Adams, J. N. (2003) Bilingualism and the Latin Language, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahl, F. M. (1976) Lucan: an Introduction, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. M. (1989) ‘Homer, Vergil, and Complex Narrative Structures in Latin Epic: An Essay,’ ICS 14, 1–31.Google Scholar

André, J. (1949) La vie et l’oeuvre d’Asinius Pollion, Paris.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1961) Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought, London.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (2004) The Origins of Totalitarianism, with a new introduction by S. Power, New York.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1959) ‘The Author of the Greek Original of the Poenulus,’ RhM 102, 252–62.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (2004) ‘Alexis, Greek New Comedy and Plautus’ Poenulus,’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus, Tübingen, 61–91.Google Scholar

Asheri, D. (1990) Erodoto, Le Storie, Volume III: La Persia, Milan.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1971) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bachvarova, M. R. and Dutsch, D. (2016) ‘Mourning a City “Empty of Men”: Stereotypes of Anatolian Communal Lament in Aeschylus’ Persians,’ in Bachvarova, M. R., Dutsch, D. and Suter, A. (eds.) The Fall of Cities in the Mediterranean: Commemoration in Literature, Folk-Song, and Liturgy, Cambridge, 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandelli, G. (2004) ‘Momenti e forme nella politica Illirica della repubblica Romana (229–49 a.C.),’ in Urso, G. (ed.) Dall’Adriatico al Danubio. L’Illirico nell’età Greca e Romana. Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Cividale del Friuli, 25–27 Settembre 2003), Pisa, 95–139.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2009) ‘Euripides’ Corinthian Princess in the Aeneid,’ CPh 104, 317–30.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. (1998) ‘Un epigramma encomiastico “Alessandrino” per Augusto (SH 982),’ Aevum Antiquum 11, 255–344.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. (2001) Φάτις νικηφόρος: Frammenti di elegia encomiastica nell’età delle Guerre Galatiche. Supplementum Hellenisticum 958 e 969, Milan.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1995) ‘Genealogie: Callimaco, Ennio e l’autocoscienza dei poeti Augustei,’ in Belloni, L., Milanese, G. and Porro, A. (eds.) Studia Classica Iohanni Tarditi Oblata, Volume 1, Milan, 5–18.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1999) ‘Representations of Suffering and Interpretation in the Aeneid,’ in Hardie, P. (ed.) Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors, Volume 3, London, 324–44 = (1994) ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide,’ A&A 40, 109–24.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2001) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and other Latin Poets, London.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2008) ‘Bellum Italicum: l’unificazione dell’Italia nell’Eneide,’ in Urso, G. (ed.) Patria diversis gentibus una? Unità politica e identità etniche nell’Italia antica: Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Cividale del Friuli, 20–22 Settembre 2007), Pisa, 243–60.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. and Rosati, G. (2007) Ovidio, Metamorfosi, Volume 2: Libri III–IV, Milan.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, M. (1962) Nevio Epico, Padua.Google Scholar

Bartuschat, J. (2000) ‘Sofonisba e Massinissa: dall’Africa e dal De Viris ai Trionfi,’ in Caratozzolo, V. and Güntert, G. (eds.) Petrarca e i suoi lettori, Ravenna, 109–41.Google Scholar

Bayet, J. (1941) ‘L’omen du cheval à Carthage: Timée, Virgile et le monnayage Punique,’ REL 19, 166–90.Google Scholar

Beck, H. (2011) ‘The Reasons for the War,’ in Hoyos, D. (ed.) (2011) A Companion to the Punic Wars, Oxford and Malden, 225–41.Google Scholar

Bergk, T. (1842) Review of J. K. Köne–W. H. Grauert (1840) Über die Sprache der römischen Epiker, Münster, Zeitschrift für die Altertumswissenschaft 9, 183–98.Google Scholar

Bergmann, G. (1964) Logic and Reality, Madison.Google Scholar

Bertman, S. (2000) ‘Cleopatra and Antony as Models for Dido and Aeneas,’ EMC n.s. 19, 395–8.Google Scholar

Bieńkowski, P. R. (1908) Die Darstellungen der Gallier in der hellenistischen Kunst, Vienna.Google Scholar

Biggs, T. J. (2014) A Roman Odyssey: Cultural Responses to the First Punic War from Andronicus to Augustus, PhD diss. Yale.Google Scholar

Biggs, T. J. (2016, unpublished) ‘Siculum mare Poeno purpureum sanguine: The First Punic War in Augustan Rome,’ unpublished paper presented at the CAAC 2016, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. (1932) Der Warner bei Herodot, PhD diss. Marburg.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (2011) Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Bocciolini Palagi, L. (2007) La Trottola di Dioniso: Motivi dionisiaci nel VII libro dell’Eneide, Bologna.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (1997) ‘Becoming Medea: Assimilation in Euripides,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, Princeton, 127–48.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1972) ‘Asinius Pollio and Augustus,’ Historia 21, 441–73.Google Scholar

Bowditch, P. L. (2001) Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (1990) ‘The Death of Priam: Allegory and History in the Aeneid,’ CQ 40, 470–81.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (2006) An Introduction to Roman Tragedy, London and New York.Google Scholar

Braccesi, L. (1984) La leggenda di Antenore: da Troia a Padova, Padua.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1960) ‘Tragic History and Aristotle’s School,’ PCPS 186, 14–19.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (1993) ‘Livy and Polybius,’ in Schuller, W. (ed.) Livius: Aspekte seines Werkes, Xenia 31, Konstanz, 39–52.Google Scholar

Brisson, J. P. (1969) ‘Carthage et le fatum,’ in Bibauw, J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard, Brussels, 163–73.Google Scholar

Broude, N. (2009) ‘G. B. Tiepolo at Valmarana: Gender Ideology in a Patrician Villa of the Settecento,’ The Art Bulletin 91, 160–83.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1955) P. Vergilius Maro, der Dichter der Römer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Burck, E. (1971) ‘The Third Decade,’ in Dorey, T. A. (ed.) Livy, London and Toronto, 21–46.Google Scholar

Cadotte, A. (2006) La romanisation des dieux: l’interpretatio romana en Afrique du Nord sous le Haut-Empire, Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1983) ‘Horace’s Epode 9: Some New Interpretations,’ ICS 8, 80–93.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1996) ‘Die Episode des Tribunen Q. Caedicius (Cato, Orig. Frg. 7–43 Peter),’ Maia 48, 1–32.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics, Princeton.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1954) ‘A Note on the Structure of the Aeneid,’ CQ 4, 214–15.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1969) An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar

Carey, W. L. (1996) ‘Nullus videtur dolo facere: The Roman Seizure of Sardinia in 237 B.C.,’ CPh 91, 203–22.Google Scholar

Carlson, G. I. (1978) ‘From Numantia to Necking: Horace Ode 2.12,’ CW 71, 441–8.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (1993) The Greeks: A Portrait of Self and Others, Oxford.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1999) ‘Facta impia (Virgil, Aeneid 4.596–9),’ CQ 49, 203–11.Google Scholar

Catin, L. (1944) En lisant Tite-Live, Paris.Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, P. (2008) ‘Simonides (of Magnesia) (163),’ in Brill’s New Jacoby, editor in Chief: Ian Worthington (University of Missouri). Consulted online on 25 August 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a163.Google Scholar

Cecioni, N. (1993) ‘Octavian and Orestes in Pausanias,’ CQ 43, 506.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (2003) ‘Agamemnon at Rome: Roman Dynasts and Greek Heroes,’ in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, Exeter, 295–319.Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (1986) Caton, Les Origines (fragments), Paris.Google Scholar

Cipriani, G. (1984) L’epifania di Annibale: Saggio introduttivo a Livio, Annales, XXI, Bari.Google Scholar

