Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:36:13.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Interviewing Suspects in Criminal Investigations

Decisions and Their Consequences

from Part II - Pretrial Phase Decision-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2024

By
Mark D. Snow  and
Joseph Eastwood
Edited by
Monica K. Miller ,
Logan A. Yelderman ,
Matthew T. Huss  and
Jason A. Cantone
Monica K. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Logan A. Yelderman
Affiliation:
Prairie View A & M University, Texas
Matthew T. Huss
Affiliation:
Creighton University, Omaha
Jason A. Cantone
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Investigative interviews with suspects are complex interpersonal interactions that are focused on eliciting statement evidence to use within subsequent investigative and judicial processes. When conducting an investigative interview, criminal investigators face a series of decision points – involving potentially competing alternatives – which collectively determine how the interview will unfold. These decisions are also made under real-world constraints of limited time and knowledge. Interviewer decision-making, therefore, is both psychologically complex and practically consequential. In the present chapter we examine the role of interviewer decision-making across five dimensions of investigative interviewing: Why (is an interview conducted?), Who (will participate?), When and Where (will the interview occur?), and What (techniques will be used?). We use this structure to outline the current state of the literature on suspect interviewing best practices and how each decision point raises factual and ethical considerations for interviewers, interviewees, and the criminal justice system more broadly. We conclude by discussing potential future directions for research that can continue to inform effective decision-making in this area.

