Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T23:30:59.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Heinrich Schenker

from D - Tonality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Thomas Christensen
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Long after his major writings on harmony, counterpoint and analysis began to appear, Heinrich Schenker (1868–1935) remains one of the most important and influential theorists in the history of Western music. His achievements have often been compared to those of eminent thinkers of his age working in other fields, e.g., his Viennese compatriots Sigmund Freud in psychology and Albert Einstein in physics. His influence, modest (though not negligible) in his own lifetime, has grown steadily since the middle of the last century and shows no signs of abating. Already a paradigmatic figure in North American universities by the 1970s, he has since exerted a powerful influence in British and, more recently, European academic circles. Indeed, the interest shown in his life’s work is, in some respects, comparable to that of some of the twentieth century’s leading composers, and in this respect his reputation as a theorist is unequaled.

That which is called “Schenkerian theory” is a complex set of regulatory principles that were initially intended to explain the tonal music of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries; it is at the same time a synthesis of many traditions, embracing Fuxian counterpoint, the thorough-bass teaching of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach and late nineteenth-century harmonic theory. It is at once a sophisticated explanation of tonality, but also an analytical system of immense empirical power. Schenker’s ideas and work touch on, or have implications for, virtually every topic addressed in this volume.

This chapter includes a synopsis of Schenker’s life and works, an explanation of the rudiments of his theory, remarks on its historical background, and a survey of its reception both as a pedagogical tool and as a basis for further investigation of a wide range of music.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babbitt, M. review of Structural Hearing by Salzer, Felix, Journal of the American Musicological Society, University of Chicago Press, et al., 19485 (1952)
Badura-Skoda, P.A Tie is a Tie is a Tie: Reflections on Beethoven’s Pairs of Tied Notes,” Early Music 16 (1988)Google Scholar
Beach, D.A Schenker Bibliography: 1969–1979,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 23 (1979)Google Scholar
Beach, D.A Schenker Bibliography,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 13 (1969)Google Scholar
Beach, D.The Cadential Six-Four as Support for Scale-Degree Three of the Fundamental Line,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195734 (1990)Google Scholar
Beach, D.The Current State of Schenkerian Research,” Acta Musicologia, International Musicological Socety, Bärentriter, Basel et al., 192857 (1985)Google Scholar
Beach, D.The Fundamental Line from Scale Degree 8: Criteria for Evaluation,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195732 (1988)Google Scholar
Beach, D., ed., Aspects of Schenkerian Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983Google Scholar
Beethoven: Die letzten fünf Sonaten: kritische Ausgabe mit Einführung und Erläuterung, Vienna, Universal, 1913 (Op. 109), 1914 (Op. 110), 1915 (Op. 111), 1920 (Op. 101); rev. 2nd edn., ed. Jonas, O., Vienna, Universal, 1971–72 (Op. 106 not completed or published)Google Scholar
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie, Vienna, Universal, 1912; trans. Rothgeb, J. as Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1992
Bent, I.Heinrich Schenker e la missione del genio germanico,” Rivista italiana di musicologia 26 (1991)Google Scholar
Bent, I.Analysis, with glossary by Drabkin, W., Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1987Google ScholarPubMed
Bergquist, P.Mode and Polyphony around 1500: Theory and Practice,” Music Forum 1 (1967)Google Scholar
