Sousa, JP, Wolsey, LA. A Time Indexed Formulation of Nonpreemptive Single-Machine Scheduling Problems. Math Program. 1992;54(3):353–367.Google Scholar

Wolsey, LA. Valid Inequalities for 0-1 Knapsacks and MIPs with Generalized Upper Bound Constraints. Discrete Applied Mathematics. 1990;29(2–3):251–261.Google Scholar

van den Akker, JM, Hurkens, CAJ, Savelsbergh, MWP. Time-Indexed Formulations for Machine Scheduling Problems: Column Generation. INFORMS J Comput. 2000;12(2):111–124.Google Scholar

Sadykov, R, Wolsey, LA. Integer Programming and Constraint Programming in Solving a Multimachine Assignment Scheduling Problem with Deadlines and Release Dates. INFORMS J Comput. 2006;18(2):209–217.Google Scholar

van den Akker, JM, van Hoesel, CPM, Savelsbergh, MWP. A Polyhedral Approach to Single-Machine Scheduling Problems. Math Program. 1999;85(3):541–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pekny, JF, Miller, DL, Mcrae, GJ. An Exact Parallel Algorithm for Scheduling When Production Costs Depend on Consecutive System States. Comput Chem Eng. 1990;14(9):1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kondili, E, Pantelides, CC, Sargent, RWH. A General Algorithm for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch-Operations .1. MILP Formulation. Comput Chem Eng. 1993;17(2):211–227.Google Scholar

Shah, N, Pantelides, CC, Sargent, RWH. A General Algorithm for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch-Operations .2. Computational Issues. Comput Chem Eng. 1993;17(2):229–244.Google Scholar

Karmarkar, US, Schrage, L. The Deterministic Dynamic Product Cycling Problem. Oper Res. 1985;33(2):326–345.Google Scholar

Kelly, JD, Zyngier, D. An Improved MILP Modeling of Sequence-Dependent Switchovers for Discrete-Time Scheduling Problems. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46(14):4964–4973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velez, S, Dong, Y, Maravelias, CT. Changeover Formulations for Discrete-Time Mixed-Integer Programming Scheduling Models. Eur J Oper Res. 2017;260(3):949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolsey, LA. MIP modelling of changeovers in production planning and scheduling problems. Eur J Oper Res. 1997;99(1):154-65.Google Scholar

Lasserre, JB, Queyranne, M, editors. Generic Scheduling Polyhedra and a New Mixed-Integer Formulation for Single-Machine Scheduling. Paper from the conference IPCO: Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. 1992.Google Scholar

Kopanos, GM, Puigjaner, L, Maravelias, CT. Production Planning and Scheduling of Parallel Continuous Processes with Product Families. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50(3):1369–1378.Google Scholar

Lima, RM, Grossmann, IE, Jiao, Y. Long-Term Scheduling of a Single-Unit Multi-Product Continuous Process to Manufacture High Performance Glass. Comput Chem Eng. 2011;35(3):554–574.Google Scholar

Blazewicz, J, Dror, M, Weglarz, J. Mathematical-Programming Formulations for Machine Scheduling – a Survey. Eur J Oper Res. 1991;51(3):283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinto, JM, Grossmann, IE. A Continuous-Time Mixed-Integer Linear-Programming Model for Short-Term Scheduling of Multistage Batch Plants. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1995;34(9):3037–3051.Google Scholar

Cerda, J, Henning, GP, Grossmann, IE. A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for Short-Term Scheduling of Single-Stage Multiproduct Batch Plants with Parallel Lines. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1997;36(5):1695–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendez, CA, Henning, GP, Cerda, J. Optimal Scheduling of Batch Plants Satisfying Multiple Product Orders with Different Due-Dates. Comput Chem Eng. 2000;24(9-10):2223–2245.Google Scholar

Lim, M-F, Karimi, IA. A Slot-Based Formulation for Single-Stage Multiproduct Batch Plants with Multiple Orders per Product. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42(9):1914–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castro, PA, Grossmann, IE. An Efficient MILP Model for the Short-Term Scheduling of Single Stage Batch Plants. Comput Chem Eng. 2006;30(6–7):1003–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchetti, PA, Mendez, CA, Cerda, J. Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Monolithic Formulations for Lot-Sizing and Scheduling of Single-Stage Batch Facilities. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49(14):6482–6498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velez, S, Dong, YC, Maravelias, CT. Changeover Formulations for Discrete-Time Mixed-Integer Programming Scheduling Models. Eur J Oper Res. 2017;260(3):949–963.Google Scholar

