Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T19:23:31.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Spray Impact

from Part III - Spray Formation and Impact onto Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

Alexander L. Yarin
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Ilia V. Roisman
Affiliation:
Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
Cameron Tropea
Affiliation:
Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
Get access

Summary

The impact of sprays onto walls is of great industrial importance and for this reason has attracted the attention of researchers in an effort to predict the outcome. While some applications expressly avoid splashing, e.g. coating or spray painting, many result in a secondary spray. In fact, spray impact may even be used to intentionally change the size distribution of droplets in a spray, such as with inhalation nebulizers or in direct injection fuel systems. While Chapters 4, 5 and 6 dealt with the impact of single drops onto surfaces or liquid layers, the present chapter addresses the impact of sprays onto such surfaces. Fundamentally, similar questions are asked: how many secondary droplets of what size and velocity are generated and what part of the impacting liquid remains on the surface? If heat transfer is involved then interest lies with the heat flux density at the surface or the effective Nusselt number, which, as with single drops, will depend strongly on the temperature of the surface; hence on which regime of the Nukiyama curve describing heat transfer at the surface is applicable (Nukiyama 1934, Kutateladze 1963, Carey 1992). This chapter encompasses spray impact onto liquid films (Section 9.1), discusses the secondary spray formation in Section 9.2 and outlines useful empirical correlations in Section 9.3