Blasius, L.Schenker’s Argument and the Claims of Music Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, C.Schenker’s Theory of Levels and Musical Performance,” in Aspects of Schenkerian Theory, ed. Beach, D., New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983Google Scholar
Cadwallader, A. and Gagné, D., Analysis of Tonal Music: A Schenkerian Approach, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998Google Scholar
Cadwallader, A., ed., Trends in Schenkerian Research, New York, Schirmer, 1990Google Scholar
Chew, G.The Spice of Music: Towards a Theory of the Leading Note,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 19822 (1983)Google Scholar
Christensen, T.Rameau and Musical Thought in the Enlightenment, Cambridge University Press, 1993Google Scholar
Cook, N.Heinrich Schenker, Polemicist: A Reading of the Ninth Symphony Monograph,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 198214 (1995)Google Scholar
Cook, N.Schenker’s Theory of Music as Ethics,” Journal of Musicology, Greenfield, OH, and St. Joseph, MI, Music Science Press, 19827 (1989)Google Scholar
Cook, N.A Guide to Musical Analysis, London, Dent, 1987Google Scholar
Cube, F.-E. von, The Book of The Musical Artwork, ed. and trans. Neumeyer, D., Boyd, G. and Harris, S., Mellen, Lewiston E., 1988Google Scholar
Das Meisterwerk in der Musik: ein Jahrbuch, 3 vols., Munich, Drei Masken, 1925, 1926, 1930; ed. Drabkin, W., trans.Google Scholar
Der freie Satz (Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien III), Vienna, Universal, 1935; rev. 2nd edn., ed. Jonas, O., Vienna, Universal, 1955; trans. and ed.Google Scholar
Drabkin, W., Pasticci, S., and Pozzi, E., Analisi schenkeriana, Lucca, Libreria Musicale Italiana, 1995Google Scholar
Drabkin, W.A Lesson in Analysis with Heinrich Schenker,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 19824 (1985)Google Scholar
Drabkin, W.Felix-Eberhard von Cube and the North-German Tradition of Schenkerism,” Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association 111 (1986)Google Scholar
Drabkin, W.Schenker, the Consonant Passing Note and the First Movement of Beethoven’s Sonata Opus 26,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 198215 (1996)Google Scholar
Dubiel, J.‘When You are a Beethoven’: Kinds of Rules in Schenker’s Counterpoint,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195734 (1990)Google Scholar
Dunsby, J.The Multipiece in Brahms: Fantasien, Op. 116,” in Brahms: Biographical, Documentary and Analytical Studies, ed. Pascall, R., Cambridge University Press, 1983Google Scholar
Dunsby, J. and Whittall, A., Music Analysis in Theory and Practice, London, Faber, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgese, E. M., ed. Jonas, O. as Harmony, University of Chicago Press, 1954Google Scholar
Oster, E. as Free Composition, New York, Longman, 1979; reprint edn. Stuyvesant, NY, Pendragon Press, 2001Google Scholar
Ein Beitrag zur Ornamentik, Vienna, Universal, 1904; rev. 2nd edn., 1908; trans. Siegel, H. as “A Contribution to the Study of Ornamentation,” Music Forum 4 (1976)Google Scholar
Federhofer, H.Akkord und Stimmführung in den musiktheoretischen Systemen von Hugo Riemann, Ernst Kurth und Heinrich Schenker, Vienna, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981Google Scholar
Federhofer, H.Heinrich Schenker, nach Tagebüchern und Briefen in der Oswald Jonas Memorial Collection, Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1985Google Scholar
Forte, A.Schenker’s Conception of Musical Structure,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 19573 (1959)Google Scholar
Forte, A.The American Popular Ballad of the Golden Era, 1924–1950, Princeton University Press, 1996Google Scholar
Forte, A. and Gilbert, S., Introduction to Schenkerian Analysis, New York, Norton, 1982Google Scholar
Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln (Five Analyses in Sketch Form), Vienna, Universal, 1932; facs. ed. Salzer, F. as Five Graphic Music Analyses, New York, Dover, 1969Google Scholar
Gilbert, S.The Music of Gershwin, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1995Google Scholar
,Harmonielehre (Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien I), Stuttgart, Cotta, 1906; reprint Vienna, Universal, 1978; abridged trans.
