Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:03:24.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Stakeholder Theory in Management Education

from Part IV - Stakeholder Theory in Education and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2019

By
Irene Henriques
Edited by
Jeffrey S. Harrison ,
Jay B. Barney ,
R. Edward Freeman  and
Robert A. Phillips
Jeffrey S. Harrison
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
Jay B. Barney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Robert A. Phillips
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory , pp. 211 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Resource List

Video Cases

Seventh Generation Case

Russo, M. V. & Goldstein, D. (2007). Seventh Generation: Balancing Customer Expectations with Supply Chain Realities. oikos sustainability case collection. https://oikos-international.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/oikos_Cases_2007_Seventh_Generation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Information on cotton used by Seventh Generation Diapers: www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5 U-0ReBMRwGoogle Scholar

Guayakí Case

This case is accompanied by a teaching note, available to faculty only. Please send your request to . Access to the Guayakí case video hosted by VIMEO is also free and the password is in the teaching note.

For details on how to undertake a stakeholder negotiation exercise with actual stakeholders of a negotiation as coaches see:

Issue-based stakeholder negotiation exercises where actual stakeholder coaches are not present require instructors to choose a local or national issue of significance so as to heighten students’ involvement and interest. The ideal issue is one that is complex and uncertain and has many differing stakeholder perspectives as to how the problem should or should not be addressed. Examples include (1) a major labor disruption that not only affects the company and its primary stakeholders but the community as well; and (2) controversial capital investments including building on rich agricultural land, pipeline expansion, mining expansion, etc. For details on methods to engage students in an issue-based stakeholder negotiation exercise see:

Russo, M. V. & Crooke, M. (2016). Guayakí: Securing Supplies, Strengthening the Mission. oikos Case Writing Competition 2016 – Corporate Sustainability Track 1st Prize. https://oikos-international.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/2016_CS_free-case_Guayaki_case.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ramus, C. A. (2003). Stakeholders as Coaches: An Experiential Method for Teaching Environmental Regulatory Negotiation. Journal of Management Education, 27(2): 246–270.Google Scholar
Collins, E., & Kearins, K. (2007). Exposing students to the potential and risks of stakeholder engagement then teaching sustainability: A classroom exercise. Journal of Management Education, 31(4): 521–540.Google Scholar
Egri, C. P. (1999). The environmental round table role-play exercise: The dynamics of multi-stakeholder decision-making processes. Journal of Management Education, 23(1): 95–103.Google Scholar

Social Protest Novel

Some examples of historical social protest novels that have led to change include: The Jungle by Upton Sinclair (1906) on the terrible treatment of immigrant laborers in food processing facilities in the United States; The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan (1963) on the dissatisfaction of housewives across America; Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison (1947) about societal repression and African American’s community’s resulting frustrations; and Silent Spring by Rachel Carson (1962) on the serious health problems that chemical companies denied. All these novels preceded subsequent changes to the Meat Inspection Act, the Feminist movement, the Civil Rights movement, and the Environmental movement respectively.

For a discussion on how to introduce historical protest novels into a classroom setting and suggestions of social protest novels for a management classroom see:

Westerman, J. W., & Westerman, J. H. (2009). Social Protest Novels in Management Education: Using Hawk’s Nest to Enhance Stakeholder Analysis. Journal of Management Education, 33(6): 659–675.Google Scholar

Issue-Based Stakeholder Town Hall

An issue-based stakeholder town hall is a stakeholder exercise that is based on an issue that has yet to be resolved. The ideal issue is in the news, is complex, involves a company or an industry, has multiple stakeholders with differing perspectives, and is contested.

Below I provide a few examples

Pipeline expansion: Keystone XL Pipeline expansion Resource List

Students are also asked to watch a video made by the Pembina Institute (an environmental non-governmental organization) regarding the Canadian oil sands which can be found at www.pembina.org/pub/1280.

