Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:58:13.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Working Memory and L2 Grammar Development in Children

from Part V - Bilingual Acquisition and Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2022

John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University
Get access

Summary

The role of working memory in language learning has received considerable attention, but several pertinent issues remain. One of these concerns the directionality of the relationships between working memory and language learning. Another issue relates to different types of processing and working memory components involved in learning different aspects of a second language (vocabulary, grammatical sub-skills, e.g., subject-verb agreement, verb placement, word order, auxiliaries). In this chapter we review and integrate findings of previous studies, following the extraction and integration model (Thiessen et al., 2013), and apply these to second language learning. In so doing, we distinguish between statistical learning based on conditional relations of adjacencies (extraction) and statistical learning based on distributional patterns of non-adjacencies (integration). We propose how L2 children's gradual increase in knowledge of the second language increases the sensitivity of working memory to cues in ambient speech that, in turn, fosters further second language learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249306.Google Scholar
Arciuli, J. (2017). The multi-component nature of statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372 (20160058).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20, R136R140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 4789). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2009). Compression in visual working memory: Using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 138, 487502.Google Scholar
Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 867873.Google Scholar
Coady, J. A., & Evans, J. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychological Bulletin Review, 24, 11581170.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Duran, N. D., & Morehead, J. R. (2012). Prediction during statistical learning, and implications for the implicit/explicit divide. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 196209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bree, E. H., Verhagen, J., Kerkhoff, A. O., Doedens, W. J., & Unsworth, S. (2017). Language learning from inconsistent input: Bilingual and monolingual toddlers compared. Infant and Child Development, 26, e1996.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing and acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Collins, L. (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function: Introduction to special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 329335.Google Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 974986.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 1923.Google Scholar
Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66108.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211245.Google Scholar
French, L. M. (2006). Phonological working memory and second language acquisition: A developmental study of Francophone children learning English in Quebec. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463487.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 23, 8394.Google Scholar
Gómez, R., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267333.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P. (2014). A role for chunk formation in statistical learning of second language syntax. Language Learning, 64, 247278.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P., Lum, J. G., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Child first language and adult second language are both tied to general-purpose learning systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(7), 14871492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulstijn, J. H.. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193223.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 7398.Google Scholar
Isbilen, E. S., McCauley, S. M., Kidd, E., & Christiansen, M. H. (2020). Statistically induced chunking recall: A memory-based approach to statistical learning. Cognitive Science, 44, e12848.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131161.Google Scholar
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case-marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language. Acquisition, 20, 543587.Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 171184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301347.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261271.Google Scholar
Lee, H. J., Kin, Y. T., & Yim, D. (2013). Non-word repetition in Korean-English children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(4), 375382.Google Scholar
Leseman, P. P. M., Henrichs, L. F., Blom, E. & Verhagen, J. (2019). Young mono- and bilingual children’s exposure to academic language as related to language development and school achievement. In Grøver, V., Ucelli, P., Rowe, M. & Lieven, E. (Eds.), Learning through language (pp. 205217). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Competition Model. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 35). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 4967). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211227). Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379413.Google Scholar
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383388.Google Scholar
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (2005). Phonological short-term memory skills and new word learning in young Greek children. Memory, 13, 422429.Google Scholar
McCauley, S. M., Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Chunking ability shapes sentence processing at multiple levels of abstraction. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2681–2686).Google Scholar
Messer, M. H., Leseman, P. P. M., Boom, J., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 306323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messer, M. H., Verhagen, J., Boom, J., Mayo, A. Y., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2015). Growth of verbal short-term memory of nonwords varying in phonotactic probability: A longitudinal study with monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 2436.Google Scholar
Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302331.Google Scholar
Morales, M., Mundy, P., Delgado, C. E. F., Yale, M., Messinger, D., Neal, R., & Schwartz, H. K. (2000). Responding to joint attention across the 6- to 24-month age period and early language acquisition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 283298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundy, P., & Gomes, A. (1998). Individual differences in joint attention skill development in the second year. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 469482.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D. A., Conway, A., Cowan, N., Donkin, C., Farrell, S. A., Hitch, G. J., Hurlstone, M. J., Ma, W. J., Morey, C. C., Nee, D. E., Schweppe, J., Vergauwe, E., & Ward, G. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144), 885958.Google Scholar
Palmer, S. D., & Mattys, S. L. (2016). Speech segmentation by statistical learning is supported by domain-general processes within working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 23902401.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2007). Second language acquisition in childhood. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology: Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 387405). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82(6), 18341849.Google Scholar
Romberg, A. S. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1, 906914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928Google Scholar
Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P. M., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of mono- and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 117140.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129158.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1978). The acculturation model for second-language acquisition. In Gingras, R.C. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Scott, R. M., & Fisher, C. (2012). 2.5-year-olds use cross-situational consistency to learn verbs under referential uncertainty. Cognition, 122, 163180.Google Scholar
Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 2150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155172.Google Scholar
Sherman, B. E., Graves, K. N., & Turke-Brown, N. B. (2020). The prevalence and importance of statistical learning in human cognition and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 32, 1520.Google Scholar
Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegelman, N., Bogaerts, L., Christiansen, M. H., & Frost, R. (2017). Towards a theory of individual differences in statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372(20160059).Google Scholar
Smith, L. B., Suanda, S. H., & Yu, C. (2014). The unrealized promise of infant statistical word–referent learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18( 5), 251258.Google Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293320.Google Scholar
Speidel, G. E. (1993). Phonological short-term memory and individual differences in learning to speak: A bilingual case study. First Language, 13, 6991.Google Scholar
Speidel, G. E., & Herreshoff, M. J. (1989). Imitation and the construction of long utterances. In Speidel, G. E. & Nelson, K. E. (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 181197). Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Custode, S., Kuchirko, Y., Escobar, K., Lo, T. (2019). Routine language: Speech directed to infants during home activities. Child Development, 90(6), 21352152.Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. D. (2017). What’s statistical about learning? Insights from modelling statistical learning as a set of memory processes. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 1711.Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. D., & Erickson, L. C. (2013). Beyond word segmentation: A two-process account of statistical learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science22, 239243.Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., & Hufnagle, D. G. (2013). The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 792814.Google Scholar
Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(2), 303324.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1988). The role of joint attentional processes in early language development. Language Sciences, 10, 6988.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J., & Calude, A. S. (2015). The role of statistical learning in the acquisition of motion event construal in a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18, 602623.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, Adult L2, Child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University).Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2014). Comparing the role of input in bilingual acquisition across domains. In Grüter, T. & Paradis, J. (Eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development (pp. 181201).  John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104132.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., & Spillers, G. J. (2010). Working memory capacity: Attention control, secondary memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 392406.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J. (2009). Finiteness in Dutch as second language (Doctoral dissertation Free University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Verhagen, J., Messer, M. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2015). Phonological memory and the acquisition of grammar in child L2 learners. Language Learning, 65, 417448.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J., Boom, J., Mulder, H., de Bree, E. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2019). Reciprocal relationships between nonword repetition and vocabulary during the preschool years. Developmental Psychology, 55, 11251137.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J., & de Bree, E. H. (2020). Effects of bilingualism on statistical learning in preschoolers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(5), 611-639.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J. & Leseman, P. P. M. (2016). How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar? A comparison between first and second language learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 6582.Google Scholar
Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265279.Google Scholar
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J., & Serratrice, L. (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields. (pp. 3756). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162185.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×