Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T13:24:56.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Surgery for renal cancer: current status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

Ravi Barod
Affiliation:
Urology Fellow, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
Tim O'Brien
Affiliation:
Consultant Urologist, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
Uday Patel
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Currently, surgery offers the only well-recognized chance of cure from kidney cancer. The principal developments in renal cancer surgery in recent years relate to the use of laparoscopy and it is likely that the scope of minimal access surgery will continue to increase in the future. In this chapter, we give an overview of the indications and current status of both open and laparoscopic techniques of radical and partial nephrectomy, as well as surgery for metastatic disease.

Radical nephrectomy (RN)

Surgery has been the mainstay of treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for over 35 years and remains the only curative therapeutic approach. In 1969, Robson et al. described their results from radical nephrectomy in a series of 88 patients with RCC. The original operation involved early ligation of renal vessels to avoid tumor embolization, adrenalectomy, removal of perirenal fat, and extensive lymph node dissection from the crus of the diaphragm to the bifurcation of the aorta. This approach was described in a time when diagnosis was often made on the basis of intravenous urography (IVU) or angiography. Accurate preoperative anatomical definition was not possible and the tumor was often of an advanced stage at operation. Recently, with the increased sensitivity of imaging and high resolution computerized tomography (CT) scans the exact anatomy of the tumor can be confidently mapped prior to surgery.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robson, C. J., Churchill, B. M., and Anderson, W., The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 101:3 (1969), 297–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heidenreich, A. and Ravery, V., Preoperative imaging in renal cell cancer. World J Urol, 22:5 (2004), 307–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, D. A. and Borges, P. M., Complications of transabdominal radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 129:4 (1983), 704–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, J. S., Shvarts, O., Leppart, J. T.et al., Renal cell carcinoma 2005: new frontiers in staging, prognostication and targeted molecular therapy. J Urol, 173:6 (2005), 1853–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pantuck, A. J., Zisman, A., Dorey, F.et al., Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes: role of lymph node dissection. J Urol, 169:6 (2003), 2076–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, J. H., Poppel, H., Marechal, J. M.et al., Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph node dissection: preliminary results of the EORTC randomized phase III protocol 30881. EORTC Genitourinary Group. Eur Urol, 36:6 (1999), 570–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, J. S., Belldegrun, J. S., and Pantuck, A. J., Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol, 24:3 (2006), 255–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasselli, J. R., Yang, J. C., Linehan, W. M.et al., Lack of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy predicts survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 166:1 (2001), 68–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siemer, S., Lehmann, J., Kamradt, J.et al., Adrenal metastases in 1635 patients with renal cell carcinoma: outcome and indication for adrenalectomy. J Urol, 171:6 (Pt 1) (2004), 2155–9; discussion 2159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsui, K. H., Shvarts, O., Smith, R. B.et al., Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol, 163:4 (2000), 1090–5; quiz 1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayman, R. V., Kavoussi, L. R., Soper, N. J.et al., Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med, 324:19 (1991), 1370–1.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunn, M. D., Portis, A. J., Shalhav, A. L.et al., Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol, 164:4 (2000), 1153–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, I. S., Schweizer, D., Hobart, M. G.et al., Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland clinic experience. J Urol, 163:6 (2000), 1665–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C. T., Katz, J., Shi, W.et al., Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol, 163:3 (2000), 730–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzzo, R. G. and Novick, A. C., Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol, 166:1 (2001), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delakas, D., Karyotis, I., Daskalopoulos, G.et al., Nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma with a normal contralateral kidney: a European three-center experience. Urology, 60:6 (2002), 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licht, M. R., Novick, A. C., and Goormastic, M., Nephron sparing surgery in incidental versus suspected renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 152:1 (1994), 39–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinbach, F., Stockle, M., Muller, S. C.et al., Conservative surgery of renal cell tumors in 140 patients: 21 years of experience. J Urol, 148:1 (1992), 24–9; discussion 29–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kural, A. R., Demirkesen, O., Onal, B.et al., Outcome of nephron-sparing surgery: elective versus imperative indications. Urol Int, 71:2 (2003), 190–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafez, K. S., Fergany, A. F., and Novick, A. C., Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol, 162:6 (1999), 1930–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, I. S., Matin, S. F., Desai, M. M.et al., Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol, 170:1 (2003), 64–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Link, R. E., Bhayani, S. B., Allaf, M. E.et al., Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol, 173:5 (2005), 1690–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rassweiler, J. J., Abbou, C., Janetschek, G.et al., Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The European experience. Urol Clin North Am, 27:4 (2000), 721–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novick, A. C., Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy. Clin Cancer Res, 10:18 (Pt 2) (2004), 6322S–7S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, S. G., Choyke, P. L., Reiter, R.et al., Regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after cytoreductive nephrectomy. J Urol, 150:2 (Pt 1) (1993), 463–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montie, J. E., Stewart, B. H., Straffon, R. A.et al., The role of adjunctive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 117:3 (1977), 272–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanigan, R. C., Salmon, S. E., Blumenstein, B. A.et al., Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med, 345:23 (2001), 1655–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mickisch, G. H., Garin, A., Poppel, H.et al., Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomized trial. Lancet, 358:9286 (2001), 966–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H. S., Neef, H., Krohe, K.et al., Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 48:1 (2005), 77–81; discussion 81–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poel, H. G., Roukema, J. A., Horenblas, S.et al., Metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis. Eur Urol, 35:3 (1999), 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Surgery for renal cancer: current status
    • By Ravi Barod, Urology Fellow, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK, Tim O'Brien, Consultant Urologist, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Uday Patel, St George's Hospital, London
  • Book: Carcinoma of the Kidney
  • Online publication: 08 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545436.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Surgery for renal cancer: current status
    • By Ravi Barod, Urology Fellow, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK, Tim O'Brien, Consultant Urologist, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Uday Patel, St George's Hospital, London
  • Book: Carcinoma of the Kidney
  • Online publication: 08 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545436.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Surgery for renal cancer: current status
    • By Ravi Barod, Urology Fellow, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK, Tim O'Brien, Consultant Urologist, Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Uday Patel, St George's Hospital, London
  • Book: Carcinoma of the Kidney
  • Online publication: 08 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545436.010
Available formats
×