Heinrich Schenker als Essayist und Kritiker: Gesammelte Aufsätze, Rezensionen und kleinere Berichte aus den Jahren 1891–1901, ed. Federhofer, H., Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1990Google Scholar
Bent, I. et al. as The Masterwork in Music, 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1994–97Google Scholar
Rothgeb, J. as Introduction to the Theory of Heinrich Schenker, New York, Schirmer, 1982Google Scholar
Rothgeb, J., trans. Thym, J. as Counterpoint, 2 vols., New York, Schirmer, 1987Google Scholar
J. S. Bach, Chromatische Phantasie und Fuge: kritische Ausgabe, Vienna, Universal, 1910; trans. Siegel, H. as J. S. Bach’s Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue: Critical Edition with Commentary. New York, Longman, 1984
Johannes Brahms: Oktaven und Quinten u. a., MS; facs. with commentary, Vienna, Universal. 1933; trans. Mast, P. as “Brahms’s Study, Octaven u. Quinten u. A., with Schenker’s Commentary Translated,” Music Forum 5 (1980)Google Scholar
Jonas, O.Das Wesen des musikalischen Kunstwerkes: eine Einführung in die Lehre Heinrich Schenkers, Vienna, Saturn, 1934; 2nd edn., Vienna, Universal, 1972; trans.Google Scholar
Jonas, O. and Salzer, F., eds., Der Dreiklang: Monatsschrift für Musik, 9 issues, Vienna, Krystall, 1937–38; facs. Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1989Google Scholar
Katz, A.Heinrich Schenker’s Method of Analysis,” Musical Quarterly, 21 (1935)Google Scholar
Katz, A.Challenge to Musical Tradition: A New Concept of Tonality, New York, A. Knopf, 1945Google Scholar
Keiler, A.The Origins of Schenker’s Thought: How Man is Musical,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195733 (1989)Google Scholar
Komar, A.Theory of Suspensions, Princeton University Press, 1971Google Scholar
Kontrap, Unkt (Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien II), 2 vols., Vienna, Universal, 1910–22; trans.Google Scholar
Korsyn, K.Schenker and Kantian Epistemology,” Theoria 3 (1988)Google Scholar
Kosovsky, R.The Oster Collection: Papers of Heinrich Schenker: A Finding List, New York Public Library, 1990Google Scholar
Lang, R. and Kunselman, J., Heinrich Schenker, Oswald Jonas, Moriz Violin: a Checklist of Papers in the Oswald Jonas Memorial Collection, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1999Google Scholar
Larson, S.Schenkerian Analysis of Modern Jazz: Questions about Method,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 197920 (1998)Google Scholar
Leech-Wilkinson, D.Machaut’s Rose, lis and the Problem of Early Music Analysis,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 19823 (1984)Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R., A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, Cambridge, Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 1982– MIT Press, 1983
Loeb, D.An Analytic Study of Japanese Koto Music,” Music Forum 4 (1976)Google Scholar
Lubben, J.Schenker the Progressive: Analytic Practice in Der Tonwille,” Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 197915 (1993)Google Scholar
Marston, N.Analysing Variations: The Finale of Beethoven’s String Quartet Op. 74,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 19828 (1989)Google Scholar
Marston, N.Trifles or a Multi-Trifle? Beethoven’s Bagatelles, Op. 119, Nos. 7–11,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 19825 (1986)Google Scholar
Meyer, L. B.Explaining Music: Essays and Explorations, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1971Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J.The Prologue to Orlando di Lasso’s Prophetiae Sibyllarum,” Music Forum 2 (1970)Google Scholar
Morgan, R. P.Schenker and the Theoretical Tradition: The Concept of Musical Reduction,” College Music Symposium 18 (1978)Google Scholar
Narmour, E.Beyond Schenkerism: the Need for Alternatives in Music Analysis, University of Chicago Press, 1977Google Scholar
Neumeyer, D.Fragile Octaves, Broken Lines: On Some Limitations in Schenkerian Theory and Practice,” In Theory Only 11 (1989)Google Scholar
Neumeyer, D.The Urlinie from [doubt8circ] as a Middleground Phenomenon,” In Theory Only 9 (1987)Google Scholar
Neumeyer, D.The Ascending Urlinie,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195731 (1987)Google Scholar
Neumeyer, D.The Three-Part Ursatz,” In Theory Only 10 (1987)Google Scholar
