Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- 21 Surrogate Motherhood and Transforming Families
- 22 Kinship and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Middle Eastern Comparison
- 23 A Comparison of Kinship Understandings among Israeli and US Surrogates
- 24 Self, Personhood, and Belonging: The Role of Technology in Childhood Disability
- 25 Paid and Unpaid Labor: Pregnancy and Surrogacy in Anthropological Studies of Reproduction
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
24 - Self, Personhood, and Belonging: The Role of Technology in Childhood Disability
from Part V - Technological Conceptions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- 21 Surrogate Motherhood and Transforming Families
- 22 Kinship and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Middle Eastern Comparison
- 23 A Comparison of Kinship Understandings among Israeli and US Surrogates
- 24 Self, Personhood, and Belonging: The Role of Technology in Childhood Disability
- 25 Paid and Unpaid Labor: Pregnancy and Surrogacy in Anthropological Studies of Reproduction
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 552 - 579Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ashley’s Mom and Dad. 2007, updated 2012. “The Ashley Treatment, Towards a Better Quality of Life for Pillow Angels.” www.pillowangel.org, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Battles, Heather and Manderson, Lenore. 2008. “The Ashley Treatment: Furthering the Anthropology of/on Disability.” Medical Anthropology 27(3): 219–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchbinder, Mara and Timmermans, Stefan. 2011. “Medical Technologies and the Dream of the Perfect Newborn.” Medical Anthropology 30(1): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burne, Brian and Breaux, Becky. May 2013. “Power Wheelchairs: Young Children.” EP Magazine, 32–34.Google Scholar
Calculator, Stephen and Black, Tibbany. 2009. “Validation of an Inventory of Best Practices in the Provision of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Services to Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education Classrooms.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 18: 329–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvorsky, G. 2006. “Helping Families Care for the Helpless.” http://sentientdevelopments.blogspot.com/2006/11helping-families-care-for-helpless_06.html, accessed June 26, 2007.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2008. “Childhood Disability and Parental Moral Responsibility in Northern Vietnam: Towards Ethnographies of Intercorporeality.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14(4): 826–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, N. January 2007. “Pillow Angel Ethics.” Time Magazine Online. http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1574851,00.html, accessed April 4, 2007.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Barbara. 2006. “Disability, Connectivity and Transgressing the Autonomous Body.” Journal of Medical Humanities 27: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Barbara, Carnevale, Franco and King, Gillian. 2012. “This Is My Way: Reimagining Disability, In/dependence and Interconnectedness of Persons and Assistive Technologies.” Disability and Rehabilitation 34(2): 1894–1899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, Barbara and Teachman, Gail. 2012. “Critical Approaches in Physical Therapy Research: Investigating the Symbolic Value of Walking.” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 28(6): 474–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, B. P., Teachman, G, Wright, V, Fehlings, D, Young, N. I and McKeever, P. 2011. “Children’s and Parent’s Beliefs Regarding the Value of Walking: Rehabilitation Implications for Children with Cerebral Palsy.” Child Care, Health and Development 38(1): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimp Parade. 2007. The Ransom Notes Campaign. http://thegimpparade.blogspot.com/2007/12/ransom-notes-campaign.html, accessed December 24, 2007.Google Scholar
Gunther, D. F. and Diekema, D. S. 2006. “Attenuating Growth in Children with Profound Developmental Disability: A New Approach to an Old Dilemma.” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 160(10): 1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfon, Neal, Houtrow, Amy, Larson, Kandyce and Newacheck, Paul. 2012. “The Changing Landscape of Disability in Childhood.” The Future of Children 22(1): 13–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockenberry, John. 2007. “Ashley X: Straight on til Mourning.” Posted on The Gimp Parade, February 23, 2007. http://thegimpparade.blogspot.com/2007/02/Saturday-slumgullion-29.html, accessed June 29, 2007.Google Scholar
Ivry, Tsipy. 2009. “The Ultrasonic Picture Show and the Politics of Threatened Life.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 23(3): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivry, Tsipy, Teman, Elly and Frumkin, Ayala. 2011. “God-sent Ordeals and Their Discontents: Ultra-orthodox Jewish Women Negotiate Prenatal Testing.” Social Science & Medicine 72: 1527–1533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasnitz, Devva and Block, Pamela. 2012. “Participation, Time, Effort, and Speech Disability Justice.” In Politics of Occupation-Centered Practice: Reflections on Occupational Engagement across Cultures, ed. Pollard, Nick and Sakellariou, Dikaios, 197–216. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent-Walsh, Jennifer and McNaughton, David. 2005. “Communication Partner Instruction on AAC: Present Practices and Future Directions.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 21(3): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Amie and Fahsl, Allison. 