Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:04:40.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

43 - Decision-Making in Civil Matters

The Role of Substituted Judgment

from Part V - Other Legal Decision-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2024

By
Julie A. Nason  and
Eric Y. Drogin
Edited by
Monica K. Miller ,
Logan A. Yelderman ,
Matthew T. Huss  and
Jason A. Cantone
Monica K. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Logan A. Yelderman
Affiliation:
Prairie View A & M University, Texas
Matthew T. Huss
Affiliation:
Creighton University, Omaha
Jason A. Cantone
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

The law presumes that all persons are capable of guiding their own day-to-day lives, but the presence of various types and degrees of mental disability or mental incapacity can call this capability into question. When competency is convincingly demonstrated to be impaired, to the extent that decision-making requires input, persistent guidance, or outright control by some external entity, the civil courts might elect at that juncture to impose some form of “substituted judgment.” Substituted judgment undertakes to address three broad and potentially overlapping decision-making domains, described here with brief accompanying examples: prior judgment (regarding wills and other advance directives), present judgment (regarding informed consent and the corresponding right to refuse treatment), and future judgment (regarding guardianship and conservatorship). This chapter will explore each of these domains in detail, identifying the contributions mental health professionals can make to reliable and valid forensic assessment in this regard.

Keywords

substituted judgmentdecision-makingcapacityguardianshipconservatorshipwillsadvance directivesinformed consentright to refuse treatmentassessment
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making , pp. 664 - 674
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altimus., C. M. , Marlin, B. J., Charalambakis, N. E., et al. (2020). The next 50 years of neuroscience. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0744-19.2019.Google Scholar
Antusch, S., Custers, R., Marien, H., & Aarts, H. (2021). Intentional action and limitation of personal autonomy: Do restrictions of action selection decrease the sense of agency? Consciousness and Cognition, 88, 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103076.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 319(25), 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198812223192504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avila, A., & Leeper, E. (2022). Assessment of barriers to effective use of psychiatric advance directives: Providers’ knowledge and attitudes. Psychological Services, 19(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000525.Google Scholar
Baisch, S., Abele, C., Theile-Schurholz, A., et al. (2022). Project DECIDE, part 1: Increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning – a prospective double‑arm intervention study. BMC Medical Ethics, 23, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00854-0.Google Scholar
Bazzano, L. A.., Durant, J., & Brantley, P. R. (2021). A modern history of informed consent and the role of key information. Ochsner Journal, 21(5), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0105.Google Scholar
Bester, J., Cole, C. M., & Kodish, E. (2016). The limits of informed consent for an overwhelmed patient: Clinicians’ role in protecting patients and preventing overwhelm. AMA Journal of Ethics, 18(9), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.peer2-1609.Google Scholar
Bitenc, U. M. , Grad, O. T. , & De Leo, D. (2020). Understanding suicide from survivors’ perspective – psychological autopsy outcomes: The model of a hot air balloon. In De Leo, D & Poštuvan, V (Eds.), Reducing the toll of suicide: Resources for communities, groups, and individuals (pp. 185–201). Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Borecka-Biernat, D. (2018). The role of emotional reactions and retrospective assessment of parental attitudes in controlling destructive strategies for coping with a social conflict situation by junior high school students. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 6(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.75709Google Scholar
Bush, S. S., & Heck, A. L. (2018). Psychology’s role in guardianship and conservatorship evaluations. In Dudley, K. C. & Edmonds, N. (Eds.), Forensic geropsychology: Practice essentials (pp. 257–279). American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. J. (2009). Campbell’s psychiatric dictionary (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canterbury v. Spence, 150 US App. D.C. 263, 464 F.2d 772 (1972).Google Scholar
Chase, R. H. (1918). To make a valid will. In Chase, R. H., The ungeared mind (pp. 135–147). F. A. Davis. https://doi.org/10.1037/14447-007.Google Scholar
Chipidza, F. E., Wallwork, R. S., & Stern, T. A. (2015). Impact of the doctor–patient relationship. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 17(5), e10.4088/PCC.15f01840. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15f01840.Google Scholar
Convie, L. J., Carson, E., McCuster, D., et al. (2020). The patient and clinician experience of informed consent for surgery: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMC Medical Ethics, 21, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00501-6.Google Scholar
Dayton, A. K. (2012). Standards for health care decision-making: Legal and practical considerations. Utah Law Review, 2002(3), 1329–1444.Google Scholar
Drogin, E. Y., & Barrett, C. L. (2013). Civil competencies. In Otto, R. K. & Weiner, I. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (pp. 295–307). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Drogin, E. Y., & Dattilio, F. M. (2015). Forensic psychiatry and psychology: Fraternal twins of courtroom science. In Sadoff, R. L. (Ed.), The evolution of forensic psychiatry: History, current developments, future directions (pp. 205–211). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199393435.003.0019.Google Scholar
Elzakkers, I. F. F. M., Danner, U. N., Grisso, T., Hoek, H. W., & van Elburg, A. A. (2018). Assessment of mental capacity to consent to treatment in anorexia nervosa: A comparison of clinical judgment and MacCAT-T and consequences for clinical practice. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 58, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.001.Google Scholar
Fleischner, R. D. (2021). Adult guardianship, conservatorship, substituted judgement, and alternatives. In Legal Rights of Individuals with Disabilities (3rd ed.) (pp. 1–18). MCLE New England, Inc.Google Scholar
Foubister, N., & Connell, M. (2011). Competency to consent to treatment. In Drogin, E. Y., Dattilo, F. M., Sadoff, R. L., & Gutheil, T. G. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic assessment: psychological and psychiatric perspectives (pp. 503–519). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, B. A. (2019). Black’s law dictionary (11th ed.). Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
Gerstenecker, A., Martin, R. C., Hebert, K., Triebel, K., & Marson, D. C. (2022). Cognitive correlates of impaired testamentary capacity in Alzheimer’s dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(6), 1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac034.Google Scholar
