ‘The Puzzle of Brandeis, Privacy and Speech’ (2010) 63 Vanderbilt Law Review 1295Google Scholar

Richards, Neil M, ‘The Dangers of Surveillance’ (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review 1934Google Scholar

Richards, Neil M, Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015Google Scholar

Richards, Neil M and Solove, Daniel J, ‘Privacy’s Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality’ (2006) 96 Georgetown Law Journal 123Google Scholar

Richards, Neil M and Solove, Daniel J, ‘Prosser’s Privacy Law: A Mixed Legacy’ (2010) 98 California Law Review 1887Google Scholar

Richardson, Megan and Kenyon, Andrew T, ‘Fashioning Personality Rights in Australia’ in Kenyon, Andrew T, Loon, Ng-Loy Wee and Richardson, Megan (eds), The Law of Reputation and Brands in the Asia Pacific, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012Google Scholar

Richardson, Megan and Rivette, Michael, ‘Australia’ in Moreham, NA and Warby, Mark (eds), Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media, 3rd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016Google Scholar

Richardson, Megan, Bryan, Michael, Vranken, Martin and Barnett, Katy, Breach of Confidence: Social Origins and Modern Developments, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rishworth, Paul, ‘Human Rights’ (2005) New Zealand Law Review 87Google Scholar

Roberts, Andrew J, ‘A Republican Account of the Value of Privacy’ (University of Melbourne, Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 673, 2013) http://ssrn.com/abstract=2369680CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, Arthur Henry (ed), Privacy and Human Rights: Reports and Communications Presented at the Third International Colloquy about the European Convention on Human Rights, Manchester University Press: Manchester, 1973Google Scholar

Robertson, Geoffrey and Nicol, Andrew, Media Law, 5th ed, Penguin Books: London, 2007Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘Preparing for a Full-Scale Invasion? Truth, Privacy and Defamation’ (2007) 25 Communications Law Bulletin 5Google Scholar

Rolph, David, Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘A Critique of the National, Uniform Defamation Laws’ (2008) 16 Torts Law Journal 207Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘Showing Restraint: Interlocutory Injunctions in Defamation Cases’ (2009) 14 Media & Arts Law Review 255Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘Publication, Innocent Dissemination and the Internet after Dow Jones & Co v. Gutnick’ (2010) 33 University of NSW Law Journal 562Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘Irreconcilable Differences?’ Interlocutory Injunctions for Defamation and Privacy’ (2012) 17 Media & Arts Law Review 170Google Scholar

Rolph, David, ‘Splendid Isolation? Australia as a Destination for Libel Tourism’ (2012) 18 Australian International Law Journal 79Google Scholar

Rowbottom, Jacob, ‘In the Shadow of the Big Media: Freedom of Expression, Participation and the Production of Knowledge Online’ [2014] Public Law 491Google Scholar

Sawer, Geoffrey, A Guide to Australian Law for Journalists, Authors, Printers and Publishers, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1949; 2nd ed, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1968; 3rd ed, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1984Google Scholar

Scanlon, Joseph T, Luukko, Rudy and Morton, Gerald, ‘Media Coverage of Crises: Better than Reported, Worse than Necessary’ (1978) 55 Journalism Quarterly 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scanlon, Joseph and McCullum, Conrad, ‘Media Coverage of Mass Death: Not Always Unwelcome’ (1999) 14 Australian Journal of Emergency Management 55Google Scholar

Scanlon, Thomas, ‘A Theory of Freedom of Expression’ (1972) 1 Philosophy & Public Affairs 204Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Reflections on the Value of Truth’ (1991) 41 Case Western Reserve Law Review 699Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Uncoupling Free Speech’ (1992) 92 Columbia Law Review 1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Can Public Figures Have Private Lives?’ in Paul, Ellen Frankel, Miller, Fred D Jr and Paul, Jeffrey (eds), The Right to Privacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘On the Relationship between Press Law and Press Content’ in Cook, Timothy E (ed), Freeing the Presses: The First Amendment in Action, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2005Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Harm(s) and the First Amendment’ [2011] Supreme Court Review 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick, ‘Free Speech on Tuesdays’ (University of Virginia, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Paper No. 2014-10) http://ssrn.com/abstract=2387009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schils, Edward, ‘Privacy: Its Constitution and Vicissitudes’ (1966) 31 Law and Contemporary Problems 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard, Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court, New York: Oxford University Press, 1985Google Scholar

Scordato, Marin, ‘The International Legal Environment for Serious Political Reporting Has Fundamentally Changed: Understanding the Revolutionary New Era of English Defamation Law’ (2007) 40 Connecticut Law Review 165Google Scholar

Scott, Andrew, ‘The Same River Twice? Jameel v. Wall Street Journal Europe’ (2007) 12 Communications Law 52Google Scholar

