Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:00:45.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Toward a comprehensive loss inventory of weather and climate hazards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2009

Susan L. Cutter
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Melanie Gall
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Christopher T. Emrich
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Henry F. Diaz
Affiliation:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, District of Columbia
Richard J. Murnane
Affiliation:
Bermuda Biological Station for Research, Garrett Park, Maryland
Get access

Summary

Condensed summary

A comprehensive national loss inventory of natural hazards is the cornerstone for effective hazard and disaster mitigation. Despite federally demanded mitigation plans (Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, DMA 2000) that are supposed to accurately represent the risks and losses, there still is no systematic and centralized inventory of all hazards and their associated losses (direct, indirect, insured, uninsured, etc.) – at least not in the public domain. While a variety of agencies and groups collect hazard-related information, differences among their goals result in a patchwork of data coverage. In lieu of a central, systematic, and comprehensive events and loss inventory, the Hazards Research Laboratory at the University of South Carolina developed the Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States (SHELDUS). This database is currently the most comprehensive inventory for the United States. However, issues that emerged during its development – such as standardizing losses, spatial coverage, and so forth – stressed the need for a national clearinghouse for loss data. It is imperative that such a clearinghouse be developed to promote standardized guidelines for loss estimation, data compilation, and metadata standards. Otherwise, the development of a national loss inventory will remain deficient and the nation will continue to lack baseline data against which trends in hazardousness and the effectiveness of mitigation efforts could be evaluated.

Introduction

There is significant uncertainty about the severity and magnitude of disaster losses in the United States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Changnon, S. A. (2003). Measures of economic impacts of weather extremes. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 84(9), 1231–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changnon, S. A., Pielke, R. A. Jr., Changnon, D., Sylves, R. T., and Pulwarty, R. (2000). Human factors explain the increased losses from weather and climate extremes. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(3), 437–42.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter, S. L., ed. (2001). American Hazardscapes: The Regionalization of Hazards and Disasters. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., and Emrich, C. T. (2005). Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the U.S. increasing?Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 86(41), 381, 388–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downton, M. W., Miller, Barnard J. Z., and Pielke, R. A. Jr. (2005). Reanalysis of U.S. National Weather Service flood loss database. Natural Hazards Review, 6(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2006). National Flood Insurance Program: flood insurance statistics (Internet). Last updated March 30, 2006. Cited June 3, 2006. Available at www.fema.gov/business/nfip/statistics/statscal.shtm.
Ganderton, P. T., Bourque, L. B., Dash, N., et al. (2006). Mitigation generates savings of four to one and enhances community resilience: MMC releases study on savings from mitigation. Natural Hazards Observer, 30(4), 1–3.Google Scholar
Guha-Sapir, D., and Below, R. (2002). The quality and accuracy of disaster data: a comparative analysis of three global data sets (Internet). ProVention Consortium, The World Bank Group. Cited May 31, 2003. Available at www.proventionconsortium.org/themes/default/pdfs/data_quality.pdf.
Hazards Research Laboratory (2006). Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States (SHELDUS), version 4.2 (online database). University of South Carolina. Cited June 3, 2006. Available at www.sheldus.org.
Homeland Security Council (2005). National Planning Scenarios. Draft, version 20.1. Washington D.C.: Department of Homeland Security. Available at media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/nationalsecurity/earlywarning/NationalPlanningScenariosApril2005.pdf.
Hydrologic Information Center (2004). Flood losses: compilation of flood loss statistics (Internet). National Weather Service (NWS). Last updated January 05, 2004. Cited June 3, 2006. Available at www.weather.gov/oh/hic/flood_stats/Flood_loss_time_series.shtml.
McBean, G. (2004). Climate change and extreme weather: a basis for action. Natural Hazards, 31, 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) (2006). Billion dollar U.S. weather disasters (Internet). Cited February 14, 2006. Available at lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html.
National Research Council (1999a). The Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Framework for Loss Estimation. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (1999b). Mitigation emerges as major strategy for reducing losses caused by natural disasters. Science, 284, 1943–7.CrossRef
Shein, K. A. (2006). State of the climate in 2005. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 87(6), 801–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, M., LeComte, D., Hayes, M., et al. (2002). The drought monitor. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), 1181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, G. (1998). Why the United States is becoming more vulnerable to natural disasters. Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 79(44), 533, 537.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (1994). A perspective on reducing losses from natural hazards. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 75(7), 1237–40.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhite, D. A. (2000). Drought as natural hazard: concepts and definitions. In Drought: A Global Assessment, vol. 1, ed. Wilhite, D. A.. London: Routledge Publishers, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×