Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:19:52.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Piecing Together the Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Sergio Canavero
Affiliation:
Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group, Turin, Italy
Vincenzo Bonicalzi
Affiliation:
Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group, Turin, Italy
Get access

Summary

“… in the light of knowledge finally achieved, deductions seem almost obvious and can be understood by any intelligent student; but the experience of research, gropingly in the darkness, with its profound anxiety to succeed and its alternating character between certainty and discouragement, can only be understood by him who has experienced it.”

(A. Einstein, 1935)

The evidence reviewed strongly suggests that CP may be understood as the result of a localized reverberation loop between the parietal cortex (SI, and perhaps SII) and the sensory thalamus (Vc, core and shell) with a supporting role of Vim, CL and its SI projections, and pulvinar (Canavero et al. 1993; Canavero 1994), as this is the only mechanism able to explain pain disappearance following lesions limited to the subcortical white matter (see Box 8.1). This dipole is exquisitely adjusted to explain somatotopographical pain distribution in CP (Canavero 1994). The loop, with its descending excitatory arm, is engaged bilaterally, with contralateral – or, in some cases, ipsilateral – predominance. In those rare cases with complete SI or thalamic destruction (e.g., maxithalamotomies), the reverberant loop can be activated contralaterally. CP appears to be more frequent after right-sided lesions, perhaps due to lateralization of norepinephrine. Since the evidence points to a major role of this arm in CP sustenance (see also Yamashiro et al. 1991), we propose that STT lesions (or simple interference, without actual sensory loss) unbalance the normal oscillatory corticothalamic “dialogue,” starting in SI, where GABA levels drop acutely, and induce changes caudad along a diffuse spinotruncothalamic reticular core (see in Gybels and Sweet 1989; Nandi et al. 2004), which becomes hyperactive.

Type
Chapter
Information
Central Pain Syndrome
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management
, pp. 307 - 338
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×