Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T11:50:54.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

84 - Guilt and shame

from G

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

David A. Reidy
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
Jon Mandle
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
David A. Reidy
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Get access

Summary

Guilt and shame are unpleasant moral feelings that persons experience on particular occasions. Moral feelings, which may be pleasant or unpleasant, are a normal part of human life. Moral feelings are episodic, being triggered by particular events. Moral attitudes and sentiments, in contrast to feelings, are not episodic; they are deeper andmore entrenched features of our affective nature. While episodic, moral feelings, like guilt and shame, express and constitute evidence of less transient moral and natural sentiments and attitudes, for without these deeper andmore entrenched dimensions of our affective nature, our moral feelings would not be triggered by the events that give rise to them. In his account of the stability of a society organized on the principles of justice as fairness, Rawls endeavors to show, inter alia, that those living within such a society will develop moral feelings, attitudes, and sentiments inclining them toward justice and toward remedial action in the case of injustice.

Our affective nature includes both moral and natural feelings, attitudes, and sentiments. These are distinguished by the fact that an adequate explanation of the former, but not the latter, necessarily requires appeal to moral principles, concepts or ideals. Moral feelings are often associated with certain linguistic expressions, behaviors, and physical sensations (e.g. feeling hot or lushed). But these signs do not constitute the moral feeling and an explanation of any moral feeling is incomplete if it refers only to these signs and triggering events. An adequate explanation must make appeal to appropriate moral principles, concepts or ideals. Indeed, sometimes an adequate explanation of a moral feeling is just that a person says that she has it and that her having it makes sense in light of appropriate moral principles, concepts, or ideals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Guilt and shame
  • Edited by Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany, David A. Reidy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Book: The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026741.086
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Guilt and shame
  • Edited by Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany, David A. Reidy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Book: The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026741.086
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Guilt and shame
  • Edited by Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany, David A. Reidy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Book: The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026741.086
Available formats
×