Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1987, April). The impact of peekability on feedback effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 5–25.Google Scholar

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 188–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A. F., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shiffrin, R. M. (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Black, H. (1986). Assessment for learning. In Nuttall, D. L. (Ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In Gardner, J. (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blodgett, H. C. (1929). The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4(8), 113–134.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 289–328.Google Scholar

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Braun, K. F. (1909). Electrical oscillations and wireless telegraphy. In Alfred Nobel Memorial Foundation (Ed.), Nobel prize lectures (pp. 226–245). Stockholm: Alfred Nobel Memorial Foundation.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N. (1991). Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–76.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N. (1992). Using tests to promote learning: A neglected classroom resource. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 213–217.Google Scholar

Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth.Google Scholar

Education Endowment Foundation. (2015). Teaching and learning toolkit. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit/toolkit-a-z/.Google Scholar

Elshout-Mohr, M. (1994). Feedback in self-instruction. European Education, 26(2), 58–73.Google Scholar

Gagné, R. M. (1954). Training devices and simulators: Some research issues. American Psychologist, 9(3), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar

James, M. (1992, April). Assessment for learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Jay, J. M. (1865, May 16). Improvement in machines for making the spindles of wagon-axles. US Patent No. US47769 A. US Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Jenkins, D. H. (1948). Feedback and group self-evaluation. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, W. O., & Stanley, Julian C. Jr. (1950). Partial reinforcement: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 193–234.Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.Google Scholar

Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79–97.Google Scholar

Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54, 421–431.Google Scholar

McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mittler, P. (1973). Purposes and principles of assessment. In Mittler, P. (Ed.), Assessment for learning in the mentally handicapped (pp. 1–16). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar

Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155–175.Google Scholar

Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis. Master’s thesis, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 85–102.Google Scholar

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

Roseborough, M. E. (1953). Experimental studies of small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 275–303.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (2nd edn., pp. 215–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 369–393.Google Scholar

Schimmel, B. J. (1983, April). A meta-analysis of feedback to learners in computerized and programmed instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, L. A. (2008). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. In Dwyer, C. A. (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 279–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5–11.Google Scholar

Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 176–199.Google Scholar

Stenhouse, L. (1980). Product or process? A reply to Brian Crittenden. New Education, 2, 137–140.Google Scholar

Sutton, R. (1995). Assessment for learning. Salford, UK: RS Publications.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1913). The psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Washburne, J. N. (1935). An electro-chemical theory of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 99–122.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (1992). Special needs and the distribution of attainment in the national curriculum. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 397–403.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011a). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2011b). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2013). Feedback and instructional correctives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (2nd edn., pp. 197–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2016a). La evaluación formative del desempeño de la enseñanza. In Niebla, G. G., Irigoyen, M. T. M., Castaño, F. E. R., Pérez, H. S., & Segura, F. T. (Eds.), La evaluación docente en el mundo (pp. 166–199). Mexico City: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D. (2016b). Leadership for teacher learning: Creating a culture where all teachers improve so that all learners succeed. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K-12 classrooms. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.Google Scholar

Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In Dwyer, C. A. (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. C., High, W. S., & Beem, H. P. (1954). A factor-analytic study of supervisory and group behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 89–92.Google Scholar

Yan, V. (2016). Retrieval strength vs. storage strength. Learning Scientists. Retrieved from www.learningscientists.org/blog/2016/5/10-1.Google Scholar

Yeager, D. S., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Hooper, S. Y., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Loss of institutional trust among racial and ethnic minority adolescents: A consequence of procedural injustice and a cause of life-span outcomes. Child Development, 88, 658–676.Google Scholar