Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:09:53.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.5 - Chemical Approaches to Dietary Representation

from Part I - Determining What Our Ancestors Ate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Ted Rathbun
Edited by
Kenneth F. Kiple  and
Kriemhild Coneè Ornelas
Kenneth F. Kiple
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Dietary reconstruction for past populations holds significant interest as it relates to biological and cultural adaptation, stability, and change. Although archaeological recovery of floral and faunal remains within a prehistoric or historical context provides some direct evidence of the presence (and sometimes quantity) of potential food resources, indirect evidence for the dietary significance of such foodstuffs frequently must be deduced from other bioarchaeological data.

The types of data with dietary significance range from recovered plant and animal remains through evidence of pathology associated with diet, growth disruption patterns, and coprolite contents. Other traditional approaches involving the people themselves – as represented by skeletal remains – include demographic (Buikstra and Mielke 1985) and metabolic (Gilbert 1985) stress patterns.

In addition to bioanthropological analyses, reconstruction of environmental factors and the availability and limits of food species and their distribution for a population with a particular size, technology, and subsistence base are typical components within an archaeological reconstruction. Although these physical aspects are significant, the distribution, or more likely the restriction, of particular foodstuffs from certain segments of the population (because of sex, age, status, food avoidance, or food taboos) may be important cultural system features. The seasonal availability of food and its procurement, preservation, and preparation may also have influenced group dietary patterns and nutritional status (Wing and Brown 1979).

Analysis of skeletal remains may also provide some direct evidence of diet. Type and adequacy of diet have long been of interest to physical anthropologists, especially osteologists and paleopathologists (Gilbert and Mielke 1985; Larsen 1987). More recently, direct chemical analysis of bones and teeth has been attempted in an effort to assess the body’s metabolism and storage of nutritive minerals and other elements. L. L. Klepinger (1984) has reviewed the potential application of this approach for nutritional assessment and summarized the early findings reported in the anthropological literature. (In addition, see Volume 14 of the Journal of Human Evolution [1985], which contains significant research surveys to that date.)

