Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T11:50:08.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Governance choices and dilemmas in a warmer Europe: what does the future hold?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Johannes Stripple
Affiliation:
Lund University, Sweden
Tim Rayner
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
Roger Hildingsson
Affiliation:
Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)
Andrew Jordan
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
Constanze Haug
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Andrew Jordan
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Dave Huitema
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Harro van Asselt
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Tim Rayner
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Frans Berkhout
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since 1996, EU climate policy has subscribed to the overall objective of ensuring that global average temperatures do not exceed 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Achieving this target will require fundamental shifts in European and global energy systems. The EU's 2008 climate–energy package, which set out a 20% emissions reduction target by 2020, was a significant step forward in political commitment, but still fell well short of the IPCC's recommendation (Pachauri and Reisinger 2007) of a 25–40% cut by industrialised countries by 2020. The European Council has, since 2007, also been committed in principle to a reduction in collective emissions from industrialised countries by 60–80% by 2050 – a figure broadly commensurate with the IPCC's advice (see Chapter 3).

What stands out about all these goals is that they deal with what many of today's governors would consider to be the very long-term future, although in scientific terms is not. Given that climate policy is such a long-term undertaking, there is a need to understand whether these and other policies are likely to be robust over these timescales; in other words, capable of performing well under a range of different conditions.

The general aim of this chapter is to explore how EU climate policy might evolve in the period from 2020 to 2040 given a set of different policy contexts. In effect, we reverse the emphasis on historical developments of Parts II and III, and examine how policy might unfold in the future.

Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change Policy in the European Union
Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation?
, pp. 229 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Acclimatise and Hampshire County Council (2007). What Policies Present Barriers to Adaptation in the UK and the Netherlands? ESPACE Project Extension Action 1b: Final report. Southwell: Acclimatise.Google Scholar
Adelle, C., Pallemaerts, M. and Baldock, D. (2008). Turning the EU Budget into an Instrument to Support the Fight Against Climate Change. SIEPS Report No. 4. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Aldy, J. E. and Stavins, R. N. (2007). Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. and Bows, A. (2008). Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1882), 3863–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkhout, F., Hertin, J. and Jordan, A. J. (2002). Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’. Global Environmental Change, 12, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F. and Boas, I. (2008). Protecting climate refugees: the case for a global protocol, Environment, 50(6), 9–16.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. and Zelli, F., eds. (2010). Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Crutzen, P. J. (2006). Albedo enhancements by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma. Climatic Change, 77, 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, D. (2008). On the Politics of Climate Change: Is there an East-West Divide? Working Paper No. 181. Budapest: Institute for World Economics.Google Scholar
,ENDS Europe Daily (various years). London: Environmental Data Services (ENDS) Ltd. http://www.endseuropedaily.com/articles/index.cfm.
Eskeland, G., Jochem, E., Neufeldt, H.et al. (2008). The Future of European Electricity: Choices Before 2020. CEPS Policy Brief No. 164. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
,European Environment Bureau (EEB) (2009). How is Europe Adapting to Climate Change? EEB Input into the Informal Environment Council of 14–15 April 2009. Brussels: European Environment Bureau.Google Scholar
Haug, C., Rayner, T., Jordan, A. J.et al. (2010). Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe. Climatic Change (in press).CrossRef
Hochrainer, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J. and Mechler, R. (2010). The European Union Solidarity Fund: its legitimacy, viability and efficiency. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (in press).CrossRef
Hulme, M. (2008). Governing and adapting to climate. A response to Ian Bailey's commentary on ‘geographical work at the boundaries of climate change’Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(3), 424–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, M. and Neufeldt, H., eds. (2010). Making Climate Change Work for Us. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
,IEA (International Energy Agency) (2007). World Energy Outlook 2007. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Klein, R. J. T., Huq, S., Denton, F.et al. (2007). Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, ed. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 745–77.Google Scholar
Knopf, B. and Edenhofer, O. (2010). The economics of low stabilisation: implications for technological change and policy. In Making Climate Change Work for Us, ed. Hulme, M., and Neufeldt, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 291–318.Google Scholar
Lenton, T. M., and Vaughan, N. E (2009). The radiative forcing potential of different climate geo-engineering options. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 2559–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F., ed. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008). Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change Costs, Benefits and Policy Instruments. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pachauri, R. K., and Reisinger, A., eds. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Solomon, S., ed. (2007). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M.et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swart, R. and Raes, F. (2007). Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: mainstreaming into sustainable development policies?, Climate Policy, 7(4): 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, R. (2007). Europe's long-term climate target: a critical evaluation. Energy Policy, 35(1), 424–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiman, B. L. B. (2002). Climate engineering: Concepts, examples, and risks. In Natural Resources System Challenge: Climate Change, Humans Systems and Policy, ed. Yotova, A.. Oxford: Eolss Publishers.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×