Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:47:00.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Seeking constitutional control of the military

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2009

John Hatchard
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
Muna Ndulo
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Peter Slinn
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access

Summary

The military should always be kept in subjection to the laws of the country to which it belongs, and he is no friend of the Republic who advocates the contrary.

The relationship between civilian government and the military

The most prized right of any political community is the right to govern itself. It follows that good governance and undue military involvement in the political process are incompatible and that a civilian government must retain supremacy over the military. In essence this means that the military must have sufficient power and autonomy to carry out its constitutional role but that it must not dominate or unduly influence other aspects of governance or enjoy an excessive share of national resources. As the ANC in South Africa declared in its seminal 1992 policy statement Ready to Govern, the security forces should be:

Bound by the principles of civil supremacy and subject to public scrutiny and open debate … [and] be accountable and answerable to the public through a democratically elected parliament.

The principle of ‘civil supremacy’ was also considered by the Sub-Council on Defence and the Joint Military Co-ordinating Council during the 1993 constitutional negotiations in South Africa. In doing so, it noted:

There is a fundamental division between the military and civilian spheres whatever the level of interaction between them. The essence of the division is that armed forces should refrain from involvement in politics other than through constitutionally approved channels whilst civilians refrain from interfering in operational matters, and with the military chain of command and the military discipline code.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Constitutionalism and Good Governance in the Commonwealth
An Eastern and Southern African Perspective
, pp. 240 - 275
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×