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge World History of Food , pp. 58 - 63
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, S. H. 1990. Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for isotopic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, S. H. 1993. Isotopic analysis of paleodiets: Methodological and interpretive considerations. In Investigations of ancient human tissue: Chemical analyses in anthropology, ed. Sandford, M. K.. Langhorne, Pa.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A. C. 1989. Chemical analysis of skeletal remains. In Reconstruction of life from the skeleton, ed. Iscan, M. Y. and Kennedy, K. A. R.. New York.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A. C., Angel, J. L., Kelley, J. O., et al. 1985. Lead in bone III: Prediction of social content in four Colonial American populations (Catoctin Furnace, College Landing, Governor’s Land and Irene Mound). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufderheide, A. C., Neiman, F. D., Wittmers, L. E., and Rapp., G. 1981. Lead in bone II: Skeletal lead content as an indicator of lifetime lead ingestion and the social correlates in an archaeological population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufderheide, A. C., Wittmers, L. E., Rapp, G., and Wallgren, J.. 1988. Anthropological applications of skeletal lead analysis. American Anthropologist 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakely, R. E. 1989. Bone strontium in pregnant and lactating females from archaeological samples. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buikstra, J. E., Frankenberg, S., Lambert, J., and Xue, L.. 1989. Multiple elements: Multiple expectations. In The chemistry of prehistoric human bone, ed. Price, T. D.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J. E., and Mielke, J. H.. 1985. Demography, diet, and health. In The analysis of prehistoric diets, ed. Gilbert, R. I. Jr., and Mielke, J. H.. Orlando, Fla.Google Scholar
Buikstra, J. E., and Ubelaker, D. H.. 1994. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains.Arkansas Archeological Survey, Research Series No. 44. Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Bumstead, M. P. 1984. Human variation: 13C in adult bone collagen and the relation to diet in an isochronous C4 (Maize) archaeological population.Los Alamos, N. Mex.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H., and Price, T. D.. 1990. Ratio of barium to strontium as a paleodietary indicator of consumption of marine resources. Journal of Archaeological Science 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, B. S. 1989. Variation in diet reconstructions based on stable carbon isotopic evidence. In The chemistry of prehistoric human bone, ed. Price, T. D.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crist, T. A. J. 1991. The bone chemical analysis and bioarchaeology of an historic South Carolina African-American cemetery.Volumes in Historical Archaeology XVIII. Columbia, S.C.Google Scholar
Edward, J. B., and Benfer, R. A.. 1993. The effects of diagenesis on the Paloma skeletal material. In Investigations of ancient human tissue: Chemical analyses in anthropology, ed. Sandford, M. K.. Langhorne, Pa.Google Scholar
Geidel, A. A. 1982. Trace element studies from Mississippian skeletal remains: Findings from neutron activation analysis. MASCA Journal 2.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. I. Jr. 1977. Applications of trace element research to problems in archaeology. In Biocultural adaptations to prehistoric America, ed. Blakely, R. I.. Athens, Ga.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. I. Jr. 1985. Stress, paleonutrition, and trace elements. In The analysis of prehistoric diets, ed. Gilbert, R. I. Jr., and Mielke, J. H.. Orlando Fla.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. I. Jr., and Mielke, J. H., eds. 1985. The analysis of prehistoric diets.Orlando, Fla.Google Scholar
Grupe, G., and Herrmann, B.. 1988. Trace elements in environmental history.Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, J. S., Aufderheide, A. C., and Corruccini, R. S.. 1986. Lead content and poisoning in Barbados slaves. Social Science History 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenberg, M. A. 1984. Chemical analysis of prehistoric human bone from five temporally distinct populations in Southern Ontario.Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenberg, M. A. 1992. Advances in stable isotope analysis of prehistoric bones. In Skeletal biology of past peoples: Research methods, ed. Saunders, S. R. and Katzenberg, M. A.. New York.Google Scholar
Keegan, W. F. 1989. Stable isotope analysis of prehistoric diet. In Reconstruction of life from the skeleton, ed. Iscan, M. Y. and Kennedy, K. A. R.. New York.Google Scholar
Klepinger, L. L. 1984. Nutritional assessment from bone. Annual Review of Anthropology 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klepinger, L. L. 1992. Innovative approaches to the study of past human health and subsistence strategies. In Skeletal biology of past peoples: Research methods, ed. Saunders, S. R. and Katzenberg, M. A.. New York.Google Scholar
Klepinger, L. L., Kuhn, J. K., and Williams, W. S.. 1986. An elemental analysis of archaeological bone from Sicily as a test of predictability of diagenetic change. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, J. H. 1986. Effect of post-burial contamination on the concentrations of major and minor elements in human bones and teeth. Journal of Archaeological Science 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, J. B., Szpunar, C. B., and Buikstra, J. E.. 1979. Chemical analysis of excavated human bone from middle and late Woodland sites. Archaeometry 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C. S. 1987. Bioarchaeological interpretations of subsistence economy and behavior from human skeletal remains. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Paleopathology Association. 1991. Skeletal database committee recommendations.Detroit, Mich.
Prasad, A. S. 1978. Trace elements and iron in human metabolism.New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T. D., ed. 1989. The chemistry of prehistoric human bone.Cambridge.Google Scholar
Price, T. D., Armelagos, G. J., Buikstra, J. E., et al. 1989. The chemistry of prehistoric human bone: Recommendations and directions for future study. In The chemistry of prehistoric human bone, ed. Price, T. D.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Price, T. D., and Kavanagh, M.. 1982. Bone composition and the reconstruction of diet: Examples from the midwestern United States. Midcontinent Journal of Archaeology 7.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. C. 1993. The six deadly sins of trace element analysis: A case of wishful thinking in science. In Investigations of ancient human tissue: Chemical analyses in anthropology, ed. Sandford, M. K.. Langhorne, Pa.Google Scholar
Rathbun, T. A. 1987. Health and disease at a South Carolina plantation: 1840–1870. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, T. A., and Scurry, J. D.. 1991. Status and health in colonial South Carolina: Belleview plantation, 1738–1756. In What mean these bones?: Studies in southeastern bioarchaeology, ed. Powell, J. L., Bridges, P. S., and Mires, A. M. W.. Tuscaloosa, Ala.Google Scholar
Rennert, O. M., and Chan., W. 1984. Metabolism of trace metals in man.Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
Sandford, M. K. 1992. A reconsideration of trace element analysis in prehistoric bone. In Skeletal biology of past peoples: Research methods, ed. Saunders, S. R. and Katzenberg, M. A.. New York.Google Scholar
Sandford, M. K. 1993a. Understanding the biogenic-diagenetic continuum: Interpreting elemental concentrations of archaeological bone. In Investigations of ancient human tissue: Chemical analyses in anthropology, ed. Sandford, M. K.. Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
Sandford, M. K. ed. 1993b. Investigations of ancient human tissue: Chemical analyses in anthropology.Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
Sandford, M. K., Repke, D. B., and Earle, A. L.. 1988. Elemental analysis of human bone from Carthage: A pilot study. In The circus and a Byzantine cemetery at Carthage, ed. Humphrey, J. H.. Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Schoeninger, M. J. 1979. Diet and status at Chalcatzingo: Some empirical and technical aspects of strontium analysis.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoeninger, M. J. 1981. The agricultural “revolution”: Its effect on human diet in prehistoric Iran and Israel. Paleorient 7.Google Scholar
Schoeninger, M. J. 1989. Reconstructing prehistoric human diet. In The chemistry of prehistoric human bone, ed. Price, T. D.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schoeninger, M. J., Moore, K. M., Murray, M. K., and Kingston, J. D.. 1989. Detection of bone preservation in archaeological and fossil samples. Applied Geochemistry 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarcz, H. P., and Schoeninger, M. J.. 1991. Stable isotope analyses in human nutritional ecology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillen, A., and Kavanagh, M.. 1982. Strontium and paleodietary research: A review. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillen, A., Sealy, J. C., and Merwe, N. J.. 1989. Chemistry and paleodietary research: No more easy answers. American Antiquity 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillen, A., and Smith, P.. 1984. Sr/Ca ratios in juvenile skeletons portray weaning practices in a medieval Arab population. Journal of Archaeological Science 11.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J. 1977. Trace elements in human and animal nutrition.New York.Google Scholar
Waldron, H. A. 1981. Postmortem absorption of lead by the skeleton. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldron, H. A. 1983. On the postmortem accumulation of lead by skeletal tissues. Journal of Archaeological Science 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, T. 1982. Human bone lead concentrations. In Romano-British cemeteries at Cirencester, ed. McWhirr, A., Viner, L., and Wells, C.. Gloucester, England.Google Scholar
Waldron, T. 1987. The potential of analysis of chemical constituents of bone. In Death, decay and reconstructions: Approaches to archaeology and forensic science, ed. Boddington, A., Garland, A. N., and Janaway, R. C.. Manchester, England.Google Scholar
Wing, E. S., and Brown, A. B.. 1979. Paleonutrition: Method and theory in prehistoric foodways.New York.Google Scholar
Wood, W. D., Burns, K. R., and Lee., S. R. 1985. The Mt. Gilead cemetery study: An example of biocultural analysis from western Georgia.Athens, Ga.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×