Two main approaches are commonly used to predict the outcome of a spray impact with a rigid wall or with a wall covered by a liquid film. The first approach is formulated in the framework of an Euler/Lagrange numerical simulation and describes the spray as the superposition of a large number of isolated, non-interacting drops (Cossali et al. 2005). Numerous models for single drop impact have been proposed (Bai and Gosman 1995, Stanton and Rutland 1996, Mundo et al. 1998, Lee and Bergman 2002), all having empirical origins. Roisman et al. (1999), Moreira et al. (2010) and Park and Watkins (1996) have provided overviews of many existing models and presented also direct comparisons of their predictive capabilities. It is a characteristic of all models that they provide reliable predictions at most over the narrow range of impact parameters from which they were derived. Indeed, several models in use for spray impact are even based on the impact of single drops onto a dry surface, which may be completely inappropriate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babinsky, E. and Sojka, P. E. (2002). Modeling drop size distributions, Progr. Energy Comb. Sci. 28: 303–329.Google Scholar
Bai, C. and Gosman, A. D. (1995). Development of methodology for spray impingement simulation, Technical report, SAE Technical Paper 950283.
Bai, C., Rusche, H. and Gosman, A. D. (2002). Modeling of gasoline spray impingement, Atom. Sprays 12: 1–27.Google Scholar
Bakshi, S., Roisman, I. V. and Tropea, C. (2007). Investigations on the impact of a drop onto a small spherical target, Phys. Fluids 19: 032102.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. A., Hardalupas, Y., Taylor, A. M. K. P. and Wilkins, J. H. (1999). An investigation of the interaction between two adjacent droplets, ILASS-Europe, Toulouse, France.
Berberović, E., van Hinsberg, N. P., Jakirlić, S., Roisman, I. V. and Tropea, C. (2009). Drop impact onto a liquid layer of finite thickness: Dynamics of the cavity evolution, Phys. Rev. E 79: 036306.Google Scholar
Bush, J. W. M. and Hasha, A. E. (2004). On the collision of laminar jets: fluid chains and fishbones, J. Fluid Mech. 511: 285–310.Google Scholar
Carey, V. P. (1992). Liquid-vapor Phase-change Phenomena: An Introduction to the Thermophysics of Vaporization and Condensation Processes in Heat Transfer Equipment, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DC.
Cossali, G. E., Coghe, A. and Marengo, M. (1997). The impact of a single drop on a wetted surface, Exp. Fluids 22: 463–472.Google Scholar
Cossali, G. E., Marengo, M., Coghe, A. and Zhdanov, S. (2004a). The role of time in single drop splash on thin film, Exp. Fluids 36: 888–900.Google Scholar
Cossali, G. E., Marengo, M. and Santini, M. (2004b). Drop array impacts on heated surfaces: secondary atomization characteristics, 19th ILASS-Europe, Nottingham, UK.
Cossali, G. E., Marengo, M. and Santini, M. (2004c). Impact of single and multiple drop array on a liquid film, 19th ILASS-Europe, Nottingham, UK.
Cossali, G. E., Marengo, M. and Santini, M. (2005). Single-drop empirical models for spray impact on solid walls: a review, Atom. Sprays 15: 699–736.Google Scholar
Crowe, C., Sommerfeld, M. and Tsuji, Y. (1997). Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Fedorchenko, A. I. and Wang, A. B. (2004). On some common features of drop impact on liquid surfaces, Phys. Fluids 16: 1349–1365.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. I, John Wiley & Sons., New York.
Frankel, I. and Weihs, D. (1985). Stability of a capillary jet with linearly increasing axial velocity (with application to shaped charges), J. Fluid. Mech. 155: 289–307.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, H., Ito, S. and Takezaki, I. (2002). Experimental study of successive collision of two water droplets with a solid, Exp. Fluids 33: 500–502.Google Scholar
Fukai, J., Shiiba, Y., Yamamoto, T., Miyatake, O., Poulikakos, D., Megaridis, C. M. and Zhao, Z. (1995). Wetting effects on the spreading of a liquid droplet colliding with a flat surface: experiment and modeling, Phys. Fluids 7: 236–247.Google Scholar
Gao, X. and Li, R. (2015). Impact of a single drop on a flowing liquid film, Phys. Rev. E 92: 053005.Google Scholar
Gavaises, M., Theodorakakos, A. and Bergeles, G. (1996). Modeling wall impaction of diesel sprays, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 17: 130–138.Google Scholar
Han, Z., Xu, Z. and Trigui, N. (2000). Spray/wall interaction models for multidimensional engine simulation, Int. J. Engine Res. 1: 127–146.Google Scholar
Josserand, C. and Zaleski, S. (2003). Droplet splashing on a thin liquid film, Phys. Fluids 15: 1650–1657.Google Scholar
Kalantari, D. and Tropea, C. (2007). Spray impact onto flat and rigid walls: empirical characterization and modelling, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 33: 525–544.Google Scholar
Kalb, T., Kaiser, H. G., Chaves, H., Obermeier, F. and Ebert, F. (2000). Splashing due to neighbouring droplet impact, Proc. ILASS-Europe, Darmstadt, Germany.
Khakhar, D. V. and Ottino, J. M. (1987). Breakup of liquid threads in linear flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 13: 71–86.Google Scholar
Kutateladze, S. S. (1963). Fundamentals of Heat Transfer, Academic Press, New York.
Lee, J. and Bergman, T. L. (2002). Scaling analysis and prediction of thermal aspects of the plasma spraying process using a discrete particle approach, J. Thermal Spray Techn. 11: 179–185.Google Scholar
Li, X. G. and Tankin, R. S. (1989). Prediction of droplet size and velocity distributions in sprays using maximum-entropy principle, Comb. Sci. and Techn. 68: 147–155.Google Scholar
Lyshevskii, A. S. (1961). Trends in Liquid Dispersal by Mechanical Pressure Sprayers, Polytechn. Inst. Publ., Novocherkassk. (in Russian).
Macklin, W. C. and Metaxas, G. J. (1976). Splashing of drops on liquid layers, J. Appl. Phys. 47: 3963–3970.Google Scholar
Moreira, A. L. N., Moita, A. S. and Pan˜ao, M. R. (2010). Advances and challenges in explaining fuel spray impingement: How much of single droplet impact research is useful?, Progr. Energy Comb. Sci. 36: 554–580.Google Scholar
Mundo, C. H. R., Sommerfeld, M. and Tropea, C. (1995). Droplet-wall collisions: experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 21: 151–173.Google Scholar
Mundo, C., Sommerfeld, M. and Tropea, C. (1998). On the modeling of liquid sprays impinging on surfaces, Atom. Sprays 8: 625–652.Google Scholar
Mundo, C., Tropea, C. and Sommerfeld, M. (1997). Numerical and experimental investigation of spray characteristics in the vicinity of a rigid wall, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 15: 228–237.Google Scholar
Nukiyama, S. (1934). Maximum and minimum values of heat q transmitted from metal to boiling water under atmospheric pressure, J. Soc. Mech. Eng. Jpn. 37: 367–374.Google Scholar
Oguz, H. N. and Prosperetti, A. (1989). Surface-tension effects in the contact of liquid surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 203: 149–171.Google Scholar
Panão, M. R. O. and Moreira, A. L. N. (2005). Flow characteristics of spray impingement in PFI injection systems, Exp. Fluids 39: 364–374.Google Scholar
