Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:39:16.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - The lyric

from IV - Literary forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Glyn P. Norton
Affiliation:
Williams College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Within the loose system of literary genres that existed in the passage from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance, lyric has an especially problematic trajectory. For one thing, lyric is always – even today – the most fugitive of genres when it comes to a theory of its identity. And for another, the period in question is probably the starting point of the modern idea of lyric productions as short, intense, and exquisite redactions of impassioned speech – a notion that is much further developed in the Romantic period, but has recognizable beginnings in the early Renaissance. One consequence of this latter view is that lyric theory comes to seem almost a contradiction in terms: where it is assumed that speech can be idealized into poetry and poetry naturalized into speech, a poetics of lyric like those of epic or drama can seem beside the point. Moreover, the disparity between the available terms of lyric theory and the actual productions of the genre becomes arrestingly evident in this period. In many ways the most acute poetics of the early modern lyric is written out in poems themselves, such as Garcilaso de la Vega's Egloga tercera (written c. 1526, published 1543) and Edmund Spenser's Shepheardes calender (1579), where poets and their audiences often find the common ground for genre orientated conversation they otherwise lack. Hence the emergence of lyric in this period – its separation from the other genres, its theory and practice – must be sought in many untoward places, and witnessed alongside other events.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alighieri, Dante, De vulgari eloquentia, trans. Howell, A. G. F., in Latin works of Dante, London: Temple Classics, 1904.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger, The scholemaster, (London, 1570)in Elizabethan critical essays ed. Smith, G. G. 2 vols. (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1904), vol. 1Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, Well-weighed syllables: Elizabethan verse in classical metres, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1974).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Charles Sears, Renaissance literary theory and practice: classicism in the rhetoric and poetic of Italy, France, and England 1400–1600, ed. Clark, D. L., New York: Columbia University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Charles, A poetics, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1992).Google Scholar
Boccaccio, Giovanni, Genealogiae, ed. Orgel, S., New York: Garland, 1976. [Translation of Preface and Books 14–15, trans. Osgood, C. G., 2nd edn, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956].Google Scholar
Castelvetro, Lodovico, Castelvetro on the art of poetry: an abridged translation of ‘Poetica d'Aristotele vulgarizzata e sposta’, trans. Bongiorno, A., Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance texts and studies, 1984.Google Scholar
Castor, Grahame, Pléiade poetics: a study in sixteenth-century thought and terminology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
de Ronsard, Pierre, ‘Au lecteur’, (1550) in Œuvres complètes, vol.1Google Scholar
Du Bellay, Joachim, L'Olive, in Œuvres poetiques, ed. Aris, D. and Joukovsky, F., Paris: Classiques Garnier, 1993, 2 vols. [See especially Preface to the second edition of L'Olive].Google Scholar
Fenoaltea, Doranne and Rubin, David Lee (ed.), The ladder of high design: structure and interpretation of the French lyric sequence, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1991.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret W.Trials of desire: Renaissance defences of poetry, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Joel, Shakespeare's perjured eye: the invention of poetic subjectivity in the sonnets, (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press 1986).Google Scholar
Forrest-Thomson, Veronica, Poetic artifice, (Manchester, Manchester University Press 1978).Google Scholar
Freccero, John, ‘The fig tree and the laurel: Petrarch's poetics’, Literary theory / Renaissance texts, ed. Parker, P. and Quint, D., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. H. (ed.), Literary criticism: Plato to Dryden, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Giorgio, Giovan, Trissino, Poetica, (Venice, A. Arrivabene 1562).Google Scholar
Greene, Roland (ed.), ‘Material poetry of the Renaissance / the Renaissance of material Greene, Roland (ed.), poetry’, Harvard library bulletin new series 3, no. 2 (1992).Google Scholar
Greene, Roland (ed.), Post-Petrarchism: origins and innovations of the Western lyric sequence, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Roland (ed.), Unrequited conquests: love and empire in the colonial Americas, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Hatch, Ernest, Wilkins, ‘The invention of the sonnet’, in The invention of the sonnet and other studies in Italian literature, (Rome, Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 1959).Google Scholar
Javitch, Daniel, ‘The emergence of poetic genre theory in the sixteenth century’, Modern language quarterly, 59 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Mark, New definitions of lyric: theory, technology, and culture, New York: Garland, 1998.Google Scholar