Castro, PM, Grossmann, IE. Generalized Disjunctive Programming as a Systematic Modeling Framework to Derive Scheduling Formulations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51(16):5781–5792.Google Scholar

Maravelias, CT, Grossmann, IE. New General Continuous-Time State-Task Network Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Batch Plants. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42(13):3056–3074.Google Scholar

Kondili, E, Pantelides, CC, Sargent, RWH. A General Algorithm for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch-Operations .1. MILP Formulation. Comput Chem Eng. 1993;17(2):211–227.Google Scholar

Pantelides, CC, editor, Unified Frameworks for Optimal Process Planning and Scheduling. 2nd Conference on Foundations of Computer Aided Process Operations; 1994 1994; Snowmass, CO: CACHE Publications.Google Scholar

Mendez, CA, Henning, GP, Cerda, J. An MILP Continuous-Time Approach to Short-Term Scheduling of Resource-Constrained Multistage Flowshop Batch Facilities. Comput Chem Eng. 2001;25(4–6):701–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, S, Karimi, IA. An Improved MILP Formulation for Scheduling Multiproduct, Multistage Batch Plants. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42(11):2365–2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinto, JM, Grossmann, IE. A Continuous-Time Mixed-Integer Linear-Programming Model for Short-Term Scheduling of Multistage Batch Plants. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1995;34(9):3037–3051.Google Scholar

Pinto, JM, Grossmann, IE. An Alternate MILP Model for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch Plants with Preordering Constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1996;35(1):338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamba, N, Karimi, IA. Scheduling Parallel Production Lines with Resource Constraints. 1. Model Formulation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41(4):779–789.Google Scholar

Castro, PM, Grossmann, IE. New Continuous-Time MILP Model for the Short-Term Scheduling of Multistage Batch Plants. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44(24):9175–9190.Google Scholar

Castro, PM, Grossmann, IE, Novais, AQ. Two New Continuous-Time Models for the Scheduling of Multistage Batch Plants with Sequence Dependent Changeovers. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45(18):6210–6226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merchan, AF, Lee, H, Maravelias, CT. Discrete-Time Mixed-Integer Programming Models and Solution Methods for Production Scheduling in Multistage Facilities. Comput Chem Eng. 2016;94:387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pritsker, AAB, Waiters, LJ, Wolfe, PM. Multiproject Scheduling with Limited Resources: A Zero-One Programming Approach. Manage Sci. 1969;16(1):93–108.Google Scholar

Christofides, N, Alvarez-Valdes, R, Tamarit, JM. Project Scheduling with Resource Constraints – a Branch and Bound Approach. Eur J Oper Res. 1987;29(3):262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, HM, Karimi, IA. Scheduling in Serial Multiproduct Batch Processes with Finite Interstage Storage – a Mixed Integer Linear Program Formulation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1988;27(10):1840–1848.Google Scholar

Kim, M, Jung, JH, Lee, IB. Optimal Scheduling of Multiproduct Batch Processes for Various Intermediate Storage Policies. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1996;35(11):4058–4066.Google Scholar

Kim, SB, Lee, HK, Lee, IB, Lee, ES, Lee, B. Scheduling of Non-sequential Multipurpose Batch Processes under Finite Intermediate Storage Policy. Comput Chem Eng. 2000;24(2–7):1603–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendez, CA, Cerda, J. An MILP Continuous-Time Framework for Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Batch Processes under Different Operation Strategies. Optimization and Engineering. 2003;4(1–2):7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, JY, He, XR. A New Model for Scheduling of Batch Process with Mixed Intermediate Storage Policies. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2004;35(3):381–387.Google Scholar

Gupta, S, Karimi, IA. Scheduling a Two-Stage Multiproduct Process with Limited Product Shelf Life in Intermediate Storage. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42(3):490–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Y, Karimi, IA. Novel Continuous-Time Formulations for Scheduling Multi-Stage Batch Plants with Identical Parallel Units. Comput Chem Eng. 2007;31(12):1671–1693.Google Scholar

Liu, Y, Karimi, IA. Scheduling Multistage Batch Plants with Parallel Units and No Interstage Storage. Comput Chem Eng. 2008;32(4–5):671–693.Google Scholar

Prasad, P, Maravelias, CT. Batch Selection, Assignment and Sequencing in Multi-Stage Multi-Product Processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2008;32(6):1106–1119.Google Scholar

Sundaramoorthy, A, Maravelias, CT. Simultaneous Batching and Scheduling in Multistage Multiproduct Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47(5):1546–1555.Google Scholar

