Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:57:44.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Détente in Europe, 1962–1975

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2010

Melvyn P. Leffler
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Odd Arne Westad
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

The main purpose of this chapter is to argue that European détente was, first and foremost, a European project. While there is no denying the significance of the United States and the Soviet Union in the shaping of Europe’s fortunes in the 1960s and 1970s, détente actually began (and continued far longer) in Europe. In some ways this should be no surprise to any student of the Cold War: after all, the Cold War had commenced to a large extent in the Old World and would, in the late 1980s, wither away there as well. So, why should the “middle cold war” have been any different? In fact, one can push the argument slightly further: while the division of Germany lay at the heart of the Cold War division of Europe and the unification of that country marked the end of that era, then something profound took place in the status of Germany as a result of the Ostpolitik practiced, in particular, by West German chancellor Willy Brandt (1969–74). It was ultimately his policy of multiple “openings” – most significantly to the USSR, Poland, and East Germany – that ushered in an era of détente in Europe.

More precisely, the basic argument in this chapter is that the relaxation of East–West tensions in Europe was a result of a European challenge to the excesses of bipolarity. Some of these challenges came in the form of nationalistic needs – be it Charles de Gaulle’s effort to lift France’s international status or, most significantly, Willy Brandt’s pursuit of Ostpolitik. There was, as Henry Kissinger observed, no obvious unity among Europeans beyond their general resentment of being treated as pawns by the United States and the Soviet Union in a game of global geopolitics. Yet, as such agreements as the Harmel Report of 1967 and the Davignon Report of 1970 would indicate, most Europeans agreed with each other on the general need for improved East–West relations and better interallied cooperation. The most evident culmination of the new era in European politics during the period discussed in this volume was the conclusion of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) in 1975. It was there that Europe’s postwar erafinally came to an end.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahr, Egon, Zu Meiner Zeit (Munich: Karl Blessing Verlag, 1996).Google Scholar
Bennett, G. and Hamilton, K. A. ed., The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1972–1975, (London: Whitehall History Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar
Brandt, Willy, “Peace Policy in Our Time,” Nobel lecture, December 11, 1971, in Abrams, Irwin (ed.), Nobel Lectures: Peace, 1971–1980 (Singapore: World Scientific, 1997).Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew and Grifith, William E., “Peaceful Engagement in Eastern Europe,” Foreign Affairs, 39 (July 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, R. J., The Balkans since the Second World War (London: Longman, 2002).Google Scholar
Eckes, Alfred and Zeiler, Thomas, Globalization and the American Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bozo, Frédéric, “Détente versus Alliance: France, the United States and the Politics of the Harmel Report,” Contemporary European History, 7, 3 (1998).), Re-Thinking the Cold War (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, John, “A Naïve Approach to Studying the Cold War,” in Westad, Odd Arne (ed.), Reviewing the Cold War: Approaches, Interpretations, Theory (London: Frank Cass, 2000).Google Scholar
Granieri, Ronald, The Ambivalent Alliance: The CDU/CSU and the West, 1949–1966 (London: Berghahn Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Hanhimäki, Jussi M., The Flawed Architect: Henry Kissinger and American Foreign Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanhimäki, Jussi M.The First Line of Defense or a Springboard for Disintegration: European Neutrals in American Foreign and Security Policy, 1945–1961,” Diplomacy and Statecraft, 7, 2 (July 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanhimäki, Jussi M., ‘“They Can Write it in Swahili’: Kissinger, the Soviets, and the Helsinki Accords, 1973–1975,” Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 1, 1, (Spring 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Joseph F., “Romanian–American Relations During the Kennedy Administration,” East European Quarterly, 18, 2 (June 1984).Google Scholar
Harrington, Joseph and Courtney, Bruce, “Romanian–American Relations during the Johnson Administration,” East European Quarterly, 22, 2 (June 1988).Google Scholar
Harrison, Hope M., Driving the Soviets up the Wall: Soviet–East German Relations, 1953–1961 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, Ian, Economic Cold War: America, Britain and East-West Trade, 1948–1963 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissinger, Henry, White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979).Google Scholar
Loth, Wilfried, Overcoming the Cold War: A History of Détente (London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2002)Google Scholar
Lundestad, , “‘Empire’ by Invitation? United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research, 23, 3 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahan, Erin, Kennedy, De Gaulle and Western Europe (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, Economic Containment: CoCom and the Politics of East–West Trade (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Oudenaren, John, European Détente (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Sarotte, Mary E., Dealing with the Devil: East Germany, Détente, and Ostpolitik, 1969–1973 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas, In the Shadow of Vietnam: Lyndon Johnson and Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas, “Victories and Defeats in the Long Twilight Struggle: The United States and Western Europe in the 1960s,” in Kunz, Diane B. (ed.), The Diplomacy of the Crucial Decade: American Foreign Policy in the 1960s (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Smith, Michael E., Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Smith, Tony, “A Pericentric Framework for the Study of the Cold War,” Diplomatic History, 24, 4 (Fall 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, Richard P. (ed.), Documents on American Foreign Relations, 1963 (New York: Harper & Row, 1964)Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W., Satellites and Commissars: Strategy and Conflict in the Politics of Soviet-Bloc Trade (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C., The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Tismeanu, Vladimir, Stalinism for All Seasons: A Political History of Romanian Communism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wenger, Andreas, “Crisis and Opportunity: NATO and the Multilateralization of Détente, 1966–68,” Journal of Cold War Studies, 6, 1 (Winter 2004).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×