2012. “Supporting Social Competence in Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Teaching Exceptional Children 45(1): 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsman, Gail. 2003. “Emplotting Children’s Lives: Developmental Delay vs Disability.” Social Science & Medicine 56: 1947–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landsman, Gail. 2009. Reconstructing Motherhood and Disability in the Age of Perfect Babies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mankoff, Jennifer, Hayes, Gillian and Kasnitz, Devva. 2010. “Disability Studies As a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology.” Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2010: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, Mark. 2011. “They’re the Ultimate Teammates.” Albany Times Union. www.timesunion.com/sports/article/They-re-the-ultimate-teammates-1412561.php, accessed June 9, 2011.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Janice. 2014. “Digital Imagery and Child Embodiment in Paediatric Genetics: Sources and Relationships of Meaning.” Sociology 48(2): 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLauglin, Janice and Clavering, Emma. 2012. “Visualising Difference, Similarity and Belonging in Paediatric Genetics.” Sociology of Health Illness 34(3): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, David, Rackensperger, Tracy, Wood, Elizabeth Bender, Carole Krezman, Michael Williams and Janice, Light. 2008. “‘A Child Needs to Be Given a Chance to Succeed’: Parents of Individuals Who Use AAC Describe the Benefits and Challenges of Learning AAC Technologies.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, Hilary, Sutherland, Dean and McAuliffe, Megan. 2011. “The Effect of Pause Time upon the Communicative Interactions of Young People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 13(5): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, Mansha, Magasi, Susan and Hammel, Joy. 2016. “Soul Searching Occupations: Critical Reflections on Occupational Therapy’s Commitment to Social Justice, Disability Rights, and Participation.” In Occupying Disability: Critical Approaches to Community, Justice, and Decolonizing Disability, ed. Block, Pamela, Kasnitz, Devva, Nishida, Akemi and Pollard, Nick, 159–174. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Kevin. 2012. “It’s About Time! Understanding the Experience of Speech Impairment.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, ed. Watson, Nick, Roulstone, Alan and Thomas, Carol, 165–177. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phelan, Sharon, Wright, Virginia and Gibson, Barbara. 2014. “Representations of Disability and Normality in Rehabilitation Technology Promotional Materials.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36(24): 2072–2079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilkington, Ed. 15 Mar. 2012. “The Ashley Treatment: ‘Her Life Is As Good As We Can Possibly Make It.’” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/society/2012/mar/15/ashley-treatment-email-exchange, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna and Ginsburg, Faye. 2011. “Reverberations: Disability and the New Kinship Imaginary.” Anthropological Quarterly 86(2): 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State of Connecticut. 2009. “Governor Rell Signs Bill Limiting Obstetric Ultrasounds to Medically Necessary Procedures,” June 24. www.ct.gov/governorrell/cwp/view.asp?A=3675&Q=442298&pp=12&n=1, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan and Buchbinder, Mara. 2010. “Patients-in Waiting: Living between Sickness and Health in the Genomics Era.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(4): 408–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TVNZ. 2014. “Charley Girl.” http://tvnz.co.nz/sunday-news/charley-girl-video-5974811, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. 2011. “Maribel’s Story: How Eating Queso Fresco Harmed Her Unborn Baby.” www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/PeopleAtRisk/ucm106727.htm, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. 2014. “Avoid Fetal Keepsake Images,” Heartbeat Monitors. www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm095508.htm, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Ian, Davis, Arlene, Skinner, Debra and Bailey, Donald, Jr. 2007. “A Place for Genetic Uncertainty: Parents Valuing an Unknown in the Meaning of Disease.” Social Science & Medicine 65: 1082–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiart, L. and Darrah, J. 2002. “Changing Philosophical Perspectives on the Management of Children with Physical Disabilities: Their Effect on the Use of Powered Mobility.” Disability and Rehabilitation 24(9): 492–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiart, Lesley, Darrah, Johanna, Hollis, Vivien, Cook, Al and May, Laura. 2004. “Mothers’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Use of Powered Mobility.” Physical Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 24(4): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilford, Benjamin, Steven Miller, Paul, Korfiatis, Carolyn, Diekema, Douglas, Dudzinski, Denise, Goering, Sara, and the Seattle Growth Attenuation and Ethics Working Group. 2010. “Navigating Growth Attenuation in Children with Profound Disabilities: Children’s Interests, Family Decision-Making, and Community Concerns.” Hastings Center Report 40(6): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, Paul. 2012. “Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Disability.” The Future of Children 22(1): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed