Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Table of statutory instruments
- Table of international instruments
- Part One Theoretical perspectives and international sources
- Part Two Promoting consultation and decision-making
- 3 Adolescent autonomy and parents
- 4 Leaving home, rights to support and emancipation
- 5 Adolescent decision-making and health care
- 6 Promoting consultation and decision-making in schools
- 7 Children's involvement in family proceedings – rights to representation
- 8 Children in court – their welfare, wishes and feelings
- Part Three Children's rights and parents' powers
- 19 Conclusion – themes and the way ahead
- Appendix I UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- Appendix II Human Rights Act 1998
- Index
- References
8 - Children in court – their welfare, wishes and feelings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Table of statutory instruments
- Table of international instruments
- Part One Theoretical perspectives and international sources
- Part Two Promoting consultation and decision-making
- 3 Adolescent autonomy and parents
- 4 Leaving home, rights to support and emancipation
- 5 Adolescent decision-making and health care
- 6 Promoting consultation and decision-making in schools
- 7 Children's involvement in family proceedings – rights to representation
- 8 Children in court – their welfare, wishes and feelings
- Part Three Children's rights and parents' powers
- 19 Conclusion – themes and the way ahead
- Appendix I UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- Appendix II Human Rights Act 1998
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Section 1 of the Children Act (CA) 1989 requires the courts to reach decisions over children's upbringing, by giving the children's welfare their paramount consideration – a provision often described as the ‘paramountcy principle’. But when deciding what is in the child's welfare or best interests, the courts are directed to consider ‘the ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child concerned (considered in the light of his age and understanding)’. This direction accommodates the fact that children may have a better grasp of their own needs than adults. Indeed, it promotes a diluted form of the notion of autonomy by implying that a mature child's best interests may be fulfilled most effectively by the court acceding to his or her own wishes. Furthermore, its inclusion in the welfare checklist reflects a conviction that ‘the increasing recognition given both in practice and in law to the child's status as a human being in his own right’ should also be matched by the courts, when hearing disputes over children. Whether the direction is realistic depends on children having an effective means of conveying their views to the court – not all are provided with such a facility. Despite its importance, demonstrated by its foremost position in the ‘welfare checklist’, the courts are expected to achieve a result which most accords with adult notions of children's best interests, whether or not it accords with their wishes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Children's Rights and the Developing Law , pp. 291 - 318Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
and (1994) ‘The No Order Principle, Parental Responsibility and the Child's Wishes’ 24 Family Law91.Google Scholar
, and . (2003) ‘Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act’ 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Parental Alienation Syndrome and Alienated Children – Getting it Wrong in Child Custody Cases’ 14 Child and Family Law Quarterly381.Google Scholar
, , and . (2001) Families in Conflict: Perspectives of Children and Parents on the Family Court Welfare Service, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
, , , and . (2003) Divorcing Children: Children's Experience of Their Parents' Divorce, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Child Welfare Defences in Child Abduction Cases – Some Recent Developments’ 13 Child and Family Law Quarterly121.Google Scholar
and (1995) ‘Children's Wishes, Children's Burdens’ 17 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Domestic Violence Policy and Standards, Cafcass.
(2003) ‘The Adoption and Children Act 2002, the Welfare Principle and the Human Rights Act 1998 – a missed opportunity’ 15 Child and Family Law Quarterly119.Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘Taking the Rights of Parents and Children Seriously: Confronting the Welfare Principle under the Human Rights Act’ 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) White Paper, Adoption: The Future Cm 2288, HMSO.
, , and (2006) Research into the Operation of Rule 9.5 of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991, Final Report to the Department of Constitutional Affairs, DCA.