The Dakota Access Pipeline controversy is another example that can be used. For a synopsis of the issues, see the articles by

and

The impact of technology adoption on employment

Concern regarding technology replacing jobs is not news. What is news is the speed at which technology is and will replace jobs as artificial intelligence and robotic automation takes hold. Driverless vehicles, automated kiosks, robo-investing are all examples of this radical transition. This is an ideal, although uncomfortable, topic for management students to discuss. Taking on various stakeholder roles related to this issue would allow students to think through the short-term and long-term implications of an issue that may affect their future.

Suggested readings and videos:

TED-Talks by Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson authors of:

Song’s 2011 Inside Climate News article entitled “Keystone XL Primer: How the Pipeline’s Route Could Impact the Ogallala Aquifer” http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20110811/keystone-xl-pipeline-route-ogallala-aquifer-nebraska-sandhillsGoogle Scholar
CBC news article entitled “Keystone XL pipeline delay disappoints TransCanada” http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/11/10/keyston-pipeline-route.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
Sidder, A. (2016: September 14), Understanding the Controversy Behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, Simthosonian.com. Retrieved from www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/understanding-controversy-behind-dakota-access-pipeline-180960450/Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. (2017: June 1), Crude Oil Begins to Flow through Controversial Dakota Access Pipeline. The two-way breaking news from NPR. Retrieved from www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/01/531097758/crude-oil-begins-to-flow-through-controversial-dakota-access-pipelineGoogle Scholar
The Guardian article provides perceptual and actual data on robotic automation: www.bbc.com/future/story/20150805-will-machines-eventually-take-on-every-jobGoogle Scholar
The Economist (2016: 25 June) “Special report: The return of the machinery question” provides an excellent look at the issue and introduces students to the importance of government as an important stakeholder. www.economist.com/news/special-report/21700758-will-smarter-machines-cause-mass-unemployment-automation-and-anxietyGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine, Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age, New York: W.W. Norton & Company. www.ted.com/talks/andrew_mcafee_what_will_future_jobs_look_likewww.ted.com/talks/erik_brynjolfsson_the_key_to_growth_race_em_with_em_the_machinesGoogle Scholar