Cipriani, G. (1987) ‘La chiamata dell’eroe (Commento a Livio 21, 1–5),’ Aufidus 2, 3–28.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica, Bari.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2000) ‘The Memory of Philippi in Horace and the Interpretation of Epistle 1.20.23,’ CJ 96, 27–56.Google Scholar

Clark, E. A. (2004) History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Clark, W. P. (1932) ‘The Duration of the Action in Aeneid IV,’ CJ 27, 497–504.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World, Oxford.Google Scholar

Clarysse, W. and Thompson, D. J. (2006) Counting the People in Hellenistic Egypt, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1964) ‘An Interpretation of the Aeneid,’ HSCP 68, 139–47.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1993) The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book 1 of Apollonius’ Argonautica, Berkeley and Oxford.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1997a) ‘Conquest of the Mephistophelian Nausicaa: Medea’s Role in Apollonius’ Redefinition of the Epic Hero,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, Princeton, 149–77.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1997b) ‘“Domestici hostes”: The Nausicaa in Medea, the Catiline in Hannibal,’ MD 39, 165–85.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2000) ‘Cosmos without Imperium: The Argonautic Journey through Time,’ in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Apollonius Rhodius, Hellenistica Groningana 4, Leuven, 11–32.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2010) ‘From the Head of Zeus: The Beginnings of Roman Literature,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M. (eds.) A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, Oxford, 463–78.Google Scholar

Clément-Tarantino, S. (2006) Fama ou la renommée du genre: recherches sur la représentation de la tradition dans l’Énéide, PhD diss. Lille.Google Scholar

Clément-Tarantino, S. (2009) ‘Phémios dans l’Énéide et les “libertés” du poète épique,’ in Delignon, B. and Roman, Y. (eds.) Le poète irrévérencieux: modèles hellénistiques et réalités romaines, Lyon, 227–42.Google Scholar

Collard, C. (1975) ‘Medea and Dido,’ Prometheus 1, 131–51.Google Scholar

Consoli, V. (2008) ‘Il cosiddetto Tempio della Vittoria a Himera: per un’alternativa storico-religiosa,’ Workshop di Archeologia Classica 5, 43–75.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1980) Il genere e i suoi confini: cinque studi sulla poesia di Virgilio, Turin.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2007) The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, ed. Harrison, S. J., Oxford.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2009) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis, Berlin.Google Scholar

Conway, R. S. (1931a) Vergil’s Creative Art, London.Google Scholar

Conway, R. S. (1931b) ‘Two Difficulties in the Aeneid,’ CJ 26, 620–4.Google Scholar

Conway, R. S. (1935) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (2009) Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copley, F. O. (1970) ‘Plautus, Poenulus, 53–55,’ AJPh 91, 77–8.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (ed.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians, Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2005) Review of Erasmo (2004), BMCR 2005.07.53.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2010a) ‘A Stranger in a Strange Land: Medea in Roman Republican Tragedy,’ in Bartel, H. and Simon, A. (eds.) Unbinding Medea: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Classical Myth from Antiquity to the 21st Century, London, 39–52.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2010b) Review of I. Gildenhard and M. Revermann (eds.) (2010) Beyond the Fifth Century: Interactions with Greek Tragedy from the Fourth Century bce to the Middle Ages, Berlin and New York, BMCR 2011.11.49.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2013) ‘Haven’t I Seen You Somewhere Before? Optical Allusions in Republican Tragedy,’ in Harrison, G. W. M. and Liapis, V. (eds.) Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre, Leiden, 311–42.Google Scholar

Dangel, J. (2001) ‘Les tragédies mythologiques et prétextes de l’époque républicaine: politique en texte caché?’ in Faller, S. (ed.) Studien zu antiken Identitäten, Würzburg, 11–37.Google Scholar

Dearden, C. (2004) ‘Sicily and Rome: The Greek Context for Roman Drama,’ Mediterranean Archaeology 17, 121–30.Google Scholar

Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (2013) ‘Ennio, Scipione e la patria: interpretazione e fortuna (Virgilio, Orazio, Claudiano) di Ennio var. 6–8 V.2 (= VI op. inc. Sk.),’ Sileno 39, 115–32.Google Scholar

DeGraff, T. B. (1950) ‘Dido: Tota Vergiliana,’ The Classical Weekly 43.10, 147–51.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. (2012) Plautus, The Little Carthaginian, Pseudolus, The Rope, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (1995) From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples of the Central Apennines, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2003) ‘Beyond Greeks and Barbarians: Italy and Sicily in the Hellenistic Age,’ in Erskine, A. (ed.) A Companion to the Hellenistic World, Oxford, 294–310.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2005) Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denniston, J. D. and Page, D. L. (1957) Aeschylus, Agamemnon, Oxford.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1968) Time in Greek Tragedy, Ithaca.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1977) The Rise and Fall of States According to Greek Authors, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

De Sanctis, G. (1917) Storia dei Romani, Volume III: L’età delle guerre puniche, Parte II, Florence.Google Scholar

Dessau, H. (1906) ‘Livius und Augustus,’ Hermes 41, 142–51.Google Scholar

Devereux, G. (1976) Dreams in Greek Tragedy: An Ethno-Psycho-Analytical Study, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dewar, M. (1988) ‘Octavian and Orestes in the Finale of the First Georgic,’ CQ 38, 563–5.Google Scholar

Dewar, M. (1990) ‘Octavian and Orestes Again,’ CQ 40, 580–2.Google Scholar

D’Huys, V. (1990) ‘Χρήσιμον καὶ τέρπνον in Polybios’ Schlachtschilderungen: Einige literarische Topoi in seiner Darstellung der Schlacht bei Zama (XV 9–16),’ in Verdin, H., Schepens, G. and de Keyser, E. (eds.) Purposes of History: Studies in Greek Historians from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B.C., Leuven, 267–88.Google Scholar

Dietze, C. A. (1901) De Philemone comico, PhD diss. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. (2001) The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer’s Odyssey, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dressler, A. (2016) ‘Nominal Intelligence: Conspiracy, Prosopography, and the Secret of Horace, Odes 2.10,’ in Mitsis, P. and Ziogas, I. (eds.) Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry, Berlin, 37–68.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. (1957) ‘The Aeneid as Trilogy,’ TAPA 88, 1–10.Google Scholar

Dué, C. (2000) ‘Tragic History and Barbarian Speech in Sallust’s Jugurtha,’ HSCP 100, 311–25.Google Scholar

Dufallo, B. (2013) The Captor’s Image: Greek Culture in Roman Ecphrasis, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dunkle, J. R. (1969) ‘The Aegeus Episode and the Theme of Euripides’ Medea,’ TAPA 100, 97–107.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. T. (1996) ‘Septima Aestas: The Puzzle of Aen. 1.755–56 and 5.626,’ CW 90, 41–3.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1961) The Political Thought of Sallust, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eckstein, A. M. (1989) ‘Hannibal at New Carthage: Polybius 3.15 and the Power of Irrationality,’ CP 84, 1–15.Google Scholar

Eder, W. (2005) ‘Augustus and the Power of Tradition,’ in Galinsky, K. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, Cambridge, 13–32.Google Scholar

Edgeworth, R. J. (1976–7) ‘The Death of Dido,’ CJ 72, 129–33.Google Scholar

Edgeworth, R. J. (1989) ‘Saguntum: A Livian Overture,’ Eranos 87, 139–45.Google Scholar

Edson, C. (1948) ‘Philip V and Alcaeus of Messene,’ CPh 43, 116–21.Google Scholar

Egan, R. B. (1998) ‘The Signs of the Horse’s Head: Aeneid 1.442–5,’ PVS 23, 193–207.Google Scholar