Sundaramoorthy, A, Maravelias, CT. Modeling of Storage in Batching and Scheduling of Multistage Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47(17):6648–6660.Google Scholar

Sundaramoorthy, A, Maravelias, CT, Prasad, P. Scheduling of Multistage Batch Processes under Utility Constraints. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48(13):6050–6058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumann, P, Trautmann, N. A Continuous-Time MILP Model for Short-Term Scheduling of Make-and-Pack Production Processes. International Journal of Production Research. 2013;51(6):1707–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harjunkoski, I, Grossmann, IE. Decomposition Techniques for Multistage Scheduling Problems Using Mixed-Integer and Constraint Programming Methods. Comput Chem Eng. 2002;26(11):1533–1552.Google Scholar

Maravelias, CT. A Decomposition Framework for the Scheduling of Single- and Multi-Stage Processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2006;30(3):407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumann, K, Schwindt, C, Trautmann, N. Advanced Production Scheduling for Batch Plants in Process Industries. Or Spectrum. 2002;24(3):251–279.Google Scholar

Roe, B, Papageorgiou, LG, Shah, N. A Hybrid MILP/CLP Algorithm for Multipurpose Batch Process Scheduling. Comput Chem Eng. 2005;29(6):1277–1291.Google Scholar

Gomes, MC, Barbosa-Povoa, AP, Novais, AQ. Reactive Scheduling in a Make-to-Order Flexible Job Shop with Re-entrant Process and Assembly: A Mathematical Programming Approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013;51(17):5120–5141.Google Scholar

Gomes, MC, Barbosa-Povoa, AP, Novais, AQ. Optimal Scheduling for Flexible Job Shop Operation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2005;43(11):2323–2353.Google Scholar

Fattahi, P, Jolai, F, Arkat, J. Flexible Job Shop Scheduling with Overlapping in Operations. Appl Math Model. 2009;33(7):3076–3087.Google Scholar

Fattahi, P, Mehrabad, MS, Jolai, F. Mathematical Modeling and Heuristic Approaches to Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problems. J Intell Manuf. 2007;18(3):331–342.Google Scholar

Demir, Y, Isleyen, SK. Evaluation of Mathematical Models for Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problems. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(3):977–988.Google Scholar

Maravelias, CT. General Framework and Modeling Approach Classification for Chemical Production Scheduling. AlChE J. 2012;58(6):1812–1828.Google Scholar

Lee, H, Maravelias, CT. Discrete-Time Mixed-Integer Programming Models for Short-Term Scheduling in Multipurpose Environments. Comput Chem Eng. 2017;107:171–183.Google Scholar

Kim, YJ, Kim, MH, Jung, JH. Optimal Scheduling of the Single Line Multi-Purpose Batch Process with Re-Circulation Products. J. Chem. Eng. Japan. 2002;35(2):117–130.Google Scholar

Mendez, CA, Cerda, J. An MILP Continuous-Time Framework for Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Batch Processes Under Different Operation Strategies. Optim. Eng. 2003;4(1-2):7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrer-Nadal, S, Capon-Garcia, E, Mendez, CA, Puigjaner, L. Material Transfer Operations in Batch Scheduling. A Critical Modeling Issue. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47(20):7721–7732.Google Scholar

Lee, H, Maravelias, CT. Mixed-Integer Programming Models for Simultaneous Batching and Scheduling in Multipurpose Batch Plants. Comput Chem Eng. 2017;106:621–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kondili, E, Pantelides, CC, Sargent, RWH. A General Algorithm for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch-Operations .1. MILP Formulation. Comput Chem Eng. 1993;17(2):211–227.Google Scholar

Shah, N, Pantelides, CC, Sargent, RWH. A General Algorithm for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch-Operations .2. Computational Issues. Comput Chem Eng. 1993;17(2):229–244.Google Scholar

Pantelides, CC, editor Unified Frameworks for Optimal Process Planning and Scheduling. 2nd Conference on Foundations of Computer Aided Process Operations; 1994 1994; Snowmass, CO: CACHE Publications.Google Scholar

BarbosaPovoa, APFD, Pantelides, CC. Design of Multipurpose Plants Using the Resource-Task Network Unified Framework. Comput Chem Eng. 1997;21:S703–S708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zentner, MG, Pekny, JF, Reklaitis, GV, Gupta, JND. Practical Considerations in Using Model-Based Optimization for the Scheduling and Planning of Batch/Semicontinuous Processes. Journal of Process Control. 1994;4(4):259–280.Google Scholar

Subrahmanyam, S, Bassett, MH, Pekny, JF, Reklaitis, GV. Issues in Solving Large-Scale Planning, Design and Scheduling Problems in Batch Chemical Plants. Comput Chem Eng. 1995;19:S577–S582.Google Scholar

