Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:54:54.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Botany

from PART II - ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

Peter J. Bowler
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
John V. Pickstone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Botany has played a key role in the history of the life sciences over the past two centuries. Modern taxonomic concepts and methods had their origins in studies of the plant world. Biogeography similarly began with studies of plant distribution. Darwin’s two strongest allies in England and North America, Joseph Dalton Hooker and Asa Gray, respectively, were both plant taxonomists interested in problems of geographical distribution. Darwin’s own botanical interests ranged well beyond classification and distribution to include minute studies of the fertilization of flowers and the movements of climbing plants. Meanwhile, a growing laboratory tradition, centered in Germany, made seminal contributions to cell theory, morphology, anatomy, physiology, and plant pathology, many of which aided the development of agricultural science. In the twentieth century, the new science of genetics was based on Gregor Mendel’s earlier work on cross-breeding garden plants, rediscovered by turn-of-the-century botanists and then expanded in agricultural experiment stations before becoming established in university research laboratories. Ecological science owes both its conceptual and its institutional foundations to the work of other turn-of-the-century botanists, who combined the earlier plant geography tradition with the newlaboratory approach. Later in the twentieth century, cytogenetics became established, first among botanists. Studies of plant viruses and fungal genetics led to major developments in molecular biology, many of the initial applications of biotechnology involved research on plants, and ethnobotany developed into a global enterprise under the dual influences of environmentalism on the one hand and the search for useful, and profitable, pharmaceuticals on the other.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, David E., The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Bell, P. R., “The Movement of Plants in Response to Light,” in Darwin’s Biological Work, Some Aspects Reconsidered, ed. Bell, P. R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959);Google Scholar
Bentham, George and Hooker, Joseph Dalton, Genera Plantarum, 3 vols. (London: Williams and Norgate, 1862–83);Google Scholar
Bower, F. O., “English and German Botany in the Middle and Towards the End of Last Century,” The New Phytologist, 24 (1925);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockway, Lucille, Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Botanic Gardens (New York: Academic Press, 1979);Google Scholar
Browne, Janet, The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeography (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Stanley A., Foundations of Plant Geography (New York: Harper and Row, 1944), p..Google Scholar
Cittadino, , “Ecology and Professionalization of Botany in the United States, 1890–1905,” Studies in the History of Biology, 4 (1980);Google Scholar
Cittadino, Eugene, Nature as the Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire, 1890–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990);Google Scholar
Creager, Angela N. H., The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Crocker, William, Growth of Plants: Twenty Years’ Research at Boyce Thompson Institute (New York: Reinhold, 1948);Google Scholar
Davis, E. Wade, “Ethnobotany: An Old Practice, a New Discipline,” and Holmsted, Bo R., “Historical Perspective and Future of Ethnopharmacology,” in Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline, ed. Schultes, Richard Evans and von Reis, Siri (Portland, Ore.: Dioscorides Press, 1995), respectively;Google Scholar
Desmond, Ray, Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker: Traveller and Plant Collector (London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1999).Google Scholar
Desmond, Ray, Kew: The History of the Royal Botanic Gardens (London: Harvill Press, 1995);Google Scholar
Drayton, Richard, Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Dupree, A. Hunter, Asa Gray, 1810–1888 (New York: Atheneum, 1968);Google Scholar
Eriksson, Gunnar, “Linnaeus the Botanist,” in Linnaeus: The Man and His Work, ed. Frängsmyr, Tore (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983);Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Deborah, The Business of Breeding: Hybrid Corn in Illinois, 1890–1940 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990);Google Scholar
Ford, Brian, Single Lens: The Story of the Simple Microscope (New York: Harper and Row, 1985);Google Scholar
Geison, Gerald L., Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978);Google Scholar
Gleason, Henry A., “The Scientific Work of Nathaniel Lord Britton,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104 (1960).Google Scholar
Goebel, Karl, “Julius Sachs,” Science Progress, 7 (1898);Google ScholarPubMed
Graham, Loren R., Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987);Google Scholar
Green, J. Reynolds, A History of Botany, 1860–1900, Being a Continuation of Sachs’ “History of Botany, 1530–1860” (New York: Russell and Russell, 1967);Google Scholar
Green, John Reynolds, A History of Botany in the United Kingdom from the Earliest Times to the End of the 19th Century (London: J. M. Dent, 1914);Google Scholar
Hagen, Joel B., “Experimentalists and Naturalists in Twentieth-Century Botany: Experimental Taxonomy, 1920–1950,” Journal of the History of Biology, 17 (1984);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, Jonathan, Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993);Google Scholar