Neumeyer, D. and Tepping, S., A Guide to Schenkerian Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1992Google Scholar
Novack, S.Fusion of Design and Tonal Order in Mass and Motet: Josquin Desprez and Heinrich Isaac,” Music Forum 2 (1970)Google Scholar
Novack, S.The Analysis of Pre-Baroque Music,” in Aspects of Schenkerian Theory, ed. Beach, D., New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983Google Scholar
Pastille, W.Heinrich Schenker, Anti-Organicist,” 19th-Century Music 8 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastille, W.Music and Morphology: Goethe’s Influence on Schenker’s Thought,” in Schenker Studies, ed. Siegel, H., Cambridge University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Renwick, W.Hidden Fugal Paths: A Schenkerian View of Handel’s F major Fugue (Suite II),” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 198214 (1995)Google Scholar
Renwick, W.Analyzing Fugue: A Schenkerian Approach, New York, Pendragon Press, 1995Google Scholar
Rosen, C.The Classical Style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, London, Faber and Faber, 1971Google Scholar
Rothstein, W.Heinrich Schenker as an Interpreter of Beethoven’s Piano Sonatas,” 19th-Century Music 8 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, W.The Americanization of Heinrich Schenker,” in Schenker Studies, ed. Siegel, H., Cambridge University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Rothstein, W.Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music, New York, Schirmer, 1989Google Scholar
Salzer, F.Die historische Sendung Heinrich Schenkers,” Der Dreiklang 1 (1937)Google Scholar
Salzer, F.The Variation Movement of Mozart’s Divertimento K. 563,” Music Forum 5 (1980)Google Scholar
Salzer, F.Sinn und Wesen der abendländischen Mehrstimmigkeit, Vienna, Saturn, 1935Google Scholar
Salzer, F.Structural Hearing, New York, C. Boni, 1952Google Scholar
Schachter, C.A Commentary on Schenker’s Free Composition,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195725 (1981)Google Scholar
Schachter, C.Either/Or,” in Schenker Studies, ed. Siegel, H., Cambridge University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Schachter, C.Motive and Text in Four Schubert Songs,” in Aspects of Schenkerian Theory, ed. Beach, D., New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983Google Scholar
Schachter, C.Rhythm and Linear Analysis,” 3 parts, Music Forum 4 (1976); 5 (1980); 6 (1987)Google Scholar
Schachter, C.Twentieth-Century Analysis and Mozart Performance,” Early Music 19 (1991)Google Scholar
Schachter, C.Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
Schachter, C. and Siegel, H., eds., Schenker Studies 2, Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, H., ed., Schenker Studies, Cambridge University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Smith, C. J.Musical Form and Fundamental Structure: An Investigation of Schenker’s Formenlehre,” Music Analysis, Oxford, B. Blackwell, 198215 (1996)Google Scholar
Snarrenberg, R.Schenker’s Interpretive Practice, Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Art of Performance, trans. and ed. Esser, H., trans. Scott, I., New York, Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
Tovey, D. F.Musical Textures, London, Oxford University Press, 1941Google Scholar
Travis, R.Tonal Coherence in the First Movement of Bartók’s Fourth String Quartet,” Music Forum 2 (1970)Google Scholar
Wason, R.Schenker’s Notion of Scale-Step in Historical Perspective: Non-Essential Harmonies in Viennese Fundamental Bass Theory,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195727 (1983)Google Scholar
Wason, R.Viennese Harmonic Theory from Albrechtsberger to Schenker and Schoenberg, Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press, 1985Google Scholar
Webster, J.The Analysis of Mozart’s Arias,” in Mozart Studies, ed. Eisen, C., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1991Google Scholar
Westergaard, P.Introduction to Tonal Theory, New York, Norton, 1975Google Scholar
Yeston, M.The Stratification of Musical Rhythm, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1976Google Scholar
Yeston, M., ed., Readings in Schenker Analysis and Other Approaches, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1977Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×