Schilling, G, Pantelides, CC. A Simple Continuous-Time Process Scheduling Formulation and a Novel Solution Algorithm. Comput Chem Eng. 1996;20:S1221–S1226.Google Scholar

Zhang, X, Sargent, RWH. The Optimal Operation of Mixed Production Facilities – a General Formulation and Some Approaches for the Solution. Comput Chem Eng. 1996;20(6–7):897–904.Google Scholar

Zhang, XY, Sargent, RWH. The Optimal Operation of Mixed Production Facilities – Extensions and Improvements. Comput Chem Eng. 1996;20:S1287–S1293.Google Scholar

Mockus, L, Reklaitis, GV. Continuous Time Representation Approach to Batch and Continuous Process Scheduling. 1. MINLP Formulation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38(1):197–203.Google Scholar

Mockus, L, Reklaitis, GV. Continuous Time Representation Approach to Batch and Continuous Process Scheduling. 2. Computational Issues. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38(1):204–210.Google Scholar

Lee, KH, Park, HI, Lee, IB. A Novel Nonuniform Discrete Time Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch and Continuous Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40(22):4902–4911.Google Scholar

Castro, P, Barbosa-Povoa, APFD, Matos, H. An Improved RTN Continuous-Time Formulation for the Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Batch Plants. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40(9):2059–2068.Google Scholar

Sundaramoorthy, A, Karimi, IA. A Simpler Better Slot-Based Continuous-Time Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling in Multipurpose Batch Plants. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(10):2679–2702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimenez, DM, Henning, GP, Maravelias, CT. A Novel Network-Based Continuous-Time Representation for Process Scheduling: Part II. General Framework. Comput Chem Eng. 2009;33(10):1644–1660.Google Scholar

Gimenez, DM, Henning, GP, Maravelias, CT. A Novel Network-Based Continuous-Time Representation for Process Scheduling: Part I. Main Concepts and Mathematical Formulation. Comput Chem Eng. 2009;33(9):1511–1528.Google Scholar

Ierapetritou, MG, Floudas, CA. Effective Continuous-Time Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling. 1. Multipurpose Batch Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1998;37(11):4341–4359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ierapetritou, MG, Floudas, CA. Effective Continuous-Time Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling. 2. Continuous and Semicontinuous Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1998;37(11):4360–4374.Google Scholar

Giannelos, NF, Georgiadis, MC. A Novel Event-Driven Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Continuous Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41(10):2431–2439.Google Scholar

Giannelos, NF, Georgiadis, MC. A Simple New Continuous-Time Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Batch Processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41(9):2178–2184.Google Scholar

Janak, SL, Lin, XX, Floudas, CA. Enhanced Continuous-Time Unit-Specific Event-Based Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling of Multipurpose Batch Processes: Resource Constraints and Mixed Storage Policies. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43(10):2516–2533.Google Scholar

Janak, SL, Floudas, CA. Improving Unit-Specific Event Based Continuous-Time Approaches for Batch Processes: Integrality Gap and Task Splitting. Comput Chem Eng. 2008;32(4–5):913–955.Google Scholar

Susarla, N, Li, J, Karimi, IA. A Novel Approach to Scheduling Multipurpose Batch Plants Using Unit-Slots. AlChE J. 2010;56(7):1859–1879.Google Scholar

Maravelias, CT. Mixed-Time Representation for State-Task Network Models. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44(24):9129–9145.Google Scholar

Kelly, JD, Zyngier, D. Unit-Operation Nonlinear Modeling for Planning and Scheduling Applications. Optimization and Engineering. 2017;18(1):133–154.Google Scholar

Zyngier, D, Kelly, JD. Multiproduct Inventory Logistics Modeling in the Process Industries. Springer Ser Optim A. 2009;30:61–95.Google Scholar

Sundaramoorthy, A, Maravelias, CT. A General Framework for Process Scheduling. AlChE J. 2011;57(3):695–710.Google Scholar

Velez, S, Maravelias, CT. Mixed-Integer Programming Model and Tightening Methods for Scheduling in General Chemical Production Environments. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(9):3407–3423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundaramoorthy, A, Maravelias, CT. Computational Study of Network-Based Mixed-Integer Programming Approaches for Chemical Production Scheduling. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50(9):5023–5040.Google Scholar

Velez, S, Maravelias, CT. Advances in Mixed-Integer Programming Methods for Chemical Production Scheduling. Annu Rev Chem Biomol. 2014;5:97–121.Google Scholar