Eidinow, J. S. C. (2003) ‘Dido, Aeneas, and Iulus: Heirship and Obligation in Aeneid 4,’ CQ 53, 260–7.Google Scholar

Eigler, U. (2000) ‘Extratextuelle und textuelle Identitätsstiftung durch Themen der frühen römischen Tragödie,’ in Manuwald (ed.) (2000) 13–21.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. (1954) The Myth of the Eternal Return, transl. W. R. Trask, New York.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2009) ‘Ennius’ “Cunctator” and the History of a Gerund in the Roman Historiographical Tradition,’ CQ 59, 531–41.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2010) ‘Ennius as Universal Historian: The Case of the Annales,’ in Liddel, P. and Fear, A. (eds.) Historiae Mundi: Studies in Universal History, London, 148–61.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2013) Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Erasmo, M. (2004) Roman Tragedy: Theatre to Theatricality, Austin.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (2001) Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Euben, J. P. (ed.) (1986) Greek Tragedy and Political Theory, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Evans, J. A. S. (1961) ‘The Dream of Xerxes and the “Nomoi” of the Persians,’ CJ 57, 109–11.Google Scholar

Evrigenis, I. D. (2008) Fear of Enemies and Collective Action, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Faber, R. (2012) ‘The Ekphrasis in Naevius’ Bellum Punicum and Hellenistic Literary Aesthetics,’ Hermes 140, 417–26.Google Scholar

Fabrizi, V. (2012) Mores ueteresque nouosque: rappresentazioni del passato e del presente di Roma negli Annales di Ennio, Pisa.Google Scholar

Faller, S. (2004) ‘Punisches im Poenulus,’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus, Tübingen, 163–202.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004) ‘Maidens in Other-land or Broads Abroad: Plautus’ Poenulae,’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus, Tübingen, 235–51.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2005) ‘The Origins and Essence of Roman Epic,’ in Foley, J. M. (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Epic, Oxford, 417–28.Google Scholar

Fears, J. R. (1981) ‘The Cult of Jupiter and Roman Imperial Ideology,’ ANRW 2.17.1, 3–141.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1984) Sexti Properti Elegiarum Libri IV, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2005) Properzio Elegie Libro II: introduzione, testo e commento, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. and Ciccarelli, I. (2008) Q. Horatii Flacci Carmina Liber IV, Florence.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1984) ‘The Reconciliations of Juno,’ CQ 34, 179–94.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition, Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2005) ‘The Beginnings of a Literature in Latin,’ JRS 95, 226–40.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (1998) Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History, Berkeley and London.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2009) ‘Delusions of Grandeur: Lucretian “Passages” in Livy,’ in Hardie, P. (ed.) Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture, Oxford, 310–29.Google Scholar

Fenik, B. C. (1960) The Influence of Euripides on Vergil’s Aeneid, PhD diss. Princeton.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (1995) Tragico e tragedia nell’episodio cartaginese dell’Eneide, PhD diss. Torino.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (1996a) ‘Il prologo divino dell’Eneide (il prologo delle “Troiane” di Euripide e Aen. 1.3452),’ Lexis 14, 99–115.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (1996b) ‘Invenzione mitologica e tecnica del racconto nell’episodio virgiliano di Polidoro (Aen. 3.1–68),’ Prometheus 22, 247–73.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (2002) ‘Come sulle scene: Eneide IV e la tragedia,’ Quad. Dip. Filol. Linguist. Trad. Class. “Augusto Rostagni” 1, 141–211.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (2002–3) ‘Virgilio e l’esperienza tragica: pensieri fuori moda sul libro IV dell’Eneide,’ ITFC 2, 1–54.Google Scholar

Ferris, I. M. (2000) Enemies of Rome: Barbarians through Roman Eyes, Sutton.Google Scholar

Flory, S. (1990) ‘The Meaning of τὸ μὴ μυθῶδες (1.22.4) and the Usefulness of Thucydides’ History,’ CJ 85, 193–208.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1995) ‘Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When Were Plays on Contemporary Subjects Performed in Republican Rome?,’ CQ 45, 170–90.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture, Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2000) ‘Fabula de Bacchanalibus: The Bacchanalian Cult of the Second Century bc and Roman Drama,’ in Manuwald, (ed.) (2000) 23–35.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2010) Roman Republics, Princeton.Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri VII–VIII, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (1983) The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Foster, J. (1973–4) ‘Some Devices of Drama in Aeneid 1–4,’ PVS 13, 28–41.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1984) ‘Des espaces autres: une conférence inédite de Michel Foucault,’ Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité 5, 46–9.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. and Miskowiec, J. (1986) ‘Of Other Spaces,’ Diacritics 16, 22–7.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. (1996) ‘Even Better than the Real Thing: A Tale of Two Cities,’ in Elsner, J. (ed.) Art and Text in Roman Culture, Cambridge, 57–74.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1945) ‘Some Aspects of the Structure of Aeneid VII,’ JRS 35, 1–14.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1954) ‘The Giants in the Poem of Naevius,’ JRS 44, 14–17.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1957) Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, H. (1935) ‘Griechische Bildung in altrömischen Epen II,’ Hermes 70, 59–72.Google Scholar

Franklin, M. (2000) ‘Mantegna’s “Dido”: Faithful Widow or Abandoned Lover?,’ Artibus et Historiae 21.41, 111–22.Google Scholar

Franko, G. F. (1996) ‘The Characterization of Hanno in Plautus’ Poenulus,’ AJPh 117, 425–52.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2014) ‘Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus,’ JRS 104, 105–32.Google Scholar

Froesch, H. (1991) ‘Arma uirumque cano: Beobachtungen zu den Eingangswörtern der Aeneis,’ Anregung 37, 309–12.Google Scholar

Fusillo, M. (1985) Il tempo delle Argonautiche: un’analisi del racconto in Apollonio, Rome.Google Scholar

Galasso, L. (1995) Epistularum ex Ponto Liber II, Florence.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1969a) Aeneas, Sicily, and Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1969b) ‘Plautus’ Poenulus and the Cult of Venus Erycina,’ in Bibaw, J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard, Collection Latomus 101.1, 358–64.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction, Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2003) ‘Greek and Roman Drama and the Aeneid,’ in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, Exeter, 275–94.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2010) ‘Virgil’s Dido and the Heroism of Hannibal in Silius’ Punica,’ in Augoustakis, A. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus, Leiden and Boston, 73–98.Google Scholar

Garvie, A. F. (1999) ‘Text and Dramatic Interpretation in “Persae”,’ Lexis 17, 21–40.Google Scholar

Garvie, A. F. (2009) Aeschylus, Persae, Oxford.Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2013) ‘Princeps avant la lettre: The Foundations of Augustus in Pre-Augustan Poetry,’ in Labate, M. and Rosati, G. (eds.) La costruzione del mito augusteo, Heidelberg, 49–68.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2003) ‘The “Annalist” before the Annalists: Ennius and His Annales,’ in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds.) Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius, Darmstadt, 93–114.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2010) ‘Buskins & SPQR: Roman Receptions of Greek Tragedy,’ in Gildenhard, I. and Revermann, M. (eds.) Beyond the Fifth Century: Interactions with Greek Tragedy from the Fourth Century bce to the Middle Ages, Berlin and New York, 153–86.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2012) Virgil, Aeneid, 4.1–299: Latin Text, Study Questions, Commentary and Interpretative Essays, Cambridge: www.openbookpublishers.com/product/162.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. (2004) ‘Ovid’s “Hecale”: Deconstructing Athens in the Metamorphoses,’ JRS 94, 47–72.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2014a) ‘Virgil’s Carthaginians at Aen. 1.430–6: Cyclopes in Bees’ Clothing,’ CCJ 60, 37–58.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2014b) ‘Once More unto the Breach: Virgil’s Arae and the Treaty of Philinus,’ SIFC 107, 61–79.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2016a) ‘My Enemy’s Enemy is my Enemy: Virgil’s Illogical Use of Metus Hostilis,’ in Hardie, P. (ed.) (2016) 37–55.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2016b) ‘Dithyrambic Iambics: Epode 9 and its General(s’) Confusion,’ in Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds.) Horace Epodes: Contexts, Intertexts, and Reception, Oxford, 131–51.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2016c) ‘Did Somebody Say Augustan Totalitarianism? Duncan Kennedy’s “Reflections,” Hannah Arendt’s Origins, and the Continental Divide over Virgil’s Aeneid,’ Dictynna 13, online since 20 December 2016: http://dictynna.revues.org/1282.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2017) ‘Virgil’s Carthage: A Heterotopic Space of Empire,’ in Asper, M. and Rimell, V. (eds.) Imagining Empire: Political Space in Hellenistic and Roman Literature, Heidelberg, 133–50.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (forthcoming) ‘Bunte Barbaren Setting up the Stage: Re-inventing the Barbarian on the Georgics’ Theatre-Temple,’ in Freer, N. and Xinyue, B. (eds.) New Perspectives on Virgil’s Georgics, London.Google Scholar