(1986) ‘The Emergence of Children's Rights’ 6 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) ‘The Importance of Thinking that Children Have Rights’ in , and (eds.) Children, Rights and the Law, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1994) ‘The Interests of the Child and the Child's Wishes: The Role of Dynamic Self-Determinism’ 8 International Journal of Law and the Family42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . (2005) ‘A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System’ 6 Psychological Science in the Public Interest1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Clashing Rights, the Welfare of the Child and the Human Rights Act’ 67 Modern Law Review889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) ‘Dominant Discourse, Professional Language and Legal Change in Child Custody Decision-Making’ 101 Harvard Law Review727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Children's Rights: Are the Courts Now Taking Them More Seriously?’ 15 King's College Law Journal253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Accommodating Children's Rights in a Post Human Rights Act Era’ 69 Modern Law Review299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . (2006) ‘Young Adults’ Perceptions of Court-ordered Contact' 18 Child and Family Law Quarterly211.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘Re B (Adoption: Natural Parent) Putting the Child at the Heart of Adoption?’ 14 Child and Family Law Quarterly325.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘The Human Rights Act and the Welfare Principle in Family Law – Conflicting or Complementary?’ 11 Child and Family Law Quarterly223.Google Scholar
(2005) Domestic Violence, Safety and Family Proceedings: Thematic Review of the Handling of Domestic Violence Issues by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) and the Administration of Family Courts in Her Majesty's Courts Service (HMCS), HMICA.
(2006) An Inspection Undertaken between October 2005 and March 2006 of the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) Concerning Private Law Front-line Practice, HMICA.
. with . (2004) Child Contact with Non-resident Parents, Family Policy Briefing 3, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
and (2008) Outcomes of Applications to Court for Contact Orders After Parental Separation or Divorce, Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Squaring the Circle – The Social, Legal and Welfare Organisation of Contact’ in , , and . (eds.) Children and Their Families: Contact, Rights and Welfare, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
, and . (2004) ‘Turn Down the Volume? – Not Hearing Children in Family Proceedings’ 16 Child and Family Law Quarterly189.Google Scholar
and (1995) ‘Child Sexual Abuse, Access and the Wishes of Children’ 9 International Journal of Law and the Family54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004) ‘Incomplete Citizens: Changing Images of Post-Separation Children’ 67 Modern Law Review959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Review of Child Law, Guardianship and Custody Law Com No 172, HMSO.
, and (2006) ‘Whose Wishes and Feelings? Children's Autonomy and Parental Influence in Family Court Enquiries’ British Journal of Social Work Advance Access published 17 May 2006, doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl035.CrossRef
(1975) ‘Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy’ 39 Law and Contemporary Problems226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofsted (2008) Ofsted's Inspection of CAFCASS East Midlands, Ofsted.
(1994) ‘The Best Interests of the Child – Principles and Problems’ 8 International Journal of Law and the Family26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) ‘A Child's Right to a Veto in England and Russia: Another Welfare Ploy?’ 15 Child and Family Law Quarterly57.Google Scholar
(1996) ‘The Paramountcy Principle: Consensus or Construct?’ Current Legal Problems267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) ‘Making Sense of the Ascertainable Wishes and Feelings of Insecurely Attached Children’ 10 Child and Family Law Quarterly363.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘The Hague Child Abduction Convention and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’ in and (eds.) Family Life and Human Rights, Gyldendal.Google Scholar
, and (2008) ‘Discretion, Settlement and Child's Objections: Re M (Abduction)’ 38 Family Law230.Google Scholar
and (2000) ‘Contact and Domestic Violence – the Experts’ Court Report' 30 Family Law615.Google Scholar
, , and (2005) A Profile of Applicants and Respondents in Contact Cases in Essex, DCA Research Series 1/05, DCA.
, , , and (2006) Making Contact Happen or Making Contact Work? The Process and Outcomes of In-court Conciliation, DCA Research Series 3/06, DCA.
and (2007) The Longer-term Outcomes of In-court Conciliation, Ministry of Justice Research Series 15/07, Ministry of Justice.
(2005) ‘The “Best Interests of the Child” and Parental Separation: on the “Civilising of Parents”’ 68 Modern Law Review25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The Cost of Domestic Violence, Women and Equality Unit, DTI.
(2006) ‘Child Witness Testimony: What Do We Know and Were are We Going?’ 18 Child and Family Law Quarterly175.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Coming of Age? – The Principle of “The Best Interests of the Child”’ European Human Rights Law Review205.Google Scholar