References

Adler, P. S. (2016). 2015 Presidential Address: Our teaching mission. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 185–195. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2016.0017.Google Scholar
Alpaslan, C. M. (2009). Ethical management of crises: Shareholder value maximisation or stakeholder loss minimisation? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36: 41–50.Google Scholar
Arco, M. (2017). Christie calls on feds to make big changes after United Airlines fiasco. NJ.com.Google Scholar
de Bakker, F. G. A., den Hond, F., King, B., & Weber, K. (2013). Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. Organization Studies, 34(5–6):573–593. DOI: 10.1177/0170840613479222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Embedding sustainability across the organization: A critical perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(4): 719–731. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2010.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Shareholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 794–816. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275520.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. L. (2014). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct. Journal of Management, 40(3): 676–702. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311433854.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2): 180–191. DOI: 10.1177/0165551508095781.Google Scholar
Bonnafous-Boucher, M., & Rendtorff, J. D. (2015). Teaching Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 12: 3–4.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E., & Saatcioglu, A. (2008). A 20-year view of trying to develop emotional, social and cognitive intelligence competencies in graduate management education. Journal of Management Development, 27(1): 92–108. DOI: 10.1108/02621710810840785.Google Scholar
Bradbury-Huang, H. (2010). What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest?. Action Research, 8(1): 93–109. DOI: 10.1177/1476750310362435.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2089.Google Scholar
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships and Social Welfare: A Behavioral Theory of Contributions to Joint Value Creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229–251. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2013.0475.Google Scholar
Bruder, P. (2015). Game on: gamification in the classroom. Education Digest, 80(7): 56.Google Scholar
Coghlan, D. (2011). Action research: Exploring perspectives on a philosophy of practical knowing. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 53–87. DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2011.571520.Google Scholar
Collins, E., & Kearins, K. (2007). Exposing students to the potential and risks of stakeholder engagement when teaching sustainability: A classroom exercise. Journal of Management Education, 31(4): 521–540. DOI: 10.1177/1052562906291307.Google Scholar
Convening of Indigenous Peoples for the Healing of Mother Earth. (2008). Message of the Living Spirit of the Convening of Indigenous Peoples for the Healing of Mother Earth at the Cultural Territory of the Maya, pp. 1–7. Palenque, Chiapas, Mexico.Google Scholar
Crane, A., Henriques, I., Husted, B., & Matten, D. (2015). Defining the scope of business & society. Business & Society, 54(4): 427–434. DOI: 10.1177/0007650315590896.Google Scholar
Crane, A., & Livesey, S. (2003). Are you talking to me? Stakeholder communication and the risks and rewards of dialogue. In Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B. W., & Rahman, S. S.eds., Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Relationships, communication, reporting and performance, pp. 39–52. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
Crowne, K. A. (2009). The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence. Organization Management Journal, 6(3): 148–63. DOI: 10.1057/omj.2009.20.Google Scholar
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6): 1072–94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. H. (1861). Life in the iron mills. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study gamification in education. Educational Technology & Society, 18(June): 75–88.Google Scholar
Dicheva, D., Irwin, K., Dichev, C., & Talasila, S. (2014). A course gamification platform supporting student motivation and engagement. 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning, ICWOAL 2014. DOI: 10.1109/ICWOAL.2014.7009214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egri, C. P. (1999). The environmental round table role-play exercise: The dynamics of multi-stakeholder decision-making processes. Journal of Management Education, 23(1): 95–103.Google Scholar
Egri, C. P. (2003). Teaching about the natural environment in management education: New directions and approaches. Journal of Management Education, 27(2): 139–143. DOI: 10.1177/1052562903251409.Google Scholar
Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1): 90–92. Elsevier Inc. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & MacVea, J. (2005). A stakeholder approach to strategic, management. In Hitt, M., Freeman, R. E., & Harrison, J., eds., Handbook of strategic management, pp. 189–207. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.263511.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited.” Organization Science, 15(3): 364–369. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32: 122–124.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. (1999). Strategies influence. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar
Frostenson, M. (2015). Teaching issues-driven stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 12: 43–52.Google Scholar
Glover, I. (2013). Play as you learn: Gamification as a technique for motivating learners. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 1998–2008.Google Scholar
Grégoire, Y., Salle, A., & Tripp, T. M. (2015). Managing social media crises with your customers: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 58(2): 173–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.001.Google Scholar
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4): 463–487. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2012.0341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers and Education, 80: 152–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S. (2017). Westjet boasts it doesn’t overbook flights in ad targeting airlines that do. CBC News Business.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1): 58–74. DOI: 10.1002/smj.801.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (2014). Foundations in strategic management, 6th edn. Independence, KY: Cengage/South-Western.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1): 97–124. DOI: 10.5840/beq20132314.Google Scholar
Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 87–99.Google Scholar
Henriques, I., & Sharma, S. (2005). Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(6): 384–398.Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L., & Hult, G. T. M. (2017). International business: Competing in the global marketplace, 11th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J. S. (2013). Competing for advantage, 3rd edn. Independence, KY: Cengage/South-Western.Google Scholar
Husted, B. W. (2015). Corporate social responsibility practice from 1800–1914: Past initiatives and current debates. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1): 125–141. DOI: 10.1017/beq.2014.1.Google Scholar
Kacperczyk, A. (2009). With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 261–85. DOI: 10.1002/smj.733.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1): 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.Google Scholar
Kirsch, S. (2001). Lost worlds: Environmental disaster, “culture loss,” and the law. Current Anthropology, 42(2): 167–198.Google Scholar
Königer, P., & Janowitz, K. (1995). Drowning in information, but thirsty for knowledge. International Journal of Information Management, 15(1): 5–16. DOI: 10.1016/0268-4012(94)00002-B.Google Scholar
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37(1): 153–84. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310390963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Lumpkin, G. (1995). To make my bread. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. T. (2012). Towards a stakeholder theory of strategic management. In Ricart Costa, J. E. & Rosanas Marti, J. M., eds., Towards a new theory of the firm: Humanizing the firm and the management profession, pp. 153–182. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268–305. DOI: 10.1080/10350339209360349.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–86. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Lee, J. H., & Agle, B. R. (2017). Stakeholder prioritization work: The role of stakeholder salience in stakeholder research. In Wasieleski, D. & Weber, J., eds., Stakeholder management: Business & society 360, vol. 1, pp. 1–45. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Weaver, G. R., Agle, B. R., Bailey, A. D., & Carlson, J. (2016). Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 252–275.Google Scholar
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(October): 323–338. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x.Google Scholar
Pang, A., Hassan, N. B. B. A., & Chong, A. C. Y. (2013). Negotiating crisis in the social media environment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19(1): 96–118. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2012-0064.Google Scholar
Parker, L. (2016). What happens to the U.S. Midwest when the water’s gone? National Geographic, (August).Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review, 74(6): 61–78. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0355.Google Scholar
Ramus, C. A. (2003). Stakeholders as coaches: An experiential method for teaching environmental regulatory negotiation. Journal of Management Education, 27(2): 246–270. DOI: 10.1177/1052562903251416.Google Scholar
Reade, C., Todd, a. M., Osland, a., & Osland, J. (2008). Poverty and the multiple stakeholder challenge for global leaders. Journal of Management Education, 32(6): 820–840. DOI: 10.1177/1052562908317445.Google Scholar
Rendtorff, J. D. (2015). An interactive method for teaching business ethics, stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics Education, 12(Special Issue): 93–106.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1033–1049. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573108.Google Scholar
Robson, C., Hearst, M., Kau, C., & Pierce, J. (2013). Comparing the Use of Social Networking and Traditional Media Channels for Promoting Citizen Science. CSCW ’13 Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1463–8. DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441941.Google Scholar
Rooney, D., Leach, J., & Ashworth, P. (2014). Doing the social in social license. Social Epistemology, 28(3–4):209–218. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2014.922644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothaermel, F. (2017). Strategic management., 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887–910.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 204–219. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.9416080.Google Scholar
Russo, M. V, & Crooke, M. (2016). Guayakí: Securing supplies, strengthening the Mission. oikos Case Writing Competition 2016 – Corporate Sustainability Track, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Russo, M. V., & Goldstein, D. (2007). Seventh Generation: Balancing customer expectations with supply chain realities. oikos Sustainability Case Collection, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3): 185–211. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80058-7.Google Scholar
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 74: 14–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006.Google Scholar
Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 159–180.Google Scholar
Sinclair, U. (1906). The Jungle. In Eby, C. V.ed., Norton critical editions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Skidmore, H. (1941). Hawk’s Nest: A Novel. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, R., Williams, D., & Peterson, G. (2003). Culture loss and sense of place in resource valuation: Economics, anthropology, and indigenous cultures. In Jentoft, S., Minde, H., & Nilsen, R., eds., Indigenous peoples: Resource management and global rights, pp. 107–23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Song, L. (2011). Keystone XL Primer: How the Pipeline’s route could impact the Ogallala Aquifer. Inside Climate News.Google Scholar
Steinbeck, J. (1939). The Grapes of Wrath. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Toft, K. H. (2015). Teaching business ethics to critical students: Adopting the stance of political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 12: 77–92.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. (2017). Scarecrows, watchdogs and strange bedfellows. The Toronto Star, IN6-IN7.Google Scholar
Westerman, J. W., & Westerman, J. H. (2009). Social protest novels in management education: Using Hawk’s Nest to enhance stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Education, 33(6): 659–675. DOI: 10.1177/1052562908329815.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×