Gladhill, B. (2009) ‘The Poetics of Alliance in Vergil’s Aeneid,’ Dictynna 6, 36–69: http://dictynna.revues.org/260.Google Scholar

Gladhill, B. (2016) Rethinking Roman Alliance: A Study in Poetics and Society, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1995) Epic in Republican Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1996) ‘The Fall and Rise of Roman Tragedy,’ TAPA 126, 265–86.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1987) ‘The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology,’ JHS 107, 58–76; reprinted in J. J. Winkler and F. I. Zeitlin (eds.) (1990) Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context, Princeton, 97–129.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2000) ‘Civic Ideology and the Problem of Difference: The Politics of Aeschylean Tragedy, Once Again,’ JHS 120, 34–56.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2002) ‘Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus’ Persae,’ in Harrison, T. (ed.) Greeks and Barbarians, Edinburgh, 50–61; originally in JHS 108 (1988) 128–93.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2013) Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gotter, U. (2003) ‘Die Vergangenheit als Kampfplatz der Gegenwart: Catos (konter)revolutionäre Konstruktion des republikanischen Erinnerungsraums,’ in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds.) Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius, Darmstadt, 115–34.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2010) ‘Augustus and “Syracuse”,’ JRS 100, 69–87.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2016) ‘Dido and the Owl,’ in Mitsis, P. and Ziogas, I. (eds.) Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry, Berlin, 107–30.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graf, F. (1997) ‘Medea, the Enchantress from Afar: Remarks on a Well-known Myth,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, Princeton, 21–43.Google Scholar

Grant, J. N. (1969) ‘Dido Melissa,’ Phoenix 23, 380–91.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1971) ‘Hanno’s Punic Speech in the Poenulus of Plautus,’ Hermes 99, 25–45.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1972) ‘Plautus, Poenulus 967–981: Some Notes,’ Glotta 50, 228–33.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1973) ‘Titus Maccius Plautus,’ CQ 23, 78–84.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1982a) ‘Ennius’ Annals,’ in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Volume II: Latin Literature, Cambridge, 60–76.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1982b) ‘The Origins of Roman Drama,’ in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Volume II: Latin Literature, Cambridge, 77–92.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1998) ‘The Social Function of Attic Tragedy,’ CQ 48, 39–61.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1999) ‘Sophocles and the Democratic City,’ in Griffin, J. (ed.) Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, Oxford, 73–94.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (2007) ‘The Rule of the Father in Persians,’ in Lloyd, M. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus, Oxford, 93–140.Google Scholar

Gross, N. P. (1976) ‘Nausicaa: A Feminine Threat,’ CW 69, 311–17.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy, Leiden.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2011) Rethinking the Other in Antiquity, Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Gurval, R. A. (1995) Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A. (1997) (eds.) The Roman Cultural Revolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. (1991) The Idea of Epic, Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford.Google Scholar

Haley, S. P. (1989) ‘Livy’s Sophoniba,’ C&M 40, 171–81.Google Scholar

Haley, S. P. (1990) ‘Livy, Passion, and Cultural Stereotypes,’ Historia 39, 375–84.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1993) ‘Asia Unmanned: Images of Victory in Classical Athens,’ in Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.) War and Society in the Greek World, London and New York, 108–33.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1996) Aeschylus, Persians, Warminster.Google Scholar

Hanfmann, G. M. A. (1937) ‘Studies in Etruscan Bronze Reliefs: The Gigantomachy,’ ArtB 19, 463–84.Google Scholar

Hanson, J. A. (1959) Roman Theater-Temples, PhD diss. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1987) ‘Ships and Ship-names in the Aeneid,’ in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, Bristol, 163–71.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1990) ‘Ovid’s Theban History: The First Anti-Aeneid?,’ CQ 40, 224–35.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1991) ‘The Aeneid and the Oresteia,’ PVS 20, 29–45.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1992) ‘Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome,’ in Powell, A. (ed.) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, Bristol, 59–82.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1994) Virgil Aeneid Book IX, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1995) ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos,’ CQ 45.1, 204–15.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1997) ‘Virgil and Tragedy,’ in Martindale, C. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, Cambridge, 312–26.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1999) ‘Metamorphosis, Metaphor, and Allegory in Latin Epic,’ in Beissinger, M., Tylus, J. and Wofford, S. (eds.) Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, 89–107.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2006) ‘Virgil’s Ptolemaic Relations,’ JRS 96, 25–41.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2007a) ‘Images of the Persian Wars in Rome,’ in Bridges, E., Hall, E. and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.) Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars: Antiquity to the Third Millennium, Oxford, 127–43.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2014) The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid, London and New York.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (ed.) (2016) Augustan Poets and the Irrational, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1972–3) ‘Why Did Venus Wear Boots? Some Reflections on Aeneid 1.314f.,’ PVS 12, 10–25.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1984) ‘The Aeneid and Carthage,’ in Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.) Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus, Cambridge, 95–115.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1985) ‘Foundation Prodigies in the Aeneid,’ PLLS 5, 131–64.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1989) ‘The Tragedy of Dido,’ ECM 33.8, 1–21.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2000) The Emptiness of Asia: Aeschylus’ Persians and the History of the Fifth Century, London.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (2010) ‘Polybius and the First Universal History,’ in Liddel, P. and Fear, A. (eds.) Historiae Mundi: Studies in Universal History, London, 30–40.Google Scholar

Hau, L. (2011) ‘Tyche in Polybius: Narrative Answers to a Philosophical Question,’ Histos 5, 183–207.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1993) Virgil’s Epic Technique, trans. of 3rd edn (1915) by H. and D. Harvey and F. Robertson, Bristol.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1989) ‘Livy and the Invention of History,’ in Cameron, A. (ed.) History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History, London, 66–85.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1996) ‘Polishing off the Politics: Horace’s Ode to Pollio 2,1,’ MD 37, 59–136, revisited in Henderson (1998) 108–62.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1998) Fighting for Rome: Poets & Caesars, History & Civil War, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1999) Writing down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar

