Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:12:28.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Corpus Pragmatics

from Part III - Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2021

By
Svenja Adolphs  and
Yaoyao Chen
Edited by
Michael Haugh ,
Dániel Z. Kádár  and
Marina Terkourafi
Michael Haugh
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Dániel Z. Kádár
Affiliation:
Hungarian Research Institute for Linguistics, and Dalian University of Foreign Languages
Marina Terkourafi
Affiliation:
Leiden University
Get access

Summary

Corpus pragmatics is an emerging area of research with a growing number of specialist publications. Research in corpus pragmatics draws on empirical language samples captured in language corpora to explore a wide variety of key topics in pragmatics, such as discourse markers, speech acts and (im)politeness. However, the majority of research to date in corpus pragmatics is based on textual (transcribed) renderings of spoken discourse, and there is a notable lack of corpus pragmatic studies that also adopt a multimodal approach, investigating the potential contribution of multiple modes (including speech, gestures and facial expressions) to utterance functions. The current chapter highlights the affordances of using a multimodal corpus pragmatic approach in exploring the role of speech and gesture in meaning making. We illustrate this approach with the example of speech-gesture functional profiles arising from a multimodal analysis of multiword expressions (e.g. ‘do you know/see what I mean’). The chapter provides an overview of key corpus methods that have been used in sociopragmatic research and pragmatic research more generally before presenting our multimodal corpus pragmatic research on ‘do you know/see what I mean’.

Keywords

corpus linguisticscorpus pragmaticsspoken corporamultimodalitygesture
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics , pp. 639 - 662
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolphs, S. (2008). Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Adolphs, S. and Carter, R. (2007). Beyond the word. European Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, S. and Carter, R. (2013). Spoken Corpus Linguistics: From Monomodal to Multimodal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2015). Pragmatic markers. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.). (2015). Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Avila-Ledesma, N. E. and Amador-Moreno, C. P. (2016). “The more please [places] I see the more I think of home”: On gendered discourse of Irishness and migration experiences. In Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Society and Education in the Networked Age. Cham, Switzerland: Spinger, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar
Brookes, H. (2005). What gestures do: Some communicative functions of quotable gestures in conversations among Black urban South Africans. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(12), 2044–85.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diani, G. (2015). Politeness. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–91.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. D., Cassell, J. and Levy, E. (eds.). (2007). Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (2015). The combining of discourse markers – a beginning. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 48–53.Google Scholar
Fung, L. and Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–39.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D. and Brezina, V. (2015). Does speaker role affect the choice of epistemic adverbials in L2 speech? Evidence from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus. In Romero-Trillo, J., ed., Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 117–36.Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V. and McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67, 155–79.Google Scholar
Gray, B. and Biber, D. (2015). Stance markers. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–48.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a Communication Strategy in Second Language Discourse: A Study of Learners of French and Swedish. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2006). Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(2), 103–24.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. and Culpeper, J. (2018). Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Ilie, C. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 213–39.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, C. A., Eigsti, I. M. and Fein, D. A. (2016). Uh, Um, and autism: Filler disfluencies as pragmatic markers in adolescents with optimal outcomes from autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(3), 1061–70.Google Scholar
Jautz, S. (2008). Gratitude in British and New Zealand radio programmes: Nothing but gushing? In Schneider, K. P. and Barron, A., eds., Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 141–78.Google Scholar
Kallen, J. L. and Kirk, J. M. (2008). ICE-Ireland: A User’s Guide. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Kallen, J. L. and Kirk, J. M. (2012). SPICE-Ireland: A User’s Guide. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247–79.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1998). An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kita, S., van Gijn, I. and van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. and Fröhlich, M., eds., Gesture and Sign Language in Human–Computer Interaction: International Gesture Workshop Bielefeld, Germany, September 17–19, 1997 Proceedings, pp. 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986Google Scholar
Knight, D. (2011). Multimodality and Active Listenership: A Corpus Approach. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kohnen, T. (2015). Speech acts: A diachronic perspective. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, pp. 52–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2017). Expressive speech acts in educational e-chats. Soprag, 5(2), 151–78.Google Scholar
Martín-Laguna, S. and Alcón-Soler, E. (2018). Development of discourse-pragmatic markers in a multilingual classroom: A mixed method research approach. System, 75, 68–80.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestre-Mestre, E. M. (2016). Healing and comfort on the net: Gender and emotions in violent domestic environments. In Romero-Trillo, J., ed., Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Society and Education in the Networked Age. Cham, Switzerland: Spinger, pp. 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. and Adolphs, S. (2008). Response tokens in British and Irish discourse: Corpus, context and variational pragmatics. In Schneider, K. P. and Barron, A., eds., Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–98.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. D. (ed.). (2013). Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: New Domains and Methodologies. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.). (2014). Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.). (2015). Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.). (2016). Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: Global Implications for Society and Education in the Networked Age. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2018a). Corpus pragmatics and second language pragmatics: A mutualistic entente in theory and practice. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 113–27.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2018b). Prosodic modeling and position analysis of pragmatic markers in English conversation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(1), 169–95.Google Scholar
Ronan, P. (2015). Categorizing expressive speech acts in the pragmatically annotated SPICE Ireland corpus. ICAME Journal, 39(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C. and Aijmer, K. (2015). Introduction: Corpus pragmatics: Laying the foundations. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C. and Clancy, B. (2018). Corpus linguistics and pragmatics. In Ilie, C. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 241–66.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C. and O’Donnell, M. B. (2015). Deixis. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 331–59.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. P. and Barron, A. (eds.). (2008). Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1971). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts 1. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sloetjes, H. and Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category-ELAN and ISO DCR. In The Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), pp. 816–20.Google Scholar
Stubbe, M. and Holmes, J. (1995). You know, eh and other “exasperating expressions”: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English. Language and Communication, 15(1), 63–88.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. A. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tottie, G. (2011). Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(1), 173–97.Google Scholar
Tottie, G. (2015). Turn management and the fillers uh and um. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C., eds., Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–407.Google Scholar
Tree, J. E. F. and Schrock, J. C. (2002). Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 727–47.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, K. (2013). Listenership Behaviours in Intercultural Encounters: A Time-Aligned Multimodal Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weisser, M. (2016). DART – The dialogue annotation and research tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12(2), 355–88.Google Scholar
Werner, V. (2017). Adversative pragmatic markers in learner language: A cross-sectional perspective. Corpus Pragmatics, 1(2), 135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A. and Sloetjes, H. (2006). Elan: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Google Scholar
Woods, H. B. (1991). Social differentiation in Ottawa English. In Cheshire, J., ed., English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×