Seo, Mihye, Sun, Shaojing, Merolla, Andy J and Zhang, Shuangyue, ‘Willingness to Help Following the Sichuan Earthquake: Modelling the Effects of Media Involvement, Stress, Trust, and Relational Resources’ (2012) 39 Communication Research 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shearer, Ann, Survivors and the Media, London: Broadcasting Standards Council, 1991Google Scholar

Shillito, Richard and Barendt, Eric, ‘Libel Law’ (1999) 4 Yearbook of Copyright and Media Law 370Google Scholar

Simpson, Roger and Coté, William, Covering Violence: A Guide to Ethical Reporting about Victims and Trauma, 2nd ed, New York: Columbia University Press, 2006Google Scholar

Smith, Anthony F, ‘Actions for Breach of Confidence’ in Bartlett, Carol (ed), Current Legal Developments: Media Law Seminars, Clayton: Monash Law Press, 1985Google Scholar

Smolla, Rodney A, The First Amendment: Freedom of Expression, Regulation of Mass Media, Freedom of Religion, Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1999Google Scholar

Smolla, Rodney A and Gaertner, Michael J, ‘The Annenberg Libel Reform Proposal: The Case for Enactment’ (1989) 31 William & Mary Law Review 25Google Scholar

Soloski, John and Bezanson, Randall P (eds), Reforming Libel Law, New York: Guilford Press, 1992Google Scholar

Solove, Daniel J, ‘Conceptualizing Privacy’ (2002) 90 California Law Review 1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solove, Daniel J, ‘A Taxonomy of Privacy’ (2006) 154 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solove, Daniel J, The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007Google Scholar

Solove, Daniel J, ‘Introduction: Privacy, Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma’ (2013) 26 Harvard Law Review 1880Google Scholar

Spielmann, Dean and Cariolou, Leto, ‘The Right to Protection of Reputation under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Spielmann, Dean, Tsirli, M and Voyatzis, P (eds), The European Convention on Human Rights, A Living Instrument: Essays in Honour of Christos L Rozakis, Brussels: Bruylant, 2011Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane, ‘In Restraint of Tort’, in Birks, Peter (ed), The Frontiers of Liability, vol 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane, ‘Duty of Care: Peripheral Parties and Alternative Opportunities for Deterrence’ (1995) 111 Law Quarterly Review 301Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane, ‘Duty of Care Factors: A Selection from the Judicial Menus’, in Cane, Peter and Stapleton, Jane (eds), The Law of Obligations: Essays in Honour of John Fleming, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane, ‘Duty of Care and Economic Loss: A Wider Agenda’ (1999) 107 Law Quarterly Review 249Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane, ‘Comparative Economic Loss: Lessons from Case-Law Focused “Middle Theory”’ (2002) 50 UCLA Law Review 531Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane, ‘The Golden Thread at the Heart of Tort Law: Protection of the Vulnerable’ (2003) 24 Australian Bar Review 135Google Scholar

Svantesson, Dan Jerker B, Extraterritoriality in Data Privacy Law, Copenhagen: Ex Tuto Publishing, 2013Google Scholar

Swann, William B Jr, Chang-Schneider, Christine and McClarty, Katie Larsen, ‘Yes, Cavalier Attitudes Can Have Pernicious Consequences’ (2008) 63 American Psychologist 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tan, David, ‘The Reynolds Privilege in a Neo-Confucianist Communitarian Democracy: Reinvigorating Freedom of Political Communication in Singapore’ [2011] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 456Google Scholar

Tarantino, Bob, ‘Chasing Reputation: The Argument for Differential Treatment of “Public Figures” in Canadian Defamation Law’ (2010) 48 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsai, Robert L, Eloquence and Reason: Creating a First Amendment Culture, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van den Haag, Ernest, ‘On Privacy’ in Pennock, J Roland and Chapman, John W (eds), Privacy, NOMOS vol XIII, New York: Atherton Press, 1971Google Scholar

Varuhas, Jason NE, ‘The Concept of “Vindication” in the Law of Torts: Rights, Interests and Damages’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasterman, Peter, Yzermans, C Joris and Dirkzwager, Anja JE, ‘The Role of the Media and Media Hypes in the Aftermath of Disasters’ (2005) 27 Epidemiologic Reviews 107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Veeder, Van Vechten, ‘The History and Theory of the Law of Defamation’ (1903) 3 Columbia Law Review 546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velu, J, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Right to Respect for Private Life, the Home and Communications’ in Robertson, Arthur Henry (ed), Privacy and Human Rights: Reports and Communications Presented at the Third International Colloquy about the European Convention on Human Rights, Manchester University Press: Manchester, 1973Google Scholar

Volokh, Eugene, ‘Freedom of Speech and Information Privacy: The Troubling Implications of a Right to Stop People from Speaking about You’ (2000) 52 Stanford Law Review 1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wacks, Raymond, The Protection of Privacy, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1980Google Scholar

Wacks, Raymond, Privacy and Press Freedom, London: Blackstone Press, 1995Google Scholar