Henry, J. (1873) Aeneidea, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Herrmann, W. (1979) Die Historien des Coelius Antipater: Fragmente und Kommentar, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Heslin, P. (2015) The Museum of Augustus: The Temple of Apollo in Pompeii, the Portico of Philippus in Rome, and Latin Poetry, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. (2007) Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. (1990) ‘What Was the Trojan Horse Made of? Interpreting Vergil’s Aeneid,’ Yale Journal of Criticism 3, 109–31.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. (1992) ‘Sidonian Dido,’ in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.) Innovations of Antiquity, New York and London, 332–84.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. (1977) Ovid, Ars Amatoria Book I, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1999) ‘Römische gentes und griechische Genealogien,’ in Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds.) Rezeption und Identität: die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma, Stuttgart, 3–21, reprinted in J.-K. Hölkeskamp (2004) Senatus Populusque Romanus: die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimensionen und Deutungen, Stuttgart, 199–217.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (1984) ‘Actium und Salamis,’ in JdAI 99, 187–214; reprinted as ‘Azio and Salamina,’ in Hölscher, T. (1994) Monumenti statali e pubblico, Rome, 174–98.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (1990) ‘Augustus and Orestes,’ in Travaux du Centre d’archéologie méditerranéenne de l’Académie Polonaise des sciences 30, Études et Travaux 15, 163–8.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2009) ‘Monuments of the Battle of Actium: Propaganda and Response,’ in Edmondson, J. (ed.) Augustus, Edinburgh, 310–33, originally published as ‘Denkmäler der Schlacht von Actium: Propaganda und Resonanz,’ Klio 67 (1985) 81–102.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1973) ‘Three Notes on Horace’s Epodes,’ Philologus 117, 136–8.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1973–4) ‘Dido in the Light of History,’ PVS 13, 1–13, reprinted in S. J. Harrison (ed.) (1990) Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid, Oxford, 127–44.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1974) ‘Turnus ad portas,’ Latomus 33, 80–6.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1995) A Companion to the Study of Virgil, Mnemosyne Suppl. 151, Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2000) Virgil, Aeneid 7, Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2008) Virgil, Aeneid 2, Leiden.Google Scholar

Hoyos, B. D. (1998) Unplanned Wars: The Origins of the First and Second Punic Wars, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Hudson-Williams, T. (1935) ‘King Bees and Queen Bees,’ CR 49, 2–4.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes Argonautica Book III, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2015) Apollonius of Rhodes Argonautica Book IV, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jacobs, J. (2010) ‘From Sallust to Silius Italicus: Metus Hostilis and the Fall of Rome in the Punica,’ in Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire, Leiden and Boston, 123–39.Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (1997) Livy’s Written Rome, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Jameson, F. (1986) ‘Third-World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism,’ Social Text 15, 65–88.Google Scholar

Jeppesen, S. A. (2016) ‘Lament for Fallen Cities in Early Roman Drama: Naevius, Ennius, and Plautus,’ in Bachvarova, M. R., Dutsch, D. and Suter, A. (eds.) The Fall of Cities in the Mediterranean: Commemoration in Literature, Folk-Song, and Liturgy, Cambridge, 127–55.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1967) The Tragedies of Ennius, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1983) Review of Zorzetti (1980), CR 33, 22–3.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (2000) ‘Accius’ Aeneadae aut Decius: Romans and the Gallic Other,’ in Manuwald (ed.) (2000) 325–61.Google Scholar

Johner, A. (1996) La violence chez Tite-Live: mythographie et historiographie, Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Johnson, T. S. (2009) ‘Lyric, History and Imagination: Horace as Historiographer (C. 2.1),’ CJ 104, 311–20.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1987) Momentary Monsters: Lucan and his Heroes, Ithaca.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (1997) ‘Corinthian Medea and the Cult of Hera Akraia,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, Princeton, 44–70.Google Scholar

Keith, A. (2016) ‘City Lament in Augustan Epic: Antitypes of Rome from Troy to Alba Longa,’ in Bachvarova, M. R., Dutsch, D. and Suter, A. (eds.) The Fall of Cities in the Mediterranean: Commemoration in Literature, Folk-Song, and Liturgy, Cambridge, 156–82.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1992) ‘“Augustan” and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections on Terms of Reference,’ in Powell, A. (ed.) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, London, 26–58.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1971) Lucretius, De Rerum Natura Book III, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kerkhecker, A. (2001) ‘Zur internen Gattungsgeschichte der römischen Epik: Das Beispiel Ennius,’ in Schmidt, E. A. (ed.) L’histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine, Entretiens Hardt 47, Geneva, 39–95.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1966) The Sense of an Ending, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1979) The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kirichenko, A. (2013) ‘Virgil’s Augustan Temples: Image and Intertext in the “Aeneid”,’ JRS 103, 65–87.Google Scholar

Klingner, F. (1959) Q. Horati Flacci Opera, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Klingner, F. (1967) Virgil: Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis, Zurich and Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Klotz, A. (1940–1) Livius und seine Vorgänger, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Knox, B. M. W. (1950) ‘The Serpent and the Flame: The Imagery of the Second Book of the Aeneid,’ AJPh 71, 379–400.Google Scholar

König, A. (1970) Die Aeneis und die griechische Tragödie: Studien zur imitatio-Technik Vergils, Berlin.Google Scholar

Korenjak, M. (2004) ‘Italiam contra Tiberinaque longe / ostia: Virgil’s Carthago and Eratosthenian Geography,’ CQ 54, 646–9.Google Scholar

Kowalewski, B. (2002) Frauengestalten im Geschichtswerk des T. Livius, Munich.Google Scholar

Kragelund, P. (2002) ‘Historical Drama in Ancient Rome: Republican Flourishing and Imperial Decline?,’ SO 77, 5–51.Google Scholar

Kragelund, P. (2016) Roman Historical Drama: The Octavia in Antiquity and Beyond, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kraggerud, E. (1963) ‘Vergil über die Gründung Karthagos,’ SO 38, 32–7.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. and Woodman, A. J. (1997) (eds.) Latin Historians, Oxford.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. (2006) ‘Leonides Laco quidem simile apud Thermopylas fecit: Cato and Herodotus,’ BICS 49, 93–103.Google Scholar

Krummen, E. (2004) ‘Dido als Mänade und tragische Heroine: Dionysische Thematik und Tragödientradition in Vergils Didoerzählung,’ Poetica 36, 25–69.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (1991) ‘Città morte, città future: un tema della poesia augustea,’ Maia 43, 167–84.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1963) Orazio e l’ideologia del principato, Turin.Google Scholar

La Rocca, E. (1985) Amazzonomachia: le sculture frontonali del tempio di Apollo Sosiano, Rome.Google Scholar

Lazenby, J. F. (1996) The First Punic War: A Military History, London.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1979) ‘Sedes apibus: From the Georgics to the Aeneid,’ Vergilius 25, 2–14.Google Scholar

Leask, W. K. (1888) ‘The Homeric Phaeacians,’ The English Historical Review 3.10, 292–4.Google Scholar

Le Doze, P. (2010) ‘Les idéologies à Rome: les modalités du discours politique de Cicéron à Auguste,’ Revue Historique 654, 259–89.Google Scholar

Le Doze, P. (2012) ‘Horace et la question idéologique à Rome: considérations sur un itinéraire politique,’ Revue Historique 664, 863–86.Google Scholar

Le Doze, P. (2014) Le Parnasse face à l’Olympe: poésie et culture politique à l’époque d’Octavien/Auguste, Rome.Google Scholar

Le Doze, P. (2015) ‘Res Publica Restituta: réflexions sur la restauration Augustéenne,’ Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 26, 79–108.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1978a) ‘Versuch einer Typologie des römischen Dramas,’ in Lefèvre, E. (ed.) Das römische Drama, Darmstadt, 1–90.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1978b) Dido und Aias: ein Beitrag zur römischen Tragödie, AAWM 1978.2, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2000) ‘Aitiologisch-politische Implikationen in Naevius’ Danae,’ in Manuwald, (ed.) (2000) 175–84.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2001) ‘Ennius’ Medea im römisch-politischen Kontext,’ in Faller, S. (ed.) Studien zu antiken Identitäten, Würzburg, 39–51.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2004) ‘Plautus’ Poenulus zwischen Nea und Stegreifspiel,’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus, Tübingen, 9–59.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) (1991) Plautus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität des Plautus, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1998) ‘Sophocles at Patavium (fr. 137 Radt),’ JHS 118, 82–100.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2004) Comedy and the Rise of Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2007) ‘Epic and Historiography at Rome,’ in Marincola, J. (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 2 vols. Malden, MA, Oxford and Victoria, 483–92.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2010) ‘Early Roman Epic and the Maritime Moment,’ CPh 105, 265–80.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic War, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966) The Savage Mind (La pensée sauvage), London.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966) Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1997) Horace’s Narrative Odes, Oxford.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1965) ‘The Dating of Livy’s First Decade,’ TAPA 96, 209–40.Google Scholar