Keywords

investigative interviewinginterrogationsuspect interviewpolice decision-makinginformation-gathering
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making , pp. 225 - 239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbe, A., & Brandon, S. E. (2013). The role of rapport in investigative interviewing: A review. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1386.Google Scholar
Abbe, A., & Brandon, S. E. (2014). Building and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews. Police Practice & Research: An International Journal, 15(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.827835.Google Scholar
Akca, D., & Eastwood, J. (2021). The impact of individual differences on investigative interviewing performance: A test of the police interviewing competencies inventory and the five factor model. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1644177.Google Scholar
Akca, D., Larivière, C. D., & Eastwood, J. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of investigative interviewing training courses: A systematic review. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 23(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557211008470.Google Scholar
Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., & Christiansen, P. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(4), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034564.Google Scholar
Alison, L., Alison, E., Noone, G., et al. (2014). The efficacy of rapport-based techniques for minimizing counter-interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(4), 421–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000021.Google Scholar
Blagrove, M. (1996). Effects of length of sleep deprivation on interrogative suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.2.1.48.Google Scholar
Brimbal, L., Kleinman, S. M., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Meissner, C. A. (2019). Developing rapport and trust in the interrogative context: An empirically-supported and ethical alternative to customary interrogation practices. In Barela, S. J., Fallon, M. J., Gaggioli, G., & Ohlin, J. D. (Eds.), Interrogation and Torture: Integrating Efficacy with Law and Morality (pp. 141–196). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, R. (2014). When in interviews to disclose information to suspects and to challenge them? In Bull, R. (Ed.), Investigative Interviewing (pp. 167–181). Springer,.Google Scholar
Bull, R. (2019). Roar or “PEACE”: Is it a “tall story?” In Bull, R. & Blandón-Gitlin, I. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of legal and investigative psychology (pp. 20–36). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cabell, J. J., Moody, S. A., & Yang, Y. (2020). Evaluating effects on guilty and innocent suspects: An effect taxonomy of interrogation techniques. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000224.Google Scholar
Centrex. (2004). Practical guide to investigative interviewing. London, UK: Central Police Training and Development Authority.Google Scholar
Cleary, H. M. D., & Warner, T. C. (2016). Police training in interviewing and interrogation methods: A comparison of techniques used with adult and juvenile suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000175.Google Scholar
Crough, Q., Dion Larivière, C., Snow, M. D., & Eastwood, J. (2022a). Reflections on the nature of rapport within suspect interviews. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 34(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2021.2018814.Google Scholar
Crough, Q., Snow, M. D., Connors, C. J., Akca, D., & Eastwood, J. (2022b). The influence of interviewer behaviour on external perceptions of complainant credibility. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 12(1), 9–21.Google Scholar
Dando, C. J., & Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police officers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.145.Google Scholar
Dawson, E., Hartwig, M., Brimbal, L., & Denisenkov, P. (2017). A room with a view: Setting influences information disclosure in investigative interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness’s memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139.Google Scholar
de Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., Konings, F. E., & Schouten, B. (2013). The Communication Styles Inventory (CSI): A six-dimensional behavioral model of communication styles and its relation with personality. Communication Research, 40(4), 506–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211413571.Google Scholar
Dianiska, R. E., Swanner, J. K., Brimbal, L., & Meissner, C. A. (2019). Conceptual priming and context reinstatement: A test of direct and indirect interview techniques. Law and Human Behavior, 43(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000323.Google Scholar
Eastwood, J., & Watkins, K. (2021). Psychological persuasion in suspect interviews: Reid, PEACE, and pathways forward. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 11, 54–63.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover (original work published in 1885).Google Scholar
Frenda, S. J., Berkowitz, S. R., Loftus, E. F., & Fenn, K. M. (2016). Sleep deprivation and false confessions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(8), 2047–2050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521518113.Google Scholar
Frenda, S. J., & Fenn, K. M. (2016). Sleep less, think worse: The effect of sleep deprivation on working memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.10.001.Google Scholar
Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Luther, K., et al. (2021). Exploring the use of rapport in professional information‐gathering contexts by systematically mapping the evidence base. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3762.Google Scholar
Guarana, C. L., Ryu, J. W., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Lee, J., & Barnes, C. M. (2021). Sleep and self-control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 59, 101514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101514.Google Scholar
Harrison, Y., & Horne, J. A. (2000). The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: A review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.6.3.236.Google Scholar
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Luke, T. (2014). Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. In Raskin, D. C., Honts, C. R, & Kircher, J. C (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications (pp. 1–36). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394433-7.00001-4.Google Scholar
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-5521-x.Google Scholar
Hill, C., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2008). The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X238682.Google Scholar
Hoogesteyn, K., Meijer, E., & Vrij, A. (2019). The influence of room spaciousness on investigative interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12156.Google Scholar
Hoogesteyn, K., Meijer, E. H., & Vrij, A. (2020). Detainee and layperson’s expectations and preferences regarding police interview rooms. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0241683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241683.Google Scholar
Horgan, A. J., Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. R. (2012). Minimization and maximization techniques: Assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801.Google Scholar
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M. (2017). False confessions: How can psychology so basic be so counterintuitive? American Psychologist, 72(9), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000195.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., et al. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022599230598.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061711.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. (2013). The art of reasoning: An introduction to logic and critical thinking (4th ed.). WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. E., Abdel‐Salam, S., Miller, J. C., & Redlich, A. D. (2015). Social identity and the perception of effective interrogation methods. Investigative Interviewing Research and Practice, 2, 24–41.Google Scholar
Krizan, Z., Miller, A. J., & Meissner, C. A. (2021). Sleep and interrogation: Does losing sleep impact criminal history disclosure? Sleep, 44(10), zsab124. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsab124.Google Scholar
Leins, D. A., & Zimmerman, L. A. (2019). Navigating the interview: Judgment and decision making in investigative interviewing. In Dickinson, J. J., Compo, N. Schreiber, Carol, R. N., Schwartz, B. L., & McCauley, M. R. (Eds.), Evidence-based investigative interviewing: Applying cognitive principles (pp. 156–176). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160276-9.Google Scholar
Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leo, R. A. (2020). Structural police deception in American police interrogation: A closer look at minimization and maximization. In Eidmann, L., Lindemann, M., & Ransiek, A. (Eds.), Interrogation Confession and Truth: Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure (pp. 183–207). Nomos Press.Google Scholar
Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, T. J., & Alceste, F. (2020). The mechanisms of minimization: How interrogation tactics suggest lenient sentencing through pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 44(4), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000410.Google Scholar
Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2004). “You’re guilty, so just confess!” Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In Lassiter, G. D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 85–106). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_4.Google Scholar
Meissner, C. A., Kelly, C. E., & Woestehoff, S. A. (2015). Improving the effectiveness of suspect interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657.Google Scholar
Meissner, C. A., Kleinman, S. M., Mindthoff, A., Phillips, E. P., & Rothweiler, J. N. (2023). Investigative interviewing: A review of the literature and a model of science-based practice. In DeMatteo, D. & Scherr, K. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychology and law (pp. 582–C34P175). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.34.Google Scholar
Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., et al. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6.Google Scholar
Melinder, A., Brennen, T., Husby, M. F., & Vassend, O. (2020). Personality, confirmation bias, and forensic interviewing performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(5), 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, B., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley.Google Scholar
Narchet, F. M., Meissner, C. A., & Russano, M. B. (2011). Modeling the influence of investigator bias on the elicitation of true and false confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 35(6), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9257-x.Google Scholar
Oleszkiewicz, S., & Watson, S. J. (2021). A meta‐analytic review of the timing for disclosing evidence when interviewing suspects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 342–359.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M., & Jones, D. (2018). Evidence based police training: The bedrock of effective criminal investigation? In Griffiths, A. & Milne, R. (Eds.), The psychology of criminal investigation: From theory to practice (pp. 249–267). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637211.Google Scholar
Read, J. D., & Connolly, D. A. (2007). The effects of delay on long-term memory for witnessed events. In Toglia, M. P., Read, J. D., Ross, D. F., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. 1: Memory for events (pp. 117–155). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103(4), 734–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.734.Google Scholar
Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x.Google Scholar
Shepherd, E. & Griffiths, A. (2021). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snook, B., & Cullen, R. M. (2009). Bounded rationality and criminal investigations: Has tunnel vision been wrongfully convicted? In Rossmo, D. K. (Ed.), Criminal investigative failures (pp. 95–122). CRC Press.Google Scholar
Snook, B., Eastwood, J., & Barron, W. T. (2014). The next stage in the evolution of interrogations: The PEACE model. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 18(2), 219.Google Scholar
Snook, B., Eastwood, J., Stinson, M., Tedeschini, J., & House, J. C. (2010). Reforming investigative interviewing in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.52.2.215.Google Scholar
Swanner, J. K., Meissner, C. A., Atkinson, D. J., & Dianiska, R. E. (2016). Developing diagnostic, evidence-based approaches to interrogation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallano, J. P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000035.Google Scholar
Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). An empirical test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9014-3.Google Scholar
Vrij, A., Meissner, C. A., Fisher, R. P., et al. (2017). Psychological perspectives on interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 927–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706515.Google Scholar
Walsh, D., & Marques, P. B. (2022). Is confession really necessary? The use of effective interviewing techniques to maximize disclosure from suspects. In Marques, P. B. & Paulino, M. (Eds.), Police psychology (pp. 357–380). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816544-7.00017-6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×