Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- 1 Feedback
- 2 Becoming Proficient
- 3 Summative and Formative Feedback
- 4 Toward a Taxonomy of Written Feedback Messages
- 5 Methods in Feedback Research
- Part II Domain-Specific Feedback
- Part III Contexts and Sources of Feedback
- Part IV Student Responses to Feedback
- Part V Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
4 - Toward a Taxonomy of Written Feedback Messages
from Part I - Theoretical Foundations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- 1 Feedback
- 2 Becoming Proficient
- 3 Summative and Formative Feedback
- 4 Toward a Taxonomy of Written Feedback Messages
- 5 Methods in Feedback Research
- Part II Domain-Specific Feedback
- Part III Contexts and Sources of Feedback
- Part IV Student Responses to Feedback
- Part V Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback , pp. 79 - 96Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bevan, R., Badge, J., Cann, A., Wilmott, C., & Scott, J. (2008). Seeing eye-to-eye? Staff and student views on feedback. Bioscience Education, 12, 1–15.Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of writing corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Learning, 17, 102–118.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
Brown, E., & Glover, C. (2005, September). Refocusing written feedback. Paper presented at the 13th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, T. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 105–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Hyatt, D. F. (2005). “Yes, a very good point!”: A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 339–353.Google Scholar
Ivanic, R., Clark, R., & Rimmershaw, R. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 47–65). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2008). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 32–46). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In Brown, G. T. L. & Harris, L. R. (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murray, J. (2018). The consistency and effectiveness of written feedback provided by markers in tertiary education. Doctor of Education thesis, University of Otago.Google Scholar
Mutch, A. (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 24–38.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.Google Scholar
Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 125–136.Google Scholar
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277–289.Google Scholar
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, R. D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.Google Scholar
Smith, J. K. (2005). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement, 22(4), 26–33.Google Scholar
Spinks, S. (1998). Relating marker feedback to teaching and learning in psychology. In Candlin, C. & Plum, G. (Eds.), Researching academic literacies (pp. 148–203). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Stern, L. A., & Solomon, A. (2006). Effective faculty feedback: The road less travelled. Assessing Writing, 11, 22–41.Google Scholar
Sutton, P. (2009). Towards dialogic feedback. Critical and Reflective Practice in Education, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
Tuck, J. (2012). Feedback-giving as social practice: Teachers’ perspectives on feedback as institutional requirement, work and dialogue. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 209–221.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by