Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:29:03.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VII.5 - Food Labeling

from Part VII - Contemporary Food-Related Policy Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Kenneth F. Kiple
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

In the United States, the past three decades have witnessed tremendous changes in the way the public views the foods it buys. Unlike counterparts in the developing world, where problems of food availability and food quantities still dominate, consumers in the United States (and the West in general) have become increasingly interested in the nutritional quality of the foodstuffs they are offered. As a consequence, nutrition labeling has emerged to play a key role in government regulation of the food supply, in informing consumers about the constituents of the foods they eat, and in the formulation and marketing of food products by the manufacturers.

The importance of food labels has come about in spite of the fact that during the last 20 years or so, policy decisions regarding the implementation of nutrition labeling have been made in a political environment that emphasizes nonintervention in the operation of market economies. Recent legislation in industrialized countries has taken, for the most part, a minimalist approach to the regulation of nutritional quality. But although still controversial, labeling is seen as an acceptable “information remedy” that requires relatively little market intervention, and most Western nations have established some form of legislative guidelines for the regulation of nutrition labeling. With the adoption of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) in 1994 (Caswell and Mojduszka 1996), the United States is currently in the forefront of establishing a mandatory and comprehensive national nutrition labeling policy.

The growing interest in nutrition policy reflects the understanding that foods represent major potential risks to public health because of such factors as foodborne organisms, heavy metals, pesticide residues, food additives, veterinary residues, and naturally occurring toxins. But although these are very real health hazards, scientists believe that the risks associated with nutritional imbalances in the composition of the diet as a whole are the most significant in the longer run, particularly in industrialized countries, where the high percentage of fat in daily diets seems to significantly threaten public health (Henson and Traill 1993).The recognition of nutritional quality as a value in itself has led to a separation of the nutritional from other food safety issues and a growing tendency to develop legislation targeted specifically at nutrition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, F. 1984. Diet for a corporate planet: Industry sets world food standards. Multinational Monitorh 14.Google Scholar
Burton, Scott, and Biswas, A.. 1993. Preliminary assessment of changes in labels required by the NLEA of 1990. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, Julie A., ed. 1991. Economics of food safety. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, Julie A., 1995. Valuing food safety and nutrition. Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Caswell, Julie A., and Mojduszka, Eliza M.. 1996. Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, Julie A., and Padberg, Daniel I.. 1992. Toward a more comprehensive theory of food labels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 1993. FDA consumer special report: Focus on food labeling. FDA Consumer 27 (May).
Gorman, Christine. 1991. The fight over food labels. Time (July 15).Google Scholar
Gormley, T. R., Downey, G., and O'Beirne, D.. 1987. Food, health, and the consumer. London and New York.Google Scholar
Helsing, Elisabet. 1991. Nutrition policies in Europe: Background and organization. Food Policy 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, Spencer, and Sekula, Wlodzimierz. 1994. Market reform in the Polish food sector: Impact upon food consumption and nutrition. Food Policy 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, Spencer, and Traill, Bruce. 1993. The demand for food safety: Market imperfections and the role of government. Food Policy 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Peter J. 1996. American’s dilemma: What’s for dinner? Boston Globe, June 27.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E., and Haddad, L.. 1992. Food security and nutrition, 1971–91. Lessons learned and future priorities. Food Policy 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, Jean. 1993. GATT and the economics of food safety. Food Policy 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Carol S. 1990. Food safety: Consumer preferences, policy options, research needs. In Consumer demands in the market place: Public policies related to food safety, quality, and human health, ed. Clancy, K. L.. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Swinbank, Alan. 1993. Industry note: Completion of the EC’s internal market, mutual recognition, and the food industries. Agribusiness 9.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, Mira. 1994. When and why brand names in food and drink? In Adding value: Brands and marketing in food and drink, ed. Jones, G. J. and Morgan, N. J.. London and New York.Google Scholar
Worley, C. T., Folwell, R. J., McCracken, V. A., and Bagnara, G. L.. 1994. Changing labeling regulations: Implications for international food marketing. Journal of Food Distribution Research 25 (February).Google Scholar
Worley, C. T., Folwell, R. J., McCracken, V. A., and Bagnara, G. L.. 1995. Food label regulations in the United States and the European Community: International trade facilitators or non tariff barriers. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarkin, G. A., and Anderson, D. W.. 1992. Consumer and producer responses to nutrition label changes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×