Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:42:32.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Evolution of Working Memory and Language

from Part II - Models and Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2022

By
Frederick L. Coolidge  and
Thomas Wynn
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Zhisheng (Edward) Wen
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Shue Yan University
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents the hypothesis that working memory and language evolved in tandem. It reviews the evolutionary origins of each of the components of Baddeley’s working memory model and their role in the evolution of language. The chapter reviews the gradualist position that language did evolve slowly from aurally directed early primate calls and notes that the primary purpose of language has always been communication. The chapter also presents the novel idea that the pragmatics of speech (the purposes of speech) also evolved in tandem with the evolution of working memory. The chapter also reviews the saltationist idea that something happened to language more recent than 100,000 years ago, and that is the release of the fifth pragmatic of speech, the subjunctive mood, which expresses wishes and ideas contrary to fact. The subjunctive mood required fully modern working memory capacity, sufficient phonological storage capacity, and an enhanced visuospatial sketchpad, which are also critically involved in episodic memory recall and simulation. The phenotypic result of this genotype meant that thought experiments could be conducted in a recursive manner. We propose that the fruits of Homo sapiens’s cultural explosion, cave art, creative figurines, and highly ritualized burials, were the direct result of the wishes and imaginings that arise from subjunctive thinking and subjunctive language.

Keywords

evolution of working memoryenhanced working memorylanguage evolutionepisodic memoryrecursionpragmatics of speechsubjunctive
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 31 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboitiz, F. (2017). A brain for speech: A view from evolutionary neuroanatomy. Springer.Google Scholar
Aboitiz, F., Aboitiz, S., & García, R. R. (2010). The phonological loop: A key innovation in human evolution. Current Anthropology, 51(S1), S55–S65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboitiz, F., García, R. R., Bosman, C., & Brunetti, E. (2006). Cortical memory mechanisms and language origins. Brain and Language, 98(1), 40–56.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (2013). What is special about the human language faculty and how did it get that way? In Botha, R. & Everaert, M. (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Evidence and inference (pp. 18–41). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (p. 28–61). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158–173.Google Scholar
Barham, L., & Everett, D. (2020). Semiotics and the origin of language in the lower Palaeolithic. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1–45.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2017). Why only us: Recent questions and answers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43, 166–177.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C., Hauser, M., & Tattersall, I. (2013). Neanderthal language? Just-so stories take center stage. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 671.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2000). How protolanguage became language. In Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Hurford, J., The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp. 264–284). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2014). How could language have evolved? PLoS Biology, 12(8), e1001934.Google Scholar
Botha, R. (2010). On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behaviour. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20, 345–356.Google Scholar
Botha, R., & Everaert, M. (Eds.). (2013). The evolutionary emergence of language: Evidence and inference. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bramble, D. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432(7015), 345–352.Google Scholar
Bruner, E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics and paleoneurology: Brain shape evolution in the genus. Homo: Journal of Human Evolution, 47, 279–303.Google Scholar
Bruner, E., & Iriki, A. (2015). Extending mind, visuospatial integration, and the evolution of the parietal lobes in the human genus. Quaternary International, 369, 1–13.Google Scholar
Cachel, S., & Harris, J. W. (1995). Ranging patterns, land-use and subsistence in Homo erectus from the perspective of evolutionary ecology. In Bower, J. R. & Sartono, S. (Eds), Human evolution in its ecological context: Palaeo-anthropology: Evolution and ecology of Homo erectus (pp. 52–65). Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation.Google Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1995). Aphasic disorders of syntactic comprehension and working memory capacity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(6), 637–649.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2015). Some core contested concepts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 91–104.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coolidge, F. L. (2014). The exaptation of the parietal lobes in Homo sapiens. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 92, 295–298.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L. (2019). The ultimate origins of learning and memory systems. Human Evolution, 34, 21–38.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L. (2020). Evolutionary neuropsychology: An introduction to the evolution of the structures and functions of the human brain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., Haidle, M. N., Lombard, M., & Wynn, T. (2016). Bridging theory and bow hunting: Human cognitive evolution and archaeology. Antiquity, 90, 219–228.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., Overmann, K. A., & Wynn, T. (2010). Recursion: What is it? Who has it? How did it evolve? WIRE Cognitive Science, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L. & Wynn, T. (2001). Executive functions of the frontal lobes and the evolutionary ascendancy of Homo sapiens. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2005). Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15, 5–26.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2006). The effects of the tree-to-ground sleep transition in the evolution of cognition in early Homo. Before Farming: The Archaeology and Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2018). The rise of Homo sapiens: The evolution of modern thinking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2011). The recursive mind: The origins of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2017). The truth about language: What it is and where it came from. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.Google Scholar