Gold, L. H. (2002). Psychiatric diagnoses and the retrospective assessment of mental states. In Simon, R. I. & Shuman, D. W. (Eds.), Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past (pp. 335–367). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Grisso, T. (2006). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). Springer.Google Scholar
Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. K. B., Phelan, C. H., Chin, N. A., et al. (2020). The U-ARE protocol: A pragmatic approach to decisional capacity assessment for clinical research. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 73(2), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190457.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. (1978). The Roman law of guardianship in England, 1300–1600. Tulane Law Review, 52(2), 223–257.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A. J. (2017). Testation and the mind. Washington and Lee Law Review, 74(1), 285–267.Google Scholar
Karel, M. J., Gurrera, R. J., Hicken, B., & Moye, J. (2010). Reasoning in the capacity to make medical decisions: The consideration of values. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(1), 58–71.Google Scholar
Kilbride, M. K., & Joffe, S. (2018). The new age of patient autonomy: Implications for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 320(19), 1973–1974. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14382.Google Scholar
Kiriaev, O., Chacko, E., Jurgens, J. D., et al. (2018). Should capacity assessments be performed routinely prior to discussing advance care planning with older people? International Psychogeriatrics, 30(8), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217002836Google Scholar
Knoll, J. L. IV. (2009). The psychological autopsy, part 2: Toward a standardized protocol. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 15(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000344920.36157.95.Google Scholar
Lai, J. M., Gill, T. M., Cooney, L. M., et al. (2008). Everyday decision-making ability in older persons with cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16(8), 693–696. https://doi.org/10.1097/jgp.0b013e31816c7b54.Google Scholar
Leenaars, A. A., Dieserud, G., Wenckstern, S., et al. (2018). A multidimensional theory of suicide: A psychological autopsy corroborative study. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 39(6), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000508.Google Scholar
McSwiggan, S., Meares, S., & Porter, M. (2016). Decision-making capacity evaluation in adult guardianship: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(3), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610215001490.Google Scholar
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., et al. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Azar, A. R., & Gurrera, R. J. (2004). Capacity to consent to treatment: Empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. The Gerontologist, 44(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.2.166.Google Scholar
Moye, J., & Naik, A. D. (2011). Preserving rights for individuals facing guardianship. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 305(9), 936–937, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.247.Google Scholar
Nijhawan, L., Janodia, M., Muddukrishna, B., et al. (2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research, 4(3), 134–140.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. J. (2015). Psychiatric advance directives. In Corrigan, P. W. (Ed.), Person-centered care for mental illness: The evolution of adherence and self-determination (pp. 103–116). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14644-006.Google Scholar
Pereira, F. S., Yassuda, M. S., Oliveria, A. M., & Forlenza, O. V. (2008). Executive dysfunction correlates with impaired functional status in older adults with varying degrees of cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 20(6), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610208007631.Google Scholar
Phillips, J., & Wendler, D. (2015). Clarifying substituted judgment: The endorsed life approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(9), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101852.Google Scholar
Rabinovici, G. D., Stephens, M. L., & Possin, K. L. (2015). Executive dysfunction. Continuum, 21(3), 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000466658.05156.54.Google Scholar
Ramos, G., Ponting, C., Labao, J. P., & Sobowale, K. (2021). Considerations of diversity, equity, and inclusion in mental health apps: A scoping review of evaluation frameworks. Behavior Research and Therapy, 147, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.103990.Google Scholar
Read, S. L., & Spar, J. E. (2018). Capacity, informed consent, and guardianship. In Holzer, J. C., Kohn, R., Ellison, J. M., & Recupero, P. R. (Eds.), Geriatric forensic psychiatry: Principles and practice (pp. 75–81). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 154 Cal. App. 2d 560; 317 P.2d 170 (1957).Google Scholar
Selinger, P. (2009). The right to consent: Is it absolute? British Journal of Medical Practitioners (BJMP), 2(2), 50–54.Google Scholar
Shuman, D. W. (2002). Retrospective assessment of mental states and the law. In Simon, R. I. & Shuman, D. W. (Eds.), Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past (pp. 21–45). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Tinland, A., Loubière, S., Mougeot, F., et al. (2022). Effect of psychiatric advance directives facilitated by peer workers on compulsory admission among people with mental illness: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 79(8), 752–759. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1627.Google Scholar
Torke, A. M., Alexander, G. C., & Lantos, J. (2008). Substituted judgment: The limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision-making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(9), 1514–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0688-8.Google Scholar
Tseng, W. S., Matthews, D., & Elwyn, T. S. (2004). Cultural competence in forensic mental health: A guide for psychiatrists, psychologists and attorneys. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ubel, P. A., Scherr, K. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2018). Autonomy: What’s shared decision making got to do with it? American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), W11–W12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409844.Google Scholar
Uniform Law Commission. (n.d.). Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act. https://tinyurl.com/laws-UAGPPJA.Google Scholar
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Williamson, B. (2019). Brain data: Scanning, scraping and sculpting the plastic learning brain through neurotechnology. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0008-5.Google Scholar
Zietlow, K., Dubin, L., Battles, A., & Vitale, C. (2022) Guardianship: A medicolegal review for clinicians. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70, 3070–3079. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17797.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×