Jones, Ann Rosalind, The currency of Eros: women's love lyric in Europe, 1540–1620, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Julian, Paul, Smith, ‘The rhetoric of presence in poets and critics of Golden Age lyric: Garcilaso, Herrera, Góngora’, Modern language notes 100 (1985)Google Scholar
Kennedy, William J.Authorizing Petrarch, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lobkowitz, Caramuel, Juan, Primus calamus ob oculos ponens metametricam, (Rome, F. Falconius 1663).Google Scholar
March, Ausias, Obra poetica completa, ed. Ferreres, R., Madrid: Castalia, 1979, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F.Manuscript, print, and the English Renaissance lyric, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mazzaro, Jerome, Transformations in the Renaissance English lyric, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Mazzotta, Giuseppe, ‘The Canzoniere and the language of the self’, Studies in philology, 75(1978).Google Scholar
Minturno, Antonio Sebastiano, L'arte poetica; 1564; facs. reprint Munich: W. Fink, 1971, ed. Fabian, B..Google Scholar
Minturno, Antonio, L'arte poetica, Venice: G. Valvassori, 1564.Google Scholar
Morell, Gallego, Antonio, (ed.), Garcilaso de la Vega y sus comentaristas, 2nd edn (Madrid, Gredos 1972).Google Scholar
Navarrete, Ignacio, Orphans of Petrarch: poetry and theory in the Spanish Renaissance, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Select translations from Scaliger's Poetics, Padelford, F. M. (New York, Henry Holt 1905).Google Scholar
Puttenham, George (?), The arte of English poesie (1589), ed. Willcock, G. D. and Walker, A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Puttenham, George (?), The arte of English poesie, ed. Willcock, G. D. and Walker, A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Ramos, María, José, Vega, El secreto artificio: qualitas sonorum, maronolatríay tradición pontaniana en la poética del Renacimiento, (Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Extremadura 1992)Google Scholar
Read, K., Malcolm, ‘Language and the body in Francisco de Quevedo’, Modern language notes 99 (1984)Google Scholar
Rigolot, François, Le texte de la Renaissance: des rhétoriqueurs è Montaigne, Geneva: Droz, 1982.Google Scholar
Rigolot, François, Le texte de la Renaissance: des rhétoriqueurs à Montaigne, (Geneva, Droz 1982).Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., Jr., A preface to Chaucer, (Princeton, Princeton University Press 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronsard, Pierre, Abbregé de l'art poëtique françois, in Œuvres complètes, ed. Laumonier, P., Silver, I., Lebègue, R., Paris: M. Didier, 1914–75, 20 vols.Google Scholar
Santillana, Iñigo López Mendoza, marqués, , ‘Proemio e carta’, in Obras completas, ed. Moreno, A. Gómez and Kerkhof, M. P. A. M., Barcelona: Planeta, 1988.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar, Poetices libri septem, ed. Buck, A., Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: F. Frommann-Holzboog, 1987.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar, Poetices libri septem; 1561; facs. reprint Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1987, ed. Buck, A..Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar, Select translations from Scaliger's ‘Poetics’, trans. Padelford, F. M., New York: Henry Holt, 1905.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip Sir, A defence of poetry, in Miscellaneous prose of Sir Philip Sidney, ed. Duncan-Jones, K. and Dorsten, J., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SidneyPhilip, Sir, An apologie for poetrie, in Elizabethan critical essays, ed. Smith, G. G., 2 vols., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1904, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Trissino, Giovanni Giorgio, La quinta e la sesta divisione della Poetica, in Trattati di poetica e retorica del Cinquecento, ed. Weinberg, B., Bari: Laterza, 1970, vol. II.Google Scholar
Webbe, William, Discourse of English poetrie (1586), in Elizabethan critical essays, ed. Smith, G. G., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard, A history of literary criticism in the Italian Renaissance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961, 2 vols. [See esp. vol. I, pp. 71–249 on readings of Aristotle and Horace].Google Scholar
Weiss, Julian, The poet's art: literary theory in Castile c. 1400–60, (Oxford, Society for the Study of Mediaeval Languages and Literature 1990).Google Scholar
Zim, Rivkah, English metrical psalms: poetry as praise and prayer, 1535–1601, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1987).Google Scholar
Zumthor, Paul, Towards a medieval poetics, trans. Bennett, P. (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press 1992).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The lyric
  • Edited by Glyn P. Norton, Williams College, Massachusetts
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300087.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The lyric
  • Edited by Glyn P. Norton, Williams College, Massachusetts
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300087.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The lyric
  • Edited by Glyn P. Norton, Williams College, Massachusetts
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300087.023
Available formats
×