Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:06:23.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Affect and Workplace Judgment and Decision-Making

from Part II - Workplace Affect and Individual Worker Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

By
Shanique G. Brown  and
Alice F. Stuhlmacher
Edited by
Liu-Qin Yang ,
Russell Cropanzano ,
Catherine S. Daus  and
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Liu-Qin Yang
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Russell Cropanzano
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Catherine S. Daus
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Get access

Summary

Judgment and decision-making (JDM) are ubiquitous within organizations. Leaders initiate critical judgments and decisions about organizational strategy and operating procedures. Continuous judgments and decisions are generated relating to the recruitment, selection, performance management, and departure of organizational talent. Every employee makes judgments and decisions on career directions, task acceptance, resource use, and time allocations across both work and non-work tasks. Employees generate frequent high-stakes judgments and decisions in courtrooms, as well as split-second decisions in emergency rooms and cockpits. It is hard to imagine workplace decisions and judgments such as these occurring without affective processes being involved.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect , pp. 174 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. J. (2007). The functions of emotion in decision making and decision avoidance. In Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Loewenstein, G (Eds.), Do emotions help or hurt decision making? A hedgefoxian perspective (pp. 183–201). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google ScholarPubMed
Au, K., Chan, F., Wang, D., & Vertinsky, I. (2003). Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 322–338.Google Scholar
Baron, R. A. (1993). Interviewers’ moods and evaluations of job applicants: The role of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 253–271.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45–62.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. E. (1999). Judgment and decision-making research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 13, 385–398.Google Scholar
Booth‐Butterfield, M., & Booth‐Butterfield, S. (1990). Conceptualizing affect as information in communication production. Human Communication Research, 16, 451–476.Google Scholar
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.Google Scholar
Brown, S. G., & Daus, C. S. (2016). Avoidant but not avoiding: The mediational role of anticipated regret in police decision-making. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31, 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.) (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive–experiential self-theory. In Chaiken, S & Trope, Y (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462–482). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, J. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127–148.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3–34.Google Scholar
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299–307.Google Scholar
George, J. M. (1992). The role of personality in organizational life: Issues and evidence. Journal of Management, 18, 185–213.Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Dane, E. (2016). Affect, emotion, and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 47–55.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K., Shih, S. I., & Mohammed, S. (2017). The predictive validity of the decision styles scale: An evaluation across task types. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 333–340.Google Scholar
Johnson, E., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. F., & Connelly, S. (2016). Moral disengagement and ethical decision-making: The moderating role of trait guilt and shame. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 15, 184–189.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 162–176.Google Scholar
Kligyte, V., Connelly, S., Thiel, C., & Devenport, L. (2013). The influence of anger, fear, and emotion regulation on ethical decision making. Human Performance, 26, 297–326.Google Scholar
Kooij‐de Bode, H. J., Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). Good effects of bad feelings: Negative affectivity and group decision‐making. British Journal of Management, 21, 375–392.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific Influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 473–493.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115–137.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D. (1995). The system–topic framework and the structural arrangement of systems within and around personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 459–493.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140.Google Scholar
Mikels, J. A., Shuster, M. M., & Thai, S. T. (2015). Aging, emotion, and decision making. In Hess, T. M., Strough, J, & Löckenhoff, C. E. (Eds.), Aging and decision making: Empirical and applied perspectives (pp. 169–188). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252–283.Google Scholar
Ng, C. K., Wong, K. F. E., & Fai, E. (2008). Emotion and organizational decision-making: The roles of negative affect and anticipated regret in making decisions under escalation situations. In Ashkanasy, N & Copper, C (Eds.), Emotions in organizations (pp. 45–60). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. J., Fletcher, J. M., Marks, A. D., & Hine, D. W. (2016). Thinking styles and decision making: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 260–290.Google Scholar
Robbins, T. L., & DeNisi, A. S. (1998). Mood vs. interpersonal affect: Identifying process and rating distortions in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 313–325.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 247–270.Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2001). Feelings as information: implications for affective influences on information processing. In Martin, L. L. & Clore, G. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 159–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van Lange, P, Kruglanski, A, & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Volume 1, pp. 289–308). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1, 57–64.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2010). Affective antecedents of intuitive decision-making. Journal of Management & Organization, 16, 382–398.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. C. (1988). Mood, categorization breadth, and performance appraisal: The effects of order of information acquisition and affective state on halo, accuracy, information retrieval, and evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 22–46.Google Scholar
Sirois, F., & Pychyl, T. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 115–127.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2003). The rationality debate as a progressive research program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 531–533.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. K., Busemeyer, J. R., & Naylor, J. C. (1990). Judgment and decision-making theory. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Volume 1, pp. 283–374). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
Summers, B., & Duxbury, D. (2012). Decision-dependent emotions and behavioral anomalies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 226–238.Google Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., Kooij-de Bode, H. J., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organization Science, 21, 731–744.Google Scholar
Varma, A., DeNisi, A., & Peters, L. H. (1996). Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 49, 341–360.Google Scholar
Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Burns, W. J., Erlandsson, A., Koppel, L., Asutay, E., & Tinghög, G. (2016). The arithmetic of emotion: Integration of incidental and integral affect in judgments and decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 325.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organization behavior (Volume 19, pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Wong, K. F. E., Yik, M., & Kwong, J. Y. (2006). Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: The role of negative affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 282–297.Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., Van der Pligt, J., & De Vries, N. K. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148–158.Google Scholar
Zeelenger, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93–106.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×