Luck, G. (1983) ‘Naevius and Virgil,’ ICS 8, 267–75.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2009) Tragedy and the Dionysiac in Virgil’s Aeneid, DPhil diss. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2013) ‘Virgil’s Bacchus and the Roman Republic,’ in Nelis, D. and Farrell, J. A. (eds.) Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic, Oxford, 124–45.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2015) ‘The Argo: Archaic Wonder and Innovation,’ Maia 67, 233–51.Google Scholar

Macherey, P. (1978) A Theory of Literary Production, transl. G. Wall, London.Google Scholar

Mack, S. (1978) Patterns of Time in Vergil, Hamden.Google Scholar

Mackail, J. W. (1930) The Aeneid, Oxford.Google Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1979) ‘Horace and the Sibyl (Epode 16.2),’ CQ 29, 220–1.Google Scholar

Mader, G. (1993) ‘“Annibas hubristes”: Traces of a “tragic” pattern in Livy’s Hannibal Portrait in Book XXI?,’ AncSoc 24, 205–24.Google Scholar

Maguinness, W. S. (1963) ‘L’inspiration tragique de l’Éneide,’ AC 32, 477–90.Google Scholar

Mandra, R. (1934) The Time Element in the Aeneid of Vergil, Williamsport.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2000) Identität und Alterität in der frührömischen Tragödie, Würzburg.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2001) Fabulae Praetextae: Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer, Munich.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2011) Roman Republican Theatre, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2012) Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta, Volume 2: Ennius, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Marconi, P. (1929) Agrigento, Florence.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2010) ‘Eros and Empire: Virgil and the Historians on Civil War,’ in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. (eds.) Ancient Historiography and its Contexts, Oxford, 183–204.Google Scholar

Mariotti, S. (1955) Il Bellum Poenicum e l’arte di Nevio: saggio con edizione dei frammenti del Bellum Poenicum, Rome.Google Scholar

Marmorale, E. V. (1950) Naevius poeta: introduzione biobibliografica, testo dei frammenti e commento, 2nd edition, Florence.Google Scholar

Martin, J. M. K. (1941–2) ‘Livy and Romance,’ G&R 11, 124–9.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (2005) Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste: An Essay in Aesthetics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mastronarde, D. J. (2002) Euripides, Medea, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mattingly, H. B. (1993) ‘L. Porcius Licinus and the Beginning of Latin Poetry,’ in Jocelyn, H. D. and Hurt, H. (eds.) Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent, Liverpool Classical Papers 3, Liverpool, 163–8.Google Scholar

Maurach, G. (1975) Plauti Poenulus, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Maurice, L. (2004) ‘Deception and Metatheatricality in the Poenulus,’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus, Tübingen 267–90.Google Scholar

Mazza, M. (1966) Storia e ideologia in Tito Livio, Catania.Google Scholar

Mazzarino, S. (1947) Introduzione alle guerre puniche, Catania.Google Scholar

McGushin, P. (1992) Sallust, The Histories, Volume 1: Books i–ii, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mertens, D. (2006) Città e monumenti dei Greci d’Occidente: dalla colonizzazione alla crisi di fine V secolo a.C., Rome.Google Scholar

Middleton, R. (1962) ‘Brother-Sister and Father-Daughter Marriage in Ancient Egypt,’ American Sociological Review 27.5, 603–11.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1995) Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Miller, M. C. (1997) Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century bc: A Study in Cultural Receptivity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mineo, B. (2011) ‘Principal Literary Sources for the Punic Wars (apart from Polybius),’ in Hoyos, B. D. (ed.) (2011) A Companion to the Punic Wars, Oxford, 111–28.Google Scholar

Mitchell, L. (2007) Panhellenism and the Barbarian in Archaic and Classical Greece, Swansea.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1983) ‘Virgil, Pompey and the Histories of Asinius Pollio,’ CW 76, 287–8.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1987) ‘The Tragedy and Guilt of Dido,’ in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, Bristol, 153–61.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1993) ‘Truth and Untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides,’ in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.) Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Exeter, 88–121.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (2009) ‘Livy’s Preface,’ in Chaplin, J. D., and Kraus, C. S. (eds.) Livy, Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, Oxford, 49–87.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1942) ‘“Terra Marique”,’ JRS 32, 53–64.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1990) The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography, Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford.Google Scholar

Monti, R. C. (1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic, Mnemosyne Supplement 66, Leiden.Google Scholar

Moorton, R. F. (1989) ‘Dido and Aeetes,’ Vergilius 35, 48–54.Google Scholar

Moreau, A. (1985) Eschyle: la violence et le chaos, Paris.Google Scholar

Morelli, A. M. (2016) ‘Lo Scipio e la poesia celebrativa enniana per Scipione: con una appendice sul problema storico dell’“ultimo discorso” dell’Africano,’ in Pieri, B. and Pellacani, D. (eds.) Si verba tenerem: studi sulla poesia latina in frammenti, Berlin and Boston, 53–78.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1998) ‘Assimilation and Civil War: Hercules and Cacus,’ in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, Swansea, 175–97.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1999) Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s ‘Georgics’, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2000) ‘The Autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio,’ JRS 90, 51–60.Google Scholar

Moudarres, A. (2011) The Mirror of the Enemy: Boundaries of Power in the Italian Renaissance, PhD diss. Yale.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. (1983) ‘Foreshadowing and Dramatic Irony in the Story of Dido,’ AJPh 104.2, 134–55.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. (1995) ‘Law, Rhetoric, and Genre in Horace, Satires 2.1,’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration, Oxford, 203–18.Google Scholar

Murray, W. (2012) The Age of Titans: The Rise and Fall of the Great Hellenistic Navies, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1969) P. Vergili Maronis Opera recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit R. A. B. Mynors, Oxford.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil, Georgics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nadeau, Y. (1980) ‘Speaking Structures: Horace, Odes, 2.1 to 2.19,’ in Deroux, C. (ed.) (1980) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History II, Brussels, 178–222.Google Scholar

Narducci, E. (1973) ‘Il tronco di Pompeo (Troia e Roma nella Pharsalia),’ Maia 25, 317–25.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. (2000) ‘Apollonius Rhodius and the Traditions of Latin Epic Poetry,’ in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Apollonius Rhodius, Hellenistica Groningana 4, Leuven, 85–103.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. (2001) Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds.Google Scholar

Niles, J. D. (1978) ‘Patterning in the Wanderings of Odysseus,’ Ramus 7, 46–60.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M. P. (1951) Cults, Myths, Oracles, and Politics in Ancient Greece, Göteborg.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book I, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1978) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book II, Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. (2004) A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book III, Oxford.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1915) Ennius und Vergilius: Kriegsbilder aus Roms grosser Zeit, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1957) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (1997) A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X, Volume 1, Oxford.Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (1998) A Commentary on Livy Books VI– X, Volume 2, Oxford.Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (2005) A Commentary on Livy Books VI– X, Volume 3, Oxford.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1965) A Commentary on Livy, Books 1–5, Oxford.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2004) ‘Cato the Elder and the Destruction of Carthage,’ Helios 31, 99–125.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid, Princeton.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan, Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Higgins, D. M. (1997) ‘Medea as Muse: Pindar’s Pythian 4,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, Princeton, 103–26.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1997) ‘Sons and Lovers: Sexuality and Gender in Virgil’s Poetry,’ in Martindale, C. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, Cambridge, 294–311.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (2001) ‘Freud’s Aeneid,’ Vergilius 47, 39–63.Google Scholar