de Boer, B., Thompson, B., Ravignani, A., & Boeckx, C. (2020). Evolutionary dynamics do not motivate a single-mutant theory of human language. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(5), 178–190.Google Scholar
Evans, P. D., Gilbert, S. L., Mekel-Bobrov, N., Vallender, E. J., Anderson, J. R., Vaez-Azizi, L. M.,…& Lahn, B. T. (2005). Microcephalin, a gene regulating brain size, continues to evolve adaptively in humans. Science, 309(5741), 1717–1720.Google Scholar
Finlayson, C. (2019). The smart Neanderthal: Bird catching, cave art, and the cognitive revolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210.Google Scholar
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. R. (2012). Language or protolanguage? A review of the ape language literature. In Tallerman, M. & Gibson, K. R., The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp.46–58). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R., & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2), 211–225.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 637–671.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. (2000). Archeology and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, 9, 17–36.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. (2009). The human career: Human biological and cultural origins. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., & Zuberbu, K. (2013). Exploring the gaps between primate calls and human language. In Botha, R. & Everaert, M. (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Evidence and inference (pp. 181–203). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, D., Bramble, D., Rachlen, D., & Shea, J. (2009). Brains, brawn, and the evolution of human endurance running capabilities. In Grine, F., Fleagle, J. & Leakey, R. (Eds.), The first humans: Origin and early evolution of the genus Homo (pp. 77–92): Springer.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1966/2012). Higher cortical functions in man. Springer.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. J. (1996). The prehistory of the mind: The cognitive origins of art, religion and science. Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. (2006). The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Neubauer, S., Hublin, J. J., & Gunz, P. (2018). The evolution of modern human brain shape. Science Advances, 4(1), eaao5961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overmann, K. A., & Coolidge, F. L. (Eds.). (2019). Squeezing minds from stones: Cognitive archaeology and the evolution of the human mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, A. R. (2006). Evolving the narrow language faculty: Was recursion the pivotal step? In Smith, K. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 239–246). World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–727.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236.Google Scholar
Price, T., Wadewitz, P., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., Hammerschmidt, K., & Fischer, J. (2015). Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity. Scientific reports, 5(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Vidal, J., d’Errico, F., Pacheco, F. G., Blasco, R., Rosell, J., Jennings, R. P., … & Finlayson, C. (2014). A rock engraving made by Neanderthals in Gibraltar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(37), 13301–13306.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210 (4471) 801–803.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029869Google Scholar
Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). Pyow-hack revisited: Two analyses of putty-nosed monkey alarm calls. Lingua, 171, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C., & Blythe, R. A. (2013). Why is combinatorial communication rare in the natural world, and why is language an exception to this trend? Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(88), 20130520.Google Scholar
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1997). The genetic basis of human scientific knowledge. In Chadwick, D. J. & Cardew, G., Ciba Foundation Symposium (pp. 23–38). Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M. (2007). Did our ancestors speak a holistic protolanguage? Lingua, 117, 579–604.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M., & Gibson, K. R. (2012). Introduction: The evolution of language. Tallerman, In M. & Gibson, K. R., The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp. 1–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. (2008). An evolutionary framework for the acquisition of symbolic cognition by Homo sapiens. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 3, 99–114.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis? In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (p. 839–853). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, B. J. (1966). Experimental psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Villa, P., & Roebroeks, W. (2014). Neandertal demise: An archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e96424.Google Scholar
Wadley, L. (2010). Compound-adhesive manufacture as a behavioral proxy for complex cognition in the Middle Stone Age. Current Anthropology, 51, S111–S119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C., & Stock, J. T. (2007). The biology of the colonizing ape. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 50, 191–222.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1978). What is sociobiology? Society, 15(6), 10–14.Google Scholar
Wynn, T. (2009). Hafted spears and the archaeology of mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 9544–9545.Google Scholar
Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2010). Beyond symbolism and language. Current Anthropology, 51, S5–S16.Google Scholar
Wynn, T., & Coolidge, F. L. (2015). Technical cognition, working memory, and creativity. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22, 45–63.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×