Wacks, Raymond, Privacy and Media Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Dignity and Defamation: The Visibility of Hate’ (2009) 123 Harvard Law Review 1596Google Scholar

Walker, Clive and Weaver, Russell L, ‘Libelocracy’ (2014) 41 Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law 69Google Scholar

Walker, Sally, The Law of Journalism in Australia, Sydney: Law Book Co, 1989Google Scholar

Walsh-Childers, Kim, Lewis, Norman and Neely, Jeff, ‘Twice Victimized: Lessons from the Media Mob at Virginia Tech’, Research Paper, University of Florida, August 2008Google Scholar

Walsh-Childers, Kim, Lewis, Norman and Neely, Jeff, ‘Listeners, Not Leeches: What Virginia Tech Survivors Needed from Journalists’(2011) 26 Journal of Mass Media Ethics 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warby, Mark, Moreham, Nicole and Christie, Iain (eds), Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media, 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Warren, Samuel D and Brandeis, Louis D, ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1890) 4 Harvard Law Review 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waters, Richard D, ‘Tracing the Impact of Media Relations and Television Coverage on US Charitable Relief Fundraising: An Application of Agenda-Setting Theory across Three Natural Disasters’ (2013) 25 Journal of Public Relations Research 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weaver, Russell L, Understanding the First Amendment, 5th ed, New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis, 2014Google Scholar

Weaver, Russell L, Hancock, Catherine, Lively, Donald E, Friedland, Steven I and Scott, Wendy B, Inside Constitutional Law: What Matters and Why, Austin, TX: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2009Google Scholar

Weaver, Russell L, Hancock, Catherine, Lively, Donald E, Knechtle, John C, The First Amendment: Cases, Problems and Materials, 3rd ed, New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis, 2011Google Scholar

Weaver, Russell L, Kenyon, Andrew T, Partlett, David F and Walker, Clive P, The Right to Speak Ill: Defamation, Free Speech and Reputation, Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2006Google Scholar

Westen, Drew, The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation, New York: Public Affairs, 2007Google Scholar

Westin, Alan F, Privacy and Freedom, New York: Atheneum, 1967Google Scholar

White, G Edward, ‘Justice Holmes and the Modernization of Free Speech Jurisprudence: The Human Dimension’ (1992) 80 California Law Review 391CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, G Edward, ‘The First Amendment Comes of Age: The Emergence of Free Speech in Twentieth-Century America’ (1996) 95 Michigan Law Review 299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitman, James Q, ‘The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty’ (2004) 113 Yale Law Journal 1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, George, A Bill of Rights for Australia, Sydney: UNSW Press, 2000Google Scholar

Williams, Kevin, ‘Defaming Politicians: The Not So Common Law’ (2000) 63 Modern Law Review 748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witzleb, Normann, ‘Interim Injunctions for Invasions of Privacy: Challenging the Rule in Bonnard v. Perryman?’ in Witzleb, Normann, Lindsay, David, Paterson, Moira and Rodrick, Sharon (eds), Emerging Challenges in Privacy Law: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witzleb, Normann and Carroll, Robyn, ‘The Role of Vindication in Torts Damages’ (2009) 17 Tort Law Review 16Google Scholar

Wragg, Paul, ‘A Freedom to Criticise? Evaluating the Public Interest in Celebrity Gossip after Mosley and Terry’ (2010) 2 Journal of Media Law 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wragg, Paul, ‘The Benefits of Privacy-Invading Expression’ (2013) 64 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wragg, Paul, ‘Enhancing Press Freedom through Greater Privacy Law: A UK Perspective on an Australian Privacy Tort’ (2014) 36 Sydney Law Review 619Google Scholar

Youm, Kyu Ho, ‘The Interaction between American and Foreign Libel Law: US Courts Refuse to Enforce English Libel Judgments’ (2000) 49 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Hilary, ‘But Names Won’t Necessarily Hurt Me: Considering the Effect of Disparaging Statements on Reputation’ (2011) 37 Queen’s Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Zadro, Lisa, Williams, Kipling W and Richardson, Rick, ‘How Low Can You Go? Ostracism by a Computer Is Sufficient to Lower Self-reported Levels of Belonging, Control, Self-esteem, and Meaningful Existence’ (2004) 40 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, Dianne, ‘Requiem for a Heavyweight: A Farewell to Warren and Brandeis’s Privacy Tort’ (1983) 68 Cornell Law Review 291Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Dianne, ‘False Light Invasion of Privacy: The Light That Failed’ (1989) 64 New York University Law Review 364Google Scholar

Zines, Leslie, ‘A Judicially Created Bill of Rights’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Review 166Google Scholar

Zines, Leslie, The High Court and the Constitution, 5th ed, Annandale, NSW: Federation Press, 2008Google Scholar

Zipursky, Benjamin C, ‘Snyder v. Phelps, Outrageousness, and the Open Texture of Tort Law’ (2011) 60 DePaul Law Review 473Google Scholar