Paduano, G. and Fusillo, M. (1986) Apollonio Rodio, Le Argonautiche, Milan.Google Scholar

Page, T. E. (1923) The Aeneid of Virgil Books I–VI, London.Google Scholar

Panoussi, V. (2002) ‘Vergil’s Ajax: Allusion, Tragedy and Heroic Identity in the Aeneid,’ ClAnt 21, 95–134.Google Scholar

Panoussi, V. (2009) Greek Tragedy in Vergil’s “Aeneid”: Ritual, Empire and Intertext, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Paratore, E. (1957) Storia del teatro latino, estratto dalla ‘Storia del teatro’ diretta da M. Praz, Milano, reprinted as Paratore (2005) Storia del teatro latino, con un’appendice di scritti sul teatro latino arcaico e un inedito autobiografico, a cura di L. Gamberale e A. Marchetta, Venosa.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1963) ‘The Two Voices of Virgil’s Aeneid,’ Arion 2, 66–80.Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. (1935) Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus, Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Perrochat, P. (1949) Les modèles grecs de Salluste, Paris.Google Scholar

Pettinger, A. (2012) The Republic in Danger: Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius, Oxford.Google Scholar

Piccaluga, G. (1983) ‘Fondare Roma, domare Cartagine: un mito delle origini,’ in Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi Fenici e Punici, Rome, 409–24.Google Scholar

Pobjoy, M. (1998) ‘Dido on the Tragic Stage: An Invitation to the Theatre of Carthage,’ in Burden, M. (ed.) A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth, London, 41–64.Google Scholar

Podlecki, A. J. (1986) ‘Polis and Monarch in Early Attic Tragedy,’ in Euben (ed.) (1986) 76–100.Google Scholar

Polleichtner, W. (2013) ‘scaenis decora apta futuris: Das Theater und die Aeneis,’ in Baumbach, M. and Polleichtner, W. (eds.) Innovation aus Tradition: Literaturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Vergilforschung. BAC – Bochumer Altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium Band 93, Trier, 139–65.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. (1962) The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, trans. G. Selingson, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Potter, F. H. (1926) ‘How Long Was Aeneas at Carthage?,’ CJ 21, 615–24.Google Scholar

Powell, J. (2011) ‘Aeneas the Spin-Doctor: Rhetorical Self-Presentation in Aeneid 2,’ PVS 27, 184–202.Google Scholar

Prag, J. R. W (2006) ‘Poenus plane est: But Who Were the “Punickes”?,’ PBSR 74, 1–37.Google Scholar

Prag, J. R. W (2010) ‘Tyrannizing Sicily: The Despots Who Cried “Carthage!”,’ in Turner, A., Chong-Gossard, K. O. and Vervaet, F. (eds.) Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Despotism and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World, Leiden, 51–71.Google Scholar

Prag, J. R. W (2011) ‘Siculo-Punic Coinage and Siculo-Punic Interactions,’ in Riva, M. Dalla (ed.) Meetings between Cultures in the Ancient Mediterranean: Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Classical Archaeology, Rome 22–26 sept. 2008, published online in Bollettino di Archeologia online, I, 2010, Volume Speciale.Google Scholar

Pratt, K. J. (1965) ‘Rome as Eternal,’ JHI 26, 25–44.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. (1995) ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth,’ in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.) Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, Oxford, 133–48.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1965) The Poetry of the Aeneid, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (1967) ‘Septima Aestas,’ CQ 17, 128–9.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (2012) ‘Persian Army and Warfare in the Mirror of Herodotus’s Interpretation,’ in Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B. and Bichler, R. (eds.) Herodot und das Persische Weltreich: Herodotus and the Persian Empire, Akten des 3. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema ‘Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen’, Wiesbaden, 5–37.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. and Samons, L. J. (1990) ‘Opposition to Augustus,’ in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.) Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 417–54.Google Scholar

Radici Colace, P. (1979) Choerili Samii reliquiae, Rome.Google Scholar

Rakob, F. (2000) ‘The Making of Augustan Carthage,’ in Fentress, E. (ed.) Romanization and the City: Creation, Transformations, and Failures. Proceedings of a Conference Held at the American Academy in Rome to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Excavations at Cosa, 14–16 May, 1998, Rome, 73–82.Google Scholar

Ramsay, W. (1869) The Mostellaria of Plautus, London.Google Scholar

Reade, B. (1939) ‘Identified Drawings by G. B. Tiepolo – I,’ The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs 75.440, 194–5 + 198–201 + 203.Google Scholar

Rebeggiani, S. (2016) ‘Orestes, Aeneas, and Augustus,’ in P. Hardie (ed.) (2016) 56–73.Google Scholar

Reckford, K. (1996) ‘Recognizing Venus (I): Aeneas Meets His Mother,’ Arion 3rd series 3.2, 1–42.Google Scholar

Reed, J. D. (2007) Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid, Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Reeve, M. (1987) ‘The Future in the Past,’ in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, Bristol, 319–22.Google Scholar

Reggiani, R. (1987) ‘Rileggendo alcuni frammenti tragici di Ennio, Pacuvio e Accio,’ Quaderni di cultura e di tradizione classica 4–5, 31–88.Google Scholar

Rhodes, P. J. (2003) ‘Nothing to Do with Democracy: Athenian Drama and the Polis,’ JHS 123, 104–19.Google Scholar

Rich, J. (1996) ‘The Origins of the Second Punic War,’ in Cornell, T., Rankov, B. and Sabin, P. (eds.) The Second Punic War: A Reappraisal, London, 1–37.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (2005) Rome and the Mysterious Orient: Three Plays by Plautus, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Roche, P. (2009) Lucan, De Bello Ciuili Book I, Oxford.Google Scholar

Romeo, I. (1998) Ingenuus leo: l’immagine di Agrippa, Rome.Google Scholar

Rose, C. B. (2003) ‘Reevaluating Troy’s Links to Rome: A Review of Andrew Erskine, Troy between Greece and Rome (Cambridge, 2001),’ JRA 16, 479–81.Google Scholar

Rose, C. B. (2005) ‘The Parthians in Augustan Rome,’ AJA 109, 21–75.Google Scholar

Rose, G. P. (1969) ‘The Unfriendly Phaeacians,’ TAPA 100, 387–406.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2004a) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2004b) ‘Parallel Lives: Hannibal and Scipio in Livy’s Third Decade,’ TAPA 134, 359–81.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. and Breed, B. W. (eds.) (2006) Ennius and the Invention of Roman Epic, Arethusa 39.3, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Rostagni, A. (1942) Da Livio a Virgilio e da Virgilio a Livio, Padua.Google Scholar

Rowell, H. T. (1947) ‘The Original Form of Naevius’ Bellum Poenicum,’ AJPh 68, 21–46.Google Scholar

Rowell, H. T. (1957a) ‘The Scholium on Naevius in Parisinus Latinus 7930,’ AJPh 78, 1–22.Google Scholar

Rowell, H. T. (1957b) Review of Mariotti (1955), AJPh 78, 420–7.Google Scholar

Russo, A. (2007) Quinto Ennio: le opere minori, Pisa.Google Scholar

Russo, F. (2011) ‘Sagunto nei trattati romano-cartaginesi,’ PP 66, 81–99.Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (2007) ‘Tragedy and History,’ in Marincola, J. (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 2 vols. Malden, MA, Oxford and Victoria, 504–14.Google Scholar