Park, K. and Watkins, A. P. (1996). Comparison of wall spray impaction models with experimental data on drop velocities and sizes, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 17: 424–438.Google Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. (1981). The fascination of fluid mechanics, J. Fluid Mech. 106: 59–80.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V. (2004). Dynamics of inertia dominated binary drop collisions, Phys. Fluids 16: 3438–3449.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Araneo, L., Marengo, M. and Tropea, C. (1999). Evaluation of drop impingement models: experimental and numerical analysis of a spray impact, 13th Annu. Conf. Liquid Atom. Spray Systems, ILASS-Europe, Florence, Italy.
Roisman, I. V., Gambaryan-Roisman, T., Kyriopoulos, O., Stephan, P. and Tropea, C. (2007). Breakup and atomization of a stretching crown, Phys. Rev. E 76: 026302.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Horvat, K. and Tropea, C. (2006). Spray impact: rim transverse instability initiating fingering and splash, and description of a secondary spray, Phys. Fluids 18: 102104.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Prunet-Foch, B., Tropea, C. and Vignes-Adler, M. (2002a). Multiple drop impact onto a dry solid substrate, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 256: 396–410.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Rioboo, R. and Tropea, C. (2002b). Normal impact of a liquid drop on a dry surface: model for spreading and receding, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A-Math. 458: 1411–1430.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V. and Tropea, C. (2001). Flux measurements in sprays using phase doppler techniques, Atom. Sprays 11: 673–705.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V. and Tropea, C. (2002). Impact of a drop onto a wetted wall: description of crown formation and propagation, J. Fluid Mech. 472: 373–397.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V. and Tropea, C. (2005). Fluctuating flow in a liquid layer and secondary spray created by an impacting spray, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 31: 179–200.Google Scholar
Roisman, I. V., van Hinsberg, N. P. and Tropea, C. (2008). Propagation of a kinematic instability in a liquid layer: Capillary and gravity effects, Phys. Rev. E 77: 046305.Google Scholar
Samenfink, W., Elsäßer, A., Dullenkopf, K. and Wittig, S. (1999). Droplet interaction with sheardriven liquid films: analysis of deposition and secondary droplet characteristics, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 20: 462–469.Google Scholar
Schmehl, R., Rosskamp, H., Willmann, M. and Wittig, S. (1999). CFD analysis of spray propagation and evaporation including wall film formation and spray/film interactions, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 20: 520–529.Google Scholar
Sellens, R. W. and Brzustowski, T. A. (1985). A prediction of the drop size distribution in a spray from first principles, Atomis. Spray Techn. 1: 89–102.Google Scholar
Senda, J. and Fujimoto, H. G. (1999). Multidimensional modeling of impinging sprays on the wall in diesel engines, Appl. Mech. Rev. 52: 119–138.Google Scholar
Šikalo, Š. (2003). Analysis of droplet impact onto horizontal and inclined surfaces, Ph.D. Thesis, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany.
Šikalo, Š., Tropea, C. and Ganić, E. N. (2005). Impact of droplets onto inclined surfaces, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 286: 661–669.Google Scholar
Sivakumar, D. and Tropea, C. (2002). Splashing impact of a spray onto a liquid film, Phys. Fluids 14: L85–L88.Google Scholar
Sovani, S. D., Sojka, P. E. and Sivathanu, Y. R. (1999). Prediction of drop size distributions from first principles: the influence of fluctuations in relative velocity and liquid physical properties, Atom. Sprays 9: 113–152.Google Scholar
Stanton, D. W. and Rutland, C. J. (1996). Modeling fuel film formation and wall interaction in Diesel engines, Technical report, SAE Technical Paper 960628.
Stow, C. D. and Hadfield, M. G. (1981). An experimental investigation of fluid flow resulting from the impact of a water drop with an unyielding dry surface, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A-Math. 373: 419–441.Google Scholar
Sultanov, F. M. and Yarin, A. L. (1990). Droplet size distribution in a percolation model for explosive liquid dispersal, J. Appl. Mech. Techn. Phys. 31: 708–713.Google Scholar
Tropea, C. and Roisman, I. V. (2000). Modeling of spray impact on solid surfaces, Atom. Sprays 10: 387–408.Google Scholar
van Hinsberg, N. P., Budakli, M., Göhler, S., Berberović, E., Roisman, I. V., Gambaryan-Roisman, T., Tropea, C. and Stephan, P. (2010). Dynamics of the cavity and the surface film for impingements of single drops on liquid films of various thicknesses, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 350: 336–343.Google Scholar
Vander Wal, R. L., Berger, G. M. and Mozes, S. D. (2005). Droplets splashing upon films of the same fluid of various depths, Exp. Fluids 40: 33–52.Google Scholar
VanderWal, R. L., Berger, G. M. and Mozes, S. D. (2006). The combined influence of a rough surface and thin fluid film upon the splashing threshold and splash dynamics of a droplet impacting onto them, Exp. Fluids 40: 23–32.Google Scholar
Wang, A. B., Chen, C. C. and Hwang, W.-C. (2002). On some new aspects of splashing impact of drop-liquid surface interactions, in M., Rein (ed.), Drop-Surface Interactions, Springer, Wien.
Wu, Z. (1992). Modélisation et calcul implicite multidomaine d'écoulements diphasiques gasgouttelettes, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Yarin, A. L. (1993). Free Liquid Jets and Films: Hydrodynamics and Rheology, Longman and John Wiley & Sons, Harlow and New York.
Yarin, A. L. and Weiss, D. A. (1995). Impact of drops on solid surfaces: self-similar capillary waves, and splashing as a new type of kinematic discontinuity, J. Fluid Mech. 283: 141–173.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Spray Impact
  • Alexander L. Yarin, University of Illinois, Chicago, Ilia V. Roisman, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany, Cameron Tropea, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
  • Book: Collision Phenomena in Liquids and Solids
  • Online publication: 13 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556580.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Spray Impact
  • Alexander L. Yarin, University of Illinois, Chicago, Ilia V. Roisman, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany, Cameron Tropea, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
  • Book: Collision Phenomena in Liquids and Solids
  • Online publication: 13 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556580.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Spray Impact
  • Alexander L. Yarin, University of Illinois, Chicago, Ilia V. Roisman, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany, Cameron Tropea, Technische Universität, Darmstadt, Germany
  • Book: Collision Phenomena in Liquids and Solids
  • Online publication: 13 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556580.010
Available formats
×