Kelman, Arthur, “Contributions of Plant Pathology to the Biological Sciences,” in Historical Perspectives in Plant Science, ed. Frey, Kenneth J. (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Barbara A., “Organisms and Interests in Scientific Research: R. A. Emerson’s Claims for the Unique Contributions of Agricultural Genetics,” in The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences, ed. Clarke, Adele E. and Fujimura, Joan H. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kingsland, Sharon E., “An Elusive Science: Ecological Enterprise in the Southwestern United States,” in Science and Nature: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences, ed. Shortland, Michael (Oxford: British Society for the History of Science, 1993);Google Scholar
Krimsky, Sheldon and Wrubel, Roger P., Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment: Science, Policy, and Social Issues (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Mägdefrau, Karl, Geschichte der Botanik (Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 1973);Google Scholar
Mabberly, D. J., Jupiter Botanicus: Robert Brown of the British Museum (Braunschweig: J. Cramer, 1985);Google Scholar
Martin, Gary J., Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual (London: Chapman and Hall, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Lee, “Katherine Esau,” in Notable Women in the Sciences: A Biographical Dictionary, ed. Shearer, Benjamin F. and Shearer, Barbara S. (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1996);Google Scholar
McIntosh, Robert P., The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, Neil, Seeds and World Agricultural Progress (Washington, D.C.: National Planning Association, 1987).Google Scholar
Morton, A. G., History of Botanical Science (London: Academic Press, 1981);Google Scholar
Nicolson, Malcolm, “Humboldtian Plant Geography after Humboldt: The Link to Ecology,” British Journal for the History of Science, 29 (1996);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, Malcolm, “National Styles, Divergent Classifications: A Comparative Case Study from the History of French and American Plant Ecology,” Knowledge and Society, 8 (1989).Google Scholar
Olby, Robert, The Path to the Double Helix (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974);Google Scholar
Overfield, Richard A., Science with Practice: Charles E. Bessey and the Maturing of American Botany (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Palladino, Paolo, “Between Craft and Science: Plant Breeding, Mendelian Genetics, and British Universities, 1900–1920,” Technology and Culture, 34 (1993);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladino, Paolo, “Science, Technology, and the Economy: Plant Breeding in Great Britain, 1920–1970,” Economic History Review, 49 (1996);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, John H., Geopolitics and the Green Revolution: Wheat, Genes, and the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997);Google Scholar
Posey, Darrell A., “Safeguarding Traditional Resource Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” in Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives, ed. Nazarea, Virginia D. (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1999);Google Scholar
Potonié, Henry, “Der königliche botanische Garten zu Berlin,” Naturwissenschaftliche Wochenschrift, 5 (1890);Google Scholar
Prest, John, The Garden of Eden: The Botanic Garden and the Re-creation of Paradise (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981);Google Scholar
Pringsheim, E. G., Julius Sachs: Der Begründer der neueren Pflanzenphysiologie, 1832–1897 (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1932);Google Scholar
Rodgers, Andrew Denny III, American Botany, 1873–1892: Decades of Transition (New York: Hafner, 1968), chaps. 2–6;Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Charles E., No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976);Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin, The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Paleontology, 2nd ed. (New York: Neale Watson, 1976);Google Scholar
Sachs, Julius, Text-book of Botany, Morphological and Physiological, trans. A. W. Bennett and W. T. Thiselton-Dyer (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1875).Google Scholar
Savage, Henry, Jr., “Introduction,” in Marguerite Duval, The King’s Garden, trans. Annette Tomarken and Claudine Cowen (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1982), p.;Google Scholar
Shteir, Anne, Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora’s Daughters and Botany in England, 1760–1860 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), especially;Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty, “G. Ledyard Stebbins, Jr. and the Evolutionary Synthesis (1924–1950),” American Journal of Botany, 84 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stace, Clive, Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics, 2nd ed. (London: Edward Arnold, 1989);Google Scholar
Stevens, Peter F., The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, Nature, and the Natural System (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994);Google Scholar
Swanson, C. P., “A History of Biology at the Johns Hopkins University,” Bios, 22 (1951).Google Scholar
Thiselton-Dyer, W. T., “Plant Biology in the ’Seventies,” Nature, 115 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavilov, N. I., The Origin, Variation, Immunity and Breeding of Cultivated Plants, trans. K. Starr Chester (Waltham, Mass.: Chronica Botanica, 1951);Google Scholar
Vines, S. H., “Reminiscences of German Botanical Laboratories in the ’Seventies and ἘEighties of the Last Century” and Scott, D. H., “German Reminiscences of the Early ἘEighties,” The New Phytologist, 24 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Sachs, Julius, A History of Botany, trans. H. E. F. Garnsey and I. B. Balfour (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1890);Google Scholar
Walter, Heinrich, Vegetation of the Earth: In Relation to Climate and the Eco-physiological Conditions, trans. Joy Wieser (London: The English Universities Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Walters, S. M., The Shaping of Cambridge Botany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepernick, Bernhard and Karlsson, Else-Marie, Berlins Botanischer Garten (Berlin: Haude und Spener, 1979);Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×