Said, E. (1978) Orientalism, London.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2002) ‘Greeks and Barbarians in Euripides’ Tragedies: The End of Differences?,’ in Harrison, T. (ed.) Greeks and Barbarians, Edinburgh, 62–100; originally (1984) ‘Grecs et Barbares dans les tragédies d’Euripide: le fin des différences,’ Ktema 9, 27–53.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2007) ‘Tragedy and Reversal: The Example of the Persians,’ in Lloyd, M. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus, Oxford, 71–92.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1965–6) ‘Anti-antiquarianism in the Aeneid,’ PVS 5, 26–38.Google Scholar

Santirocco, M. (1995) ‘Horace and Augustan Ideology,’ Arethusa 28, 225–43.Google Scholar

Scardigli, B. (1991) I trattati Romano-Cartaginesi, Pisa.Google Scholar

Schäfer, T. (2013) ‘Ciclo di rilievi Medinaceli,’ in La Rocca, E. (ed.) Augusto (exhibition catalogue), Milan, 321–3.Google Scholar

Scheid, J. and Svenbro, J. (1985) ‘Byrsa: la ruse d’Élissa et la fondation de Carthage,’ Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 40.2, 328–42.Google Scholar

Scheidel, W. (1996) Measuring Sex, Age and Death in the Roman Empire: Explorations in Ancient Demography, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Schierl, P. (2006) Die Tragödien des Pacuvius, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2005a) ‘Under the Sign of Saturn: Dido’s Kulturkampf,’ in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.) La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne / Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung, Heidelberg, 85–110.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2005b) ‘Republican Tragedy,’ in Bushnell, R. (ed.) A Companion to Tragedy, Oxford, 269–86.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2008) ‘Furthest Voices in Virgil’s Dido,’ SIFC 100, 60–109 and 194–245.Google Scholar

Schmitz, C. (2013) ‘Der Orientalismusdiskurs als Intertext in Vergils Aeneis,’ in Baumbach, M. and Polleichtner, W. (eds.) Innovation aus Tradition: Literaturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Vergilforschung. BAC – Bochumer Altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium Band 93, Trier, 97–137.Google Scholar

Schneider, R. M. (1986) Bunte Barbaren: Orientalenstatuen aus farbigem Marmor in der römischen Repräsentationskunst, Worms.Google Scholar

Schneider, R. M. (1992) ‘Barbar II (ikonographisch),’ Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum Supplement I, Stuttgart, 895–962.Google Scholar

Schneider, R. M. (1998) ‘Die Faszination des Feindes: Bilder der Parther und des Orients in Rom,’ in Wiesehöfer, J. (ed.) Das Partherreich und seine Zeugnisse, Stuttgart, 95–146.Google Scholar

Seager, R. (1980) ‘Neu sinas Medos equitare inultos: Horace, the Parthians and Augustan Foreign Policy,’ Athenaeum 58, 103–18.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1962) ‘The Phaeacians and the Symbolism of Odysseus’ Return,’ Arion 1.4, 17–64.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1966) ‘Orpheus and the Fourth Georgic: Vergil on Nature and Civilization,’ AJPh 87, 307–25.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1981) ‘Art and the Hero: Participation, Detachment, and Narrative Point of View in Aeneid 1,’ Arethusa 14, 67–83.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1986) Interpreting Greek Tragedy: Myth, Poetry, Text, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Seider, A. M. (2013) Memory in Vergil’s Aeneid: Creating the Past, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sellar, W. Y. (1889) The Roman Poets of the Republic, 3rd ed., Oxford.Google Scholar

Serrati, J. (2006) ‘Neptune’s Altars: The Treaties between Rome and Carthage (509–226 B.C.),’ CQ 56, 113–34.Google Scholar

Shi, V. S.-R. and Morgan, L. (2015) ‘A Tale of Two Carthages: History and Allusive Topography in Virgil’s Libyan Harbor (Aen. 1.159–69),’ TAPA 145, 107–33.Google Scholar

Simon, E. (1986) Augustus: Kunst und Leben in Rom um die Zeitenwende, Munich.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1968) Studia Enniana, London.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1970) ‘On Three Fragments of Porcius Licinus and on the Tutiline Gate,’ BICS 17, 120–3.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1985) The Annals of Q. Ennius, Oxford.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (1992) ‘Plautine Negotiations: The Poenulus Prologue Unpacked,’ YCS 29, 131–46.Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1979) Theseus as Son and Stepson: A Tentative Illustration of Greek Mythological Mentality, London.Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1990) ‘Myths in Images: Theseus and Medea as a Case Study,’ in Edmunds, L. (ed.) Approaches to Greek Myth, Baltimore, 395–445.Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1997) ‘Medea at a Shifting Distance: Images and Euripidean Tragedy,’ in Clauss, J. J. and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, Princeton, 253–96.Google Scholar

Spawforth, A. (1994) ‘Symbol of Unity? The Persian-Wars Tradition in the Roman Empire,’ in Hornblower, S. (ed.) Greek Historiography, Oxford, 233–47.Google Scholar

Spawforth, A. (2012) Greece and the Augustan Cultural Revolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stabryła, S. (1970) Latin Tragedy in Virgil’s Poetry, Wrocław.Google Scholar

Starks, J. H. (1999) ‘Fides Aeneia: The Transference of Punic Stereotypes in the Aeneid,’ CJ 94, 255–83.Google Scholar

Starks, J. H. (2000) ‘Nullus Me Est Hodie Poenus Poenior: Balanced Ethnic Humour in Plautus’ Poenulus,’ Helios 27, 163–86.Google Scholar

Stärk, E. (2000) ‘Politische Anspielungen in der römischen Tragödie und der Einfluss der Schauspieler,’ in Manuwald (ed.) (2000) 123–33.Google Scholar

Steiner, D. (2013) ‘Elephants Crossing: Livy 21.28.5–29 and its Intertexts,’ MD 71, 75–101.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. (2004) Attalos, Athens, and the Akropolis: The Pergamene ‘Little Barbarians’ and their Roman and Renaissance Legacy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stocks, C. (2014) The Roman Hannibal: Remembering the Enemy in Silius Italicus’ Punica, Liverpool.Google Scholar

Stocks, C. (2016) ‘Monsters in the Night: Hannibal, Prodigia, and the Parallel Worlds of Epode 16 and Ode 4.4,’ in Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds.) Horace Epodes: Contexts, Intertexts, and Reception, Oxford, 153–74.Google Scholar

Strobel, K. (1994) ‘Keltensieg und Galatersieger: die Funktionalisierung eines historischen Phänomens als politischer Mythos der hellenistischen Welt,’ in Schwertheim, E. (ed.) Forschungen in Galatien, Bonn, 67–96.Google Scholar

Strzelecki, W. (1964) Cn. Naeuii Belli Punici carminis quae supersunt, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Sumner, G. V. (1966) ‘The Chronology of the Outbreak of the Second Punic War,’ PACA 9, 5–30.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250, Oxford.Google Scholar

Syed, Y. (2005) Vergil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution, Oxford.Google Scholar

Syson, A. (2013) Fama and Fiction in Vergil’s Aeneid, Columbus.Google Scholar

Tandoi, V. (1985) ‘Il dramma storico di Pacuvio: restauri e interpretazione,’ in Tandoi, V. (ed.) Disiecti membra poetae: studi di poesia latina in frammenti, Volume 2, Foggia, 11–38.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (2012) Virgil, Aeneid Book XII, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (2016) ‘A New Critical Edition of Horace,’ in Hunter, R. and Oakley, S. P. (eds.) Latin Literature and its Transmission, Cambridge, 291–321.Google Scholar