Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:35:29.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 - Prospects for improved neuroprotection trials in stroke

from Part X - Risk factors, clinical trials and new therapeutic horizons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2009

Kennedy R. Lees
Affiliation:
University Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland
Pak H. Chan
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The experimental basis for neuroprotection is well founded. In a range of animal models of ischemic stroke, drugs acting by a variety of mechanisms can be administered up to several hours after the ischemic insult and reductions in infarct volume can be demonstrated. Whilst individual models have their proponents and their disadvantages, numerous strategies have been sufficiently convincing to encourage clinical development. Examples of drugs reaching large clinical trials range from free radical scavengers, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists and calcium antagonists, through a range of drugs acting on the glutamate cascade to precursors of membrane constituents such as citicoline. Unfortunately, the range of drugs and mechanisms that has been tested in the clinic and has so far failed, exactly parallels the former list (Table 35.1). In most cases, the result has been neutral but a few drugs had adverse effects that were not anticipated from the preclinical studies.

In the face of these disappointments, some pessimism amongst the clinical researchers would be understandable, but instead a cautious optimism remains. This is based on sound scientific analysis of the progress that has been made and the prospects for adjusting the development strategy for future compounds.

Potential reasons for the failure of previous clinical trials have been widely reviewed. Most are speculative, but the principles that underlie them can readily be tested and bear repetition. First, the translation from animal models to human stroke demands certain assumptions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cerebrovascular Disease
22nd Princeton Conference
, pp. 430 - 443
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×